Polyomavirus BK replication in de novo kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

Polyomavirus BK (BKV)-associated nephropathy causes premature kidney transplant (KT) failure. BKV viruria and viremia are biomarkers of disease progression, but associated risk factors are controversial. A total of 682 KT patients receiving basiliximab, mycophenolic acid (MPA), corticosteroids were randomized 1:1 to cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (Tac). Risk factors were analyzed in 629 (92.2%) patients having at least 2 BKV measurements until month 12 posttransplant. Univariate analysis associated CsA-MPA with lower rates of viremia than Tac-MPA at month 6 (10.6% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.048) and 12 (4.8% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.004) and lower plasma BKV loads at month 12 (3.9 vs. 5.1 log(10) copies/mL; p = 0.028). In multivariate models, CsA-MPA remained associated with less viremia than Tac-MPA at month 6 (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.36-0.99) and month 12 (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16-0.68). Viremia at month 6 was also independently associated with higher steroid exposure until month 3 (OR 1.19 per 1 g), and with male gender (OR 2.49) and recipient age (OR 1.14 per 10 years) at month 12. The data suggest a dynamic risk factor evolution of BKV viremia consisting of higher corticosteroids until month 3, Tac-MPA compared to CsA-MPA at month 6 and Tac-MPA, older age, male gender at month 12 posttransplant.

Periodontitis and Accelerated Biological Aging: A Geroscience Approach.

As the whole world is epidemically aging, the burden of periodontitis and tooth loss is becoming a major health concern. Growing meta-epidemiological data implicate chronic systemic inflammation/infection due to periodontitis as an independent risk factor for aging-related diseases and mortality. However, because people age differently, chronological age is not a reliable marker of an individual's functional status. Recent advances in geroscience have shown that various biomarker signatures of biological aging are longitudinally associated with declined physical function, morbidity, and mortality due to major age-related diseases, including periodontitis. Here, we emphasize novel research developments bidirectionally linking periodontitis to accelerated biological aging. Using a composite biomarker age estimator, a striking increase in periodontitis and tooth loss was observed in subjects whose biological age at baseline was higher than their chronological age. Moreover, significantly shortened telomeres were encountered in populations affected by severe periodontitis. Second, we elucidate the cellular and molecular pillars of the aging process at the periodontal level. Accumulating evidence suggests that cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, and immunoaging are hallmarks of biological aging implicated in the impairment of periodontal homeostasis and the pathophysiology of periodontitis. Indeed, persistent bacteria-derived lipopolysaccharide stimulation influences cellular senescence in osteocytes, driving alveolar bone resorption. Moreover, inflammaging status induced by chronic hyperglycemia elevates the burden of senescent cells in gingival tissues, impairing their barrier function. Lastly, we reviewed a recent breakthrough in senotherapy to directly target the mechanisms of aging at the periodontal level. Physical exercise and intermittent fasting, together with natural compounds, senolytic drugs, and cell therapy, are increasingly being evaluated to rejuvenate the oral cavity. Following these innovations in geroscience, further advancements could provide oral clinicians the chance to intercept biological aging when still "subclinical" and set interventions for halting or delaying the trajectory toward aging-related diseases while patients are still chronologically young.

Immunosuppression with belatacept-based, corticosteroid-avoiding regimens in de novo kidney transplant recipients.

Current immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation typically include calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, both of which have toxicities that can impair recipient and allograft health. This 1-year, randomized, controlled, open-label, exploratory study assessed two belatacept-based regimens compared to a tacrolimus (TAC)-based, steroid-avoiding regimen. Recipients of living and deceased donor renal allografts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive belatacept-mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), belatacept-sirolimus (SRL), or TAC-MMF. All patients received induction with 4 doses of Thymoglobulin (6 mg/kg maximum) and an associated short course of corticosteroids. Eighty-nine patients were randomized and transplanted. Acute rejection occurred in 4, 1 and 1 patient in the belatacept-MMF, belatacept-SRL and TAC-MMF groups, respectively, by Month 6; most acute rejection occurred in the first 3 months. More than two-thirds of patients in the belatacept groups remained on CNI- and steroid-free regimens at 12 months and the calculated glomerular filtration rate was 8-10 mL/min higher with either belatacept regimen than with TAC-MMF. Overall safety was comparable between groups. In conclusion, primary immunosuppression with belatacept may enable the simultaneous avoidance of both CNIs and corticosteroids in recipients of living and deceased standard criteria donor kidneys, with acceptable rates of acute rejection and improved renal function relative to a TAC-based regimen.

Pharmacokinetics for once- versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplantation: a randomized, open-label trial.

Tacrolimus, a cornerstone immunosuppressant, is widely available as a twice-daily formulation (Tacrolimus BID). A once-daily prolonged-release formulation (Tacrolimus QD) has been developed that may improve adherence and impart long-lasting graft protection. This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant patients treated with Tacrolimus QD or Tacrolimus BID. A 6-week, open-label, randomized comparative study was conducted in centers in Europe and Australia. Eligible patients received Tacrolimus QD or Tacrolimus BID. PK profiles were obtained following the first tacrolimus dose (day 1), and twice under steady-state conditions. As secondary objectives, efficacy and safety parameters were also evaluated. Sixty-six patients completed all PK profiles (34 Tacrolimus QD, 32 Tacrolimus BID). Mean AUC(0-24) of tacrolimus on day 1 was approximately 30% lower for Tacrolimus QD than Tacrolimus BID (232 and 361 ng.h/mL, respectively), but was comparable by day 4. There was a good correlation and a similar relationship between AUC(0-24) and C(min) for both formulations. Efficacy and safety data were also comparable over the 6-week period. Tacrolimus QD can be administered once daily in the morning on the basis of the same systemic exposure and therapeutic drug monitoring concept as Tacrolimus BID.

Living kidney donation from people at risk of nephrolithiasis, with a focus on the genetic forms.

Deciding whether to accept a donor with nephrolithiasis is a multifaceted task because of the challenge of finding enough suitable donors while at the same time ensuring the safety of both donors and recipients. Until not long ago, donors with a history of renal stones or with stones emerging during screening on imaging were not considered ideal, but recent guidelines have adopted less stringent criteria for potential donors at risk of stones. This review goes through the problems that need to be approached to arrive at a wise clinical decision, balancing the safety of donors and recipients with the need to expand the organ pool. The risk of declining renal function and worsening stone formation is examined. Documents (consensus statements, guidelines, etc.) on this issue released by the most important medical societies and organizations are discussed and compared. Specific problems of living kidney donation associated with certain systemic (chronic hypercalcemia due to CYP24A1 gene mutations, primary hyperoxaluria, APRT deficiency) and renal (medullary sponge kidney, cystinuria, distal renal tubular acidosis, Dent's disease, Bartter syndrome, familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis) Mendelian disorders that cause nephrolithiasis are also addressed.

Dyslipidemia can reduce the immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporine.

AIMS: Dyslipidemia is a significant risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic disease and of chronic allograft rejection. Few data are available on the effects of dyslipidemia on the immunosuppressive action of immunosuppressive agents. We investigate the in vitro effects of lipids solution on the immunosuppressive action of cyclosporine (CsA). METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were PHA or OKT3 activated in vitro with/without different concentrations of Intralipid solution (INT, range 0.5% to 15%). CsA inhibition of activation was measured after a 3 day incubation, by adding H3-thimidine. The intracellular concentration of CsA was measured by radioimmunoassay and related to the CsA inhibitory effects. RESULTS: Increasing INT concentration in the medium, CsA inhibition of PBMC activation by PHA or OKT3 was reduced from 72+/-13% to 8+/-2% and from 80+/-10% to 18+/-3%, respectively. A significant reduction of the intracellular CsA concentration was also evident with increasing INT concentrations and was related to the inhibitory activity of CsA. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that dyslipidemia may reduce the availability of intracellular CsA concentration to inhibit the immune activation process and may explain the relationship between dyslipidemia and chronic allograft loss.

Higher incidence of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients with low everolimus exposure.

Everolimus (EVL) has shown a potential to reduce nephrotoxicity associated with cyclosporine (CsA) while providing similar protection against rejection. We analyzed the incidence of acute rejection episodes (ARE) among 20 cadaveric renal transplant recipients treated with the combination of EVL + CsA. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab induction given pretransplant and on day 4 posttransplant; EVL at a starting dose of 1.5 mg/day followed by concentration control to trough levels of 3 to 8 ng/mL by day 7; CsA at a starting dose of 4 mg/kg per day and then concentration controlled with C2 monitoring (C2 500-700 ng/mL); and steroids in a tapering regimen to reach 5 mg by day 30. The overall incidence of ARE was 25%. On postoperative day 7, patients with ARE showed significantly lower mean EVL trough concentrations compared with those not experiencing ARE (NO ARE: 2.2 +/- 2.1 ng/mL vs 4.8 +/- 2.4 ng/mL) (P = .05). The CsA C2 values were close to the lower end of the target range on day 3 (583 +/- 334 ng/mL). All rejecting grafts were functioning at 3 months posttransplantations, but mean serum creatinine was higher in the ARE group (ARE 2.2 +/- 0.7 mg/dL vs 1.1 +/- 0.2 NO ARE; P = .04). In conclusion, whenever EVL is used in combination with CsA to protect kidney transplant patients against the risk of acute rejection, a threshold of 3 ng/mL must be reached in the first week posttransplantation. We suggest careful monitoring of EVL exposure and increased EVL starting doses.

Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assay as a Complementary Method to Assess and Monitor Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients on Pre-emptive Antiviral Therapy: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease represents a major cause of post-transplantation morbidity and mortality. To estimate the risk of infection and monitor response to antiviral therapy, current guidelines suggest combination of viral load monitoring with direct assessment of CMV-specific immune response. We used enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) for the evaluation of CMV-specific T-cell response in kidney transplant recipients with CMV viremia and investigated how information gained could help manage CMV infection. METHODS: Seventeen patients on pre-emptive antiviral therapy and CMV quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) ≥500 copies/mL (first episode after transplantation) were assessed using ELISpot and divided into Weak (9 patients with baseline ELISpot <25 spot-forming colonies [SFCs]/200,000 peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs]) and Strong Responders (8 patients with baseline ELISpot ≥25 SFCs/200,000 PBMCs). CMV-specific T-cell response, infection severity, viral load, and antiviral therapy were prospectively recorded and compared between groups at 1, 2, and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Demographic and transplant characteristics of Weak and Strong Responders were similar. No episodes of CMV disease were observed. Weak Responders were more likely to experience CMV syndrome (56% vs 36.5%) and late virus reactivation (56% vs 25%) than Strong Responders. Weak Responders showed higher baseline median viral loads (19,700 vs 9265 copies/mL) and needed antiviral therapy for longer (179 vs 59.5 days). T-cell response showed 2 main patterns: early and delayed. CONCLUSIONS: ELISpot provides prognostic information about infection severity, risk of late reactivation, and response to therapy. Randomized trials, evaluating the need for antiviral therapy in kidney transplant recipients with asymptomatic infection and effective virus-specific T-cell immune response, are warranted.

Incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant recipients immunosuppressed with sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine.

Sirolimus (SRL) in combination with Cyclosporine A (CsA) and steroids has been shown to lower the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection episodes, allowing CsA sparing. We retrospectively compared the incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) among kidney transplant recipients (KTx) immunosuppressed with SRL + CsA versus CsA alone. Patients were divided into two groups: SRL + CsA (n = 38) versus CsA (n = 48). Mean follow-up was 53.9 +/- 17.1 months. Seventeen/86 subjects (19.8%) developed diabetes after transplantation (7 IFG, 8.1%; 10 PTDM, 11.6%). The incidence was significantly higher in SRL + CsA (12/38 patients, 31.6%) compared with CsA (5/43 patients, 10.4%) (P = .0144, odds ratio 3.97). More patients required treatment in the SRL + CsA compared to CsA alone cohort (13.2% vs 2.1%, P = .051): 4 pts (10.5%) became insulin- dependent among SRL+CsA, vs none in the CsA group. Use of OHD was similar in both groups (2.6% SRL + CsA vs 2.1% CsA). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex distribution, BMI, or serum creatinine at 1 to 3 and 5 years from transplantation. All PTDM patients are alive at follow-up, while two grafts were lost due to chronic renal allograft dysfunction. Within the limits of a small retrospective study, we observed that SRL in combination with CsA increased the diabetogenic potential of CsA. A possible explanation of our findings is that higher CsA doses were used in the early experience with SRL + CsA; therefore the higher incidence of PTDM that we observed in the SRL + CsA combination may be a sign of toxicity. Careful monitoring of blood levels is mandatory in the SRL + CsA combination to avoid pleiotropic toxicity.

Lymphocele after renal transplantation: the influence of the immunosuppressive therapy.

Lymphocele is a complication of renal transplantation, representing a lymphatic collection around the grafted kidney. The use of the immunosuppressive agent sirolimus (SRL) has been associated with a significant increase in lymphocele formation. This complication has been related to the antiproliferative activity of SRL, which delays surgical wound repair and closure of injured lymphatic vessels. The aim of this study was to relate the incidence of lymphocele with immunosuppression among 158 renal transplant patients operated with routine closure of all the visible lymphatic vessels around the iliac vessels and at the renal hilum. The incidence of lymphocele was not significantly different among the various immunosuppressive regimens.

Immunosuppression and cancer: A comparison of risks in recipients of organ transplants and in HIV-positive individuals.

The comparison of cancers occurring excessively among HIV-infected and transplanted individuals may help to elucidate the relationship between immune surveillance, viral infections, and cancer. A longitudinal study was conducted on 2002 HIV-infected Italian subjects, 6072 HIV-infected French individuals, and 2878 Italian recipients of solid organ transplants. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed to quantify the risk for cancer, compared with the French and Italian general populations. The SIRs for all cancers were 9.8 (95% CI: 9.0-10.6) for HIV-infected individuals versus 2.2 (95% CI: 1.9-2.5) for transplant recipients. In both groups, most of the excess risk was attributable to virus-related cancers, such as Kaposi's sarcoma (KS; SIR = 451 in HIV-positive individuals, 125 in transplant recipients), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL; SIR = 62.1 and 11.1, respectively), and liver cancer (SIR = 9.4 and 4.1, respectively). Significantly increased SIRs for anal cancer and Hodgkin's lymphoma were found only among HIV-positive individuals. Among women younger than 40 years of age, a more than 10-fold increase in cervical cancer risk was found in both groups. Among HIV-infected individuals treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapies drastically reduced SIRs for KS and NHL only. These results show that HIV-infected individuals and transplant recipients share a similar pattern of cancer risk, largely due to virus-related cancers.

Severe limb lymphedema in sirolimus-treated patients.

We report two kidney transplant recipients who developed severe limb lymphedema under sirolimus (SRL) immunosuppression. The patients received SRL 10 and 2 mg/d to achieve target levels of 10 to 20 ng/mL with tapering doses of prednisone. Renal function and drug levels were monitored monthly. Patient 1 developed lymphedema of the left upper limb 3 years posttransplantation, after having been exposed to high SRL doses in the preceding 2 years (mean SRL dose-9.5 mg/d, mean trough level-26.3 ng/mL, mean serum creatinine-1.63 mg/dL). In patient 2 lymphedema of both upper and lower right limbs occurred 18 months posttransplantation (mean SRL dose-3.2 mg/d, mean trough level-8.8 ng/mL, mean serum creatinine-2.9 mg/dL). Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were also observed in both patients before SRL reduction/conversion. No signs of hematopoietic toxicity were observed. In both patients magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the limb was negative for vascular obstruction, and lymphoscintigraphy revealed lymphatic obstruction. In patient 1 lymphedema improved significantly following SRL reduction and lymphatic drainage massage therapy. Patient 2 was converted to cyclosporine (CsA) improving markedly after conversion. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia also improved significantly in both patients after reduction/conversion. We conclude that SRL may facilitate the occurrence of lymphatic obstruction by mechanisms that are presently unexplained. Lymphedema of the limbs in renal transplant recipients under SRL treatment, especially if on the same side as the hemodialysis access, should warn the transplant physician to rapidly reduce or withdraw SRL before the occurrence of complete obstruction.

Comparison of oblique versus hockey-stick surgical incision for kidney transplantation.

The hockey-stick surgical incision is becoming more popular than the oblique incision for kidney transplantations. Both incisions are convenient and comfortable. Both have some drawbacks, such as muscle denervation for the former, or section of lateral muscles for the latter. In this retrospective study, we compared these incisions with regard to the incidence of long-term complications, such as postincisional hernia, relaxation of the abdominal wall, and a poor cosmetic result. One hundred patients (50 of each type) were evaluated at an average of 4.5 years after transplantation (3 months-15 years). Occurrence of incisional hernia was 16% in the former (8 cases) versus 4% in the latter (2 cases: X(2) = 4; P < .05). A major relaxation of the abdominal wall was found in 24% of the former (12 cases) versus 8% of the latter (4 cases) (X(2) = 4.76; P < .05). These complications were not correlated with age, sex, weight, side of transplant, or immunosuppressive drugs. In the former patients with hockey-stick incisions, the overall cosmetic results were poor, because in most cases the incision had been prolonged upward, above the transverse umbilical line, even as high as the costal arch. In 20% of the former patients with hockey-stick incisions, the scar had widened, particularly in the upper vertical branch of the J incision. We conclude that the final outcome of the oblique surgical incision was better than the hockey-stick incision because of the lower incidence of hernia and abdominal wall relaxation and the more favorable cosmetic results.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) requiring surgical management are encountered more frequently in renal transplant recipients, presenting an important technical problem during the repair. The aim of the present study was to analyze the epidemiology and natural evolution of AAA among renal allograft recipients. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-four renal transplant recipients were periodically evaluated with abdominal aortic ultrasound tomography for AAA. The indication for surgery was a maximal diameter >5 cm. Renal function, graft, and patient survival were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 51 months. RESULTS: Four AAA were detected in 394 renal transplant recipients, a prevalence of 1.01%. All of the AAA were found in male recipients of mean age 59.2 +/- 5.5 years and mean time posttransplantation of 82.7 +/- 77.3 months. The mean follow-up period between diagnosis and indication for surgery was 14.2 +/- 10.8 months. Two patients underwent open repair with aneurysmectomy and conventional tube graft positioning, and 2 patients refused surgical repair. To preserve renal graft function during the aortic cross-clamping phase, cold perfusion with 4 degrees C Ringer acetate and local hypothermia with sterile ice were used. Renal function did not change after the operation (preoperative serum creatinine levels were 1.2 and 1.3 mg/dL; postoperative 1.3 and 1.5 mg/dL respectively). The 2 patients who underwent surgery are alive with excellent graft functioning after a follow-up of 1.5 and 7 years, respectively. The 2 patients who refused surgical treatment are dead. CONCLUSIONS: Yearly ultrasound screening for AAA must be recommended in renal transplant recipients as part of the routine posttransplantation follow-up. De novo AAA occurs in younger subject in the transplant population and shows a faster evolution.

Gonadal function and immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation.

UNLABELLED: End-stage renal disease is associated with disorders in hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal function. Immunosuppressive therapies may influence the restoration of normal levels of gonadal hormones after renal transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the hormonal status of successful renal transplant recipients who were treated with different immunosuppressive agents. METHODS: Testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured in 59 male renal transplant recipients with stable graft function with serum creatinine <2.5 mg/dL. Patients were treated with three different immunosuppressive regimens: group I, calcineurin inhibitors (CI; n = 15), group II, sirolimus without calcineurin inhibitors (SRL; n = 15), group III, sirolimus in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (SRL * CI; n = 29). RESULTS: Testosterone was significantly lower in group II versus group I (3.12 +/- 1.23 versus 4.39 +/- 1.53 ng/mL; P < .0197). Group III had higher testosterone values than group II, but lower than group I. FSH and LH were also higher in the SRL group, but the differences were not statistically significant, perhaps because of the small number of patients. No relationship was found between testosterone blood levels and age, posttransplant follow-up, renal function, time on dialysis, body mass index, steroid use, or posttransplant diabetes. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus seems to impair the improvement of gonadal function after renal transplantation. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these data before patients are advised of this potential side effect.

Addition of sirolimus to cyclosporine in long-term kidney transplant recipients to withdraw steroid.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression regimen in long-term renal transplant (KTx) recipients after addition of sirolimus (SRL) to cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppression. A multicenter, prospective pilot study of steroid withdrawal (SW) was initiated for KTx patients. SW was divided into three phases: (A) conversion to a SRL + CsA + steroid regimen; (B) steroid tapering and withdrawal; and (C) maintenance with SRL + CsA. Primary endpoints of the study were incidence of acute biopsy-proven rejection (AR) and safety. In the A and B phases of the study 42 KTx patients (132 +/- 75 months post-Tx) were entered into the study, 18 of 42 (43%) with severe, acute side effects due to the CsA + SRL combination. These side effects were reversible with reduction of CsA or with suspension of the SRL/CsA combination. An amendment was introduced in the protocol to drastically reduce the CsA exposure to <50 ng/mL (trough) at the time of SRL addition. After this amendment, 39 other KTx patients entered the study and only 3 of 39 (8%) were discontinued because of toxic side effects. In the overall cohort of 81 KTx patients, the incidence of AR after SW was low (n = 5, 6.1%), all occurring within the first 3 months after SW. These findings indicate: (1) addition of SRL to very low-maintenance CyA exposure allows safe SW in KTx; (2) with the SRL + CsA combination, the incidence of AR after SW is low in long-term KTx patients; and (3) in the first 3 months after SW strict monitoring for early diagnosis and treatment of AR is mandatory.

N-Acetylcysteine and High-Dose Atorvastatin Reduce Oxidative Stress in an Ischemia-Reperfusion Model in the Rat Kidney.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and high-dose atorvastatin (ATOR) in reducing oxidative stress in a rat kidney model of ischemia-reperfusion injury. METHODS: Forty female rats underwent clamping of the left renal artery for 30 minutes, followed by reperfusion. The effects of pre-ischemic administration of NAC and/or ATOR were evaluated within 4 groups: a) control (no NAC, no ATOR); b) NAC (intraperitoneal NAC administration); c) ATOR (oral ATOR administration); and d) NAC+ATOR (both drugs). Oxidative stress was assessed by measuring the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). Post-ischemia-reperfusion injury was evaluated by means of renal histology. RESULTS: NAC, ATOR, and NAC+ATOR in rats showed lower MPO (P < .05) and higher GPx activity (P < .05) versus control; SOD activity was lower in NAC versus ATOR (P < .05). No difference among groups was found at histology. However, a lower rate of tubular ischemic lesions was evident in NAC+ATOR versus control (P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin pretreatment provides protection against oxidative stress in a rat kidney model of ischemia-reperfusion injury, reinforcing the evidence of a beneficial effect of statins beyond their cholesterol-lowering properties.

Expanding the Living Donor Pool "Second Act": Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment.

BACKGROUND: To safely expand our living donor pool, we recently decided to work on 3 areas: analysis of causes of exclusion of potential donors, the results of which we recently published, introduction of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), and ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation. We sought to determine the impact of the new strategy on living donor recruitment and transplantation during over a 10-year period at a single institution. METHODS: From January 2005 to September 2014, we evaluated 131 living donors. Of these, 80 (61%) were genetically related, 51 (39%) unrelated, 119 (91%) ABO compatible (ABOc), 12 ABOi (9%). The analysis was divided into 2 eras: era 1, 2005-2010 (n = 53) included the use of open lumbotomy and acceptance of ABOc only; and era 2, 2011-2014 (n = 78), which saw the introduction of LDN and ABOi transplantation. RESULTS: Forty-five (34%) potential candidates successfully donated, 67 (51%) were excluded, and 19 (15%) were actively undergoing evaluation. Overall, 53 potential donors were evaluated in era 1 (8.8 donors/year), 78 in era 2 (19.5 donors/year). There were fewer excluded donors in era 2 vs era 1 (62% era 1 vs 44% era 2), and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) significantly increased in era 2 vs era 1 (3.3/year era 1 vs 7.1/year era 2). The establishment of an ABOi LDKT program led to a 15% increase of evaluations in era 2 (12/78 donors). CONCLUSIONS: LDN along with ABOi LDKT allowed for an improvement in recruitment of living donors and corresponding LDKT.

Steroid side effects and their impact on transplantation outcome.

Steroids are a staple of immunosuppressive therapy in transplantation. Despite the high incidence of side effects associated with steroid therapy, the risk of increased rejection with steroid discontinuation has often outweighed the potential benefits of improved quality of life. With the advent of a number of newer immunosuppressive agents, however, there has been a renewed and heightened focus on the possibility of steroid avoidance or withdrawal protocols that do not place the patient or graft at undue risk. Much of the work in this area is preliminary, and large long-term trials are needed to reach definitive conclusions. Clinical trials need to resolve patient selection criteria for steroid discontinuation, effective and appropriate baseline immunosuppression, and the optimal timing of steroid withdrawal. Appropriate monitoring parameters also need to be developed to reduce the risk of acute rejection, and follow-up of patients who have been withdrawn from steroids will become increasingly important. Nonetheless, the hope is that newer immunosuppressive agents will soon allow for a reduction in steroid use in appropriate patients, with an improvement in patients' long-term quality of life, and fewer healthcare-related costs.

Cyclosporine's dual mechanism of action in inhibiting generation of the cytoplasmic activation signal and the nuclear response thereto.

The mechanism of cyclosporine's action was dissected using protocols admixing cytoplasmic extracts to trigger isolated nuclei prepared after phytohemagglutinin, OKT3, or mixed lymphocyte culture stimulation of normal volunteer and renal transplant recipient lymphocytes. CsA at 100-1000 ng/ml doses prevented cytoplasmic extracts of cells activated in vitro by OKT3 or MLC from triggering incorporation of radiolabeled nucleotides by resting isolated nuclei. In addition, nuclei isolated from cells previously treated with 200-1000 ng/ml of CsA were refractory to the potent cytoplasmic signal extracted from OKT3- or MLC-stimulated cells. CsA less effectively inhibited phytohemagglutinin-stimulated responses. CsA, but not its inactive analog cyclosporin H, inhibited 3H-thymidine incorporation into in situ nuclei. The inhibited cytoplasmic signal generation and nuclear responsiveness observed with normal lymphocytes exposed to CsA in vitro also was demonstrated with cells from renal transplant recipients who had been treated with CsA for less than 6 months. The impaired response of isolated patient lymphocyte nuclei to in vitro triggering with activated cytoplasmic extracts correlated with intranuclear CsA concentrations, but not with serum levels assessed with monoclonal antibodies selective for CsA or nonselective for CsA plus metabolites. Furthermore, patients displaying drug-induced nephrotoxicity had elevated intranuclear CsA, but not CsA plus metabolite, concentrations compared with stable transplant recipients. Thus, CsA addition in vitro or administration in vivo causes stereospecific inhibition, particularly for CD3 stimuli, of the cytoplasmic activation signal, and, to a lesser extent, of the subsequent nuclear response.