Fibrinogen reconstitution after therapeutic apheresis: Comparison of double-filtration plasmapheresis, plasma exchange, and immunoadsorption.

BACKGROUND: Fibrinogen reconstitution after therapeutic apheresis has been poorly studied. Apheresis modalities, for example, plasma exchange (PE), double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), or selective immunoadsorption (IA), may have different impacts. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated therapeutic apheresis sessions performed at our center across four modalities (PE, DFPP, and IA with or without plasma filtration). Fibrinogen levels were assessed at the beginning and end of each apheresis session, and immediately before the subsequent session. We adjusted measurements on hematocrit values to account for hemoconcentration. RESULTS: Between January 10, 2016 and March 2, 2020, we included 90 patients for a total of 754 apheresis sessions (PE: 35; DFPP: 351; IA only: 109; IA + plasma filtration: 259). Each patient received a median of five sessions (1Q 3; 3Q 9); median plasma volume treated was 5.5 L (1Q 4.3 L; 3Q 7.0 L). Within a session, DFPP and PE induced a significantly greater depletion of fibrinogen than both IA modalities, even after adjustment for the treated plasma volume. Median fibrinogen reconstitution was 0.8 (0.4-1.2) g/L (median time between sessions: 38 hours). In multivariate analysis, fibrinogen reconstitution was significantly associated with intersession time (+0.66 g/L/log-hour P < .001), apheresis modality (ANOVA; P < .001), initial fibrinogen concentration (+0.15 g/L per gram of fibrinogen; P < .001), and the last fibrinogen concentration from the previous apheresis session (-0.14 g/L per gram of fibrinogen; P < .001). In a model that considered hemoconcentration, the results were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that fibrinogen reconstitution was highly variable between patients and apheresis sessions. Apheresis modalities had a significant impact on fibrinogen reconstitution, regardless of hemoconcentration.

How to improve clotting factors depletion in double-filtration plasmapheresis.

BACKGROUND: Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), a selective therapeutic apheresis, can deplete pathogenic antibodies/substances, but also important coagulation factors. AIM: To determine if the use of a separator filter with different characteristics (CascadefloEC-50 W) as compared to the reference filter (PlasmafloOP-08 W) is as efficient in terms of immunoglobulin loss, but can reduce coagulation factor losses and have similar tolerability. PATIENTS/METHODS: This is a single-center prospective study including 14 patients divided into two groups (7 each): that is, group1 = CascadefloEC-50 W and group2 = PlasmafloOP-08 W. We measured immunoglobulins, lipid profiles, blood-cell counts, hemostasis (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time), coagulation factors, and natural anticoagulants at before and after the first DFPP-session. RESULTS: In group 1, the loss of coagulation factors was significantly reduced as compared to group 2 for proteins with a molecular weight of >150 kDa: there was, respectively, an average decrease of 70% vs 31% for fibrinogen (P = 0.004), 66% vs 21% for factor V (P = 2.16e-07), 60% vs 32% for factor XI (P = 6.96e-06), 75% vs 17% for XIII-antigen (P = 0.0002), and 47% vs 0% for VWF-antigen(P = 0.02). The decrease in post-session IgG was, on average, 45% in group 1 and 50% in group 2 (P = 0.13). Those results remained significant even when adjusted to the treated-plasma volume and the pre-DFPP factor values. CONCLUSION: DFPP, using a CascadefloEC-50W as a first-filter, reduces efficiently IgGs similarly to PlasmafloOP-08W but spares clotting factors.

Treatment of refractory myasthenia gravis by double-filtration plasmapheresis and rituximab: A case series of nine patients and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease mediated by circulating autoantibodies (anti-AchR, anti-MuSK, etc.). More than 20% of myasthenic patients are refractory to conventional treatments (plasma exchange, IVIg, steroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil). Rituximab (B-lymphocyte-depleting anti-CD20) and apheresis (double-filtration plasmapheresis [DFPP] and immunoadsorption [IA]) are interesting therapeutic alternatives. METHODS: This monocentric pilot study included nine refractory myasthenic patients (March 2018 to May 2020) treated by DFPP and/or IA associated with rituximab (375 mg/m2 ). Clinical responses were assessed using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) score. RESULTS: Average age of patients was 53 ± 17 years. Gender ratio (M/F) was 3:6. The combination of apheresis and rituximab reduced median MGFA score from IV to II after 12 months of follow-up. Clinical improvement assessed by MGFA score was sustained in the long-term for all patients, during an average follow-up of 14 ± 9 months, allowing them to be self-sufficient and out sick-leave. The median number of apheresis sessions was 7 (5-30). The dose of prednisolone was reduced in two patients from 40 mg/d and 30 mg/d to 7.5 mg/d and 10 mg/d, respectively. It was stopped in a patient who was taking 30 mg/d. No infectious, bleeding, or thrombosis complications were noted. CONCLUSION: The combination of rituximab and DFPP was effective to treat refractory MG.

Comparison of three modalities of plasmapheresis on coagulation: Centrifugal, single-membrane filtration, and double-filtration plasmapheresis.

BACKGROUND: Plasmapheresis can deplete pathogenic antibodies and allow ABO- and/or HLA-incompatible transplantation. AIM: To determine the impacts of three modalities of plasmapheresis (centrifugal plasmapheresis [cTPE], single-filtration plasmapheresis [mTPE], double-filtration plasmapheresis [DFPP]) on hemostasis parameters and thrombin generation. MATERIALS/METHODS: Prospective, comparative study on 21 patients that received three modalities of plasmapheresis (7 patients/group). Hemostasis (prothrombin time [PT], activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], procoagulant factors and natural anticoagulants) were measured before and after the first plasmapheresis session. Thrombin generation was also assessed in platelet-poor plasma using an STA-Genesia (Stago) analyzer and Thromboscreen reagents (Stago) in 4-5 patients from each group. RESULTS: Both cTPE and mTPE resulted in high decreases in proteins, whatever their molecular weights. Median post/pre ratios were 0.27 to 0.55 for cTPE for most proteins (except FVIII [0.64] and VWF [0.57]). Median post/pre-ratios of mTPE were 0.28 to 0.56 for all proteins. DFPP decreased high-molecular-weight proteins (fibrinogen, FV, FVIII, FXI, VWF) and proteins strongly bound to large molecules (protein SandTFPI). Median post/pre ratios with cTPE and mTPE were similar to DFPP for fibrinogen and FXIII. Regarding thrombin generation, cTPE and mTPE did not significantly modify endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and DFPP induced a slight decrease in ETP (median post/pre ratio at 0.73) in the absence of thrombomodulin. ETP inhibition by thrombomodulin was decreased for all procedures. CONCLUSIONS: DFPP depleted high molecular-weight proteins in contrast to cTPE and mTPE, which significantly decreased all proteins. Regarding thrombin generation, depletion of procoagulant factors was counterbalanced by a decrease in some natural anticoagulants whatever plasmapheresis method used; with all methods, fibrinogen and FXIII were highly depleted.

Isoagglutinin removal by plasma centrifugation or filtration (single or double): A prospective study in a single center.

INTRODUCTION: ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation, a well-established procedure, has good long-term results provided pretransplant desensitization that includes immunosuppression and apheresis. OBJECTIVE: To compare, within the first pretransplant apheresis session given to 29 ABOi kidney-transplant candidates, the effect on isoagglutinin titers (both IgG and IgM isotypes) of three modalities: centrifugation therapeutic plasmapheresis (cTP; n = 10), filtration TP (fTP; n = 9), and double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP; n = 10). RESULTS: The three groups were comparable according to baseline demographics. Treated plasma volumes were similar across the three groups, that is, 4111 ± 403 mL (cTP), 3861 ± 282 mL (fTP), and 3699 ± 820 mL (DFPP): that is, 54 ± 7, 53 ± 7, and 53 ± 10 mL/kg respectively. One session of centrifugation or filtration TP reduced IgG anti-A/anti-B isoagglutinin titer by ~4, whereas one DFPP session reduced it by ~2. One session of cTP reduced IgM anti-A isoagglutinin titer by a little less than 4, whereas fTP and DFPP sessions reduced it by ~3. There were no statistical differences across the three groups regarding isoagglutinin rebound (IgG and IgM). However, isoagglutinin IgG rebound was >4 dilutions for anti-B titers compared with ~2 dilutions for anti-A titers. The median decreases in IgG level were -3.9 g/L (DFPP), -5.9 g/L (cTP), and - 6.06 g/L (fTP) (p = ns). Median fibrinogen depletions were ~ 60% (fTP), 64% (DFPP), and 76% (cTP). CONCLUSIONS: Isoagglutinin depletions within the first apheresis session were similar across cTP, fTP, and DFPP: this was numerically lower for DFPP.

The association between renal resistive index and premature mortality after kidney transplantation is modified by pre-transplant diabetes status: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Renal resistive index (RI) predicts mortality in renal transplant recipients, but we do not know whether this is true in diabetic patients. The objective of this study was to analyse the long-term predictive value of RI for death with a functioning graft (DWFG) in renal transplant recipients with or without pre-transplant diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in 1800 renal transplant recipients between 1985 and 2017 who were followed for up to 30 years (total observation period: 14 202 patient years). Donor and recipient characteristics at time of transplantation and at 3 months were reviewed. The long-term predictive value of RI for DWFG and the age-RI and arterial pressure-RI relationships were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 284/1800 (15.7%) patients had diabetes mellitus before transplantation. RI was <0.75 in 1327/1800 patients (73.7%). High RI was associated with a higher risk of DWFG in non-diabetic patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.39, 95% confidence interval 2.50-4.61; P < 0.001], but not in patients with pre-transplant diabetes (HR = 1.25, 0.70-2.19; P = 0.39), even after multiple adjustments. There was no interaction between diabetes and age. In contrast, there was an interaction between RI and pulse pressure. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that RI is not a predictor of DWFG in diabetic renal transplant recipients, in contrast to non-diabetic recipients. These findings could be due to a different age-RI or pulse pressure-RI relationship.

Effect of immunoadsorption alone or combined with membrane filtration on hemostasis parameters.

INTRODUCTION: ABO- or HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation is possible thanks to pretransplant antibody-depletion achieved by extracorporeal-treatment modalities. These methods induce depletion of some plasma proteins and may also impact on proteins involved in hemostasis. METHODS: To determine the impact of one session of immunoadsorption (IA) alone or combined with membrane filtration (MF) on clotting factors and natural anticoagulants, we performed a prospective, observational study on 13 patients waiting for HLA-/ABO-incompatible kidney transplants. Plasma hemostasis parameters were measured before and immediately after a first session of IA alone in six patients and of IA + MF in seven patients. RESULTS: IA alone induced depletion of fibrinogen and factor XIII (FXIII) whereas IA + MF caused greater depletion of all high-molecular-weight hemostatic proteins (fibrinogen, FV, FVIII, FXI, FXIII, von-Willebrand factor [VWF]). After an IA session, median reductions were 30% for fibrinogen and 43% for FXIII compared to baseline values. After a session of IA + MF, median decreases were 70% for fibrinogen, 54% for FV, 56% for FVIII, 37% for FXI, 78% for FXIII, and 62% for VWF. Noticeably, levels of low-molecular-weight factors (<100 kDa) were far less decreased than high-molecular-weight proteins with IA + MF, except for protein S and the tissue factor pathway inhibitor, which are known to be partially physiologically bound to high-molecular-weight molecules. CONCLUSIONS: IA and IA + MF induced significant depletion of some proteins implicated in the hemostatic process; however, IA + MF resulted in stronger modifications to hemostasis parameters than IA alone. This may have potential clinical implications regarding bleeding risk, and particularly depletion of fibrinogen and FXIII.

CMV-infected kidney grafts drive the expansion of blood-borne CMV-specific T cells restricted by shared class I HLA molecules via presentation on donor cells.

We aimed to determine the role of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-infected donor cells in the development of a CMV-specific immune response in kidney transplant recipients. We assessed the CMV pp65-specific immune response by using interferon-É£ ELISPOT and dextramers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 115 recipients (D+R- 31, D+R + 44, D-R + 40) late after transplantation (mean 59 ± 42 months). Receiving a kidney from a D+ donor resulted in a higher number of IFN-É£-producing anti-CMV T cells (P = .004). This effect disappeared with the absence of shared HLA class I specificities between donors and recipients (P = .430). To confirm the role of donor cells in stimulating the expansion of newly developed CMV-specific CD8+ T cells after transplantation, we compared the number of HLA-A2-restricted CMV-specific CD8+ T cells in primo-infected recipients who received an HLA-A2 or non-HLA-A2 graft. The median of anti-CMV pp65 T cells restricted by HLA-A2 was very low for patients who received a non-HLA-A2 graft vs an HLA-A2 graft (300 [0-14638] vs. 17972 [222-85594] anti-CMV pp65 CD8+ T cells/million CD8+ T cells, P = .001). This adds new evidence that CMV-infected kidney donor cells present CMV peptides and drive an inflation of memory CMV-specific CD8+ T cells, likely because of frequent CMV replications within the graft.

Conversion to mTOR-Inhibitors Plus IV Immunoglobulins in Kidney-Transplant Recipients with BKV Infection: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

BK virus-associated nephropathy (PvAN) increases the risk of graft failure justifying treatment. Conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) and Human polyclonal immunoglobulins (IVIg) could prevent the risk of PvAN. Our retrospective study assessed the efficacy of mTORi associated with IVIg therapy (mTORi±IVIg group) versus standard immunosuppression reduction to clear BKV DNAemia. Among forty-three kidney-transplanted patients with positive BKV DNAemia, we included twenty-six patients in the mTORi±IVIg group and reduced immunosuppression therapy for seventeen patients. We focused on BKV DNAemia clearance on the first-year. Renal function, rejection rate, evolution to PvAN, and complications of immunosuppression were assessed. BKV DNAemia decreased faster and significantly in the control group as compared to the mTORi±IVIg group (p < 0.001). Viral clearance was significantly higher in the control group compared to the mTORi±IVIg group (88% vs. 58%; p = 0.033). Death-censored graft loss, rejection rates and kidney-graft function at 12 months did not significantly differ. Multivariate analyses significantly associated BKV DNAemia clearance with reducing immunosuppression (OR = 0.11 (0.06−0.9), p = 0.045), female kidney donor (OR = 0.10 (0.01−0.59/)], p = 0.018) and time to first DNAemia, (OR = 0.88 (0.76−0.96), p = 0.019). In our study, the standard treatment for BKV DNAemia had better outcomes than an mTORi±IVIg conversion.

pre-existing diabetes and PTDM in kidney transplant recipients: how to handle immunosuppression.

INTRODUCTION: Preexisting diabetes (PD) and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) are common and severe comorbidities posttransplantation. The immunosuppressive regimens are modifiable risk factors. AREAS COVERED: We reviewed Pubmed and Cochrane database and we summarize the mechanisms and impacts of available immunosuppressive treatments on the risk of PD and PTDM. We also assess the possible management of these drugs to improve glycemic parameters while considering risks inherent in transplantation. EXPERT OPINION: PD i) increases the risk of sepsis, ii) is an independent risk factor for infection-related mortality, and iii) increases acute rejection risk. Regarding PTDM development i) immunosuppressive strategies without corticosteroids significantly reduce the risk but the price may be a higher incidence of rejection; ii) minimization or rapid withdrawal of steroids are two valuable approaches; iii) the diabetogenic role of calcineurin inhibitors(CNIs) is also well-described and is more important for tacrolimus than for cyclosporine. Reducing tacrolimus-exposure may improve glycemic parameters but also has a higher risk of rejection. PTDM risk is higher in patients that receive sirolimus compared to mycophenolate mofetil. Finally, conversion from CNIs to belatacept may offer the best benefits to PTDM-recipients in terms of glycemic parameters, graft and patient-outcomes.

Apheresis Efficacy and Tolerance in the Setting of HLA-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation.

Nearly 18% of patients on a waiting list for kidney transplantation (KT) are highly sensitized, which make access to KT more difficult. We assessed the efficacy and tolerance of different techniques (plasma exchanges [PE], double-filtration plasmapheresis [DFPP], and immunoadsorption [IA]) to remove donor specific antibodies (DSA) in the setting of HLA-incompatible (HLAi) KT. All patients that underwent apheresis for HLAi KT within a single center were included. Intra-session and inter-session Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) decrease in DSA, clinical and biological tolerances were assessed. A total of 881 sessions were performed for 45 patients: 107 DFPP, 54 PE, 720 IA. The procedures led to HLAi KT in 39 patients (87%) after 29 (15-51) days. A higher volume of treated plasma was associated with a greater decrease of inter-session class I and II DSA (p = 0.04, p = 0.02). IA, PE, and a lower maximal DSA MFI were associated with a greater decrease in intra-session class II DSA (p < 0.01). Safety was good: severe adverse events occurred in 17 sessions (1.9%), more frequently with DFPP (6.5%) p < 0.01. Hypotension occurred in 154 sessions (17.5%), more frequently with DFPP (p < 0.01). Apheresis is well tolerated (IA and PE > DFPP) and effective at removing HLA antibodies and allows HLAi KT for sensitized patients.

Immortal Time-Bias-Corrected Survival of Highly Sensitized Patients and HLA-desensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: In the setting of kidney transplantation (KT), we assessed the efficacy of desensitization and compared the survival of desensitized patients (HLA-incompatible KT) with similarly sensitized patients receiving HLA-compatible KT or sensitized patients still on a waiting list after adjusting for the usually unaccounted immortal time bias. METHODS: All patients in a French KT center on the waiting list between August 1994 and December 2019 with a high level of sensitization (panel-reactive antibodies [PRAs] ≥80%) were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. A time-varying covariate Cox survival model was used to account for the immortal time bias. A landmark analysis was used as a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 326 patients with high PRAs were followed, among which 147 (45%) remained on the waiting list at the time of last follow-up and 179 benefited from a KT. Thirty-six patients were desensitized, of which 30 received a kidney transplant, including eight deceased kidney donors. There were no differences in mortality rates between desensitized KT patients, nondesensitized KT patients, and waitlisted patients after adjusting for immortal time bias (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.48, P = 0.22). Death-censored graft survival was similar between desensitized and nondesensitized KT patients (HR = 0.92, P = 0.88 adjusting for donor age >65 years, donor status, and time on the waiting list). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year post-KT was similar for desensitized KT patients (53.3 ± 21 vs. 53.6 ± 21 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for nondesensitized patients; P = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: HLA-desensitization was effective for highly sensitized patients and gave access to KT without detrimental effects on patient or graft survival rates.

Early Steroid Withdrawal After Kidney Transplantation in Patients at Risk for New-Onset Diabetes After Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complication after kidney transplantation because of worse graft survival and increased risk of cardiovascular events. It is partly induced by immunosuppressive therapies such as corticosteroids. This study aimed to assess whether early corticosteroid withdrawal on day 4 (early steroid withdrawal [ESW] group) could prevent the development of NODAT within 2 years posttransplantation while maintaining good graft and patient survival rates. METHODS: This was an observational, single-center, retrospective study. All patients received an induction therapy of antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab and maintenance therapy of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil/corticosteroids. Patients were either weaned off corticosteroids on day 4 (ESW group) or were maintained on corticosteroids for at least 3 months (standard group). NODAT was defined as the initiation of any oral hypoglycemic agent or insulin at 3 months and up to 2 years posttransplantation in previously nondiabetic recipients. RESULTS: Between January, 1, 2010, and December 14, 2014, 492 recipients were included in this study; 88 received the ESW strategy, and 404 received the standard strategy. Age and body mass index (BMI) were significantly higher in the ESW group. The incidence of NODAT was 36.8% in the ESW group and 8.8% in the standard group (odds ratio [OR], 47.5; P < .001). Compared with a matched sample from the standard group that had the same probability to benefit from ESW at baseline, ESW was still associated with a significantly increased risk of NODAT (OR, 4.41; P = .018). Among recipients with a BMI >25 kg/m2, the ESW strategy significantly decreased the risk of NODAT compared with the standard strategy (OR, 0.07; P = .013). Safety endpoints (eg, acute rejection, de novo-specific antibodies, graft function/survival) did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Despite a reassuring safety profile, ESW on day 4 after kidney transplantation only had a marginal effect on the incidence of NODAT.

Cytomegalovirus disease in de novo kidney-transplant recipients: comparison of everolimus-based immunosuppression without prophylaxis with mycophenolic acid-based immunosuppression with prophylaxis.

PURPOSE: To compare everolimus (EVR) plus low-dose tacrolimus (TAC) with mycophenolic acid (MPA) plus standard-dose TAC with regards to rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in de novo kidney-transplant recipients (KTRs). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 187 de novo KTRs; 59 patients (31.6%) received EVR/low-dose TAC (group 1); 128 patients (68.4%) received MPA with standard-dose TAC (group 2). All received anti-thymocyte globulins as the induction therapy, and steroid-sparing strategy. Valganciclovir prophylaxis was mandatory for CMV D+/R- KTRs (seronegative recipients of a seropositive donor) in both groups and for R+ seropositive recipients (only in group 2). RESULTS: The 2-year incidence of CMV disease was low and comparable between groups: 6.8% and 7.0% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.94). There was no statistical difference in CMV serostatus (p = 1). However, CMV disease tended to be less frequent, though not statistically different, in R+ KTRs receiving EVR without prophylaxis (3.7% vs. 8.5% in groups 1 and 2, respectively) and in patients without EVR discontinuation (2.6% vs. 6.9% in patients who did not discontinue MPA (p = 0.29). Two-year graft function was good and comparable between groups (median eGFR of 54.2 and 53.0 mL/min in groups 1 and 2, respectively; p = 0.47); incidence of immunological events was low. Significantly more patients in group 1 discontinued EVR because of adverse events than patients that discontinued MPA in group 2 (35.6% in group 1 vs. 10.2% in group 2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus plus low-dose TAC given to de novo KTRs was associated with low rates of CMV disease, especially in R+ patients with no CMV prophylaxis.

[Tricks and misuses of rapid diagnostic testing for malaria diagnosis]. / Pièges et mésusages des tests de diagnostic rapide pour rechercher le paludisme en routine.

Molecular biology or immunochromatographic tests are conventionally offered as aids in the routine diagnosis of malaria. However, the interpretation of their results requires a precise knowledge of their limits, both by the biologist and the physician. It is in particular conditioned by thorough interview of the patient in order to seek a history of recent or even older malaria disease. We discuss herein the different usages and how to interpret such diagnostics, through a concrete example of a malaria case which was particularly tough to investigate.

Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection After Kidney Transplantation With or Without Direct-Acting Antivirals in a Real-Life Setting: A French Multicenter Experience.

PURPOSE: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are frequently infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), which can increase the risk of graft loss. Active HCV infections among KTRs are associated with shorter survival times. The emergence of very efficient interferon-free treatments (direct-acting antivirals [DAAs]) has revolutionized prognoses for chronic viral hepatitis. We performed a multicenter study where HCV (+)/RNA (+) KTRs were followed up and either received DAAs (group A) or not (group B) according to the transplant center. The aim was to assess, in a real-life setting, the impact of DAA therapy and to compare these results with those from HCV RNA (+) KTRs where HCV infection was not treated during the same period. METHODS: This study included 66 patients from 11 centers: 44 patients (66.7%; group A) received DAAs, whereas 22 patients did not (group B); the 2 groups were comparable according to baseline data. Most patients (88.6%) received sofosbuvir, 50% received ledipasvir, and 34.7% received daclatasvir. The duration of treatments ranged from 8 to 24 weeks. RESULTS: HCV RNA clearance (ie, a sustained virologic response) was observed in 95.4% of treated patients. Eradication of HCV led to a significant decrease in liver enzymes (50% reduction for alanine aminotransferase [P ≤ .001] and 41% for gamma glutamyl transpeptidase [P < .001]). Conversely, liver enzymes did not decrease in group B. Death occurred significantly more frequently in nontreated than treated patients (3 in group B vs none in group A, P = .003). Of the 10 treated patients with severe renal impairment before DAA therapy, 6 experienced graft loss. CONCLUSION: DAAs are very effective at treating chronic HCV and have an excellent tolerance profile.

Specific impact of past and new major cardiovascular events on acute kidney injury and end-stage renal disease risks in diabetes: a dynamic view.

BACKGROUND: Interconnections between major cardiovascular events (MCVEs) and renal events are recognized in diabetes, however, the specific impact of atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) on the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on top of established renal risk factors is unclear in type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in 861 consecutive patients followed in a nephrology setting during the 2000-13 period. RESULTS: The mean age was 70 ± 10 years, 65.1% were men and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 42.4 ± 21.0 mL/min/1.73 m2. During follow-up (median 59 months), 194 patients reached ESRD. A history of AF, HF or ACS was associated with an increased risk of reduced baseline eGFR. In turn, reduced baseline eGFR resulted in a greater risk of new MCVE (especially HF) during follow-up. Finally, all new MCVEs were risk factors for subsequent acute kidney injury (AKI) {HF: hazard ratio [HR] 8.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.06-11.4]; AF: HR 5.42 (3.91-7.52); ACS: HR 8.82 (6.24-12.5); all P < 0.0001} and ESRD [HF: HR 5.52 (95% CI 4.01-7.60), P < 0.0001; AF: HR 3.48 (2.30-5.21), P < 0.0001; ACS: HR 2.31 (1.43-3.73), P = 0.0006]. The AF- and HF-associated risks of ESRD were significant after adjustments on all renal risks of ESRD (gender, blood pressure, eGFR, albuminuria, renin-angiotensin blockers, retinopathy and AKI), but the association was less strong for ACS. Importantly, no association was noted between other major events such as stroke or infections and the risk of ESRD. CONCLUSIONS: Past and new cardiovascular events (more HF and AF than ACS) have a strong, independent impact on the development of ESRD above and beyond established risk factors in diabetes.

Impact on renal resistive index of diabetes in renal transplant donors and recipients: A retrospective analysis of 1827 kidney transplant recipients.

High renal resistive index (RI) is observed in diabetes and is associated with poor patient survival, but whether it is primarily due to renal vascular resistance or systemic vascular alterations is unclear. The respective impact of kidney transplant from diabetic donors or to diabetic recipients on RI would shed some light on this issue. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of donor and recipient diabetes on RI in order to understand the respective impact of the kidney and the vascular environment. The authors conducted a retrospective study in 1827 renal transplant recipients who received a kidney between 1985 and 2017, and had Doppler measurements at 3 months after transplant. Donor and recipient characteristics at the time of transplant and at 3 months were reviewed. Both donor diabetes and recipient diabetes were associated with RI in univariate analysis, but only recipient diabetes remained significantly associated in stepwise multivariate analyses (effect estimate on RI: +0.03 ± 0.005, P < 0.001). These findings were confirmed when RI was expressed as a binary variable using a cutoff of 0.75 (OR = 2.50 [1.77, 3.54], P < 0.001). Other determinants of RI were recipient characteristics (age, sex, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and duration of dialysis). Donor characteristics were not associated with RI. Our results suggest that high RI observed in diabetic recipients shortly after transplant is primarily due to the new vascular environment, rather than to characteristics of the transplanted kidney. Therefore, RI reflects systemic rather than intra-renal changes.