Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ophthalmology ; 119(2): 327-32, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22133795

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS). DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Interventional series of 150 eyes in 140 patients treated for subfoveal or juxtafoveal CNV secondary to POHS from January 2006 to January 2010. INTERVENTION: Intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy or combination IVB and verteporfin photodynamic therapy (IVB/PDT). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity (VA) at 12 and 24 months was analyzed. Secondary outcome measures included the number of injections per year and treatment-free intervals. RESULTS: A total of 117 eyes received IVB monotherapy, and 34 eyes underwent combination IVB/PDT treatment. For all patients, the average pretreatment logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) was 0.63 (Snellen equivalent 20/86) with a 12-month logMAR VA of 0.45 (Snellen equivalent 20/56) and a 24-month logMAR VA of 0.44 (Snellen equivalent 20/55). The mean follow-up was 21.1 months with an average of 4.24 IVB injections per year. There was no significant difference in initial VA, VA at 12 months, VA at 24 months, or number of eyes with a 3-line gain between the IVB monotherapy and IVB/PDT groups. Thirty-eight percent (39/104) of eyes gained 3 lines or more, and 81.2% (84/104) of subjects had maintained or improved their starting VA at 1 year. The proportion of subjects maintaining a 3-line gain in VA was relatively preserved at 2 years (29.8%, 17/57) and 3 years (30.3%, 10/32) follow-up. There was no increase in the proportion of subjects losing 3 lines or more over 3 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in VA outcomes between IVB monotherapy versus IVB/PDT combination therapy. The use of IVB alone or in combination with PDT results in significant visual stabilization in the majority of patients with CNV secondary to POHS.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Neovascularización Coroidal/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Histoplasmosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab , Neovascularización Coroidal/microbiología , Neovascularización Coroidal/fisiopatología , Terapia Combinada , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/microbiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Histoplasmosis/microbiología , Histoplasmosis/fisiopatología , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fotoquimioterapia , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/uso terapéutico , Porfirinas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Verteporfina , Agudeza Visual/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA