Diagnostic Performance and Safety of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 Positron Emission Tomography in Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer Recurrence: Results From a Phase 3, Prospective, Multicenter Study (SPOTLIGHT).

PURPOSE: SPOTLIGHT (NCT04186845) evaluated diagnostic performance and safety of radiohybrid 18F-rhPSMA-7.3, a novel high-affinity positron emission tomography radiopharmaceutical. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with prostate cancer recurrence underwent positron emission tomography/CT 50-70 minutes after intravenous administration of 296±20% MBq 18F-rhPSMA-7.3. To assess the coprimary end points (verified detection rate and combined region-level positive predictive value), 3 blinded, independent central readers evaluated the scans. Verified detection rate is equivalent to the overall detection rate × positive predictive value. Standard of truth was established for each patient using histopathology or confirmatory imaging. Statistical thresholds (lower bounds of the confidence intervals) of 36.5% and 62.5% were prespecified for verified detection rate and combined region-level positive predictive value, respectively. Additional end points included detection rate, verified detection rate, and combined region-level positive predictive value in patients with histopathology standard of truth, and safety. RESULTS: The overall 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 detection rate among all 389 patients with an evaluable scan was 83% (majority read). Among the 366 patients (median prostate-specific antigen 1.27 ng/mL) for whom a standard of truth (histopathology [n=69]/confirmatory imaging only [n=297]) was available, verified detection rate ranged from 51% (95% CI 46.1-56.6) to 54% (95% CI 48.8-59.3), exceeding the prespecified statistical threshold. Combined region-level positive predictive value ranged from 46% (95% CI 42.0-50.3) to 60% (95% CI 55.1-65.5) across the readers, not meeting the threshold. In the subset of patients with histopathology standard of truth, the verified detection rate and combined region-level positive predictive value were both above the prespecified thresholds (majority read, 81% [95% CI 69.9-89.6] and 72% [95% CI 62.5-80.7], respectively). No significant safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 offers a clinically meaningful verified detection rate for localization of recurrent prostate cancer. Despite missing the coprimary end point of combined region-level positive predictive value, the totality of the data support the potential clinical utility of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3.

Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of TAR-200 in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Who Refused or Were Unfit for Curative-intent Therapy: A Phase 1 Study.

PURPOSE: Half of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer worldwide may not receive curative-intent therapy. Elderly or frail patients are most affected by this unmet need. TAR-200 is a novel, intravesical drug delivery system that provides sustained, local release of gemcitabine into the bladder over a 21-day dosing cycle. The phase 1 TAR-200-103 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of TAR-200 in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who either refused or were unfit for curative-intent therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had cT2-cT3bN0M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. TAR-200 was inserted for 4 consecutive 21-day cycles over 84 days. The primary end points were safety and tolerability at 84 days. Secondary end points included rates of clinical complete response and partial response as determined by cystoscopy, biopsy, and imaging; duration of response; and overall survival. RESULTS: Median age of the 35 enrolled patients was 84 years, and most were male (24/35, 68.6%). Treatment-emergent adverse events related to TAR-200 occurred in 15 patients. Two patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events leading to removal of TAR-200. At 3 months, complete response and partial response rates were 31.4% (11/35) and 8.6% (3/35), respectively, yielding an overall response rate of 40.0% (14/35; 95% CI 23.9-57.9). Median overall survival and duration of response were 27.3 months (95% CI 10.1-not estimable) and 14 months (95% CI 10.6-22.7), respectively. Progression-free rate at 12 months was 70.5%. CONCLUSIONS: TAR-200 was generally safe, well tolerated, and had beneficial preliminary efficacy in this elderly and frail cohort with limited treatment options.

A Nationwide, Population Based Analysis of Patients with Organ Confined, Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Not Receiving Curative Intent Therapy in Sweden from 1997 to 2014.

PURPOSE: While radical cystectomy remains the standard treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer, the natural history of patients unable or unwilling to receive therapy with curative intent is not well understood. The study objective was to identify these patients in a population based cohort, investigate the clinical profile and describe time to mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the Bladder Cancer Data Base Sweden, a database collected from 1997 to 2014, and identified 9,811 patients with stage T2-T4 disease. Median overall and cancer specific survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Relative risks due to prognostic factors were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of the 5,592 patients who did not receive therapy with curative intent 68% were male and 32% were female with a median age of 79 and 81 years, respectively. After 1 year patients had been hospitalized an average of 2.1 times for an average of 18.8 days. Major and minor urological surgeries were the most commonly registered procedures during these hospitalizations. Median overall survival was worse in women than in men (7 vs 8 months). Risk factors for death from bladder cancer were higher tumor stage, age greater than 80 years, later year of diagnosis and female gender. Organ confined disease (T2-T3 M0) was diagnosed in 1,352 patients (24%). These patients had a median of 2.4 hospitalizations per patient during the first 12 months after diagnosis. Half of these hospitalizations were due to cancer or genitourinary symptoms. Median overall survival in the organ confined subgroup was 11 months. Most of these patients had stage N0 disease. They had 2-month longer median overall survival but otherwise similar outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: These patients experience substantial disease specific morbidity. They are hospitalized frequently during the final year of life and primarily die of bladder cancer progression.

The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography with 18F-Fluciclovine on the Treatment of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Results from the LOCATE Trial.

PURPOSE: The prospective, multicenter LOCATE (F Fluciclovine [FACBC] PET/CT in Patients with Rising PSA after Initial Prostate Cancer Treatment) trial assessed the impact of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography with F-fluciclovine on treatment plans in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after primary therapy with curative intent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men who had undergone curative intent treatment of histologically confirmed prostate cancer but who were suspected to have recurrence based on rising prostate specific antigen levels were enrolled prospectively. Each man had negative or equivocal findings on standard of care imaging. F-fluciclovine positron emission tomography/computerized tomography was performed according to standardized protocols. Treating physicians completed a questionnaire regarding the patient treatment plan before and after scanning, recording changes to the treatment modality (eg salvage radiotherapy to systemic androgen deprivation therapy) as major and changes in a modality (eg modified radiotherapy fields) as other. RESULTS: Between June 2016 and May 2017, 213 evaluable patients with a median age of 67 years and median prostate specific antigen 1.00 ng/ml were enrolled in study. F-fluciclovine avid lesions were detected in 122 of the 213 patients (57%). Overall 126 of the 213 patients (59%) had a change in management after the scan, which were major in 98 of 126 (78%) and in 88 (70%) were informed by positive positron emission tomography/computerized tomography findings. The most frequent major changes were from salvage or noncurative systemic therapy to watchful waiting (32 of 126 cases or 25%), from noncurative systemic therapy to salvage therapy (30 of 126 or 24%) and from salvage therapy to noncurative systemic therapy (11 of 126 or 9%). CONCLUSIONS: F-fluciclovine positron emission tomography/computerized tomography detected 1 or more recurrence sites in the majority of men with biochemical recurrence, frequently resulting in major changes to management plans. Future studies will be planned to determine whether a management change leads to improved outcomes.

Multisite Experience of the Safety, Detection Rate and Diagnostic Performance of Fluciclovine (18F) Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Imaging in the Staging of Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Sensitive detection of cancer foci in men experiencing biochemical recurrence following initial treatment of prostate cancer is of great clinical significance with a possible impact on subsequent treatment choice. We describe a multisite experience of the efficacy and safety of the positron emission tomography/computerized tomography agent fluciclovine (18F) after biochemical recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 596 patients underwent fluciclovine (18F) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography at 4 clinical sites. Detection rate determinations were stratified by the baseline prostate specific antigen value. Diagnostic performance was assessed against a histological reference standard in 143 scans. RESULTS: The subject level fluciclovine (18F) positron emission tomography/computer tomography detection rate was 67.7% (403 of 595 scans). Positive findings were detected in the prostate/bed and pelvic lymph node regions in 38.7% (232 of 599) and 32.6% of scans (194 of 596), respectively. Metastatic involvement outside the pelvis was detected in 26.2% of scans (155 of 591). The subject level detection rate in patients in the lowest quartile for baseline prostate specific antigen (0.79 ng/ml or less) was 41.4% (53 of 128). Of these patients 13 had involvement in the prostate/bed only, 16 had pelvic lymph node involvement without distant disease and 24 had distant metastases. The positive predictive value of fluciclovine (18F) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography scanning for all sampled lesions was 62.2%, and it was 92.3% and 71.8% for extraprostatic and prostate/bed involvement, respectively. Fluciclovine (18F) was well tolerated and the safety profile was not altered following repeat administration. CONCLUSIONS: Fluciclovine (18F) is well tolerated and able to detect local and distant prostate cancer recurrence across a wide range of prostate specific antigen values.

18F-Flotufolastat Positron Emission Tomography in African American Patients With Suspected Prostate Cancer Recurrence: Findings From the Phase 3 SPOTLIGHT Study.

Purpose: Although African American (AA) patients are disproportionately affected by prostate cancer, they are often underrepresented in oncology clinical trials. The SPOTLIGHT study (NCT04186845) assessed the novel diagnostic positron emission tomography radiopharmaceutical, 18F-flotufolastat (18F-rhPSMA-7.3), in patients with recurrent prostate cancer. The proportion of AA patients enrolled in SPOTLIGHT (17%) was greater than typically enrolled in oncology trials (8.5%) and was representative of the US population (14%). This post hoc analysis of SPOTLIGHT evaluates the diagnostic performance of 18F-flotufolastat in AA patients. Methods and Materials: Patients underwent positron emission tomography/computed tomography 50 to 70 minutes after intravenous administration of 296 MBq 18F-flotufolastat. Three blinded readers evaluated all images, with the majority read (agreement of ≥2 readers) result reported here. Standard of truth (SoT) was established with histopathology or correlative imaging. Data from AA patients were evaluated to determine the 18F-flotufolastat overall detection rate (DR), positive predictive value (PPV), and verified DR (VDR). VDR (SoT-verified) is equivalent to DR × PPV. Results: In total, 61 of 366 (17%) patients were AAs. Although baseline characteristics were broadly similar, fewer AA patients (56%) had undergone prostatectomy than non-AA patients (82%). The patient-level DR was 93% (57/61) in AA patients, increasing from 67% at prostate-specific antigen <0.5 ng/mL to 100% at prostate-specific antigen ≥10 ng/mL. Patient-level DR was marginally lower in all other patients (87%, 264/305). However, when stratifying by prior treatment, DRs were similar across ethnic groups in postprostatectomy patients, but in patients with intact prostates, AA patients had higher prostate DR than non-AA patients. SoT-verification (predominantly with conventional imaging [79%]) gave a VDR of 64% and PPV of 68% in AA patients, versus 55% and 64%, respectively, in all other patients. Conclusions: 18F-Flotufolastat DRs were marginally higher in AA patients than in all other patients enrolled in SPOTLIGHT. High VDR and PPV were also achieved in AA patients from across all participating centers, indicating the broad applicability of newly US Food and Drug Administration-approved 18F-flotufolastat to the US population as a whole.

True-Positive 18F-Flotufolastat Lesions in Patients with Prostate Cancer Recurrence with Baseline-Negative Conventional Imaging: Results from the Prospective, Phase 3, Multicenter SPOTLIGHT Study.

18F-rhPSMA-7.3 (18F-flotufolastat) is a high-affinity prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted diagnostic radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging in patients with prostate cancer. Here, we report findings from the SPOTLIGHT study (NCT04186845), assessing the performance of 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT for identifying prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive lesions confirmed by standard of truth (SoT) in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and negative conventional imaging at baseline. Methods: Men with biochemical recurrence received 296 MBq of 18F-flotufolastat intravenously and then underwent PET/CT 50-70 min later. 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT findings were evaluated by 3 masked central readers and verified using histopathology or follow-up confirmatory imaging (CT, MRI, bone scan, or 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT) as the SoT. The present analysis evaluated all patients who had negative conventional imaging at baseline, underwent 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT, and had SoT verification by histopathology or follow-up confirmatory imaging to report detection rate (DR), which is the number of patients with at least 1 PET-positive lesion, divided by the number of evaluable patients, and verified DR (VDR), which is the proportion of patients with at least 1 true-positive lesion as verified by SoT, of all patients scanned (PET-positive and PET-negative scans). DR and VDR were calculated and stratified according to prior therapy. Majority read data (agreement between ≥2 readers) are reported. Results: In total, 171 patients with negative baseline conventional imaging and SoT by histopathology or post-PET confirmatory imaging were evaluated. By majority read, the overall 18F-flotufolastat DR among these patients was 95% (163/171; 95% CI, 91.0%-98.0%), and 110 of 171 of these patients had at least 1 true-positive lesion identified (VDR, 64%; 95% CI, 56.7%-71.5%). In the postprostatectomy group (133/171), 8.3% of patients had at least 1 true-positive lesion in the prostate bed, 28% in pelvic lymph nodes, and 35% in other sites. Among those who had received radiotherapy (36/171), 50% of patients had true-positive detections in the prostate, 8.3% in pelvic lymph nodes, and 36% in other sites. Conclusion: 18F-flotufolastat frequently identified true-positive prostate cancer lesions in patients with negative conventional imaging. 18F-flotufolastat may help to better define sites of disease recurrence and inform salvage therapy decisions than does conventional imaging, potentially leading to improved outcomes.

Impact of Clinical Factors on 18F-Flotufolastat Detection Rates in Men With Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of the Phase 3 SPOTLIGHT Study.

Purpose: 18F-Flotufolastat (18F-rhPSMA-7.3) is a newly approved prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting radiopharmaceutical for diagnostic imaging of prostate cancer (PCa). SPOTLIGHT (National Clinical Trials 04186845) evaluated 18F-flotufolastat in men with suspected PCa recurrence. Here, we present results of predefined exploratory endpoints from SPOTLIGHT to evaluate the impact of clinical factors on 18F-flotufolastat detection rates (DR). Methods and Materials: The impact of baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA doubling time (PSAdt), and International Society of Urologic Pathology Grade Group (GG) on 18F-flotufolastat DR was evaluated among all SPOTLIGHT patients with an evaluable scan, with DR stratified according to the patients' prior treatment (radical prostatectomy ± radiation therapy [RP] or radiation therapy only [RT]). The patients underwent positron emission tomography 50 to 70 minutes after receiving 18F-flotufolastat (296 MBq IV), and scans were read by 3 blinded central readers, with the majority read representing agreement between ≥2 readers. Results: In total, 389 men (median PSA: 1.10 ng/mL) were evaluable. By majority read, 18F-flotufolastat identified distant lesions in 39% and 43% of patients treated with prior RP or RT, respectively. The overall DR broadly increased with increasing PSA (<0.2 ng/mL: 33%; ≥10 ng/mL: 100%). Among patients with PSA <1 ng/mL, 68% had positive scans, and 27% had extrapelvic findings. PSAdt was available for 145/389 (37%) patients. PSAdt did not appear to influence 18F-flotufolastat DR (77%-90% across all PSAdt categories). Among patients with prior RP, DR ranged from 70% to 83% across PSAdt categories, and 100% DR was reported for all post-RT patients. In total, 362/389 (93%) patients had baseline GG data. Overall DRs were uniformly high (75%‒95%) across all GG. When stratified by prior treatment, DRs across all GG were 69% to 89% in patients with prior RP and ≥96% in patients with prior RT. Conclusions: 18F-Flotufolastat-positron emission tomography enabled the accurate detection of recurrent PCa lesions across a wide range of PSA, PSAdt, and International Society of Urologic Pathology GG, thus supporting its clinical utility for a broad range of patients with recurrent PCa.

Interreader and Intrareader Reproducibility of 18F-Flotufolastat Image Interpretation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed or Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Data from Two Phase 3 Prospective Multicenter Studies.

Interreader and intrareader reproducibility of 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT scans in newly diagnosed and recurrent prostate cancer patients was assessed from masked image evaluations from two phase 3 studies. Methods: 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT images of newly diagnosed (n = 352) or recurrent (n = 389) patients were evaluated by 3 masked readers. Cohen κ was used to assess pairwise patient- and region-level interreader agreement. Agreement among all readers was assessed using Fleiss κ. Intrareader agreement between the first and repeat read (20% of images, ≥4 wk later) was assessed using Cohen κ. Results: Pairwise interreader agreement was 95% or better (newly diagnosed) and 75% or better (recurrent). The κ coefficients were impacted by the high-agreement-low-κ paradox: Cohen κ ranged from not estimable to 0.55, whereas Fleiss κ was 0.50 (newly diagnosed) and 0.41 (recurrent). Agreement was highest in the prostate of newly diagnosed patients (≥95%) and in the pelvic lymph nodes in recurrent patients (≥87%). Intrareader agreement was 86% or better across both populations. Conclusion: 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT images can be reliably interpreted, with a high degree of inter- and intrareader agreement.

The Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Gemcitabine-releasing Intravesical System (TAR-200) in American Urological Association-defined Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Patients: A Phase 1b Study.

Background and objective: Patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (IR NMIBC) have a high risk of recurrence and need effective therapies to reduce the risk of disease recurrence or progression. This phase 1b study (NCT02720367) assessed the safety and tolerability of TAR-200, an intravesical drug delivery system, in participants with IR NMIBC. Methods: Participants with recurrent IR NMIBC were eligible. Participants received either two 7-d or two 21-d TAR-200 dosing cycles over a 4-6-wk period in a marker lesion/ablation design. TAR-200 was placed in the window between the cystoscopy showing recurrent papillary disease and the subsequent complete transurethral resection of the bladder tumour. The primary endpoint was TAR-200 safety. The secondary endpoints included TAR-200 tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy. Key findings and limitations: Twelve participants received TAR-200 treatment. No TAR-200-related serious or grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred. Nine participants had grade ≤ 2 TAR-200-related TEAEs, with urgency, dysuria, and haematuria being most common. Two participants refused a second dosing cycle due to urinary urgency and frequency. Insertion and removal of TAR-200 was successful in all cases. Plasma gemcitabine concentrations remained below the lower limit of detection. Five participants (42%) had complete response (CR): four had pathological CR and one had CR based on visual assessment. Conclusions and clinical implications: TAR-200 appears to be safe and well tolerated, with encouraging preliminary efficacy in participants with IR NMIBC. This study lays the groundwork for the multiple phase 2 and 3 global studies that are currently on-going for TAR-200. Patient summary: In this study, researchers evaluated the safety of the novel drug delivery system TAR-200 in participants with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. They concluded that TAR-200 was safe and well tolerated with promising antitumour activity.

Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Positron Emission Tomography with 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Unfavourable Intermediate- to Very-high-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from a Phase 3, Prospective, Multicentre Study (LIGHTHOUSE).

BACKGROUND: Radiohybrid (rh) 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 is a novel high-affinity prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting radiopharmaceutical for prostate cancer (PCa) imaging. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and safety of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in newly diagnosed PCa patients planned for prostatectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data on 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 were reported from the phase 3 prospective, multicentre LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04186819). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Patients underwent positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) 50-70 min after an injection of 296 MBq 18F-rhPSMA-7.3. Images were interpreted locally and by three blinded independent readers. The coprimary endpoints were patient-level sensitivity and specificity for the detection of pelvic lymph node (PLN) metastases, validated using histopathology at PLN dissection. Prespecified statistical thresholds (lower bounds of 95% confidence interval [CI]) were set at 22.5% for sensitivity and 82.5% for specificity. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 372 patients screened, 352 had evaluable 18F-rhPSMA-7.3-PET/CT and 296 (99 [33%] with unfavourable intermediate-risk [UIR] and 197 [67%] with high-/very-high-risk [VHR] PCa) subsequently underwent surgery. As per the independent reads, 23-37 (7.8-13%) patients had 18F-rhPSMA-7.3-positive PLN. Seventy (24%) patients had one or more positive PLNs on histopathology. The sensitivity for PLN detection was 30% (95% CI, 19.6-42.1%) for reader 1, 27% (95% CI, 17.2-39.1%) for reader 2, and 23% (95% CI, 13.7-34.4%) for reader 3, not meeting the prespecified threshold. Specificity was 93% (95% CI, 88.8-95.9%), 94% (95% CI, 89.8-96.6%), and 97% (95% CI, 93.7-98.7%), respectively, exceeding the threshold for all readers. Specificity was high (≥92%) across both risk stratifications. Sensitivity was higher among high-risk/VHR (24-33%) than among UIR (16-21%) patients. Extrapelvic (M1) lesions were reported for 56-98/352 (16-28%) patients who underwent 18F-rhPSMA-7.3-PET/CT irrespective of surgery. Verification of these (predominantly by conventional imaging) gave a verified detection rate of 9.9-14% (positive predictive value, 51-63%). No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Across all risk stratifications, 18F-rhPSMA-7.3-PET/CT had high specificity, meeting the specificity endpoint. The sensitivity endpoint was not met, although higher sensitivity was noted among high-risk/VHR than among UIR patients. Overall, 18F-rhPSMA-7.3-PET/CT was well tolerated, and identified N1 and M1 disease prior to surgery in newly diagnosed PCa patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In order to select the most appropriate treatment for patients with prostate cancer, it is critical to diagnose the disease burden accurately at initial diagnosis. In this study, we investigated a new diagnostic imaging agent in a large population of men with primary prostate cancer. We found it to have an excellent safety profile and to provide clinically useful information regarding the presence of disease beyond the prostate.

The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a neoadjuvant gemcitabine intravesical drug delivery system (TAR-200) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: a phase I trial.

OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy (RC) are underutilized standards of care for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) due to high patient burden from systemic toxicities and postoperative complications, respectively. TAR-200 is a novel intravesical drug delivery system developed to release gemcitabine into the bladder urine continuously, resulting in distribution of drug into stromal layers of the bladder. The primary aim of the TAR-200-101 study was to evaluate the safety of TAR-200 in patients with MIBC prior to RC (NCT02722538). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This phase I, open-label study was conducted across 6 US and European sites. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed T2a-T3b N0-N1 M0 urothelial cancer and had refusal or were ineligible to receive cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Two arms were enrolled serially. Patients in Arm 1 had residual tumor >3 cm after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT); those in Arm 2 had undergone maximal TURBT (residual tumor <3 cm). Patients received two 7-day cycles of intravesical gemcitabine delivery via TAR-200 before undergoing RC. Primary outcome was safety; secondary outcomes were tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy. RESULTS: Of 23 patients in the intention-to-treat population (11 in Arm 1, 12 in Arm 2), 20 completed both dosing cycles of TAR-200. No patients were classified as intolerant to TAR-200. Ten patients (4 in Arm 1, 6 in Arm 2) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most common TAR-200-related TEAEs were pollakiuria (n = 3) and urinary incontinence (n = 2). All TEAEs prior to RC were grade ≤2; 1 patient in Arm 2 experienced a grade 3 non-treatment-related TEAE. Plasma gemcitabine levels were undetectable. In Arm 1, those with residual tumor, 4 of 10 patients exhibited pathologic downstaging; 1 experienced a complete response (CR) and 3 a partial response (PR). In Arm 2, those undergoing maximal TURBT, 6 of 10 patients exhibited downstaging; 3 experienced a CR and 3 a PR. CONCLUSION: Controlled intravesical gemcitabine release via TAR-200 was safe and well tolerated in patients with MIBC.

Effect of 18F-Fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography on the Management of Patients With Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Results From the FALCON Trial.

PURPOSE: Early and accurate localization of lesions in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer may guide salvage therapy decisions. The present study, 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in biochemicAL reCurrence Of Prostate caNcer (FALCON; NCT02578940), aimed to evaluate the effect of 18F-fluciclovine on management of men with BCR of prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with a first episode of BCR after curative-intent primary therapy were enrolled at 6 UK sites. Patients underwent 18F-fluciclovine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) according to standardized procedures. Clinicians documented management plans before and after scanning, recording changes to treatment modality as major and changes within a modality as other. The primary outcome measure was record of a revised management plan postscan. Secondary endpoints were evaluation of optimal prostate specific antigen (PSA) threshold for detection, salvage treatment outcome assessment based on 18F-fluciclovine-involvement, and safety. RESULTS: 18F-Fluciclovine was well tolerated in the 104 scanned patients (median PSA = 0.79 ng/mL). Lesions were detected in 58 out of 104 (56%) patients. Detection was broadly proportional to PSA level; ≤1 ng/mL, 1 out of 3 of scans were positive, and 93% scans were positive at PSA >2.0 ng/mL. Sixty-six (64%) patients had a postscan management change (80% after a positive result). Major changes (43 out of 66; 65%) were salvage or systemic therapy to watchful waiting (16 out of 66; 24%); salvage therapy to systemic therapy (16 out of 66; 24%); and alternative changes to treatment modality (11 out of 66, 17%). The remaining 23 out of 66 (35%) management changes were modifications of the prescan plan: most (22 out of 66; 33%) were adjustments to planned brachytherapy/radiation therapy to include a 18F-fluciclovine-guided boost. Where 18F-fluciclovine guided salvage therapy, the PSA response rate was higher than when 18F-fluciclovine was not involved (15 out of 17 [88%] vs 28 out of 39 [72%]). CONCLUSIONS: 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT located recurrence in the majority of men with BCR, frequently resulting in major management plan changes. Incorporating 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT into treatment planning may optimize targeting of recurrence sites and avoid futile salvage therapy.

Diagnostic Performance of 18F-Fluciclovine in Detection of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases.

PURPOSE: F-fluciclovine is a synthetic amino acid radiotracer that has recently been approved in Europe and the United States for PET imaging in men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer after prior definitive treatment. Accurate identification of the sites of disease in patients presenting with BCR of prostate cancer is important in determining the appropriate treatment. Bone is the most frequent site of metastatic disease in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of the available preclinical and clinical data on the diagnostic performance of F-fluciclovine PET/CT in an attempt to draw practical and general conclusions on the utility and limitations of F-fluciclovine PET/CT in localization of osseous metastatic disease in prostate cancer. RESULTS: The cumulative preclinical data and results of some retrospective and 2 prospective clinical studies suggest that F-fluciclovine can detect early bone marrow involvement in patients with BCR of prostate cancer and negative prior bone-specific imaging findings. CONCLUSIONS: F-fluciclovine PET/CT seems to offer useful information for early detection of bone metastases in men with BCR of prostate cancer. Additional investigations will be needed to compare the diagnostic performance of F-fluciclovine PET/CT to other standard and novel imaging methods in initial staging, BCR, and castrate-resistant phases of disease.

Reader Training for the Restaging of Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer Using 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT.

18F-Fluciclovine is a novel PET/CT tracer. This blinded image evaluation (BIE) sought to demonstrate that, after limited training, readers naïve to 18F-fluciclovine could interpret 18F-fluciclovine images from subjects with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer with acceptable diagnostic performance and reproducibility. The primary objectives were to establish individual readers' diagnostic performance and the overall interpretation (2/3 reader concordance) compared with standard-of-truth data (histopathology or clinical follow-up) and to evaluate interreader reproducibility. Secondary objectives included comparison to the expert reader and assessment of intrareader reproducibility. Methods:18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT images (n = 121) and corresponding standard-of-truth data were collected from 110 subjects at Emory University using a single-time-point static acquisition starting 5 min after injection of approximately 370 MBq of 18F-fluciclovine. Three readers were trained using standardized interpretation methodology and subsequently evaluated the images in a blinded manner. Analyses were conducted at the lesion, region (prostate, including bed and seminal vesicle, or extraprostatic, including all lymph nodes, bone, or soft-tissue metastasis), and subject level. Results: Lesion-level overall positive predictive value was 70.5%. The readers' positive predictive value and negative predictive value were broadly consistent with each other and with the onsite read. Sensitivity was highest for readers 1 and 2 (68.5% and 63.9%, respectively) whereas specificity was highest for reader 3 (83.6%). Overall, prostate-level sensitivity was high (91.4%), but specificity was moderate (48.7%). Interreader agreement was 94.7%, 74.4%, and 70.3% for the lesion, prostate, and extraprostatic levels, respectively, with associated Fleiss' κ-values of 0.54, 0.50, and 0.57. Intrareader agreement was 97.8%, 96.9%, and 99.1% at the lesion level; 100%, 100%, and 91.7% in the prostate region; and 83.3%, 75.0%, and 83.3% in the extraprostatic region for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Concordance between the BIE and the onsite reader exceeded 75% for each reader at the lesion, region, and subject levels. Conclusion: Specific training in the use of standardized interpretation methodology for assessment of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT images enables naïve readers to achieve acceptable diagnostic performance and reproducibility when staging recurrent prostate cancer.

The effect of pre-operative information in relieving anxiety in oral surgery patients.

UNLABELLED: Appropriate stress management of patients is essential for smooth running of invasive or surgical dental procedures conducted under local anaesthesia. OBJECTIVE: The current study analysed the effectiveness of pre-operative information provision for anxiety reduction during dentoalveolar surgery in patients with high- or low-trait anxiety. METHODS: Patients scheduled for oral surgical procedures performed by six private dental practitioners were invited to participate in the study. They were randomly assigned to four groups and received the following pre-operative information: (i) basic information only, (ii) basic information with details of the operative procedures, (iii) basic information with details of the expected recovery, and (iv) basic information with details of both the operative procedures and recovery. The participants' trait anxiety level was measured with the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), then they were divided into high- or low-trait anxiety groups with the method of median-split on the basis of the DASS score. Self-rated anxiety was recorded immediately before, during and 10 min after the surgical procedures. RESULTS: High-trait anxiety subjects gave higher self-reported anxiety levels (repeated-measures ANOVA, P < 0.05). Pre-operative provision of details about the expected recovery only or details concerning both the operative procedures and recovery led to significant reduction in self-reported anxiety among the participants throughout the procedure (P < 0.01). However, information on operative procedures led to anxiety reduction in low (P < 0.05) but not high-trait anxiety participants. CONCLUSION: Provision of pre-operative information of the recovery process leads to significant anxiety reduction in all patients who undergo surgical/invasive procedures with local anaesthesia.