Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 88(3): 560-567, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36228942

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite encouraging trends in survival, sociodemographic inequalities persist among patients with melanoma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the effect of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and health care systems on melanoma-specific mortality within an insured population of patients. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort study, we identified insured adults diagnosed with Stage I to IV melanoma from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014, followed through 2017, from the California Cancer Registry. We compared melanoma-specific mortality between insured patients diagnosed within the largest vertically integrated health care system in California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, and insured patients with other private insurance (OPI). RESULTS: Our cohort included 14,614 adults diagnosed with melanoma. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that race/ethnicity was not associated with survival disparities, while socioeconomic status was a strong predictor of melanoma-specific mortality, particularly for those with OPI. For example, hazard ratios demonstrate that the poorest patients with OPI have a 70% increased risk of dying from their melanoma compared to their wealthiest counterparts, while the poorest patients in Kaiser Permanente Southern California have no increased risk. LIMITATIONS: Our main limitation includes inadequate data for certain racial/ethnic groups, such as Native Americans. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the persistence of socioeconomic disparities within an insured population, specifically among those in non-integrated health care systems.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Melanoma , Adulto , Humanos , Etnicidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Clase Social , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos , California , Melanoma Cutáneo Maligno
2.
Cancer Causes Control ; 32(6): 609-616, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33783687

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We evaluated the influence of race/ethnicity and geocoded socioeconomic status (SES) on all-cause mortality in cancer patients with health insurance. METHODS: We identified adults diagnosed with eight common cancers from 2009 to 2014 from the California Cancer Registry and followed them through 2017 (8 years maximum). We calculated person-year mortality rates by race/ethnicity and SES. Adjusted hazard ratios for the association between overall mortality and race/ethnicity and SES were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models accounting for other demographics, stage at diagnosis, and cancer treatments. RESULTS: A total of 164,197 adults were diagnosed with cancer originating from breast, prostate, lung, colon, skin melanoma, uterus, kidney, and bladder. For all race/ethnic groups combined, the mortality rates from lowest to highest SES groups were 112.1/1000 PY (lowest); 100.2/1000 PY (lower-middle); 91.2/1000 PY (middle); 79.1/1000 PY (upper-middle); and 63.5/1000 PY (upper). These rates suggest that person with lowest SES have a markedly increased mortality risk after cancer diagnosis even if they have health insurance. In multivariable analyses, those in the lowest SES group had a 40-78% increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to those in the upper SES group across all race/ethnicities. For example, within African Americans, the adjusted mortality risk was up to 61% higher (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.41-1.83) in the lowest SES group compared to the highest SES group. CONCLUSION: This study suggests disparities in overall mortality risk after cancer diagnoses persist even in a cohort with health insurance, and that SES is an important driver of this disparity.


Asunto(s)
Seguro de Salud , Neoplasias/etnología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , California , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Clase Social , Factores Socioeconómicos
3.
J Pediatr ; 219: 173-179.e1, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31987655

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine maternal preexisting type 2 diabetes (T2D) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on risk of childhood asthma. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective birth cohort study included 97 554 singletons born in 2007-2011 within hospitals from a single integrated healthcare system. Children were prospectively followed from age 5 until December 31, 2017, using electronic medical records. Relative risks of childhood asthma associated with maternal diabetes in utero were estimated by hazard ratios using Cox regression adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: There were 3119 children (3.2%) who were exposed to preexisting T2D and 9836 (10.1%) to GDM. Among mothers with GDM, 3380 (34.4%) were dispensed antidiabetic medication during pregnancy. During a median of 7.6 years (IQR, 6.3-9.0 years) after birth, 15 125 children (15.5%) were diagnosed with asthma after age 5. Maternal diabetes interacted with maternal asthma history to affect child's asthma risk (P = .05). Among children without maternal asthma (n = 89 487), the adjusted hazard ratios for childhood asthma were 1.21 (95% CI, 1.08-1.36; P < .001) for exposure to T2D, 1.12 (95% CI, 1.01-1.25; P = .04) for GDM requiring antidiabetic medications, and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.93-1.10; P = .82) for GDM not requiring medications compared with no diabetes during pregnancy. The corresponding hazard ratios were 1.53 (95% CI, 1.19-1.96; P < .001), 1.11 (95% CI, 0.65-1.46; P = .44), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.66-1.08; P = .17) among children without maternal asthma (n = 8067). Gestational age at GDM diagnosis was not associated with childhood asthma (P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of childhood asthma was predominately observed for exposure to preexisting T2D, small for GDM requiring medication, and not increased for GDM not requiring medication during pregnancy, compared with no diabetes during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Gestacional , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 92(2): 284-292.e2, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32126220

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: An increasing number of patients are undergoing GI endoscopic procedures with active prescriptions for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). DOACs have been associated with a higher risk of GI bleeding (GIB) compared with warfarin. Our aims were to compare the risk of postendoscopic GIB and thromboembolic (TE) events among patients on DOACs versus warfarin. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18 years or older in a large integrated health care system in Southern California, who had undergone an outpatient GI endoscopic procedure and were taking a DOAC or warfarin between January 1, 2013, and October 1, 2019. We compared bleeding and thrombosis risk in the 30 days after the endoscopic procedure between the warfarin and DOAC groups using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2013, and October 1, 2019, we identified 6765 outpatient GI endoscopic procedures in which patients received preprocedure prescriptions for either a DOAC (1587) or warfarin (5178). Overall, there was no significant difference in postprocedure GIB (odds ratio [OR], 1.165; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.55; P = .291) or TE (OR, 0.929; 95% CI, 0.64-1.35; P = .703) between the DOAC and warfarin groups). Subgroup analysis revealed a higher risk of GIB associated with DOAC specifically with EGD procedures (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.15-2.83; P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the overall postendoscopic risk of GIB and TE events among patients with preprocedure use of DOACs compared with patients on warfarin. There may be a higher risk of GIB in patients taking DOACs and undergoing EGD.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Warfarina , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Endoscopía , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Warfarina/efectos adversos
5.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 57(3): 303-310.e2, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28259737

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the association between adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and molecular monitoring and the risk of disease progression or mortality among patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). DESIGN: We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients with CML (chronic phase, no prior cancer history, and confirmed to be Philadelphia chromosome positive) using data from electronic health records and chart reviews. Medication possession ratio (MPR) was used to measure drug adherence. SETTING: A large, community-based, integrated health plan in Southern California. PARTICIPANTS: The cohort consisted of 245 adult patients (≥18 years old) with Philadelphia positive chronic phase CML diagnosed from 2001 to 2012 and followed through 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In survival analyses, we examined the association of TKI adherence (MPR) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) monitoring test frequency with the composite clinical outcome, progression to accelerated phase disease-blast crisis or mortality (progression-free survival). The cohort was followed for a maximum of 13 years (median 4.6 years). RESULTS: Over 90% of the cohort initiated TKI therapy within 3 months of diagnosis, and the mean MPR was 88% (SD 18%). Virtually all patients (96%) started on imatinib. The rates of progression to accelerated phase-blast crisis and mortality were lower in patients with greater TKI adherence (20.4/1000 person-years) versus lower adherence (27.0/1000 person-years). Patients who underwent PCR monitoring had a significantly reduced risk of progression or mortality, which was seen in patients with high and low TKI adherence status from both the groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.07 [95% CI 0.03-0.19 if MPR >90%] and HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.02-0.21 if MPR<90%]). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that close clinical monitoring, which includes PCR monitoring in patients with high and low TKI drug adherence, is associated with a lower risk of progression or mortality.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Prepagos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/mortalidad , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , California , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 156(2): 379-89, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27002508

RESUMEN

The effectiveness of bisphosphonates (BP) in reducing risk of second breast cancer and recurrence in observational studies has been minimally studied. We examined the association of oral BP use on risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and recurrence in 16,781 women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer from 1996 to 2007, treated with tamoxifen, and followed through December 31, 2009 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC, n = 8857) and Southern California (KPSC, n = 7924). Sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacy information were extracted from electronic medical records and cancer registries. CBC was identified from cancer registries, and recurrences from electronic health records and chart reviews. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) treating BP use and hormonal therapy as time-varying variables. After mean 6.4 years of follow-up, 494 (3.0 %) women developed CBC. BP use post-breast cancer diagnosis (>93 % alendronate) ranged from 14.5 to 24.9 % at both study sites. Overall, there was no association of BP use with reduced risk of CBC (ever use, HR = 0.96; 95 % CI 0.67-1.38 and continuous use, HR = 1.03; 95 % CI 0.88, 1.20). Similar null associations were observed for recurrence (ever use, HR = 0.98; 95 % CI 0.82, 1.17 and continuous use, HR = 1.00; 95 % CI 0.92, 1.09). Associations varied somewhat by site yet confidence intervals overlapped. BP use was not associated with reduced risk of recurrence or new primary disease among women diagnosed with early breast cancer and treated with tamoxifen.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/epidemiología , Tamoxifeno/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
7.
Cancer ; 121(13): 2147-55, 2015 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25757699

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The risks of both endometrial cancer and postmenopausal breast cancer are increased by obesity and higher endogenous estrogen levels. Although aromatase inhibitors reduce breast cancer incidence, their influence on endometrial cancer is uncertain. METHODS: The authors investigated this issue in a cohort of 17,064 women who were diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in an integrated group practice health plan. Information on demographics, comorbidities, and the receipt of adjuvant endocrine therapy was available from electronic medical records and pharmacy records, respectively. Endometrial cancer information was obtained from the health plan's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-affiliated tumor registry, and rates were compared across endocrine therapy groups (aromatase inhibitor, n = 5303; tamoxifen, n = 5155; switchers: both [n = 3787] or none [n = 2819]) using multivariable adjusted Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: Endometrial cancer incidence was a statistically significant 48% lower in the aromatase inhibitor group versus the tamoxifen group (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.87; P = .01). Endometrial cancer incidence was 29% lower in the aromatase inhibitor group versus the no endocrine therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.35; P = .30) and 33% lower in the aromatase inhibitor group versus the tamoxifen group (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-1.06; P = .08), but neither difference was statistically significant. Associations were stronger among those with good drug adherence. CONCLUSIONS: In a community-based, integrated health plan setting, endometrial cancer incidence was lower in women who were receiving an aromatase inhibitor compared with those who were receiving tamoxifen. In addition, aromatase inhibitors may mitigate the incidence of tamoxifen-associated endometrial cancer. Although there were somewhat fewer endometrial cancers in the aromatase inhibitor group versus the no endocrine therapy group, further studies are needed for the definitive assessment of this potential association.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Tamoxifeno/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , California/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Endometriales/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos
8.
Med Care ; 53(4): 380-5, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25769058

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Many cancer registries do not capture recurrence; thus, outcome studies have often relied on time-intensive and costly manual chart reviews. Our goal was to build an effective and efficient method to reduce the numbers of chart reviews when identifying subsequent breast cancer (BC) using pathology and electronic health records. We evaluated our methods in an independent sample. METHODS: We developed methods for identifying subsequent BC (recurrence or second primary) using a cohort of 17,245 women diagnosed with early-stage BC from 2 health plans. We used a combination of information from pathology report reviews and an automated data algorithm to identify subsequent BC (for those lesions without pathologic confirmation). Test characteristics were determined for a developmental (N=175) and test (N=500) set. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of our hybrid approach were robust [96.7% (87.6%-99.4%) and 92.1% (85.1%-96.1%), respectively] in the developmental set. In the test set, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were also high [96.9% (88.4%-99.5%), 92.4% (89.4%-94.6%), and 99.5% (98.0%-99.0%), respectively]. The positive predictive value was lower (65.6%, 55.2%-74.8%). Chart review was required for 10.9% of the 17,245 women; 2946 (17.0%) women developed subsequent BC over a 14-year period. The date of subsequent BC identified by the algorithm was concordant with full chart reviews. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an efficient and effective hybrid approach that decreased the number of charts needed to be manually reviewed by approximately 90%, to determine subsequent BC occurrence and disease-free survival time.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Patología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos de Investigación , Algoritmos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
9.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 29(2): 133-138, 2023 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36735425

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: There is limited current literature regarding the retreatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after midurethral sling (MUS) placement with prior urethral bulking. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the retreatment and perioperative complications of MUS placement with prior urethral bulking compared with MUS placement without prior urethral bulking. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients within the Southern California Permanente Medical Group who underwent MUS placement from January 2009 to December 2020. Patients who underwent prior urethral bulking were compared with a control group without prior urethral bulking in a 1:1 ratio matched by age and MUS procedure date. The primary outcome was the retreatment of SUI after MUS placement with prior urethral bulking. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications. Regression models were used to evaluate associations between retreatment and perioperative complications while controlling for confounding variables. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients who underwent MUS placement with prior urethral bulking were identified and matched with 85 control patients who underwent MUS placement without prior urethral bulking. Patients who underwent MUS placement without prior urethral bulking were more likely to have concomitant surgery. Linear regression analysis controlling for the effect of concomitant surgery revealed no difference in estimated blood loss and operative time between the 2 groups. In logistic regression analysis, there was no difference in the retreatment rate and perioperative complications between groups. CONCLUSION: We found that the unique treatment combination of MUS placement with prior urethral bulking for recurrent SUI seems to have a similar retreatment rate and perioperative complications as MUS placement without prior urethral bulking.


Asunto(s)
Cabestrillo Suburetral , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo/cirugía , Cabestrillo Suburetral/efectos adversos , Retratamiento , Uretra/cirugía
10.
World J Hepatol ; 15(3): 419-430, 2023 Mar 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37034236

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive tests, such as Fibrosis-4 index and transient elastography (commonly FibroScan), are utilized in clinical pathways to risk stratify and diagnose non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In 2018, a clinical decision support tool (CDST) was implemented to guide primary care providers (PCPs) on use of FibroScan for NAFLD. AIM: To analyze how this CDST impacted health care utilization and patient outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of adults who had FibroScan for NAFLD indication from January 2015 to December 2017 (pre-CDST) or January 2018 to December 2020 (post-CDST). Outcomes included FibroScan result, laboratory tests, imaging studies, specialty referral, patient morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: We identified 958 patients who had FibroScan, 115 before and 843 after the CDST was implemented. The percentage of FibroScans ordered by PCPs increased from 33% to 67.1%. The percentage of patients diagnosed with early F1 fibrosis, on a scale from F0 to F4, increased from 7.8% to 14.2%. Those diagnosed with advanced F4 fibrosis decreased from 28.7% to 16.5%. There were fewer laboratory tests, imaging studies and biopsy after the CDST was implemented. Though there were more specialty referrals placed after the CDST was implemented, multivariate analysis revealed that healthcare utilization aligned with fibrosis score, whereby patients with more advanced disease had more referrals. Very few patients were hospitalized or died. CONCLUSION: This CDST empowered PCPs to diagnose and manage patients with NAFLD with appropriate allocation of care towards patients with more advanced disease.

11.
Perm J ; 27(2): 37-42, 2023 06 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37057344

RESUMEN

Objective The objective of this study was to assess whether additional primary care practitioner (PCP) contacts beyond the intake visit are associated with reduced hemoglobin A1c in patients with type 2 diabetes actively engaged in the Kaiser Permanente case management system. Methods This retrospective cohort study using the Kaiser Permanente electronic health record explored the effect of enhanced PCP contact among adult patients with type 2 diabetes actively working with diabetes case managers (defined as ≥ 4 case manager contacts during the study period). Results A total of 837 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. On average, patients with the highest PCP contact, < 7 contacts, had Ac levels 0.53 lower than those in the lowest PCP contact quartile, < 3 contacts (p = 0.0007). A1c decreased an average of 0.20 when the PCP contact quartile was one quartile higher (p = 0.0004). Holding the baseline A1c constant, the A1c decreased an average of 0.15 when the PCP contact quartile was one quartile higher (p = 0.0024). A1c change was significantly correlated with baseline A1c; A1c decreased by 0.64 more as the baseline A1c level increased by 1 (p < 0.0001). Additionally, the A1c level decreased by 0.02 more when patient age increased by 1 (p < 0.0001). Metformin use was associated with a decrease of A1c by 0.40 (p = 0.0057), whereas insulin use was associated with an increase of A1c by 0.29 (p = 0.0280). Conclusion In summary, a significant reduction was observed in A1c in patients with increased PCP contacts. This effect was seen in patients already receiving recommended case manager support.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Adulto , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemoglobina Glucada , Estudios Retrospectivos , Manejo de Caso , Atención Primaria de Salud , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico
12.
Am J Cardiol ; 187: 171-178, 2023 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36459742

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid adoption of telehealth (TH); however, its safety in subspecialty clinical practice remains uncertain. To assess the clinical outcomes associated with TH use in patients with coronary artery disease and/or heart failure during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, eligible adult patients who saw cardiologists from March 1, 2020, to August 31, 2020 (TH period) were identified. Patients were divided into two 3-month subcohorts (TH1, TH2) and compared with corresponding 2019 prepandemic subcohorts. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) events within 3 months after index visits. Secondary analysis was CV events in patients aged ≥75 years within 3-month follow-up associated with TH use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between TH use and CV outcomes. The study cohort included 6,485 TH and 7,557 prepandemic patients. The mean age was 70 years, with 40% of patients aged ≥75 years and 35% women. TH visits accounted for 0% of visits during the prepandemic period, compared with 68% during the TH period. Telephone visits comprised ≥92% of all TH encounters. Compared with the prepandemic period, patients seen during the TH period had fewer overall CV events (adjusted odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.90). Patients aged ≥75 years had similar findings (adjusted odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 0.89). Additional analysis of CV outcome events within 6 months after index visits showed similar findings. In conclusion, TH largely by way of telephone encounters can be safely incorporated into the ambulatory cardiology practice regardless of age.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Telemedicina , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Pandemias , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia
13.
Perm J ; 27(4): 44-54, 2023 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37718610

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients who are immunocompromised face an increased chance of severe COVID-19 infection compared with patients who are immunocompetent. However, vaccine efficacy for COVID-19 appears to be lower in patients who are immunocompromised. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab are monoclonal antibodies designed to enhance immune defense against COVID-19. Nevertheless, the safety and efficacy of tixagevimab-cilgavimab specifically in patients who are immunocompromised remains unknown. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective case study of patients who were immunocompromised and received tixagevimab-cilgavimab between January 3, 2022 to July 31, 2022 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. All patients were monitored for 180 days following tixagevimab-cilgavimab administration. Patients who were immunocompromised included those with solid tumors, hematologic malignancies, primary immunodeficiencies, recipients of solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplants, and patients undergoing treatment with immunosuppressive medications (eg, chemotherapy, high-dose corticosteroids, tumor necrosis factor blockers, and certain biologic agents). RESULTS: A total of 2352 patients who were immunocompromised were included in the study. Among them, 101 patients (4.3%) tested positive for COVID-19, and 13 patients (0.6%) required COVID-19-related hospital admissions. Notably, no deaths were reported within 180 days following tixagevimab-cilgavimab administration. Additionally, 4 patients (0.17%) sought same-day medical care after receiving tixagevimab-cilgavimab. Within 30 days, there were 39 non-COVID-19-related hospital admissions (1.7%) and within 7 days, 11 hospital admissions (0.5%) occurred after tixagevimab-cilgavimab administration. DISCUSSION: Tixagevimab-cilgavimab demonstrated a low incidence of COVID-19 and COVID-19-related hospital admissions in patients who were immunocompromised, with no reported mortality. Furthermore, there were no significant adverse effects associated with the use of these monoclonal antibodies. CONCLUSION: Tixagevimab-cilgavimab exhibited a low incidence of COVID-19 and adverse effects in patients who were immunocompromised.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales
14.
Am Surg ; 89(12): 5940-5948, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37265450

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lower socioeconomic status (SES) affects health care delivery and is associated with worse outcomes. Integrated healthcare systems (IHS) may help reduce barriers to health care and affect outcomes. Our aim was to compare outcomes of colon cancer cases diagnosed at the largest IHS in California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), to other insured patients (OI) to determine how SES influences mortality. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included insured adults in southern California diagnosed with colon cancer between 2009 and 2014, using data from the California Cancer Registry, and followed through 2017. Main outcome was all-cause mortality. Person-year mortality rates were calculated for two groups, KPSC and OI. Multivariable hazard ratios were calculated for association between SES quintiles and mortality. RESULTS: Total of 15 923 patients were diagnosed with colon cancer, 4195 patients (26.3%) within KPSC and 11 728 patients (73.7%) in OI. The overall mortality rate per 1000 person-years (PY) was lower in KPSC [103.8/1000 PY (95% CI:98.5-109.3)] compared to OI [139.3/1000 PY (95% CI:135.2-143.4)]. Compared to the highest SES group, the lowest SES group did not experience higher mortality risk in the KPSC population, after adjusting for race/ethnicity and other factors (HR, 95% CI = 1.13, .93-1.38). However, in OI patients, lowest and lower-middle SES groups had higher mortality risk compared to the highest SES group (HR, 95% CI = 1.26, 1.13-1.40 and 1.28, 1.16-1.41, respectively). DISCUSSION: Lower SES was associated with higher mortality risk within the OI group; however, within KPSC no such association was observed. Care coordination in IHS settings mitigate SES-related mortality differences.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Clase Social , Etnicidad , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia
15.
J Telemed Telecare ; 29(7): 566-575, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33866894

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The global pandemic has raised awareness of the need for alternative ways to deliver care, notably telehealth. Prior to this study, research has been mixed on its effectiveness and impact on downstream utilization, especially for seniors. Our multi-institution study of more than 300,000 telehealth visits for seniors evaluates the clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization for urgent and non-emergent symptoms. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from November 2015 to March 2019, leveraging different models of telehealth from three health systems, comparing them to in-person visits for urgent and non-emergent needs of seniors based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition diagnoses. The study population was adults aged 60 years or older who had access to telehealth and were affiliated with and resided in the geographic region of the healthcare organization providing telehealth. The primary outcomes of interest were visit resolution and episodes of care for those that required follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 313,516 telehealth visits were analysed across three healthcare organizations. Telehealth encounters were successful in resolving urgent and non-emergent needs in 84.0-86.7% of cases. When visits required follow-up, over 95% were resolved in less than three visits for both telehealth and in-person cohorts. DISCUSSION: While in-person visits have traditionally been the gold standard, our results suggest that when deployed within the confines of a patient's existing primary care and health system provider, telehealth can be an effective alternative to in-person care for urgent and non-emergent needs of seniors without increasing downstream utilization.


Asunto(s)
Telemedicina , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud
16.
Surgery ; 171(1): 29-34, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34364687

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nephrolithiasis is a classic indication for parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism patients; however, the effects of parathyroidectomy on nephrolithiasis recurrence are not well studied. The aim was to determine effect of parathyroidectomy on time to first nephrolithiasis recurrence and recurrence rate per patient-years. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism and at least one episode of nephrolithiasis was performed. The patients were divided into observation, presurgery, and postsurgery groups. Endpoints were time to first recurrence of nephrolithiasis and average recurrence rate per patient-years. RESULTS: The cohort was comprised of 1,252 patients. In addition, 334 (27%) patients underwent parathyroidectomy and 918 (73%) were observed. The surgical and nonsurgical groups differed significantly in age, sex, Charlson, calcium, and primary hyperparathyroidism level. Overall recurrence rate was 31.3%. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year recurrence-free survival rates were 74.4%, 56.3%, 49.5%, respectively (presurgery), 82.4%, 70.9%, 62.8%, respectively (postsurgery; P < .0001), and 86.3%, 77.7%, and 70.6%, respectively (observation). The presurgery group had an increased risk of first recurrence compared with the observation group (hazard ratio 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-2.47). The average recurrence rates among all surgical patients who recurred were 1 event per 4.3 patient-years presurgery versus 1 event per 6.7 patient-years postsurgery (P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Recurrent nephrolithiasis is a significant problem in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Parathyroidectomy prolongs the time to first recurrence and decreases the number of re-recurrences over time but does not eliminate recurrences. Observation may also be a reasonable approach in selected patients.


Asunto(s)
Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/cirugía , Nefrolitiasis/cirugía , Paratiroidectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Calcio/sangre , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/sangre , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/complicaciones , Hiperparatiroidismo Primario/mortalidad , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrolitiasis/sangre , Nefrolitiasis/etiología , Nefrolitiasis/mortalidad , Hormona Paratiroidea/sangre , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevención Secundaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
17.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(7): 1242-1248, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35379493

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Same-day discharge (SDD) protocols after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy have not been well studied in a community hospital setting, especially when hospitals with low inpatient pediatric censuses are increasingly closing their pediatric units. This study evaluates the outcomes of a SDD protocol after pediatric appendectomy that was implemented across an integrated healthcare system in which hospitals experienced closure of pediatric units. METHODS: Patients between ages 6 to 13 years-old who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis from January 1st 2015 to December 31st 2020 were reviewed. During the study period, an inter-hospital SDD protocol was introduced at nine hospitals, four of which closed their pediatric units. RESULTS: There were 1293 patients in the pre-protocol cohort and 953 patients in the post-protocol cohort. There were 588 (45.5%) patients who underwent SDD in the pre-protocol cohort, compared with 804 (84.4%) patients in the post-protocol cohort (p<0.00001). Postoperative narcotics were prescribed to 358 (27.7%) patients in the pre-protocol cohort, compared to 482 (50.6%) patients in the post-protocol cohort (P<0.00001). There was no difference in the 30-day emergency department visit rate or 30-day readmission rate between the two cohorts. A subgroup analysis comparing the surgical outcomes at community hospitals with and without pediatric units after implementation of the SDD protocol showed no difference. CONCLUSION: Same-day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis in community hospitals, even after pediatric unit closure, is safe and feasible. The decrease in postoperative LOS and the increase in SDD are not associated with higher complication rates.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Adolescente , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Niño , Hospitales Comunitarios , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Am J Manag Care ; 28(2): e35-e41, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35139294

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Procalcitonin (PCT) testing is FDA approved to guide antibiotic therapy in patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). However, its utilization and impact on real-world antibiotic prescribing behavior are unknown. We investigated the rate of PCT testing to evaluate an association between initial PCT level and antibiotic prescription patterns for patients with suspected LRTI within a large integrated health system. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study (January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2017) was performed in patients 18 years and older who were hospitalized with LRTI and had a PCT measurement. Antibiotic changes were noted before and 36 hours after initial PCT results. Antibiotic concordance was determined using a PCT cutoff value of 0.25 mcg/L. Concordance was defined as (1) patients received antibiotics after a PCT of at least 0.25 mcg/L resulted or (2) antibiotics were withheld after a PCT less than 0.25 mcg/L resulted. RESULTS: PCT testing occurred in 18% of hospitalized patients with LRTI. Among 1606 patients, antibiotic concordance with PCT results was 55%. Among the discordant population, 77% of patients received antibiotics in the setting of a low PCT level compared with 23% who did not receive antibiotics at a high PCT level. There were no statistical differences between LRTI types between patients with PCT-discordant and PCT-concordant care. CONCLUSIONS: Within a real-world environment of patients hospitalized with LRTI, PCT testing was low and the PCT levels did not appear to influence antibiotic prescribing behavior. Our findings suggest that clinicians continue to prioritize clinical judgment over initial PCT levels when prescribing antibiotics for suspected LRTIs.


Asunto(s)
Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores , Hospitalización , Humanos , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 10(3): 827-836, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34971845

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 mRNA vaccination-associated acute-onset hypersensitivity reactions have caused anxiety and may be contributing to vaccine hesitancy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, severity, and risk factors for treated acute-onset COVID-19 mRNA vaccination-associated hypersensitivity reactions in a well-characterized population. METHODS: All Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) members who received COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations between December 15, 2020, and March 11, 2021, at a KPSC facility were identified and characterized, along with all treated acute-onset vaccination-associated hypersensitivity events. RESULTS: We identified 391,123 unique vaccine recipients (59.18% female, age 64.19 ± 17.86 years); 215,156 received 2 doses (53.54% Moderna), 157,615 only a first dose (50.13% Moderna) (1961 [1.46%] >2 weeks late getting a second dose), and 18,352 (74.43% Moderna) only a second dose. Only 104 (0.028%) (85.58% female, age 53.18 ± 15.96 years) had treated first dose events, 68 (0.030%) Moderna. Only 32 (0.014%) (93.75% female, age 57.28 ± 17.09 years) had treated second dose events, 21 (0.016%) Moderna. Only 2 (0.00033%) vaccinations resulted in anaphylaxis. Only 27 (20.77%) of those with treated first dose reactions failed to get a second dose. Only 6 of 77 (7.8%) with first dose reactions also had second dose reactions. Individuals with treated events were more likely to be female (P < .0001), younger (P < .0001), and had more pre-existing drug "allergies" (2.11 ± 2.12 vs 1.02 ± 1.41 [P < .0001] for average recipients). CONCLUSIONS: Treated acute-onset hypersensitivity events were mostly benign, more common with first COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses, more likely to occur in younger females with typical risk factors associated with multiple drug intolerance syndrome, and very unlikely to be primarily immunologically mediated.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , COVID-19 , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Anafilaxia/etiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , ARN Mensajero , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunas Sintéticas , Vacunas de ARNm
20.
Clin Kidney J ; 15(11): 2056-2062, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36320364

RESUMEN

Background: Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are highly susceptible to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and its complications. Remdesivir has improved outcomes in COVID-19 patients but its use has been limited among ESKD patients due to insufficient data regarding safety outcomes. We sought to evaluate the safety of remdesivir among dialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients age ≥18 years on maintenance dialysis and hospitalized with COVID-19 between 1 May 2020 and 31 January 2021 within an integrated health system who were treated or not treated with remdesivir. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and transaminitis (AST/ALT >5× normal). Pseudo-populations were created using inverse probability of treatment weights with propensity scoring to balance patient characteristics among the two groups. Multivariable Poisson regression with robust error was performed to estimate 30-day mortality risk ratio. Results: A total of 486 (407 hemodialysis and 79 peritoneal dialysis) patients were hospitalized with COVID-19, among which 112 patients (23%) were treated with remdesivir [median treatment four days (interquartile range 2-5)]. The 30-day mortality rate was 24.1% among remdesivir-treated and 27.8% among non-treated patients. The estimated 30-day mortality rate was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.52-1.05) among remdesivir treated compared with non-treated patients. Liver injury and ICU admission rates were 1.8% and 14.3% among remdesivir-treated patients compared with 2.4% and 16% among non-treated patients. Conclusion: Among dialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir was not associated with higher rates of liver injury or ICU admissions, and demonstrated a trend toward lower 30-day mortality.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA