RESUMEN
PURPOSE: In pediatric healthcare, patient satisfaction queries exclude children and solicit quantitative ratings from caregivers. We sought satisfaction perspectives from hospitalized children 7 to 17 years and their caregivers by qualitatively analyzing interview responses. DESIGN AND METHODS: English and Spanish-speaking children and their parents on five inpatient units completed two open-ended questions about their satisfaction at hospital discharge (T1, face to face) and 7 to 10 days later (T2, telephone). The questions asked about what was good and what could be better at the hospital. Responses were analyzed using descriptive semantic content analysis and consensus coding methods. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 11.9 years (SD = 3.17); 51% were male. At T1, 362 patients offered 833 responses; 600 parents offered 1496 responses. At T2, 252 patients offered 552 responses; 488 parents offered 1290 responses. At T1 and T2, the most frequent patient response to what was good was 'Staff took good care of me' and for caregivers was 'Staff behaving professionally'. At T1, the most frequent patient response about what could be better was 'more activities for kids', and at T2, 'Nothing' and 'More food options and better food quality'; for caregivers at T1, 'Nothing' and 'Not liking the physical space', and at T2, 'Nothing', and 'More communication and professionalism from hospital staff'. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients and their caregivers are willing and able to offer perspectives about satisfaction with care, and suggestions for improvement before discharge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pediatric patients and their caregivers' perspectives about care yield actionable recommendations for hospital systems.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Pacientes Internos , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Hospitalización , Alta del Paciente , Niño HospitalizadoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Patient satisfaction is a quality improvement indicator used to evaluate care. Ratings of patient satisfaction in pediatrics exclude the child voice. We tested the feasibility and acceptability of a new model that included both child and parent satisfaction ratings. DESIGN AND METHODS: We executed a randomized, two-arm, unblinded cohort study comparing child (aged 7-17â¯years) and parent reports (Arm 1) to parent report only (Arm 2) among a convenience sample of inpatients at a single urban pediatric medical center. The primary (feasibility and acceptability) and secondary outcomes were assessed at the time of discharge (T1) and approximately 10â¯days following discharge (T2) (standard timing). RESULTS: Of 672 screened families, 89.3% (nâ¯=â¯600) enrolled in the study; 362 children and parents were randomized to Arm 1 and 238 parents to Arm 2. Patients (98.6%) and parents (99.8%) indicated preference for providing satisfaction ratings at the time of discharge. Seventy-five percent of families (nâ¯=â¯488) completed T1 and T2; neither child nor parent ratings differed significantly between T1 and T2 nor did parent ratings differ between the two study arms. Nurse friendliness, courtesy, and feeling well cared for were among the highest rated items at T1 and T2 by both children and parents. CONCLUSIONS: Children 7 to 17â¯years of age and their parents are willing and like to provide satisfaction with care ratings prior to hospital discharge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This measurement model could yield valid findings representative of hospitalized children and their parents, and could become the basis for a new and needed measurement approach for pediatric satisfaction with hospital care.
Asunto(s)
Niño Hospitalizado/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Padres/psicología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
When nurses declare a professional legacy (or what they intend to be better in health care because of their efforts), they are likely to maintain a focus on achieving their legacy and to experience meaning in the process. We depict the legacy and involved steps in creating a legacy map, which is a concrete guide forward to intended career outcomes. Informed by the "meaningful work" literature, we describe a legacy map, its function, the process to create one, and the application of a legacy map to guide careers. We also describe an administrative benefit of the legacy map-the map can be used by team leaders and members to secure needed resources and opportunities to support the desired legacy of team members. Legacy mapping can be a self-use career guidance tool for nurses and other health care professionals or a tool that links the career efforts of a team member with the career support efforts of a team leader.
Asunto(s)
Recursos Audiovisuales , Selección de Profesión , Movilidad Laboral , Motivación , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study examined predictors of readmission to a psychiatric inpatient unit of an urban children's hospital within 1 year of discharge among a racially diverse sample of youths. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed 2 years of electronic health record data of inpatient psychiatric unit admissions (N=1,604). Multivariate logistic regression and random-effects multinomial logistic regression were used for analyses. RESULTS: The estimated odds ratios for any readmission within 1 year of discharge were significantly higher for Black youths, youths insured by Medicaid, and youths with a length of stay longer than 7 days. Factors remained strongly predictive when examining multiple readmissions versus no readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Black youths, youths insured by Medicaid, and youths with longer stays were more likely than other youths to be readmitted. Findings suggest the need for interventions such as care coordination to target predictors of readmission and the need to examine inequities in the health care system.
Asunto(s)
Medicaid , Readmisión del Paciente , Niño , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Modelos Logísticos , Tiempo de Internación , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Introduction: Patient satisfaction ratings differ between minority and nonminority respondents in studies of hospitalized adults, but little is known about such differences in pediatrics. Our goal was to determine if patient satisfaction ratings completed by hospitalized children and their parents at the point of discharge differed by race/ethnicity, language, child gender, and age. Methods: We used a mixed-methods design. English and Spanish-speaking families from 5 inpatient units at 1 pediatric hospital completed ratings, face-to-face, before scheduled hospital discharge (T1), and again by telephone after discharge (T2). Participating children and their parents completed an 8-item satisfaction survey, and parents additionally completed 7 discharge readiness items. Results: The refusal rate was 10.7%, with 600 families enrolled; non-white families represented 66% of both study refusals and completions. The proportion of racial/ethnic groups in our study exceeded those in our standard survey sample. There were no significant differences in satisfaction ratings between non-white and white families or by child gender, age, or language. Conclusions: The lack of rating differences by demographic characteristics, the low refusal and attrition rates, and a more racially/ethnically representative sample of both child and parent perspectives indicate this approach to measuring satisfaction is acceptable and feasible to demographically diverse families.