The MAFB transcription factor impacts islet α-cell function in rodents and represents a unique signature of primate islet ß-cells.

Analysis of MafB(-/-) mice has suggested that the MAFB transcription factor was essential to islet α- and ß-cell formation during development, although the postnatal physiological impact could not be studied here because these mutants died due to problems in neural development. Pancreas-wide mutant mice were generated to compare the postnatal significance of MafB (MafB(Δpanc)) and MafA/B (MafAB(Δpanc)) with deficiencies associated with the related ß-cell-enriched MafA mutant (MafA(Δpanc)). Insulin(+) cell production and ß-cell activity were merely delayed in MafB(Δpanc) islets until MafA was comprehensively expressed in this cell population. We propose that MafA compensates for the absence of MafB in MafB(Δpanc) mice, which is supported by the death of MafAB(Δpanc) mice soon after birth from hyperglycemia. However, glucose-induced glucagon secretion was compromised in adult MafB(Δpanc) islet α-cells. Based upon these results, we conclude that MafB is only essential to islet α-cell activity and not ß-cell. Interestingly, a notable difference between mice and humans is that MAFB is coexpressed with MAFA in adult human islet ß-cells. Here, we show that nonhuman primate (NHP) islet α- and ß-cells also produce MAFB, implying that MAFB represents a unique signature and likely important regulator of the primate islet ß-cell.

Long-Term Efficacy of Teprotumumab in Thyroid Eye Disease: Follow-Up Outcomes in Three Clinical Trials.

Introduction: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is an autoimmune process characterized by extraocular muscle and orbital fat remodeling/expansion resulting in swelling, pain, redness, proptosis, and diplopia. Teprotumumab, an insulin-like growth factor-I receptor inhibitor, demonstrated improvements in TED signs and symptoms in three adequately powered clinical trials of 24 weeks duration. Here we analyze the long-term maintenance of responses with teprotumumab from these trials. Methods: A total of 112 patients who received 7 or 8 infusions of teprotumumab in the Phase 2, Phase 3 (OPTIC study), and OPTIC Extension (OPTIC-X) studies were included in this analysis. Responses, including clinical activity score (CAS ≥2-point improvement), the European Group of Graves' Orbitopathy ophthalmic composite outcome, diplopia (≥1 Gorman grade improvement), proptosis (≥2 mm improvement), Overall (improvement in proptosis + CAS), and disease inactivation (CAS ≤1), were assessed and pooled from study baseline to week 24 (formal study) and up to week 72 (formal follow-up). Graves' Ophthalmopathy quality-of-life (GO-QoL) scores were also assessed. Outcomes included the percentages of observed patient responses from the study baseline. Additional alternative treatments for TED were assessed as a surrogate of persistent benefit from week 24 through week 120 (extended follow-up). Studies differed in the timing of follow-up visits, and data from some visits were unavailable. Results: At week 72, 52/57 (91.2%), 51/57 (89.5%), 35/48 (72.9%), 38/56 (67.9%), and 37/56 (66.1%) of patients were responders for CAS, composite outcome, diplopia, proptosis, and Overall response, respectively. The mean reduction in proptosis was 2.68 mm (SD 1.92, n = 56), mean GO-QoL improvement was 15.22 (SE 2.82, n = 56), and disease inactivation (CAS ≤1) was detected in 40/57 (70.2%). Over 99 weeks following teprotumumab therapy, 19/106 (17.9%) patients reported additional TED therapy during formal and extended follow-up. Conclusion: The long-term response to teprotumumab as observed 51 weeks after therapy was similar to week 24 results in the controlled clinical trials. Inflammatory and ophthalmic composite outcome improvements were seen in 90% of patients with nearly 70% reporting improvement in diplopia and proptosis. Further, 82% of patients in this analysis did not report additional TED treatment (including surgery) over 99 weeks following the final teprotumumab dose.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus From Inactivation of Prolactin Receptor and MafB in Islet ß-Cells.

ß-Cell proliferation and expansion during pregnancy are crucial for maintaining euglycemia in response to increased metabolic demands placed on the mother. Prolactin and placental lactogen signal through the prolactin receptor (PRLR) and contribute to adaptive ß-cell responses in pregnancy; however, the in vivo requirement for PRLR signaling specifically in maternal ß-cell adaptations remains unknown. We generated a floxed allele of Prlr, allowing conditional loss of PRLR in ß-cells. In this study, we show that loss of PRLR signaling in ß-cells results in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), reduced ß-cell proliferation, and failure to expand ß-cell mass during pregnancy. Targeted PRLR loss in maternal ß-cells in vivo impaired expression of the transcription factor Foxm1, both G1/S and G2/M cyclins, tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (Tph1), and islet serotonin production, for which synthesis requires Tph1. This conditional system also revealed that PRLR signaling is required for the transient gestational expression of the transcription factor MafB within a subset of ß-cells during pregnancy. MafB deletion in maternal ß-cells also produced GDM, with inadequate ß-cell expansion accompanied by failure to induce PRLR-dependent target genes regulating ß-cell proliferation. These results unveil molecular roles for PRLR signaling in orchestrating the physiologic expansion of maternal ß-cells during pregnancy.

Revealing transcription factors during human pancreatic ß cell development.

Developing cell-based diabetes therapies requires examining transcriptional mechanisms underlying human ß cell development. However, increased knowledge is hampered by low availability of fetal pancreatic tissue and gene targeting strategies. Rodent models have elucidated transcription factor roles during islet organogenesis and maturation, but differences between mouse and human islets have been identified. The past 5 years have seen strides toward generating human ß cell lines, the examination of human transcription factor expression, and studies utilizing induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) and human embryonic stem (hES) cells to generate ß-like cells. Nevertheless, much remains to be resolved. We present current knowledge of developing human ß cell transcription factor expression, as compared to rodents. We also discuss recent studies employing transcription factor or epigenetic modulation to generate ß cells.