Factors influencing the indication of coronary angiography in patients presenting with chest pain unspecified: an analysis of two decades (1994-2014).

Guidelines for cardiac catheterization in patients with non-specific chest pain (NSCP) provide significant room for provider discretion, which has resulted in variability in the utilization of invasive coronary angiograms (CAs) and a high rate of normal angiograms. The overutilization of CAs in patients with NSCP and discharged without a diagnosis of coronary artery disease is an important issue in medical care quality. As a result, we sought to identify patient demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors that influenced the performance of a CA in patients with NSCP who were discharged without a diagnosis of coronary artery disease. We intended to establish reference data points for gauging the success of new initiatives for the evaluation of this patient population. In this 20-year retrospective cohort study (1994-2014), we examined 107 796 patients with NSCP from the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System, a large statewide validated database that contains discharge data for all patients with cardiovascular disease admitted to every non-federal hospital in NJ. Patients were partitioned into two groups: those offered a CA (CA group; n = 12 541) and those that were not (No-CA group; n = 95 255). Geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic variables were compared between the two groups using multivariable logistic regression, which determined the predictive value of each categorical variable on the odds of receiving a CA. Whites were more likely than Blacks and other racial counterparts (19.7% vs. 5.6% and 16.5%, respectively; P < .001) to receive a CA. Geographically, patients who received a CA were more likely admitted to a large hospital compared to small- or medium-sized ones (12.5% vs. 8.9% and 9.7%, respectively; P < .05), a primary teaching institution rather than a teaching affiliate or community center (16.1 % vs. 14.3% and 9.1%, respectively; P < .001), and at a non-rural facility compared to a rural one (12.1% vs. 6.5%; P < .001). Lastly from a socioeconomic standpoint, patients with commercial insurance more often received a CA compared to those having Medicare or Medicaid/self-pay (13.7% vs. 9.5% and 6.0%, respectively; P < .001). The utilization of CA in patients with NSCP discharged without a diagnosis of coronary artery disease in NJ during the study period may be explained by differences in geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic factors. Patients with NSCP should be well scrutinized for CA eligibility, and reliable strategies are needed to reduce discretionary medical decisions and improve quality of care.

Stroke Recovery Program with Modified Cardiac Rehabilitation Improves Mortality, Functional & Cardiovascular Performance.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity and exercise after stroke is strongly recommended, providing many positive influences on function and secondary stroke prevention. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a stroke recovery program (SRP) integrating modified cardiac rehabilitation on mortality and functional outcomes for stroke survivors. METHODS: This study used a retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively collected stroke rehabilitation database which followed 449 acute stroke survivors discharged from an inpatient rehabilitation facility between 2015 and 2020. For 1-year post-stroke, 246 SRP-participants and 203 nonparticipants were compared. The association of the SRP including modified cardiac rehabilitation with all-cause mortality and functional performance was assessed using the following statistical techniques: log rank test, Cox proportional hazard model and linear mixed effect models. Cardiovascular performance over 36 sessions of modified cardiac rehabilitation was assessed using linear effect model with Tukey procedure. The primary outcome measure was 1-year all-cause mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were functional performance measured in Activity Measure of Post-Acute Care scores and cardiovascular performance measured in metabolic equivalent of tasks times minutes. RESULTS: The SRP-participants had: (1) a significantly reduced 1-year post-stroke mortality rate from hospital admission corresponding to a four-fold reduction in mortality (P = 0.005, CI for risk ratio = [0.08, 0.71]), (2) statistically and clinically significant improvement of function in all Activity Measure of Post-Acute Care domains (P < 0.001 for all, 95% CI for differences in Basic Mobility [5.9, 10.1], Daily Activity [6.2, 11.8], and Applied Cognitive [3.0, 6.8]) compared to the matched cohort and (3) an improvement in cardiovascular performance over 36 sessions with an increase of 78% metabolic equivalent of tasks times minutes (P < 0.001, 95% CI [70.6, 85.9%]) compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke survivors who participated in a comprehensive stroke recovery program incorporating modified cardiac rehabilitation had decreased all-cause mortality, improved overall function, and improved cardiovascular performance.

Recruitment strategies and challenges in a large intervention trial: Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

BACKGROUND: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 9361 participants with hypertension who are ≥50 years old. The trial is designed to evaluate the effect of intensive systolic blood pressure control (systolic blood pressure goal <120 mm Hg) compared to standard control (systolic blood pressure goal <140 mm Hg) on cardiovascular events using commonly prescribed antihypertensive medications and lifestyle modification. OBJECTIVE: To describe the recruitment strategies and lessons learned during recruitment of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial cohort and five targeted participant subgroups: pre-existing cardiovascular disease, pre-existing chronic kidney disease, age ≥75 years, women, and minorities. METHODS: In collaboration with the National Institutes of Health Project Office and Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Coordinating Center, five Clinical Center Networks oversaw clinical site selection, recruitment, and trial activities. Recruitment began on 8 November 2010 and ended on 15 March 2013 (about 28 months). Various recruitment strategies were used, including mass mailing, brochures, referrals from healthcare providers or friends, posters, newspaper ads, radio ads, and electronic medical record searches. RESULTS: Recruitment was scheduled to last 24 months to enroll a target of 9250 participants; in just over 28 months, the trial enrolled 9361 participants. The trial screened 14,692 volunteers, with 33% of initial screens originating from the use of mass mailing lists. Screening results show that participants also responded to recruitment efforts through referral by Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial staff, healthcare providers, or friends (45%); brochures or posters placed in clinic waiting areas (15%); and television, radio, newspaper, Internet ads, or toll-free numbers (8%). The overall recruitment yield (number randomized/number screened) was 64% (9361 randomized/14,692 screened), 77% for those with cardiovascular disease, 79% for those with chronic kidney disease, 70% for those aged ≥75 years, 55% for women, and 61% for minorities. As recruitment was observed to lag behind expectations, additional clinics were included and inclusion criteria were broadened, keeping event rates and trial power in mind. As overall recruitment improved, a greater focus on subgroup recruitment was implemented. CONCLUSION: Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial met its overall projected recruitment goal using diverse, locally adapted enrollment strategies to specifically target persons with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, ≥75 years old, women, and minority subgroups. The trial exceeded its recruitment goal for minorities but found it a challenge to meet the competing demands of the targeted goals for recruiting into the remaining four subgroups. Important lessons include the imperative to monitor the recruitment process carefully, decide early to add new clinics or modify inclusion and exclusion criteria if recruitment lags, and consider limiting enrollment to subgroups only. We found benefit in using multiple recruitment sources simultaneously; mass mailing produced the largest number of participants, but referrals resulted in the greater randomization yield.

Gender disparity in the use of drug-eluting stents during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: We examined gender disparity in the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare metal stents (BMS) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and gender disparity in all-cause mortality after coronary stent implantation for AMI. BACKGROUND: Gender disparities in AMI managements have been well documented, but it is unclear whether these disparities are seen in the type of coronary stent implantation for AMI and outcomes. METHODS: Hospital discharge data from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2010 in New Jersey from the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System were used to identify 40,215 patients (12,878 women and 27,337 men) with coronary stent implantation for AMI. The in-hospital, short term (30 days) and long term (1 and 5 year) all-cause mortality rates, unadjusted and adjusted for demographics and comorbidities, were determined. RESULTS: Women were older than men and had a higher prevalence of co-morbidities. Men had higher prevalence of prior coronary revascularizations. After adjustment for co-morbidities, there was no significant gender difference in the use of DES versus BMS for AMI, except in 2003 and 2006 where women were found to be more likely to receive a DES versus a BMS. After adjustment, women had higher odds of in-hospital deaths but no difference in short and long-term all-cause mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant gender difference in the proportion of DES implantation versus BMS for AMI in contemporary years. Women treated with either BMS or DES for AMI had higher in-hospital death than men.

US Initiative to Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health: The Impact on the Outcomes of ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in New Jersey.

Background In 1998, President Clinton launched a federal initiative to eliminate racial and ethnic health disparities. The impact on the outcomes of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction has not been well studied. Methods and Results ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction outcomes from 1994 to 2015 were studied in 7942 Black, 27 665 Hispanic, and 88 727 White patients with first admission of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction using the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System. Logistic regressions were used to assess mortality adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and interventional procedures. There was an overall rise from 1994 to 2015 in the use of percutaneous coronary interventions in all 3 groups. Before 1998, White patients received more percutaneous coronary interventions compared with Black and Hispanic patients (P<0.05). After 1998, the disparity in use of percutaneous coronary interventions in Black and Hispanic patients was greatly reduced compared with White patients, and the difference reversed in favor of Hispanic patients after 2005 (P<0.05). There was an overall downward trend of in-hospital mortality without evidence of disparity among Black, Hispanic, and White patients. A linear regression model was used with a change point in 1998. Before 1998, the slope of 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was not statistically significant. After 1998, the mortality showed negative slopes for all 3 groups, however, with lower overall crude mortality for Hispanic patients compared with Black and White patients (P<0.0001). Conclusions The initiative launched in 1998 may have contributed to a reduction in percutaneous coronary intervention usage disparity in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Short- and long-term mortality decreased in all 3 groups, but more in the Hispanic population.

Relation of Socioeconomic Status to 1-Year Readmission and Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Cardiovascular (CV) disease accounts for 1/3 of deaths worldwide and 1/4 of deaths nationwide. Socioeconomic status (SES) affects CV health and outcomes. Previous studies that examined the association of SES and CV outcomes have yielded mixed results. Using a large-scale database, the aim of this study was to assess the magnitude of the association between categorized median household income, an indicator for SES, and nonfatal or fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Using logistic regression models, zip code median household income data from the United States Census Bureau were matched to 1-year rates of hospital readmission for AMI and CV death. Patient outcomes were obtained from the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System, a comprehensive database that includes all patient CV disease admissions to acute care New Jersey hospitals. Our main results indicate that compared with those in the highest household income level (>$68,000), patients in the lowest-income group (<$43,000) had significantly higher risk for AMI readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.1388, 95% confidence interval 1.0905 to 1.1893, p = 0) and CV death (odds ratio 1.0479, 95% confidence interval 1.0058 to 1.0917, p = 0.0254) after 1 year. This study also found that the likelihood of AMI readmission increased as household income levels decreased. Our findings suggest that healthcare professionals and policy makers should allocate additional resources to low-income communities to reduce disparities in AMI hospital readmissions and AMI case fatalities.

Impact of Modified Cardiac Rehabilitation Within a Stroke Recovery Program on All-Cause Hospital Readmissions.

OBJECTIVE: A Stroke Recovery Program (SRP) including cardiac rehabilitation demonstrated lower all-cause mortality rates, improved cardiovascular function, and overall functional ability among stroke survivors. Neither an effect of SRP on acute care hospital readmission rates nor cost savings have been reported. DESIGN: This prospective matched cohort study included 193 acute stroke survivors admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility between 2015 and 2017. The 105 SRP participants and 88 nonparticipants were matched exactly for stroke type, sex, and race and approximately for age, baseline functional scores, and medical complexity scores. Primary outcome measured acute care hospital readmission rate up to 1 yr post-stroke. Secondary outcomes measured costs. RESULTS: A 22% absolute reduction (P = 0.006) in hospital readmissions was observed between the SRP participant (n = 47, or 45%) and nonparticipant (n = 59, or 67%) groups. This resulted in significant cost savings. The conventional care cost to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services for stroke patients for both readmissions and outpatient therapy is estimated at $9.67 billion annually. The yearly cost for these services with utilization of the SRP is $8.55 billion. CONCLUSION: Acute care hospital readmissions were reduced in stroke survivors who participated in SRP. Future study is warranted to examine whether widespread application of a similar program may improve quality of life and decrease cost.

Association between chlorthalidone treatment of systolic hypertension and long-term survival.

CONTEXT: In the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) trial, conducted between 1985 and 1990, antihypertensive therapy with chlorthalidone-based stepped-care therapy resulted in a lower rate of cardiovascular events than placebo but effects on mortality were not significant. OBJECTIVE: To study the gain in life expectancy of participants randomized to active therapy at the 22-year follow-up. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A National Death Index ascertainment of death in the long-term follow-up of a randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial (SHEP) of patients aged 60 years or older with isolated systolic hypertension. Recruitment was between March 1, 1985, and January 15, 1988. After the end of a 4.5-year randomized phase of the SHEP trial, all participants were advised to receive active therapy. The time interval between the beginning of recruitment and the ascertainment of death by National Death Index (December 31, 2006) was approximately 22 years (21 years 10 months). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: At the 22-year follow-up, life expectancy gain, expressed as the area between active (n = 2365) and placebo (n = 2371) survival curves, was 105 days (95% CI, -39 to 242; P = .07) for all-cause mortality and 158 days (95% CI, 36-287; P = .009) for cardiovascular death. Each month of active treatment was therefore associated with approximately 1 day extension in life expectancy. The active treatment group had higher survival free from cardiovascular death vs the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; P = .03) but similar survival for all-cause mortality (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04; P = .42). There were 1416 deaths (59.9%) in the active treatment group and 1435 deaths (60.5%) in the placebo group (log-rank P = .38, Wilcoxon P = .24). Cardiovascular death was lower in the active treatment group (669 deaths [28.3%]) vs the placebo group (735 deaths [31.0%]; log-rank P = .03, Wilcoxon P = .02). Time to 70th percentile survival was 0.56 years (95% CI, -0.14 to 1.23) longer in the active treatment group vs the placebo group (11.53 vs 10.98 years; P = .03) for all-cause mortality and 1.41 years (95% CI, 0.34-2.61; 17.81 vs 16.39 years; P = .01) for survival free from cardiovascular death. CONCLUSION: In the SHEP trial, treatment of isolated systolic hypertension with chlorthalidone stepped-care therapy for 4.5 years was associated with longer life expectancy at 22 years of follow-up.

Monotherapy treatment with chlorthalidone or amlodipine in the systolic blood pressure intervention trial (SPRINT).

This post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) examined the performance of chlorthalidone (C) versus amlodipine (A) monotherapies. ANOVA was used to analyze the differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) response between C and A. Logistic regression was used to examine monotherapy failure (adding a second antihypertensive agent or switching to a different antihypertensive agent) rates. Four hundred ninety-one participants were treated with C monotherapy (n = 210, mean dose = 22 mg/day) or A monotherapy (n = 281, mean dose = 7 mg/day). There was a significant difference in mean SBP reduction between the C and A monotherapies at the third visit (higher reduction with A, adjusted p = .018). Unadjusted analysis showed a higher failure with C in the standard treatment group. Although the average SBP at failure was higher and above the 140 mm Hg cutoff that indicated monotherapy failure with A (142.60) compared with C (138.40), more participants on C failed despite having SBP below the 140 cutoff. This was probably due to decisions made by the investigative teams to change the antihypertensive regimen, because, in their opinion, the clinical picture required it. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, C had higher failure than A only in the standard treatment group (1.64 odds ratio [OR], 95% CI 1.06-2.56, p = .028). A sub-analysis including participants who had never used antihypertensive treatment before randomization had similar results (2.57 OR, 95% CI 1.34-5.02, p = .004). Overall, in SPRINT chlorthalidone was associated with higher monotherapy failure than amlodipine in the standard treatment group because of decisions of the investigative teams.

A Twenty-Year Analysis of Demographics, Surgical Management, and Outcomes of Aortic Stenosis in New Jersey.

We investigated the incidence and characteristics of 14,996 patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who were hospitalized in New Jersey between the years 1995 to 2015. The average age was 72, the majority were Caucasian males and common co-morbidities were hypertension, coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolemia. Hospital admission for AS declined between 1995 to 2007, to 10/100,000 patients, and increased to 15/100,000 patients in 2015 (p for trend <0.001). During the study period, the percentage of patients who received aortic valve replacement (AVR) increased (p <0.001). All-cause and cardiovascular mortality were higher among patients who did not undergo AVR at 1-year (HR 1.98 CI 1.75 to 2.23, p <0.001 and HR 1.82 CI 1.57 to 2.11, p <0.001, respectively) and 3-years (HR 2.16 CI 1.96 to 2.38, p <0.001 and HR 2.16 CI 1.90 to 2.45, p <0.001, respectively). The probability for readmission for AS was higher in patients who did not receive AVR compared to patients who had AVR at 1 year (HR 92.95 CI 57.85 to 149.35, p <0.001) and 3 years (HR 70.36 CI 47.18 to 104.95, p <0.001). These data imply that earlier diagnosis of AS and AVR when indicated will improve outcomes.

Constrictive Pericarditis after Open Heart Surgery: A 20-Year Case Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Constrictive pericarditis is a rare complication of open heart surgery (OHS), but little is known regarding the etiologic determinants, and prognostic factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical predictors and long term prognosis of post-operative constrictive pericarditis (CP). METHODS: Using the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System database, we analyzed records of 142,837 patients who were admitted for OHS in New Jersey hospitals between 1995 and 2015. Ninety-one patients were hospitalized with CP 30 days or longer after discharge from OHS. Differences in proportions were analyzed using Chi square tests. Controls were matched to cases for demographics, surgical procedure type, history of OHS, and propensity score. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the risk of all-cause death. Log-rank tests and Cox models were used to assess differences in the Kaplan-Meier survival curves with and without adjustments for comorbidities. RESULTS: Patients with CP were more likely to have history of valve disease (VD, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (AF, p = 0.024) renal disease (CKD, p = 0.028), hemodialysis (HD, p = 0.008), previous OHS (p < 0.001). Patients with CP compared to matched controls had a higher 7-year mortality (p < 0.001). This difference became statistically significant at 1-year after surgery. CONCLUSION: CP is a rare complication of OHS that occurs more frequently in patients with VD, AF, CKD, HD, multiple OHS, and it is associated with an unfavorable long-term prognosis. Given the large number of OHS performed every year, the results highlight the need for clinicians to recognize and properly manage this complication of OHS.

Preeclamptic Women Are at Significantly Higher Risk of Future Cardiovascular Outcomes Over a 15-Year Period.

Background: Preeclampsia (PE) may lead to maternal and infant mortality and severe medical complications. Understanding future short- and long-term cardiovascular (CV) outcomes of PE is important to women's health. Materials and Methods: A retrospective matched case-control study assessed the risks of CV outcomes over a 15-year period (1999-2013) in pregnant case women, with gravidity and parity of one, diagnosed with PE, compared to pregnant primiparous control women who were not diagnosed with PE. The New Jersey Electronic Birth Certificate (EBC) database and the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS), a database of all hospital admissions in New Jersey with longitudinal follow-up, were used to conduct the analysis. Participants were 18 years and older with demographics consistent with New Jersey, a state with a range of racial and ethnic diversity. Main outcome measures postpregnancy and over this 15-year period were myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, CV death, and all-cause death. Results: Women with PE (N = 6,360) were more likely to suffer MI, stroke, CV death, and all-cause death than controls (N = 325,347). After matching cases to controls for demographics and comorbidities, hazard ratios of PE cases for the outcomes of MI (p adjusted for comorbidities and demographics = 0.0196), CV death (adjusted p = 0.007), and all-cause death (adjusted p = 0.0026) were significantly higher than 1 compared to matched controls. Women with PE had 3.94 (95% CI: 1.25-12.4) times higher hazard for MI, 4.66 (95% CI: 1.52-14.26) times higher hazard of CV death, and 2.32 (95% CI: 1.34-4.02) times higher hazard for all-cause death than matched controls. Conclusions: This 15-year study indicates that women who have PE with their first pregnancy have a significantly higher risk of adverse CV outcomes compared to controls and suggest a heightened and continued CV monitoring after birth for this population of women.

Relation Between Statewide Hospital Performance Reports on Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Healthcare systems may be judged on quality of care and access to health services. Studies on the association of hospital quality of care scores and clinical outcomes have yielded mixed results. With the help of a richer and more representative database, the aim of our study was to shed light on these inconsistencies. We examined the association of 4 process of care scores (prescription of aspirin, ß blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker used for left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and an overall composite score) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), reported in the Hospital Performance Reports, with 30-day and 1-year rates of readmission for AMI and cardiovascular (CV) death. Clinical outcomes were from the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System, an administrative database that comprises all patient CV disease admissions to acute care hospitals in New Jersey. CV death was related with overall score (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.821, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.726 to 0.930, p = 0.002) at 30 days and with all 4 scores at 1 year (OR ranging from 0.829 to 0.997, p <0.01). Readmission due to AMI was associated with the overall score (OR 0.789, 95% CI 0.691 to 0.902, p <0.0001) and the aspirin score (OR 0.995, 95% CI 0.990 to 1, p = 0.046) at 30 days. Low hospital performance scores for AMI were associated with increased CV death and readmission for AMI. In conclusion, healthcare providers should allocate their resources to improving hospital performance to decrease AMI case fatality, AMI readmissions, and CV-related healthcare spending.

Trends in Hospitalization for Infective Endocarditis as a Reason for Admission or a Secondary Diagnosis.

We postulate that the trends for infective endocarditis (IE) are different for patients admitted for this condition compared with those admitted for a different reason with IE as a secondary diagnosis. Using the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS) database, we analyzed 21,443 records of patients hospitalized with diagnosis of IE from 1994 to 2015. There were 9,191 patients hospitalized with IE as the primary diagnosis, and 12,252 patients with IE as a secondary diagnosis. Piecewise linear models were used to detect changes in trends. A bootstrap method was used to assess the statistical significance of the slopes and break point of each model. Differences in co-morbidities and microbiological patterns were analyzed. Trend analysis showed a significant decrease in IE as the primary diagnosis starting in the year 2004 (p <0.01). Hospitalizations with IE as a secondary diagnosis showed a linear increase in incidence (p <0.001), without any change points. In primary diagnosis IE, the proportion of streptococci as a causative microorganism was higher compared with staphylococci (p <0.001). On the contrary, in secondary diagnosis IE, the proportion of staphylococci was higher than streptococci (p <0.001). The proportion of gram-negative and other organism IE was similar in both groups. In conclusion, this study showed 2 divergent temporal trends in hospitalizations for IE as a primary or secondary diagnosis starting in 2004. The profile of the microorganisms reveals a steady higher proportion of staphylococcal infection in secondary diagnosis IE compared with streptococcal infection. Different strategies are needed for the prevention of IE.

Impact of a Stroke Recovery Program Integrating Modified Cardiac Rehabilitation on All-Cause Mortality, Cardiovascular Performance and Functional Performance.

OBJECTIVE: Using a feasibility analysis and matched subgroup analysis, this study investigated the implementation/safety/outcomes of a stroke recovery program (SRP) integrating modified cardiac rehabilitation for stroke survivors. DESIGN: This prospective cohort study of 783 stroke survivors were discharged from an inpatient rehabilitation facility to an outpatient setting; 136 SRP-participants completed a feasibility study and received the SRP including modified cardiac rehabilitation, 473 chose standard of care rehabilitation (nonparticipants), and a group (n = 174) were excluded. The feasibility study assessed the following: safety/mortality/pre-post cardiovascular performance/pre-post function/patient/staff perspective. In addition to the feasibility study, a nonrandomized subgroup analysis compared SRP-participants (n = 76) to matched pairs of nonparticipants (n = 66, with 10 nonparticipants used more than once) for mortality/pre-post function. RESULTS: The feasibility study showed the SRP to have the following (a) excellent safety, (b) markedly low 1-yr poststroke mortality from hospital admission (1.47%) compared with national rate of 31%, (c) improved cardiovascular performance over 36 sessions (103% increase in metabolic equivalent of tasks times minutes), (d) improved function in Activity Measure of Post-Acute Care domains (P < 0.001), (e) positive reviews from SRP-participants/staff. Subgroup analysis showed the SRP to (a) positively impact mortality, nonparticipants had a 9.09 times higher hazard of mortality (P = 0.039), and (b) improve function in Activity Measure of Post-Acute Care domains (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Stroke survivors receiving a SRP integrating modified cardiac rehabilitation may potentially benefit from reductions in all-cause mortality and improvements in cardiovascular performance and function.

Association of orthostatic hypertension with mortality in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program.

We examined the association of orthostatic hypertension with all-cause mortality in the active treatment and placebo randomized groups of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of the effect of chlorthalidone-based antihypertensive treatment on the rate of occurrence of stroke among older persons with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). Men and women aged 60 years and above with ISH defined by a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 160 mm Hg or higher and diastolic blood pressure lower than 90 mm Hg were randomized to chlorthalidone-based stepped care therapy or matching placebo. Among 4736 SHEP participants, 4073 had a normal orthostatic response, 203 had orthostatic hypertension, and 438 had orthostatic hypotension. Compared with normal response, orthostatic hypertension was associated with higher all-cause mortality at 4.5 and 17 years in analyses adjusted for age, gender, treatment, SBP, and pulse pressure (PP, HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.30-2.69, p = 0.0007; HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.17-1.68, p = 0.0003, respectively). These associations remained significant after additional adjustment for risk factors and comorbidities (HR 1.43, 95% CI 0.99-0.08, p = 0.0566 at 4.5 years, and HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06-1.53, p = 0.0096 at 17 years). The increased risk of all-cause mortality associated with orthostatic hypertension was observed in both the active and placebo groups without significant interaction between randomization group and the effect on mortality. Orthostatic hypertension is associated with future mortality risk, is easily detected, and can be used in refining cardiovascular risk assessment.

Questionable hospital chart documentation practices by physicians.

BACKGROUND: Physicians, influenced by various pressures, may document information in patient records that they did not personally observe. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hospital chart documentation practices of internists and internal medicine sub-specialists in the Northeastern United States. DESIGN: An anonymous mail survey questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand one hundred twenty-six randomly selected internists and internal medicine sub-specialists. MEASUREMENTS: Responses to questions describing their own hospital chart documentation practices, those they observed among their colleagues, and ratings of the importance of possible influences. RESULTS: Response rate was 43%. Fifty-nine percent (59%) of physicians reported personally engaging in one or more of six questionable documentation scenarios. Forty percent (40%, CI; 37%-43%) indicated that they recorded laboratory notes in patient records based on information that they did not personally obtain, while 6% (CI; 5%-8%) admitted to writing notes on patients not personally seen or examined. The corresponding percentages reported for their colleagues were 52% (CI; 49%-56%) and 22% (CI; 20%-25%), respectively. Increased rates of documentation lapses were significantly associated with working directly with residents and/or fellows (OR = 1.71, CI; 1.30-2.25), younger age (OR for 10 year age decrease = 1.35, CI; 1.19-1.53), white race (OR = 1.47, CI; 1.08-2.00), and graduation from US medical schools (OR = 1.75, CI; 1.31-2.34). CONCLUSION: Most physicians report having engaged in questionable hospital chart documentation. This practice is more common among physicians who are younger, working with house staff, and graduates of US medical schools.

Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with intraventricular conduction blocks: A sixteen-year follow-up in a state-wide database.

BACKGROUND: To assess the adverse clinical effects of left anterior hemiblock alone or in combination with right bundle branch block and of complete left bundle branch block in comparison with isolated right bundle branch block and the relationship of these effects with altered mechanoelectric factors resulting in left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: In a 16-year follow-up study using a statewide database, we studied the occurrence of mortal and morbid cardiovascular (CV) events among patients without apparent ischemic heart disease who had left anterior hemiblock (LAHB, n=4273, right bundle branch block (RBBB) with LAHB (BFBB, n=1857) and left bundle branch block (LBBB, n=9484 compared to isolated RBBB (n=25288). RESULTS: After adjustment for demographics, co-morbidities and insurance, LAHB was associated with a significant excess risk of all-cause death (HR 1.134, 95% CI 1.061-1.213, p=0.0002) and CV death (HR 1.329, 95% CI 1.174-1.501, p<0.0001). BFBB was associated with excess HF (HR 1.190, 95% CI 1.048-1.351, p<0.0071), all-cause death (HR 1.440, 95% CI 1.045-1.252, p=0.0036) and CV death (HR 1.210, 95% CI 1.020-1.436, p<0.0001). LBBB was associated with an excess risk of MR (HR 1.307, 95% CI 1.116-1.530, p<0.0009), HF 1.177, 95% CI1.097-1.263, p<0.0001) and CV death (HR 1.220, 95% CI 1.106-1.345, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients without apparent ischemic heart disease, the presence of LAHB alone or in combination with RBBB imparts increased risk of CV and all-cause death compared to isolated RBBB. BFBB is also associated with an increased risk of HF.

Association Between Dehydration and Short-Term Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Previous cross-sectional studies have demonstrated a higher incidence of dehydration in patients admitted for stroke suggesting a possible association. However, the temporality of the association has not been well established. We examined whether dehydration increases the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with a recent hospitalization for atrial fibrillation (AF). Data was from 1994 to 2012 from the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS), a repository of in-patient records New Jersey hospitals, for AF hospitalizations (n = 1,282,787). Estimates for the association between AF hospitalization with/without dehydration and ischemic stroke within 30 days post-AF discharge were determined using log-linear multivariable modeling adjusting for socio-demographic factors and comorbid conditions. Within 10 days of discharge for AF, patients 18-80 years old (YO) with comorbid dehydration had a 60 % higher risk of ischemic stroke compared to AF patients without comorbid dehydration (adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 1.60, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.28-2.00). Eighteen- to 80-YO patients had a 34 % higher risk of ischemic stroke in days 11-20 post-AF discharge (ARR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.04, 1.74). There was no difference in the risk of stroke in 18-80-YO patients with or without prior dehydration during days 21-30 post-AF discharge. We also found no difference in the risk of ischemic stroke during any time period in patients over 80 YO. Dehydration may be a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke in patients 18-80 YO with AF.

Frequency of Stroke After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (from an Eleven-Year Statewide Analysis).

We compared stroke rates associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), both on-pump and off-pump, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with both drug-eluting stent (DES) and bare-metal stent (BMS) and the impact on 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality. The Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System database was used to study patients who had on-pump CABG (n = 47,254), off-pump CABG (n = 19,118), and PCI with BMS (n = 46,641), and DES (n = 115,942) in New Jersey from 2002 to 2012. Multiple logistic and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the risk of stroke and mortality. Adjustments were made for demographics, year of hospitalization, and co-morbidities. The rate of postprocedural stroke was lowest with DES (0.5%), followed by BMS (0.6%), off-pump CABG (1.3%), and on-pump CABG (1.8%). After adjustment, on-pump CABG had a higher risk of stroke compared with off-pump (odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.56, p <0.0001). DES had lower risk of stroke compared with off-pump CABG (odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.74, p <0.0001). There was a significant excess risk of 1-year mortality due to the interaction between stroke and procedure type (on-pump vs off-pump CABG and PCI with DES vs BMS; p value for interaction = 0.02). In conclusion, in this retrospective analysis of nonrandomized data from a statewide database, PCI with DES was associated with the lowest rate of postprocedural stroke, and off-pump CABG had a lower rate of postprocedural stroke than on-pump CABG; there was an excess 1-year mortality risk with on-pump versus off-pump CABG and with DES versus BMS in patients with stroke.