Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 192
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 63(6): 1494-1501, 2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38216993

RESUMEN

Lupus enteritis (LE) is a rare manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. The pathophysiology of LE has not been fully elucidated, although inflammatory and thrombotic processes are likely important factors. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms may depend on which portion of the intestine is affected. Over half of the patients with LE also present with renal or haematological complications. The diagnosis of LE is based on clinical, histopathological and imaging findings; abdominal computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard in diagnosis. Abdominal CT can also identify factors that predict complications and could potentially guide pharmacological and nutritional management. Timely identification and prompt treatment initiation are paramount to avoid life and organ threatening complications. Glucocorticoids are often the first-line treatment. Additional therapy including immunosuppressive therapy is utilised on a case-by-case basis as there are no clinical trials to define the optimal therapeutic approach. Surgical intervention may be needed especially if there is bowel perforation or peritonitis. In general, the prognosis of LE is good.


Asunto(s)
Enteritis , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Humanos , Enteritis/etiología , Enteritis/diagnóstico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518094

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Attribution of neuropsychiatric symptoms in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) relies heavily on clinician assessment. Limited clinic time, variable knowledge, and symptom under-reporting contributes to discordance between clinician assessments and patient symptoms. We obtained attributional data directly from patients and clinicians in order to estimate and compare potential levels of direct attribution to SLE of multiple neuropsychiatric symptoms using different patient-derived measures. METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative data analysed included: prevalence and frequency of neuropsychiatric symptoms, response to corticosteroids, and concurrence of neuropsychiatric symptoms with non-neuropsychiatric SLE disease activity. SLE patients were also compared with controls and inflammatory arthritis (IA) patients to explore attributability of neuropsychiatric symptoms to the direct disease effects on the brain/nervous system. RESULTS: We recruited 2,817 participants, including 400 clinicians. SLE patients (n = 609) reported significantly higher prevalences of neuropsychiatric symptoms than controls (n = 463) and IA patients (n = 489). SLE and IA patients' quantitative data demonstrated multiple neuropsychiatric symptoms relapsing/remitting with other disease symptoms such as joint pain. Over 45% of SLE patients reported resolution/improvement of fatigue, positive sensory symptoms, severe headache, and cognitive dysfunction with corticosteroids. Evidence of direct attributability in SLE was highest for hallucinations and severe headache. SLE patients had greater reported improvement from corticosteroids (p= 0.008), and greater relapsing-remitting with disease activity (p< 0.001) in the comparisons with IA patients for severe headache. Clinician and patients reported insufficient time to discuss patient-reported attributional evidence. Symptoms viewed as indirectly related/non-attributable were often less prioritised for discussion and treatment. CONCLUSION: We found evidence indicating varying levels of direct attributability of both common and previously unexplored neuropsychiatric symptoms in SLE patients, with hallucinations and severe headache assessed as the most directly attributable. There may also be-currently under-estimated-direct effects on the nervous system in IA and other systemic rheumatological diseases.

3.
J Immunol ; 208(4): 807-818, 2022 02 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35039330

RESUMEN

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a potentially fatal small vessel vasculitis of unknown etiology, characterized by anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies, chronic inflammation, and granulomatous tissue damage. T cell dysregulation, comprising decreased regulatory T cell function and increased circulating effector memory follicular Th cells (TFH), is strongly associated with disease pathogenesis, but the mechanisms driving these observations are unknown. We undertook transcriptomic and functional analysis of naive CD4 T cells from patients with GPA to identify underlying functional defects that could manifest in the pathogenic profiles observed in GPA. Gene expression studies revealed a dysregulation of the IL-2 receptor ß/JAK-STAT signaling pathway and higher expression of BCL6 and BCL6-regulated genes in GPA naive CD4 T cells. IL-2-induced STAT5 activation in GPA naive CD4 T cells was decreased, whereas STAT3 activation by IL-6 and IL-2 was unperturbed. Consistently, BCL6 expression was sustained following T cell activation of GPA naive CD4 T cells and in vitro TFH differentiation of these cells resulted in significant increases in the production TFH-related cytokines IL-21 and IL-6. Thus, naive CD4 T cells are dysregulated in patients with GPA, resulting from an imbalance in signaling equilibrium and transcriptional changes that drives the skewed pathogenic CD4 effector immune response in GPA.


Asunto(s)
Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/metabolismo , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/etiología , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-bcl-6/genética , Factor de Transcripción STAT5/metabolismo , Linfocitos T Colaboradores-Inductores/inmunología , Linfocitos T Colaboradores-Inductores/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Diferenciación Celular/inmunología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Femenino , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/diagnóstico , Humanos , Quinasas Janus/metabolismo , Activación de Linfocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-bcl-6/metabolismo , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/genética , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Receptores de Interleucina-2/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Transcriptoma , Adulto Joven
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37491699

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A limited range of neuropsychiatric symptoms have been reported in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), with varied symptom prevalence. This study aimed to investigate a wider range of potential symptoms than previous studies, compare patient self-reports with clinician estimates, and explore barriers to symptom identification. METHODS: Mixed methods were used. Data from SARDs patients (n = 1853) were compared with controls (n = 463) and clinicians (n = 289). In-depth interviews (n = 113) were analysed thematically. Statistical tests compared means of survey items between: patients and controls, 8 different SARD groups, and clinician specialities. RESULTS: Self-reported lifetime prevalences of all 30 neuropsychiatric symptoms investigated (including cognitive, sensorimotor and psychiatric) were significantly higher in SARDs than controls. Validated instruments assessed 55% of SARDs patients as currently having depression and 57% anxiety. Barriers to identifying neuropsychiatric symptoms included: 1) limits to knowledge, guidelines, objective tests, and inter-specialty cooperation; 2) subjectivity, invisibility and believability of symptoms; and 3) under-eliciting, under-reporting and under-documenting. A lower proportion of clinicians (4%) reported never/rarely asking patients about mental health symptoms than the 74% of patients who reported never/rarely being asked in clinic (p< 0.001). Over 50% of SARDs patients had never/rarely reported their mental health symptoms to clinicians; a proportion under-estimated at < 10% by clinicians (p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Neuropsychiatric symptom self-reported prevalences are significantly higher in SARDs than controls, and greatly underestimated by most clinicians. Research relying on medical records and current guidelines is unlikely to accurately reflect patients' experiences of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Improved inter-specialty communication and greater patient involvement is needed in SARD care and research.

5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38105443

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychiatric lupus (NPSLE) is challenging to diagnose. Many neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as headache and hallucinations, cannot be verified by tests or clinician assessment. We investigated prioritisations of methods for diagnosing NPSLE and attributional views. METHODS: Thematic and comparative analyses were used to investigate how clinicians prioritise sources of evidence from a 13-item list, and explore discordances in clinician and patient perspectives on attribution. RESULTS: We identified high levels of variability and uncertainty in clinicians' assessments of neuropsychiatric symptoms in SLE patients. In attributional decisions, clinicians (surveys n = 400, interviews n = 50) ranked clinicians' assessments above diagnostic tests (many of which they reported were often unenlightening in NPSLE). Clinicians ranked patient opinion of disease activity last, and 46% of patients reported never/rarely having been asked if their SLE was flaring, despite experienced patients often having "attributional insight". SLE Patients (surveys n = 676, interviews n = 27) estimated higher attributability of neuropsychiatric symptoms to the direct effects of SLE on the nervous system than clinicians (p < 0.001 for all symptoms excluding mania), and 24% reported that their self-assessment of disease activity was never/rarely concordant with their clinicians. Reports of misattributions were common, particularly of non-verifiable diffuse symptoms. Terminology differed between clinicians and influenced attribution estimates. CONCLUSION: NPSLE diagnostic tests and clinician assessments have numerous limitations, particularly in detecting diffuse neuropsychiatric symptoms that can be directly attributable and benefit from immunosuppression. Our findings suggest that incorporating patient attributional insights-although also subject to limitations-may improve attribution decision-making. Consensus regarding terminology and interpretations of "direct attributability" is required.

6.
Lupus ; 32(9): 1033-1042, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37436429

RESUMEN

Systemic lupus erythematosus-related transverse myelitis (SLE-TM) is a rare but serious complication of SLE, which may result in significant morbidity. Its incidence is estimated between 0.5% and 1% of all SLE patients but may be the presenting feature in 30%-60% of these patients. Unfortunately, due to lack of high-quality studies, data regarding this condition remains limited. Its pathogenesis remains largely unknown and clinical presentation is variable. There are still no set guidelines regarding diagnosis, management, or monitoring and the role of autoantibodies remains controversial. In this review, we aim to summarize the available data regarding the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, management, and prognosis of this rare disease.


Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Mielitis Transversa , Mielitis , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Mielitis Transversa/diagnóstico , Mielitis Transversa/etiología , Pronóstico , Autoanticuerpos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Mielitis/complicaciones
7.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(5): 1769-1782, 2022 05 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34463703

RESUMEN

2-deoxy-2[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET-CT has revolutionized oncological imaging. The cellular processes that make cancer cells visible on FDG PET-CT also occur in a number of inflammatory cells. Exploiting this phenomenon has led to a growth of evidence supporting the use of FDG PET-CT in a wide range of infective and inflammatory diseases. Rheumatological diseases can affect multiple sites within the musculoskeletal system alongside multi-organ extra-articular disease manifestations. Inflammation is central to these diseases, making FDG PET-CT a logical choice. In this review article we describe the various applications of FDG PET-CT in rheumatological diseases using illustrative examples to highlight the beneficial role of FDG PET-CT in each case.


Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Glucosa , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Radiofármacos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico por imagen
8.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(2): 658-666, 2022 02 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33956948

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Case reports and small case series suggest that stenotic lesions of the renal, coeliac and mesenteric arteries may occur in the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) resulting in clinical consequences such as hypertension and abdominal angina. The objective was to determine the prevalence of stenotic lesions in arteries arising from the middle aorta in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) compared with healthy, hypertensive and atherosclerotic controls. METHODS: In a cross-sectional comparative radiological study using magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), we assessed five groups of subjects for the prevalence of stenotic lesions in arteries arising from the middle aorta: APS/aPL positive, healthy renal donors, patients with hypertension, patients with atherosclerosis defined radiologically and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis who were negative for aPL. All subjects underwent MRA in suspended respiration and images were assessed by two senior radiologists blinded to the clinical details. RESULTS: In the atherosclerosis group, vascular stenotic lesions were more prevalent (71%) than in any other group (P ≤0.000002). The prevalence of all stenotic lesions in aPL positive patients (33%) was significantly higher than in the renal donors (18%) and hypertensive patients (19%) (P ≤0.009). Renal artery stenosis was significantly more prevalent in aPL positive patients than in renal donors (P ≤0.0006) but similar to the prevalence in hypertensive patients. Coeliac and/or mesenteric lesions were significantly more common in aPL positive patients vs hypertensive patients (P ≤0.001). Stenoses did not correlate with traditional risk factors. CONCLUSION: Arterial stenotic lesions in arteries arising from the middle aorta were highly prevalent in atherosclerotic subjects and were more common in aPL-positive patients than in hypertensive patients and healthy renal donors.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/irrigación sanguínea , Anticuerpos Antifosfolípidos/sangre , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/complicaciones , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/sangre , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Arteria Celíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Arterias Mesentéricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
9.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(4): 1417-1429, 2022 04 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34247235

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Medication adherence is critical in the successful management of lupus. There is very limited existing literature on reasons why non-adherence is not reported. This study explores the impact of current and previous medical experiences on patient satisfaction, adherence and reporting of non-adherence. METHODS: Mixed methodology involved thematic analysis of in-depth interviews (n = 23) to further explore the statistically analysed quantitative survey findings (n = 186). RESULTS: This study identified five themes: (i) physician-patient discordance and a 'hierarchy of evidence' in medication decisions; (ii) the association of adherence with satisfaction with care; (iii) the persisting impact of past adverse medical experiences (AMEs); (iv) the dynamic balance of patient-physician control; and (v) holistic care, beyond a purely medication-based focus. Improving quality of life (43% of participants) and a supportive medical relationship (24%) were the main reasons for adherence. Patient-priorities and self-reported symptoms were perceived as less important to physicians than organ-protection and blood results. Non-reporters of non-adherence, non-adherers and those with past AMEs (e.g. psychosomatic misdiagnoses) had statistically significant lower satisfaction with care. The importance of listening to patients was a key component of every theme, and associated with patient satisfaction and adherence. The mean rating for rheumatologist's listening skills was 2.88 for non-adherers compared with 3.53 for other participants (mean difference 0.65, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Patients would like more weight and discussion given to self-reported symptoms and quality of life in medication decisions. Greater understanding and interventions are required to alleviate the persisting impact of past AMEs on some patients' wellbeing, behaviour and current medical relationships.


Asunto(s)
Médicos , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente
10.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(6): 2262-2274, 2022 05 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698822

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid global transition towards telemedicine; yet much remains unknown about telemedicine's acceptability and safety in rheumatology. To help address this gap and inform practice, this study investigated rheumatology patient and clinician experiences and views of telemedicine. METHODS: Sequential mixed methodology combined analysis of surveys and in-depth interviews. Between and within-group differences in views of telemedicine were examined for patients and clinicians using t-tests. RESULTS: Surveys (patients n = 1340, clinicians n = 111) and interviews (patients n = 31, clinicians n = 29) were completed between April 2021 and July 2021. The majority of patients were from the UK (96%) and had inflammatory arthritis (32%) or lupus (32%). Patients and clinicians rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face consultations in almost all categories, although >60% found it more convenient. Building trusting medical relationships and assessment accuracy were great concerns (93% of clinicians and 86% of patients rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face for assessment accuracy). Telemedicine was perceived to have increased misdiagnoses, inequalities and barriers to accessing care. Participants reported highly disparate telemedicine delivery and responsiveness from primary and secondary care. Although rheumatology clinicians highlighted the importance of a quick response to flaring patients, only 55% of patients were confident that their rheumatology department would respond within 48 hours. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate a preference for face-to-face consultations. Some negative experiences may be due to the pandemic rather than telemedicine specifically, although the risk of greater diagnostic inaccuracies using telemedicine is unlikely to be fully resolved. Training, choice, careful patient selection, and further consultation with clinicians and patients is required to increase telemedicine's acceptability and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This telemedicine study is part of a pre-registered longitudinal multi-stage trial, the LISTEN study (ISRCTN-14966097), with later Covid-related additions registered in March 2021, including a pre-registered statistical analysis plan.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Reumatología , Telemedicina , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telemedicina/métodos
11.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(9): 3723-3736, 2022 08 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34995345

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To better understand rheumatology patient and clinician pandemic-related experiences, medical relationships and behaviours in order to help identify the persisting impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and inform efforts to ameliorate the negative impacts and build upon the positive ones. METHODS: Rheumatology patients and clinicians completed surveys (patients n = 1543, clinicians n = 111) and interviews (patients n = 41, clinicians n = 32) between April 2021 and August 2021. A cohort (n = 139) of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease patients was also followed up from March 2020 to April 2021. Analyses used sequential mixed methods. Pre-specified outcome measures included the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental wellbeing score (WEMWBS), satisfaction with care and healthcare behaviours. RESULTS: We identified multiple ongoing pandemic-induced/increased barriers to receiving care. The percentage of patients agreeing they were medically supported reduced from 74.4% pre-pandemic to 39.7% during-pandemic. Ratings for medical support, medical security and trust were significantly (P <0.001) positively correlated with patient WEMWBS and healthcare behaviours, and decreased during the pandemic. Healthcare-seeking was reduced, potentially long-term, including from patients feeling 'abandoned' by clinicians, and a 'burden' from government messaging to protect the NHS. Blame and distrust were frequent, particularly between primary and secondary care, and towards the UK government, who <10% of clinicians felt had supported clinicians during the pandemic. Clinicians' efforts were reported to be impeded by inefficient administration systems and chronic understaffing, suggestive of the pandemic having exposed and exacerbated existing healthcare system weaknesses. CONCLUSION: Without concerted action-such as rebuilding trust, improved administrative systems and more support for clinicians-barriers to care and negative impacts of the pandemic on trust, medical relationships, medical security and patient help-seeking may persist in the longer term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is part of a pre-registered longitudinal multi-stage trial, the LISTEN study (ISRCTN-14966097), with later COVID-related additions registered in March 2021, including a pre-registered statistical analysis plan.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Reumatología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Lupus ; 31(9): 1078-1083, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35635045

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a growing literature reporting the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). AIMS: To compare the clinical characteristics of a cohort of patients with PPI-induced SCLE, their clinical course and treatment with a control group of primary SCLE patients not exposed to PPI. METHODS: We conducted a matched case-control study in a tertiary referral setting at the Louise Coote Lupus Unit. There were 64 SCLE patients: 36 with PPI-induced SCLE and 28 patients with primary SCLE. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (72%) had pre-existing SLE in the PPI-induced SCLE group. Lower limb skin lesions were significantly more prevalent in the PPI group (p < 0.0001). The prevalence of anti-Ro and anti-Ro-52 antibodies was numerically higher in the PPI group (64% and 60%), respectively, compared with 46% and 42% in the primary SCLE group. Peripheral blood eosinophils were normal in all patients in the PPI group. Thirteen patients underwent skin biopsy in the PPI group and 12 had histology in keeping with SCLE. The median time to presentation was 8 months with a median resolution period of 6 weeks. PPIs were stopped in 34 patients, while 2 patients continued treatment for other clinical indications. Twelve patients received concurrent oral corticosteroids. Two patients had severe SCLE in the form of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis requiring critical care admission and were managed with corticosteroids, IV immunoglobulin and/or belimumab. CONCLUSION: Lower limb involvement is a pointer to PPI-induced SCLE which is likely a class effect with all PPI.


Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Cutáneo , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Cutáneo/inducido químicamente , Lupus Eritematoso Cutáneo/diagnóstico , Lupus Eritematoso Cutáneo/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Piel/patología
13.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 60(11): 5194-5204, 2021 11 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33792659

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether SLE patients with inflammatory joint symptoms and US synovitis/tenosyovitis achieve better clinical responses to glucocorticoids compared with patients with normal scans. Secondary objectives included identification of clinical features predicting US synovitis/tenosynovitis. METHODS: In a longitudinal multicentre study, SLE patients with physician-diagnosed inflammatory joint pain received intramuscular methylprednisolone 120 mg once. Clinical assessments, patient-reported outcomes and bilateral hand/wrist USs were collected at 0, 2 and 6 weeks. The primary outcome (determined via internal pilot) was the early morning stiffness visual analogue scale (EMS-VAS) at 2 weeks, adjusted for baseline, comparing patients with positive (greyscale ≥2 and/or power Doppler ≥1) and negative US. Post hoc analyses excluded FM. RESULTS: Of 133 patients, 78 had a positive US. Only 53 (68%) of these had one or more swollen joint. Of 66 patients with one or more swollen joint, 20% had a negative US. A positive US was associated with joint swelling, symmetrical small joint distribution and serology. The primary endpoint was not met: in the full analysis set (N = 133) there was no difference in baseline-adjusted EMS-VAS at week 2 [-7.7 mm (95% CI -19.0, 3.5); P = 0.178]. After excluding 32 patients with FM, response was significantly better in patients with a positive US at baseline [baseline-adjusted EMS-VAS at 2 weeks -12.1 mm (95% CI -22.2, -0.1); P = 0.049]. This difference was greater when adjusted for treatment [-12.8 mm (95% CI -22, -3); P = 0.007]. BILAG and SLEDAI responses were higher in US-positive patients. CONCLUSION: In SLE patients without FM, those with a positive US had a better clinical response to therapy. Imaging-detected synovitis/tenosynovitis may be considered to decide on therapy and enrich clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico por imagen , Metilprednisolona/uso terapéutico , Sinovitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sinovitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinovitis/etiología , Ultrasonografía
14.
Rheumatol Int ; 41(4): 721-732, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33104839

RESUMEN

Lupus is a multi-system autoimmune rheumatic disease with increased morbidity and mortality. Some manifestations are life-threatening with many aspects of living with the disease, difficulties in diagnosis and accessing appropriate medical care, having an impact on quality of life. The disease itself, and these patients' perspectives, are currently poorly understood and under-researched. The LUPUS UK forum of conversations between over 25,000 members provides a rich environment to explore the views of these patients. Conversations on the LUPUS UK online forum were qualitatively explored using virtual ethnography and thematic analysis. The forum itself and positive medical relationships were widely considered to provide a means of support, understanding and validation. Forum members expressed difficulties in diagnosis, disease management, and the psychological and physical impact of living with an unpredictable, poorly understood disease, often with life-changing symptoms. Invalidating personal, social and medical environments were perceived as exacerbating these difficulties. Delays in diagnosis and misdiagnoses were frequently discussed as causing significant damage, especially when symptoms were disbelieved or dismissed. Invalidation was the key theme with further themes of: Uncertainty, Medical (mis)communications and misunderstandings, Navigating health systems and Resilience and support. Although effective care and support was reported by some members, the negative impact of living with an incurable, life-changing disease was often exacerbated by perceived invalidation, uncertainty, and difficulties in multiple areas of members' lives. Improved knowledge of the disease and greater support at all stages of the diagnostic journey could improve outcomes and quality of life for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Fisiológica , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Apoyo Social , Errores Diagnósticos , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Resiliencia Psicológica , Reino Unido/epidemiología
15.
Lupus ; 29(10): 1168-1178, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32623951

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The quality of physician-patient interaction can have a significant impact on medication adherence. Little is known about this relationship in patients with lupus nephritis. METHODS: A cross-sectional, quantitative study. Data collected included demographics, current medication, systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index, medication adherence, beliefs about medicines, shared decision-making, patient-doctor depth of relationship, patient-doctor quality of relationship, interpersonal trust in a physician and illness perceptions. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients with lupus nephritis completed the questionnaires. Logistic regression indicated that medication adherence was significantly predicted by (a) interpersonal trust in a physician (B = 0.85, Wald 3.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01, 5.44; P = 0.05); (b) timeline cyclical (B = -0.89, Wald 4.95, 95% CI 0.19, 0.90; P < 0.05) and beliefs about the necessity of medicines (B = 0.75, Wald 4.14, 95% CI 1.03, 4.38; P < 0.05). Mediation analysis showed that beliefs about the necessity of medicines significantly mediated the relationship between trust and medication adherence when adjusted for age (B = 0.48, 95% CI 0.06, 1.08; P < 0.01). A further mediation analysis showed that patient-doctor depth of relationship (B = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01, 0.09; P < 0.001), shared decision-making (B = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01, 0.13; P < 0.001) and patient-doctor quality of relationship (B = 0.08, 95% CI 0.01, 0.16; P < 0.001) significantly mediated the relationship between illness coherence and interpersonal trust in a physician. CONCLUSION: The findings highlighted two key elements: (a) the importance of trust in relation to medication adherence; and (b) a good understanding of patients' illness is linked to a better relationship with their doctor and greater participation in shared decision-making which is associated with increased trust. Tailored psycho-educational interventions could contribute to improving the patient-doctor relationship quality, trust and increased shared decision-making, which, in turn, might improve medication adherence in patients with lupus nephritis.


Asunto(s)
Nefritis Lúpica/psicología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Confianza , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Nefritis Lúpica/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
Lupus ; 29(8): 924-933, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32501170

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the experience and impact of fatigue in adults with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (pAPS). METHODS: This sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study enrolled adults with a six-month or more history of pAPS. Consenting participants completed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue subscale (FS), Multi-Dimensional Perceived Social Support Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQMETS). Relationships between FS and other variables were explored with multiple linear regression. Interviews were conducted with a subgroup of participants, and the data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: A total of 103 participants were recruited (Mage = 50.3 years; standard deviation = 10.1 years; 18 males). Of these, 62% reported severe fatigue. Greater fatigue was associated with lower mood, physical inactivity, poorer sleep quality and lower perceived social support. The best-fit model explained 56% of the variance in FS (adjusted R2 = 0.560, F(3, 74) = 33.65, p > 0.001) and included PHQ9 and IPAQMETS as significant predictors, and PSQI as a non-significant predictor. Twenty participants completed interviews. Three key themes were identified: characteristics of fatigue, impact on life and coping strategies. CONCLUSION: Fatigue was a common symptom of pAPS and challenging to manage. Other factors, particularly mood and physical activity, influenced fatigue. Evidence-based self-management interventions are needed.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Antifosfolípido/complicaciones , Fatiga/fisiopatología , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/fisiopatología , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
18.
Immunity ; 33(3): 375-86, 2010 Sep 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20832340

RESUMEN

Monocytes are effectors of the inflammatory response to microbes. Human CD14(+) monocytes specialize in phagocytosis and production of reactive oxygen species and secrete inflammatory cytokines in response to a broad range of microbial cues. Here, we have characterized the functions of human monocytes that lack CD14 (CD14(dim)) and express CD16. CD14(dim) monocytes were genetically distinct from natural killer cells. Gene expression analyses indicated similarities with murine patrolling Gr1(dim) monocytes, and they patrolled the endothelium of blood vessels after adoptive transfer, in a lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1-dependent manner. CD14(dim) monocytes were weak phagocytes and did not produce ROS or cytokines in response to cell-surface Toll-like receptors. Instead, they selectively produced TNF-α, IL-1ß, and CCL3 in response to viruses and immune complexes containing nucleic acids, via a proinflammatory TLR7-TLR 8-MyD88-MEK pathway. Thus, CD14(dim) cells are bona fide monocytes involved in the innate local surveillance of tissues and the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases.


Asunto(s)
Receptores de Lipopolisacáridos/fisiología , Monocitos/fisiología , Ácidos Nucleicos/fisiología , Receptor Toll-Like 7/fisiología , Receptor Toll-Like 8/fisiología , Virus/inmunología , Animales , Presentación de Antígeno , Citocinas/biosíntesis , Proteínas Ligadas a GPI , Antígenos HLA-DR/análisis , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Ratones , Factor 88 de Diferenciación Mieloide/fisiología , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Receptores de IgG/análisis
19.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med ; 40(2): 227-234, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31137062

RESUMEN

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune rheumatic disease characterized by the production of pathogenic autoantibodies and immune complexes and is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality through a wide range of clinical manifestations which can affect almost any organ. Pulmonary involvement is prevalent and seen in 50 to 70% of SLE patients and may even be the presenting feature in 4 to 5% of patients. By 10 years postdiagnosis, 12% will have accumulated an element of permanent lung damage. Pulmonary complications are broad and include pleural disease, interstitial lung disease (ILD), vasculitis, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary hypertension, large airway disease, shrinking lung syndrome, and infection. Conditions can range mostly from asymptomatic, for example, in mild cases of pleural effusion or obstructive airway disease, to life-threatening disease, for example, in acute lupus pneumonitis or diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. ILD and pulmonary hypertension are both frequently seen in other autoimmune rheumatic diseases such as systemic sclerosis; however, in SLE, they tend to be milder and have a comparatively favorable prognosis. Although collectively pulmonary involvement in SLE is common, the heterogeneity of SLE and rareness of individual complications make clinical trials difficult and treatment is usually based on case series reports and anecdotal experience with various immunosuppressive agents. Some of these immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide have also been linked with drug-induced lung injury.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Pleurales/etiología
20.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 77(11): 1590-1598, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30077990

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular (CV) involvement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is presumably subclinical for the major part of its evolution. We evaluated the associations between high-sensitive troponin T (hs-TropT), a sensitive marker of myocardial injury, and CV involvement using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a two-centre (London and Frankfurt) CMR imaging study at 3.0 Tesla of consecutive 92 patients with SLE free of cardiac symptoms, undergoing screening for cardiac involvement. Venous samples were drawn and analysed post-hoc for cardiac biomarkers, including hs-TropT, high-sensitive C reactive protein and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide. Compared with age-matched/gender-matched non-SLE controls (n=78), patients had significantly raised cardiac biomarker levels, native T1 and T2, aortic and ventricular stiffness, and reduced global longitudinal strain (p<0.01). In SLE, hs-TropT was significantly and independently associated with native T2, followed by the models including native T1 and aortic stiffness (Χ2 0.462, p<0.01). There were no relationships between hs-TropT and age, gender, CV risk factors, duration of systemic disease, cardiac structure or function, or late gadolinium enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SLE have a high prevalence of subclinical myocardial injury as demonstrated by raised high-sensitive troponin levels. CMR with T2 mapping reveals myocardial oedema as the strongest predictor of hs-TropT release, underscoring the inflammatory interstitial remodelling as the main mechanism of injury. Patients without active myocardial inflammation demonstrate diffuse interstitial remodelling and increased vascular stiffness. These findings substantiate the role of CMR in screening of subclinical cardiac involvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMER: NCT02407197; Results.


Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Miocarditis/diagnóstico , Miocarditis/etiología , Troponina T/sangre , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biopsia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Endocardio/patología , Femenino , Corazón/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Miocarditis/diagnóstico por imagen , Miocarditis/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA