Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Conserv Biol ; 24(1): 207-16, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19906066

RESUMEN

Ecosystem-based management is logistically and politically challenging because ecosystems are inherently complex and management decisions affect a multitude of groups. Coastal ecosystems, which lie at the interface between marine and terrestrial ecosystems and provide an array of ecosystem services to different groups, aptly illustrate these challenges. Successful ecosystem-based management of coastal ecosystems requires incorporating scientific information and the knowledge and views of interested parties into the decision-making process. Estimating the provision of ecosystem services under alternative management schemes offers a systematic way to incorporate biogeophysical and socioeconomic information and the views of individuals and groups in the policy and management process. Employing ecosystem services as a common language to improve the process of ecosystem-based management presents both benefits and difficulties. Benefits include a transparent method for assessing trade-offs associated with management alternatives, a common set of facts and common currency on which to base negotiations, and improved communication among groups with competing interests or differing worldviews. Yet challenges to this approach remain, including predicting how human interventions will affect ecosystems, how such changes will affect the provision of ecosystem services, and how changes in service provision will affect the welfare of different groups in society. In a case study from Puget Sound, Washington, we illustrate the potential of applying ecosystem services as a common language for ecosystem-based management.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Ecosistema , Comunicación
2.
Science ; 319(5861): 321-3, 2008 Jan 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18202288

RESUMEN

A common assumption is that ecosystem services respond linearly to changes in habitat size. This assumption leads frequently to an "all or none" choice of either preserving coastal habitats or converting them to human use. However, our survey of wave attenuation data from field studies of mangroves, salt marshes, seagrass beds, nearshore coral reefs, and sand dunes reveals that these relationships are rarely linear. By incorporating nonlinear wave attenuation in estimating coastal protection values of mangroves in Thailand, we show that the optimal land use option may instead be the integration of development and conservation consistent with ecosystem-based management goals. This result suggests that reconciling competing demands on coastal habitats should not always result in stark preservation-versus-conversion choices.


Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Ecología , Ecosistema , Rhizophoraceae , Humedales , Alismatales , Animales , Antozoos , Acuicultura/economía , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Explotaciones Pesqueras/economía , Lythraceae , Penaeidae , Tailandia , Árboles , Movimientos del Agua , Madera
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA