Improving the mental and physical health of older community-dwellers with a museum participatory art-based activity: results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to examine the mental and physical effects of a participatory art-based activity carried out at museums in older community-dwellers. METHODS: Based on a bicentre (the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts (MMFA), Montreal, Quebec, Canada; the Fuji Museum, Tokyo, Japan) single-blind RCT in two parallel groups (intervention group versus control group), 228 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 71.1 ± 5.4 years, 76.3% female) were enrolled. The intervention was a participatory art-based activity carried out at the MMFA and the Fuji Museum. The intervention group met weekly for 2 h over a 12-week period. The control group did not participate in any art-based intervention over the study period. Well-being was assessed before and after the first (M0) and the twelfth (M3) workshops, and quality of life and frailty before workshops at M0 and M3. These outcomes were assessed with standardized questionnaires with the same schedule in both groups. RESULTS: Well-being and quality of life improved significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group. Mixed results were observed with frailty. Although there were significantly more vigorous and fewer mildly frail participants by the end of the session when comparing intervention to control group participants, only a trend was observed in the decrease in mean value of the intervention group's frailty score. INTERPRETATION: This RCT confirmed that a participatory art-based activity performed weekly over a 3-month period may improve both mental and physical health in older community-dwellers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03679715; Title: A-Health RCT: Effects of Participatory Art-Based Activity on Health of Older Community Dwellers; First posted date: September 20, 2018; prospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03679715.

Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and incident dementia in older adults from the Québec NuAge cohort.

BACKGROUND: The co-occurrence of slow walking speed and subjective cognitive complaint (SCC) in non-demented individuals defines motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), which is a pre-dementia stage. There is no information on the association between MCR and incident dementia in Québec's older population. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to examine the association of MCR and its individual components (i.e. SCC and slow walking speed) with incident dementia in community-dwelling older adults living in the province of Québec (Canada). DESIGN: Québec older people population-based observational cohort study with 3 years of follow-up. SETTING: Community dwellings. SUBJECTS: A subset of participants (n = 1,098) in 'Nutrition as a determinant of successful aging: The Québec longitudinal study' (NuAge). METHODS: At baseline, participants with MCR were identified. Incident dementia was measured at annual follow-up visits using the Modified Mini-Mental State (≤79/100) test and Instrumental Activity Daily Living scale (≤6/8) score values. RESULTS: The prevalence of MCR was 4.2% at baseline and the overall incidence of dementia was 3.6%. MCR (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 5.18, with 95% confidence interval (CI) = [2.43-11.03] and P ≤ 0.001) and SCC alone (HR = 2.54, with 95% CI = [1.33-4.85] and P = 0.005) were associated with incident dementia, but slow walking speed was not (HR = 0.81, with 95%CI = [0.25-2.63] and P = 0.736). CONCLUSIONS: MCR and SCC are associated with incident dementia in NuAge study participants.

Screening for older inpatients at risk for long length of stay: which clinical tool to use?

BACKGROUND: Screening for inpatients at risk for long length of stay (LOS) is the first step of an effective hospital care plan for older inpatients. This study aims, in older adults admitted to a geriatric acute care ward, to examine and compare the 6-item brief geriatric assessment (BGA) and the "Programme de Recherche sur l'Intégration des Services pour le Maintien de l'Autonomie" (PRISMA-7) risk levels with long LOS, and to establish their performance criteria (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratios) for LOS. METHODS: Based on an observational, retrospective, cohort design, 166 inpatients aged ≥75 admitted to a geriatric acute care ward of a McGill University-affiliated hospital (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) were recruited. The risk levels of the 6-item BGA (low, moderate and high) and the PRISMA-7 (low versus high) were calculated from a baseline assessment. The LOS was subsequently calculated in number of days. RESULTS: Only the 6-item BGA high risk level was associated with a long LOS (Odds ratio = 1.1 with P = 0.028 and Hazard ratio = 2.1 with P = 0.004). Kaplan-Meier distributions showed that there was no significant difference in the delay of hospital discharge between the low and high-risk level reported by the PRISMA-7 (P = 0.381), whereas the 6-item BGA three risk levels differed significantly (P = 0.008), with individuals at high risk levels being discharged later when compared to those with low (P = 0.001) and moderate (P = 0.019) risk levels. Both tools' performance criteria were poor (i.e., < 0.70), except for PRISMA-7's sensitivity which was 100%. CONCLUSION: The 6-item BGA risk levels were associated with LOS, low risk-level being associated with short LOS and high-risk level with long LOS, but no association was reported with the PRISMA-7 risk levels. Both tools had poor performance criteria for long LOS, suggesting that they cannot be used as prognostic tools with current scientific knowledge.

Longitudinal advocacy training for medical students: a virtual workshop series.

Advocacy curricula in Canadian medical schools vary significantly. Expert-led, interactive workshops can effectively teach students how to address social determinants of health and advocate for patients. The Longitudinal Advocacy Training Series (LATS) is a free-of-charge, virtual program providing advocacy training created for Canadian medical students by students. The program was straightforward to implement and had high participation rates with 1140 participants representing 9.7% of enrolled Canadian medical students. As well, the program had high satisfaction reported by 87.6% of participants. The LATS toolkit enables health professional programs to develop similar programs for empowering effective health advocates.

Au Canada, les programmes de formation en matière de promotion et de défense des droits varient considérablement d'une faculté de médecine à l'autre. Les ateliers interactifs dirigés par des experts constituent un outil efficace pour enseigner aux étudiants la façon aborder les déterminants sociaux de la santé afin de défendre les droits des patients. La Longitudinal Advocacy Training Series (LATS) est un programme virtuel gratuit de formation à la défense des droits, créé par des étudiants pour les étudiants. Le programme, facile à mettre en œuvre, a connu un taux de participation élevé, à savoir 1140 participants représentant 9,7 % des étudiants en médecine au Canada. En outre, 87,6 % des participants se sont dits très satisfaits du programme. La trousse à outils LATS permet aux programmes de formation des professions de la santé de mettre sur pied des modules similaires pour donner aux étudiants les moyens de devenir des défenseurs de la santé efficaces.

Vitamin D Supplementation and Cognition in Adults: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The role of vitamin D supplementation in improving cognition and slowing the incidence of minor and major neurocognitive disorders is a matter of debate. To our knowledge, no systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has examined this question in adults. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence regarding the effects of vitamin D supplementation on cognitive performance and neurocognitive disorders in adults. METHODS: A systematic search of scientific articles in English or French was conducted. The MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid, EMBASE), PsychINFO, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for records without any limit on publication date in May 2021. Inclusion criteria were (1) human participants, (2) RCT, (3) participant age ≥ 18, (4) vitamin D supplementation as the intervention, and (5) cognition (i.e., cognitive performance or cognitive status such as cognitively healthy or minor and major neurocognitive disorder) as the primary outcome. Two independent reviewers both assessed all eligible studies' full texts and the risk of bias arising from methodological issues using a standardized procedure. RESULTS: Of the 2137 abstracts identified, 61 (2.9%) met screening inclusion criteria. After full text examination, 41 records (67.2%) were excluded. As a result, 20 RCTs (32.8%) were included in the systematic review. The review yielded mixed findings and, thus, failed to find evidence supporting cognitive benefits from vitamin D supplementation or suggesting a causal association between vitamin D and cognitive function. Half of the RCTs reported mixed results, one quarter negative results, and the last quarter positive effects for vitamin D supplementation on cognitive performance. The variability in serum 25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentration thresholds, the cognitive tests employed, the supplementation doses, and the samples' characteristics (i.e., ethnicity or number of participants) may explain these mixed findings. CONCLUSION: This systematic review of RCTs does not support a role for vitamin D supplementation in enhancing cognition in adults.

"Emergency Room Evaluation and Recommendations" (ER2) Tool for the Screening of Older Emergency Department Visitors With Major Neurocognitive Disorders: Results From the ER2 Database.

Purpose: The Emergency Room Evaluation and Recommendation (ER2) is an application in the electronic medical file of patients visiting the Emergency Department (ED) of the Jewish General Hospital (JGH; Montreal, Quebec, Canada). It screens for older ED visitors at high risk of undesirable events. The aim of this study is to examine the performance criteria (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV], positive likelihood ratio [LR+], negative likelihood ratio [LR-] and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]) of the ER2 high-risk level and its "temporal disorientation" item alone to screen for major neurocognitive disorders in older ED visitors at the JGH. Methods: Based on a cross-sectional design, 999 older adults (age 84.9 ± 5.6, 65.1% female) visiting the ED of the JGH were selected from the ER2 database. ER2 was completed upon the patients' arrival at the ED. The outcomes were ER2's high-risk level, the answer to ER2's temporal disorientation item (present vs. absent), and the diagnosis of major neurocognitive disorders (yes vs. no) which was confirmed when it was present in a letter or other files signed by a physician. Results: The sensitivities of both ER2's high-risk level and temporal disorientation item were high (≥0.91). Specificity, the PPV, LR+, and AROC were higher for the temporal disorientation item compared to ER2's high-risk level, whereas a highest sensitivity, LR-, and NPV were obtained with the ER2 high-risk level. Both area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were high (0.71 for ER2's high-risk level and 0.82 for ER2 temporal disorientation item). The odds ratios (OR) of ER2's high-risk level and of temporal disorientation item for the diagnosis of major neurocognitive disorders were positive and significant with all OR above 18, the highest OR being reported for the temporal disorientation item in the unadjusted model [OR = 26.4 with 95% confidence interval (CI) = 17.7-39.3]. Conclusion: Our results suggest that ER2 and especially its temporal disorientation item may be used to screen for major neurocognitive disorders in older ED users.

Health benefits of "Thursdays at the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts": Results of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: . This study aims to examine and compare changes in frailty status, well-being and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults living in Montreal (Quebec, Canada) participating in a 3-month session of weekly "Thursdays at the Museum" and in their control counterparts who did not participate in art-based activities. METHODS: . 165 older community dwellers were recruited to a randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups (intervention versus control). The intervention was weekly participatory art-based activities over a 3-month period carried out at the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts (MMFA, Montreal, Quebec, Canada). Frailty, well-being and quality of life were assessed using standardized questionnaires completed at baseline (M0) and before the fifth (M1), ninth (M2) and twelfth (M3) workshops in the intervention group. The control group completed these questionnaires according to the same schedule. The outcomes were mean values of frailty, well-being and quality of life scores, as well as the distribution of frailty categories (vigorous versus mild, moderate and severe frailty) at M0, M1, M2 and M3. RESULTS: . The intervention group showed significant improvements in frailty, well-being and quality of life scores (P≤0.004) when compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: . The results suggest that the 3-month session of weekly "Thursdays at the Museum" may improve both physical and mental health in Montreal community-dwelling older adults.

Telemedicine for housebound older persons during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Targeting older at-risk patients with decision-making algorithms is a priority at a time when hospitals are receiving an influx of Covid-19 patients that may exceed their capacity. Such screening could likely be extended to primary care settings in order to identify older community dwellers with Covid-19, but also those experiencing the adverse consequences of prolonged home confinement. The Centre of Excellence on Longevity of McGill University (Quebec, Canada) designed a short assessment for Montreal's housebound community-dwelling older adults. It acts as the first step in connecting older community dwellers who are housebound during the Covid-19 outbreak to telemedicine.

Effects of "Thursdays at the Museum" at the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts on the mental and physical health of older community dwellers: the art-health randomized clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Recently, we demonstrated that the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts' (MMFA) participatory art-based activity, known as "Thursdays at the Museum," improved the well-being, quality of life, and physical health (i.e., frailty) of older community dwellers by using a pre-post intervention, single arm, prospective and longitudinal experimental design. The present randomized clinical trial (RCT), known as the Art-Health RCT (A-Health RCT), aims to compare changes in well-being, quality of life, frailty, and physiological measures in older community dwellers who participate in "Thursdays at the Museum" (intervention group) and in their counterparts who do not participate in this art-based activity (control group). METHODS/DESIGN: The current unicenter, randomized, clinical, controlled, comparative trial recruits 150 older community dwellers to two parallel arms (75 participants in the intervention group and 75 participants in the control group). The intervention is a 3-month cycle of weekly "Thursdays at the Museum," which are structured 2-h-long art-based workshops performed in a group setting at the MMFA. The control group is composed of participants who do not take part in art-based activities, receive their usual health and/or social services, and commit to report any other activity practiced during the same time. Assessments of the primary outcome (well-being) and the secondary outcomes (quality of life, frailty, and physiological measures including heart rate, daily step count, sleep duration, and its phases) are performed on six occasions: at baseline, at the beginning of the second and third months, at the end of the third month, as well as 6 and 12 months after the last workshop. Statistical analyses are performed with the intention to treat and per protocol. Comparisons of changes in outcome measures between intervention and control groups use repeated measures tests. DISCUSSION: Art-based activities carried out at museums have been receiving increased interest from researchers and policy-makers because of their benefits to mental and physical health. There are few robust studies, such as RCTs, that focus on older community dwellers or assess the efficacy of these participatory museum activities. The A-Health RCT study provides an opportunity to confirm the benefits of a participatory art-based museum activity on the elderly population and to show the key role played by museums in public health promotion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03679715 ; Title: A-Health RCT: Effects of Participatory Art-Based Activity on Health of Older Community Dwellers; First posted date: September 20, 2018; prospectively registered.

Structural Brain Volume Covariance Associated with Gait Speed in Patients with Amnestic and Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Double Dissociation.

BACKGROUND: Gait impairment is observed in early stages of dementia, such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and is associated with morphological brain volume changes like atrophy. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize the brain's grey matter (GM) volume covariance associated with gait speed in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and non-amnestic MCI (naMCI). METHODS: Gait speed was measured in 171 patients with MCI (age 72.0±5.1; 36.8% female; 41 with aMCI and 130 naMCI) at normal and rapid gait speeds. Brain GM covariance networks were computed using voxel-based morphometry, using the main neural correlates of gait speed in each group and for each walking condition as seed regions. RESULTS: Normal gait speed correlated with GM volume in the left frontal cortex in patients with aMCI, and in bilateral caudate and left putamen in those with naMCI. Rapid gait speed correlated with GM volume in the bilateral caudate and right cerebellum in naMCI, but without any GM region in aMCI. For normal gait speed, the left caudate nucleus volume in naMCI covaried with subcortico-frontal regions, while the left frontal cortex covaried with cortical regions involving the frontal cortex in aMCI. For rapid gait speed, subcortico-frontal regions were similar as for normal speed in naMCI. CONCLUSION: Brain GM volume covariance associated with gait speed varies according to the type of MCI; it involved subcortico-frontal regions for patients with naMCI and the frontal cortex in those with aMCI.