RESUMEN
Neuroinflammation is an important pathogenic mechanism in many neurodegenerative diseases, including those caused by frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Postmortem and in vivo imaging studies have shown brain inflammation early in these conditions, proportionate to symptom severity and rate of progression. However, evidence for corresponding blood markers of inflammation and their relationship with central inflammation and clinical outcome are limited. There is a pressing need for such scalable, accessible and mechanistically relevant blood markers as these will reduce the time, risk, and costs of experimental medicine trials. We therefore assessed inflammatory patterns of serum cytokines from 214 patients with clinical syndromes associated with FTLD as compared to healthy controls, including their correlation with brain regional microglial activation and disease progression. Serum assays used the MesoScale Discovery V-Plex-Human Cytokine 36 plex panel plus five additional cytokine assays. A sub-group of patients underwent 11C-PK11195 TSPO PET imaging, as an index of microglial activation. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the dimensionality of cytokine data, excluding cytokines that were undetectable in >50% of participants. Frequentist and Bayesian analyses were performed on the principal components, to compare each patient cohort to controls, and test for associations with central inflammation, neurodegeneration-related plasma markers and survival. The first component identified by the PCA (explaining 21.5% variance) was strongly loaded by pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, TNF-R1, M-CSF, IL-17A, IL-12, IP-10 and IL-6. Individual scores of the component showed significant differences between each patient cohort and controls. The degree to which a patient expressed this peripheral inflammatory profile at baseline correlated negatively with survival (higher inflammation, shorter survival), even when correcting for baseline clinical severity. Higher pro-inflammatory profile scores were associated with higher microglial activation in frontal and brainstem regions, as quantified with 11C-PK11195 TSPO PET. A permutation-based Canonical Correlation Analysis confirmed the association between the same cytokine-derived pattern and central inflammation across brain regions in a fully data-based manner. This data-driven approach identified a pro-inflammatory profile across the FTLD clinical spectrum, which is associated with central neuroinflammation and worse clinical outcome. Blood-based markers of inflammation could increase the scalability and access to neuroinflammatory assessment of people with dementia, to facilitate clinical trials and experimental medicine studies.
RESUMEN
Background: Anhedonia is a key symptom of depression, and it has been suggested as a potential target for future individualised treatments. However, much is unknown about how interventions enhancing dopaminergic pathways may affect anhedonia symptoms in the context of depression. Methods: We will perform independent searches in multiple electronic databases to identify clinical and animal experimental studies on pro-dopaminergic interventions in individuals with depression or animal models for depression. The primary outcomes will be overall anhedonia symptoms and their behavioural proxies in animals. Secondary outcomes will include side effects and neurobiological measures. At least two independent reviewers will conduct the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments using pre-defined tools according to each record's study design. We will develop ontologies to facilitate study identification and data extraction. We will synthesise data from clinical and animal studies separately. If appropriate, we will use random-effects meta-analyses, or synthesis without meta-analyses. We will investigate study characteristics as potential sources of heterogeneity. We will evaluate the confidence in the evidence for each outcome and source of evidence, considering the summary of the association, potential concerns regarding internal and external validity, and reporting biases. When multiple sources of evidence are available for an outcome, we will draw an overall conclusion in a triangulation meeting involving a multidisciplinary team of experts. We plan updates of the review every 6 months, and any future modifications to the protocol will be documented. We will co-produce this review with multiple stakeholders. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023451821.