Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect Dis ; 225(3): 413-421, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34609490

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Universal varicella vaccination might reduce opportunities for varicella-zoster virus (VZV) exposure and protective immunological boosting, thus increasing herpes zoster incidence in latently infected adults. We assessed humoral and cell-mediated immunity (CMI), as markers of VZV exposure, in adults aged ≥50 years. METHODS: We repurposed data from placebo recipients in a large multinational clinical trial (ZOE-50). Countries were clustered based on their varicella vaccination program characteristics, as having high, moderate, or low VZV circulation. Anti-VZV antibody geometric mean concentrations, median frequencies of VZV-specific CD4 T cells, and percentages of individuals with increases in VZV-specific CD4 T-cell frequencies were compared across countries and clusters. Sensitivity analyses using a variable number of time points and different thresholds were performed for CMI data. RESULTS: VZV-specific humoral immunity from 17 countries (12 high, 2 moderate, 3 low circulation) varied significantly between countries (P < .0001) but not by VZV circulation. No significant differences were identified in VZV-specific CMI between participants from 2 high versus 1 low circulation country. In 3/5 sensitivity analyses, increases in CMI were more frequent in high VZV circulation countries (.03 ≤ P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: We found no consistent evidence of reduced VZV exposure among older adults in countries with universal varicella vaccination. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01165177.


Asunto(s)
Varicela , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Humanos , Inmunidad Celular , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunación
2.
COPD ; 18(3): 341-348, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33955798

RESUMEN

Pertussis is underdiagnosed and underreported in adults and patients with underlying conditions. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be at increased risk of severe pertussis. Understanding the true prevalence of pertussis infections in such patients is important. We therefore evaluated the seroprevalence of anti-pertussis toxin (PT) antibodies in a cohort of 40-85-year-old patients diagnosed with moderate, severe or very severe COPD enrolled (between June 2011 and June 2012) in the prospective, observational "Acute Exacerbation and Respiratory InfectionS in COPD" (AERIS; NCT01360398) study, conducted in England. Serum anti-PT antibodies were measured in 104 patients using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on samples collected 12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24) after enrollment. Overall, 14/104 (13.5%) patients had anti-PT concentrations ≥50 IU/mL at M12 or M24, indicative of exposure to Bordetella pertussis during the preceding 2-3 years. Of these, 6/104 (5.8%) had anti-PT ≥70 IU/mL, of whom 3/104 (2.9%) had anti-PT ≥120 IU/mL, indicative of exposure within 12 and 6 months, respectively. These results show a high circulation of B. pertussis in 40-85-year-old patients with moderate, severe or very severe COPD in England between 2012 and 2014, and call for enhanced immunization to prevent pertussis infections in such patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Tos Ferina , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Bordetella pertussis , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Tos Ferina/epidemiología
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 426, 2020 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32552685

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A previous phase 2 study demonstrated the immunogenicity of a single dose of meningococcal A, C, W, Y-tetanus toxoid conjugate (MenACWY-TT) or polysaccharide (MenACWY-PS) vaccine for up to 5 years in individuals aged 11-55 years. This follow-up study evaluated long-term antibody persistence up to 10 years and the immunogenicity and safety of a single MenACWY-TT booster dose given 10 years after primary vaccination. METHODS: Blood draws were conducted annually in Years 7-10. At Year 10, all subjects received a MenACWY-TT booster dose. Blood was drawn at 1 month and safety data were collected ≤6 months postbooster. Study endpoints included immunogenicity during the persistence phase (primary), and immunogenicity and safety during the booster phase (secondary). Statistical analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: A total of 311 subjects were enrolled in the persistence phase (MenACWY-TT, 235; MenACWY-PS, 76); 220 were enrolled in the booster phase (MenACWY-TT, 164; MenACWY-PS, 56). Descriptive analyses indicated that at Years 7-10, the percentages of subjects achieving serum bactericidal antibody assay using baby rabbit complement (rSBA) titers ≥1:8 and ≥1:128 were higher for serogroups A, W, and Y in the MenACWY-TT versus MenACWY-PS group; percentages were similar across groups for serogroup C. rSBA geometric mean titers (GMTs) for serogroups A, W, and Y were higher in the MenACWY-TT group and slightly higher in the MenACWY-PS group for serogroup C. One month postbooster, all primary MenACWY-TT and ≥98.1% of primary MenACWY-PS recipients had rSBA titers ≥1:8. For all serogroups, rSBA GMTs postbooster were higher in the MenACWY-TT versus MenACWY-PS group. Most local and general reactogenicity events were similar between groups and mild to moderate in severity. Adverse events at 1 month postbooster were 9.1% for the MenACWY-TT and 3.6% for the MenACWY-PS groups; all were nonserious. CONCLUSIONS: Immune responses to a single MenACWY-TT primary dose administered at age 11-55 years persisted in >70% of individuals evaluated at Years 7-10. A MenACWY-TT booster dose administered at Year 10 was safe and immunogenic with no new safety signals observed. These results provide important insights regarding long-term protection from primary vaccination and the benefits of booster dosing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01934140. Registered September 2013.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Vacunas Meningococicas/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Niño , Proteínas del Sistema Complemento , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neisseria meningitidis/inmunología , Conejos , Serogrupo , Factores de Tiempo , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología , Adulto Joven
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2342630, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687024

RESUMEN

Since the introduction of Haemophilus Influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccines, invasive Hib disease has strongly declined worldwide, yet continued control of Hib disease remains important. In Europe, currently three different hexavalent combination vaccines containing Hib conjugates are marketed. In this phase IV, single-blind, randomized, controlled, multi-country study (NCT04535037), we aimed to compare, in a 2 + 1 vaccination schedule, the immunogenicity and safety and show non-inferiority, as well as superiority, of DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib (Ih group) versus DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib (Va group) in terms of anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) antibody geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and proportion of participants reaching anti-PRP antibody concentrations greater than or equal to a threshold of 5 µg/mL. One month after the booster vaccination, the anti-PRP antibody GMC ratio (Ih group/Va group) was 0.917 (95% CI: 0.710-1.185), meeting the non-inferiority criteria. The difference in percentage of participants (Ih group - Va group) reaching GMCs ≥5 µg/mL was -6.3% (95% CI: -14.1% to 1.5%), not reaching the predefined non-inferiority threshold. Interestingly, a slightly higher post-booster antibody avidity was observed in the Ih group versus the Va group. Both vaccines were well tolerated, and no safety concerns were raised. This study illustrates the different kinetics of the anti-PRP antibody response post-primary and post-booster using the two vaccines containing different Hib conjugates and indicates a potential differential impact of concomitant vaccinations on the anti-PRP responses. The clinical implications of these differences should be further studied.


Vaccination against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) is included in the majority of national immunization programs worldwide and has shown to be effective in preventing Hib disease. In Europe, different vaccines containing Hib components are marketed. We compared the immune response and safety of 2 of these (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib, Ih group) and DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib, Va group) in infants and toddlers, when used in a 2 + 1 schedule, i.e. two primary vaccination doses (at 2 and 4 months of age of the infant), followed by one booster dose at the age of one year. One month after the booster vaccination, the antibody concentration ratio between both groups (Ih group/Va group) was 0.917 (95% CI: 0.710­1.185) showing the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine was non-inferior to the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib vaccine; the difference in percentage of participants (Ih group ­ Va group) with antibody concentrations above 5 µg/mL was -6.3% (95% CI: −14.1% to 1.5%), which did not meet the pre-defined criterion for non-inferiority. In the Ih group, the quality of antibodies produced was somewhat higher versus the Va group. Both vaccines were well tolerated, and no safety concerns were raised. The kinetics of the immune response are different between the 2 vaccines. Since both vaccines contain different additional components (conjugated proteins), a possible effect of concomitant (simultaneously administered) vaccines was studied. Further investigations to confirm our findings are needed.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Vacunas contra Haemophilus , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b , Esquemas de Inmunización , Polisacáridos , Vacunas Combinadas , Vacunas Conjugadas , Humanos , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/inmunología , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Lactante , Femenino , Masculino , Método Simple Ciego , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/efectos adversos , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b/inmunología , Vacunas Combinadas/inmunología , Vacunas Combinadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Combinadas/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Haemophilus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Haemophilus/inmunología , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/inmunología , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/efectos adversos , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/inmunología , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/efectos adversos , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/inmunología , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/efectos adversos , Preescolar , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Europa (Continente)
5.
N Engl J Med ; 362(4): 289-98, 2010 Jan 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20107214

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus is the most common cause of severe gastroenteritis among young children worldwide. Data are needed to assess the efficacy of the rotavirus vaccine in African children. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in South Africa (3166 infants; 64.1% of the total) and Malawi (1773 infants; 35.9% of the total) to evaluate the efficacy of a live, oral rotavirus vaccine in preventing severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. Healthy infants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive two doses of vaccine (in addition to one dose of placebo) or three doses of vaccine--the pooled vaccine group--or three doses of placebo at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. Episodes of gastroenteritis caused by wild-type rotavirus during the first year of life were assessed through active follow-up surveillance and were graded with the use of the Vesikari scale. RESULTS: A total of 4939 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the three groups; 1647 infants received two doses of the vaccine, 1651 infants received three doses of the vaccine, and 1641 received placebo. Of the 4417 infants included in the per-protocol efficacy analysis, severe rotavirus gastroenteritis occurred in 4.9% of the infants in the placebo group and in 1.9% of those in the pooled vaccine group (vaccine efficacy, 61.2%; 95% confidence interval, 44.0 to 73.2). Vaccine efficacy was lower in Malawi than in South Africa (49.4% vs. 76.9%); however, the number of episodes of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis that were prevented was greater in Malawi than in South Africa (6.7 vs. 4.2 cases prevented per 100 infants vaccinated per year). Efficacy against all-cause severe gastroenteritis was 30.2%. At least one serious adverse event was reported in 9.7% of the infants in the pooled vaccine group and in 11.5% of the infants in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Human rotavirus vaccine significantly reduced the incidence of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis among African infants during the first year of life. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00241644.)


Asunto(s)
Diarrea Infantil/prevención & control , Gastroenteritis/prevención & control , Infecciones por Rotavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Rotavirus , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Diarrea Infantil/epidemiología , Heces/virología , Femenino , Gastroenteritis/epidemiología , Gastroenteritis/virología , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Malaui/epidemiología , Masculino , Rotavirus/clasificación , Rotavirus/inmunología , Rotavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Rotavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Rotavirus/inmunología , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/inmunología , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Atenuadas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología
6.
Vaccine ; 41(40): 5805-5812, 2023 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37635001

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immunisation during pregnancy with a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine can protect infants against pertussis between birth and paediatric vaccination. We aimed to estimate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of third-trimester pregnancy immunisation with the three-component acellular pertussis (Td3ap) vaccine at preventing pertussis in infants <2 months in the United States (US), to support a label update. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc sub-analysis of a case-control study conducted in six US Emerging Infections Program Network states between 2011 and 2014. Our analysis included only cases and controls whose mothers were either vaccinated with Td3ap or did not receive any Tdap vaccine. The association between Td3ap maternal immunisation and pertussis in infants was assessed for US data using a frequentist method with conditional logistic regression. A robustified analysis was conducted using Bayesian dynamic borrowing of non-US data, considering a mixing-weighted prior of 90% for historical non-US VE data, and of 10% for a vague prior. VE was estimated as (1-odds ratio) × 100%. Sensitivity analyses accounting for the impact of each non-US study, different mixing weights and missing/ambiguous data were performed. RESULTS: We included 108 cases and 183 controls. Based on US data, the estimated VE of third-trimester maternal immunisation with Td3ap at preventing pertussis in infants <2 months was 78.0% (95% confidence interval: -38.0; 96.5). VE estimated by Bayesian dynamic borrowing of non-US data (with a 90% weight for historical data) was 83.4% (95% credible interval: 55.7; 92.5); sensitivity analyses produced similar VE estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Effectiveness of third-trimester pregnancy immunisation with Td3ap at preventing infant pertussis in the US is very likely to be ≥ 50% and is most likely âˆ¼ 80%. Bayesian dynamic borrowing of non-US VE data allowed overcoming the limited power (due to small sample size) of a brand-specific sub-analysis by considering additional evidence.


Asunto(s)
Tos Ferina , Femenino , Embarazo , Lactante , Humanos , Niño , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Teorema de Bayes , Vacunación , Inmunización , Toxoide Tetánico , Madres , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina
7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(1): 2159731, 2023 12 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36746754

RESUMEN

Patients with obstructive airway diseases (OAD), like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, may be at increased risk of pertussis infection. Pertussis may also trigger COPD and asthma exacerbations. Vaccination against pertussis could help protect OAD patients from the additional burden of pertussis, but there may be hesitancy related to vaccine safety and immunogenicity in such patients. We performed a meta-analysis on 5 clinical trials in adults receiving reduced-antigen tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap, Boostrix, GSK), from which we selected participants on active OAD treatment. We compared immunogenicity and reactogenicity outcomes of the meta-analysis with data from the overall populations of Tdap-vaccinated adults from 6 Tdap trials (including the 5 in the meta-analysis). The meta-analysis comprised 222 adults on active standard OAD treatment. One month post-Tdap, 89.0% and 97.2% of these adults, respectively, achieved seroprotective anti-diphtheria and anti-tetanus antibody concentrations; 78.3%-96.1% showed booster responses across the 3 pertussis antigens. These rates were consistent with those in the comparator population. The most frequently reported solicited local and systemic adverse events within 4 days post-Tdap were injection site pain (47.7%) and fatigue (19.3%), with low rates of grade 3 intensity (0.9% and 2.8%). This was consistent with Tdap reactogenicity in the comparator population. Evaluation of unsolicited and serious adverse events within 1 month post-Tdap did not identify safety concerns. In conclusion, Tdap was immunogenic and well tolerated in adults under active standard OAD treatment, with immunogenicity and safety profiles consistent with those in a comparator population representing the general adult population.


Whooping cough is a very contagious respiratory disease that is most dangerous for young babies but can affect people of all ages. People with chronic lung diseases like asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be more likely to get ill and suffer from complications from whooping cough. Vaccination against whooping cough is an important way to help protect these people. However, some doctors may hesitate to vaccinate patients because they may worry that vaccination could worsen asthma or COPD symptoms or that drugs taken by these patients could make vaccines work less well. We therefore looked at the immunogenicity and safety of a whooping cough vaccine (Boostrix, GSK) in adults treated for chronic lung diseases like asthma or COPD. We analyzed data from 5 previous clinical studies and specifically selected data from patients taking standard medication for chronic lung diseases in these studies. We found that the immune response to whooping cough vaccination in these patients was comparable to that in a comparator group representative of the general adult population receiving Boostrix. The vaccine was as well tolerated in patients with chronic lung diseases as in the general adult population. Our results suggest that the whooping cough vaccine Boostrix can be safely given to adults taking standard medication for chronic lung diseases to help prevent severe illness and complications from whooping cough.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular , Difteria , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Tétanos , Tos Ferina , Adulto , Humanos , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Inmunización Secundaria , Difteria/prevención & control , Tétanos/prevención & control , Vacunación , Vacunas Bacterianas , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos
8.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 22(1): 849-859, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37750613

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: During the clinical development of a vaccine, study participants are monitored for the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) over a defined period post-vaccination to assess the safety of prophylactic vaccines. Among the safety data collected, a standard practice in prophylactic vaccine clinical trials involves collecting reactogenicity data through daily AE solicitation of pre-defined sets of symptoms (i.e. solicited AEs). AREAS COVERED: This paper aims to propose recommendations to improve and harmonize the collection of active AE solicitation in prophylactic vaccine clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: We recommend using limited lists of solicited AEs adapted to the vaccine technology and target population. While the US Food and Drug Administration toxicity grading scale is commonly used in adolescents/adults, harmonizing grading criteria in infants/children would facilitate the comparison of vaccines' safety profiles. Solicited systemic AEs should not systematically be considered causally related to vaccination. Collection of solicited AEs should occur in cohorts of a maximum of 1,000 vaccinated participants, as larger cohort sizes do not improve substantially the precision of AE incidence. The incidence of daily solicited AEs should be compared with a control group for improved interpretations of their clinical relevance. These suggestions would improve the characterization of safety profiles of vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas , Niño , Lactante , Adulto , Adolescente , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Incidencia
9.
Infect Dis Ther ; 12(2): 411-423, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36520325

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This observational retrospective matched cohort study evaluated the safety of a prenatal tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination, Boostrix. We previously reported on the risk of maternal and neonatal outcomes; here we report on the risk of congenital anomalies in infants at birth through 6 months of age. METHODS: The study included pregnant Kaiser Permanente Southern California members. Women who received the Tdap vaccine on or after the 27th week of pregnancy between January 2018 and January 2019 were matched to women who were pregnant between January 2012 and December 2014 and were not vaccinated with Tdap during pregnancy. Unadjusted and adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated by Poisson regression. Quantitative secular trend analyses, from 2011 to 2017, were conducted on congenital anomalies with a statistically significant aRR > 1. RESULTS: The analysis consisted of 16,350 and 16,088 live-born infants in the Tdap-exposed and unexposed cohorts, respectively. Of the 14 congenital anomaly body systems evaluated, 8 (eye, ear/face/neck, respiratory, upper gastrointestinal, genital, renal, musculoskeletal, integument) had statistically significant elevated aRRs, with point estimates ranging from 1.17 to 2.02. The observed elevated aRRs were consistent with their respective secular increases over time. CONCLUSION: Cautious interpretation of these findings is warranted as these increases may have resulted from improved identification and diagnosis. Furthermore, the biological plausibility of an association between maternal vaccine exposure in the third trimester of pregnancy and birth defects is low. The overall study findings support the safety of maternal immunization with Boostrix during the third trimester of pregnancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03463577.

10.
Vaccine ; 40(32): 4503-4512, 2022 07 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35717267

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of prenatal tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination. This cohort study was conducted among pregnant members at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). The exposed cohort consisted of women who received Tdap vaccine on or after the 27th week of pregnancy between January 2018 and January 2019. The unexposed cohort consisted of matched women who were pregnant between January 2012 and December 2014 and were not vaccinated with any Tdap vaccine throughout their pregnancy. Maternal and infant characteristics and pre-specified endpoints were collected through automated data and review of the electronic health records. Unadjusted and adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Poisson regression. Non-inferiority testing (i.e., to rule out a two-fold increase) was conducted for primary endpoints with adjustment for multiplicity. Superiority testing was conducted without multiplicity adjustment for secondary endpoints. The analysis consisted of 16,606 pairs of Tdap recipients and unexposed pregnant women. For the primary endpoints, the aRR for preeclampsia/eclampsia was 1.38 (98.75% CI:1.21-1.58) and the aRR for intrauterine infection was 1.28 (98.75% CI:1.12-1.47). These increases were consistent with the background increasing trend of these diagnoses among all pregnant women at KPSC since 2011, and the upper limit of the 98.75% CI of both aRRs did not exceed the pre-specified threshold of 2. No increased risks of small for gestational age (aRR = 1.04, 98.75% CI:0.94-1.16) or preterm delivery (aRR = 0.71, 98.75% CI:0.64-0.78) were observed. No evidence of increased risks for secondary endpoints, including poor fetal growth, preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes, stillbirth/fetal death, placental abruption, transfusion during delivery hospitalization, and neonatal death, was observed. Prenatal Tdap vaccination after the 27th week of pregnancy was not associated with increased risks of pre-specified maternal and infant outcomes, supporting the safety of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular , Difteria , Tétanos , Tos Ferina , Estudios de Cohortes , Corynebacterium , Difteria/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Placenta , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tétanos/prevención & control , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Tos Ferina/prevención & control
11.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(1): 269-277, 2021 01 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32609045

RESUMEN

The etiology of intussusception (IS), a serious gastrointestinal obstruction, remains unclear. Limited evidence suggests a role for viral infection. We investigated the risk of IS after rotavirus gastroenteritis (RV GE) in the first year of life. In this retrospective, self-controlled case series (SCCS), we assessed the risk of IS after RV GE using data from United States administrative claims databases. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) of IS were calculated for the 7- and 21-day risk periods after RV GE (main analysis) or after fracture (sensitivity analysis). A total of 290,912,068 subjects were screened; 42 presented claims for RV GE and IS, and 66 for fracture and IS. The IRRs of IS after RV GE were 79.6 (95% confidence interval, CI: 38.6-164.4) and 25.5 (95% CI: 13.2-49.2) in the 7- and 21-day risk periods. The sensitivity analysis showed an association between IS and fracture for both periods, suggesting potential confounding. Post-hoc analyses did not confirm the association between fracture and IS but suggested a potential association between RV GE and IS. A temporal association between RV GE and IS was detected using claims databases. Due to some limitations of the data sources, this association should be further investigated.


Asunto(s)
Gastroenteritis , Intususcepción , Infecciones por Rotavirus , Vacunas contra Rotavirus , Rotavirus , Gastroenteritis/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Intususcepción/epidemiología , Intususcepción/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones por Rotavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Rotavirus/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(6): 590-596, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33956757

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence on vaccine effectiveness (VE) may encourage vaccination and help fight the reemergence of measles and mumps in Europe. However, limited data exist on real-life effectiveness of individual measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccines. This study evaluated VE of GSK's MMR vaccine ("Priorix") against measles and mumps. METHODS: This retrospective, case-control study used UK data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics database to identify children 1-13 years old diagnosed with measles or mumps from January 2006 to December 2018. Cases were matched to controls according to birth month/year and practice region. Cases were identified using clinical codes (without laboratory confirmation). "Priorix" exposure was identified using vaccine batch identifiers. Children exposed to other MMR vaccines were excluded. Adjusted VE was estimated for ≥1 vaccine dose in all children, and for 1 dose and ≥2 doses in children ≥4 years at diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, 299 measles cases matched with 1196 controls (87.6% <4 years old), and 243 mumps cases matched with 970 controls (74.2% <4 years old) were considered. VE for ≥1 dose in all children was 78.0% (97.5% confidence interval: 67.2%-85.3%) for measles and 66.7% (48.1%-78.6%) for mumps. In children ≥4 years old, VE after 1 dose was 74.6% (-21.7% to 94.7%) for measles and 82.3% (32.7%-95.3%) for mumps, and VE after ≥2 doses was 94.4% (79.7%-98.5%) for measles and 86.5% (64.0%-94.9%) for mumps. CONCLUSIONS: "Priorix" is effective in preventing measles and mumps in real-life settings.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Paperas/prevención & control , Eficacia de las Vacunas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/normas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido , Vacunación
13.
Cancer Med ; 10(21): 7759-7771, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581025

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a community-randomized trial (NCTBLINDED) in Finland to assess gender-neutral and girls-only vaccination strategies with the AS04-adjuvanted human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 (AS04-HPV-16/18)vaccine. METHODS: Girls and boys (12-15 years) were invited. We randomized 33 communities (1:1:1 ratio): Arm A: 90% of randomly selected girls and boys received AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine and 10% received hepatitis B vaccine (HBV); Arm B: 90% of randomly selected girls received AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine, 10% of girls received HBV, and all boys received HBV; Arm C: all participants received HBV. Effectiveness measurements against prevalence of HPV-16/18 cervical infection were estimated in girls at 18.5 years. The main measures were: (1) overall effectiveness comparing Arms A or B, regardless of vaccination status, vs Arm C; (2) total effectiveness comparing AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccinated girls in pooled Arms A/B vs Arm C; (3) indirect effectiveness (herd effect) comparing girls receiving HBV or unvaccinated in Arm A vs Arm C. Co-primary objectives were overall effectiveness following gender-neutral or girls-only vaccination. RESULTS: Of 80,272 adolescents invited, 34,412 were enrolled. Overall effectiveness was 23.8% (95% confidence interval: -19.0, 51.1; P = 0.232) with gender-neutral vaccination. Following girls-only vaccination, overall effectiveness was 49.6% (20.1, 68.2; P = 0.004). Total effectiveness was over 90% regardless of vaccination strategy. No herd effect was found. Immunogenicity of the AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine was high in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the difficulty in conducting community randomized trials. It is not plausible that vaccinating boys would reduce overall effectiveness, and the apparent lack of herd effect was unexpected given findings from other studies. This analysis was likely confounded by several factors but confirms the vaccine's high total effectiveness as in clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Papillomavirus Humano 18 , Vacunación Masiva/métodos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Papillomavirus Humano 16/inmunología , Papillomavirus Humano 18/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Prevalencia
14.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(11): 4646-4653, 2021 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34428112

RESUMEN

The human rotavirus vaccine (HRV; Rotarix, GSK) is available as liquid (Liq) and lyophilized (Lyo) formulations, but only Lyo HRV is licensed in India. In this phase III, randomized, open-label trial (NCT02141204), healthy Indian infants aged 6-10 weeks received 2 doses (1 month apart) of either Liq HRV or Lyo HRV. Non-inferiority of Liq HRV compared to Lyo HRV was assessed in terms of geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of anti-RV immunoglobulin A (IgA), 1-month post-second dose (primary objective). Reactogenicity/safety were also evaluated. Seroconversion was defined as anti-RV IgA antibody concentration ≥20 units [U]/mL in initially seronegative infants (anti-RV IgA antibody concentration <20 U/mL) or ≥2-fold increase compared with pre-vaccination concentration in initially seropositive infants. Of the 451 enrolled infants, 381 (189 in Liq HRV and 192 in Lyo HRV group) were included in the per-protocol set. The GMC ratio (Liq HRV/Lyo HRV) was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.34), with the lower limit of the 95% CI reaching ≥0.5, the pre-specified statistical margin for non-inferiority. In the Liq HRV and Lyo HRV groups, 42.9% and 44.3% (baseline) and 71.4% and 73.4% (1-month post-second dose) of infants had anti-RV IgA antibody concentration ≥20 U/mL, and overall seroconversion rates were 54.5% and 50.0%. Incidences of solicited and unsolicited adverse events were similar between groups and no vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Liq HRV was non-inferior to Lyo HRV in terms of antibody GMCs and showed similar reactogenicity/safety profiles, supporting the use of Liq HRV in Indian infants.


PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYWhat is the context?Rotavirus is the most common cause of acute gastronenteritis and contributes to the high number of hospitalizations and deaths in young children worldwide.Vaccination against rotavirus has led to a significant decrease in rotavirus-related infections.The human rotavirus vaccine Rotarix (GSK) is currently used as a liquid or lyophilized formulation.In clinical trials conducted in European and North American infants, the liquid vaccine showed ability to induce immune response and safety comparable to the lyophilized formulation.Only the lyophilized vaccine is currently marketed in india.What is new?We compared the 2-dose liquid and lyophilized human rotavirus vaccines in indian infants in a phase III clinical trial:The ability to induce immune response for thw liquid formulation was not inferior to that observed for the lyophilized vaccine.The safety profiles of the 2 formulations were comparable.Why is this important?This study shows that the liquid human rotavirus vaccine can be administrated to infants from india.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Rotavirus , Vacunas contra Rotavirus , Rotavirus , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Inmunoglobulina A , Lactante , Infecciones por Rotavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/efectos adversos , Vacunas Atenuadas
15.
Int J Infect Dis ; 108: 443-453, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33894353

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence of dengue infection across geographically distinct areas of Brazil. METHODS: This prospective, household-based, cohort study enrolled participants in five areas and followed them up for up to 4 years (2014-2018). Dengue seroprevalence was assessed at each scheduled visit. Suspected dengue cases were identified through enhanced passive and active surveillance. Acute symptomatic dengue infection was confirmed through reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction in combination with an antigenic assay (non-structural protein 1) and serology. RESULTS: Among 3300 participants enrolled, baseline seroprevalence was 76.2%, although only 23.3% of participants reported a history of dengue. Of 1284 suspected symptomatic dengue cases detected, 50 (3.9%) were laboratory-confirmed. Based on 8166.5 person-years (PY) of follow-up, the incidence of laboratory-confirmed symptomatic infection (primary endpoint) was 6.1 per 1000 PY (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5, 8.1). Incidence varied substantially in different years (1.8-7.4 per 1000 PY). The incidence of inapparent primary dengue infection was substantially higher: 41.7 per 1000 PY (95% CI: 31.1, 54.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings, highlighting that the incidence of dengue infection is underestimated in Brazil, will inform the design and implementation of future dengue vaccine trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01751139.


Asunto(s)
Dengue/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Virus del Dengue/inmunología , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Adulto Joven
16.
Vaccine ; 39(11): 1598-1608, 2021 03 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33612341

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transplacentally transferred antibodies induced by maternal pertussis vaccination interfere with infant immune responses to pertussis primary vaccination. We evaluated whether this interference remains in toddlers after booster vaccination. METHODS: In a prior phase IV, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (NCT02377349), pregnant women in Australia, Canada and Europe received intramuscular tetanus-reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-three-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap group) or placebo (control group) at 270/7-366/7 weeks' gestation, with crossover immunization postpartum. Their infants were primed (study NCT02422264) and boosted (at 11-18 months; current study NCT02853929) with diphtheria-tetanus-three-component acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated poliovirus/Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Immunogenicity before and after booster vaccination, and reactogenicity and safety of the booster were evaluated descriptively. RESULTS: 263 (Tdap group) and 277 (control group) toddlers received a DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib booster. Pre-booster vaccination, observed geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for the three pertussis antigens and diphtheria were 1.4-1.5-fold higher in controls than in the Tdap group. No differences were observed for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens. One month post-booster vaccination, booster response rates for pertussis antigens were ≥ 92.1% and seroprotection rates for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens were ≥ 99.2% in both groups (primary objective). Higher post-booster GMCs were observed in controls versus the Tdap group for anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (1.2-fold), anti-pertussis toxoid (1.5-fold) and anti-diphtheria (1.4-fold). GMCs for the other DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens were similar between groups. Serious adverse events were reported for three toddlers (controls, not vaccination-related). One death occurred pre-booster (Tdap group, not vaccination-related). CONCLUSIONS: As a consequence of interference of maternal pertussis antibodies with infant immune responses to pertussis primary vaccination, pertussis antibody concentrations were still lower in toddlers from Tdap-vaccinated mothers before DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib booster vaccination. After the booster, antibody concentrations were lower for filamentous hemagglutinin and pertussis toxoid but not for pertactin. The clinical significance of this interference requires further evaluation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02853929.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular , Difteria , Vacunas contra Haemophilus , Tétanos , Tos Ferina , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Australia , Canadá , Preescolar , Difteria/prevención & control , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunidad , Inmunización Secundaria , Lactante , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados , Embarazo , Tétanos/prevención & control , Vacunación , Vacunas Combinadas , Tos Ferina/prevención & control
17.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 16(6): 1280-1291, 2020 06 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32598244

RESUMEN

This phase 3B, open-label, extension study (NCT01962207) evaluated long-term persistence of antibodies induced by the quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine conjugated to tetanus toxoid (MenACWY-TT) compared with the meningococcal serogroup C vaccine conjugated to CRM (MenC-CRM) and the quadrivalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine (MenACWY-PS) 6 to 10 y after primary vaccination in toddlers (aged 1-<2 y; MenACWY-TT and MenC-CRM) and children (aged 2-<11 y; MenACWY-TT and MenACWY-PS). Antibody responses against meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, and Y were assessed by serum bactericidal antibody assays using rabbit (rSBA) or human (hSBA) complement. A MenACWY-TT booster dose at Year 10 was given to all eligible subjects regardless of the primary vaccine received. At Year 10, the percentages of subjects with rSBA titers ≥1:8 for serogroups A, C, W, and Y were as follows: MenACWY-TT (toddlers), 65.6%, 82.8%, 31.3%, 43.8%, respectively; MenC-CRM, 88.2% for serogroup C; MenACWY-TT (children), 88.9%, 84.1%, 67.1%, 65.9%; and MenACWY-PS, 28.6%, 81.0%, 23.8%, and 23.8%. Corresponding percentages for hSBA titers ≥1:4 were as follows: MenACWY-TT (toddlers), 31.1%, 91.9%, 44.4%, 41.4%; MenC-CRM, 93.8% for serogroup C; MenACWY-TT (children), 34.8%, 91.1%, 61.2%, 72.6%; and MenACWY-PS, 33.3%, 100.0%, 26.3%, and 44.4%. One month after the MenACWY-TT booster, the percentage of subjects with vaccine response ranged from 75.7% to 100.0% across serogroups in all study groups. Postbooster vaccine responses were generally comparable between groups across serogroups. No new safety signals were identified. Antibody responses persisted 10 y after MenACWY-TT vaccination. The MenACWY-TT booster dose was well tolerated and elicited robust immune responses.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Conejos , Factores de Tiempo , Vacunación , Vacunas Conjugadas
18.
Vaccine ; 38(8): 2105-2114, 2020 02 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31776027

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pertussis immunization during pregnancy results in high pertussis antibody concentrations in young infants but may interfere with infant immune responses to post-natal immunization. METHODS: This phase IV, multi-country, open-label study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of infant primary vaccination with DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13). Enrolled infants (6-14 weeks old) were born to mothers who were randomized to receive reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-three-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap group) or placebo (control group) during pregnancy (270/7-366/7 weeks' gestation) with crossover immunization postpartum. All infants received 2 or 3 DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib and PCV13 doses according to national schedules. Immunogenicity was assessed in infants pre- and 1 month post-primary vaccination. The primary objective was to assess seroprotection/vaccine response rates for DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib antigens 1 month post-primary vaccination. RESULTS: 601 infants (Tdap group: 296; control group: 305) were vaccinated. One month post-priming, seroprotection rates were 100% (diphtheria; tetanus), ≥98.5% (hepatitis B), ≥95.9% (polio) and ≥94.5% (Hib) in both groups. Vaccine response rates for pertussis antigens were significantly lower in infants whose mothers received pregnancy Tdap (37.5-77.1%) versus placebo (90.0-99.2%). Solicited and unsolicited adverse event rates were similar between groups. Serious adverse events occurred in 2.4% (Tdap group) and 5.6% (control group) of infants, none were vaccination-related. CONCLUSIONS: Pertussis antibodies transferred during pregnancy may decrease the risk of pertussis infection in the first months of life but interfere with the infant's ability to produce pertussis antibodies, the clinical significance of which remains unknown. Safety and reactogenicity results were consistent with previous experience. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02422264.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/inmunología , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/inmunología , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/inmunología , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados/inmunología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Embarazo , Vacunas Combinadas/inmunología
19.
Vaccine ; 38(8): 2095-2104, 2020 02 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31776029

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pertussis immunization during pregnancy is recommended in many countries. Data from large randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of this approach. METHODS: This phase IV, observer-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial assessed immunogenicity, transplacental transfer of maternal pertussis antibodies, reactogenicity and safety of a reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-three-component acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) during pregnancy. Women received Tdap or placebo at 27-36 weeks' gestation with crossover ≤ 72-hour-postpartum immunization. Immune responses were assessed before the pregnancy dose and 1 month after, and from the umbilical cord at delivery. Superiority (primary objective) was reached if the lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the pertussis geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratios (Tdap/control) in cord blood were ≥ 1.5. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and pregnancy-/neonate-related AEs of interest were recorded. RESULTS: 687 pregnant women were vaccinated (Tdap: N = 341 control: N = 346). Superiority of the pertussis immune response (maternally transferred pertussis antibodies in cord blood) was demonstrated by the GMC ratios (Tdap/control): 16.1 (95% CI: 13.5-19.2) for anti-filamentous hemagglutinin, 20.7 (15.9-26.9) for anti-pertactin and 8.5 (7.0-10.2) for anti-pertussis toxoid. Rates of pregnancy-/neonate-related AEs of interest, solicited general and unsolicited AEs were similar between groups. None of the serious AEs reported throughout the study were considered related to maternal Tdap vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Tdap vaccination during pregnancy resulted in high levels of pertussis antibodies in cord blood, was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile. This supports the recommendation of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy to prevent early-infant pertussis disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02377349.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Inmunidad Materno-Adquirida , Exposición Materna , Tos Ferina , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Método Simple Ciego , Vacunación , Tos Ferina/prevención & control
20.
N Engl J Med ; 354(1): 11-22, 2006 Jan 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16394298

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of an attenuated G1P[8] human rotavirus (HRV) vaccine were tested in a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial. METHODS: We studied 63,225 healthy infants from 11 Latin American countries and Finland who received two oral doses of either the HRV vaccine (31,673 infants) or placebo (31,552 infants) at approximately two months and four months of age. Severe gastroenteritis episodes were identified by active surveillance. The severity of disease was graded with the use of the 20-point Vesikari scale. Vaccine efficacy was evaluated in a subgroup of 20,169 infants (10,159 vaccinees and 10,010 placebo recipients). RESULTS: The efficacy of the vaccine against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis and against rotavirus-associated hospitalization was 85 percent (P<0.001 for the comparison with placebo) and reached 100 percent against more severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. Hospitalization for diarrhea of any cause was reduced by 42 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 29 to 53 percent; P<0.001). During the 31-day window after each dose, six vaccine recipients and seven placebo recipients had definite intussusception (difference in risk, -0.32 per 10,000 infants; 95 percent confidence interval, -2.91 to 2.18; P=0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Two oral doses of the live attenuated G1P[8] HRV vaccine were highly efficacious in protecting infants against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis, significantly reduced the rate of severe gastroenteritis from any cause, and were not associated with an increased risk of intussusception. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00139347 and NCT00263666.)


Asunto(s)
Gastroenteritis/prevención & control , Infecciones por Rotavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Rotavirus , Vacunas Atenuadas , Administración Oral , Diarrea Infantil/epidemiología , Diarrea Infantil/prevención & control , Diarrea Infantil/virología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Gastroenteritis/epidemiología , Gastroenteritis/virología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Intususcepción/etiología , Masculino , Riesgo , Rotavirus , Infecciones por Rotavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Rotavirus/mortalidad , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/efectos adversos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Atenuadas/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA