Consensus on Current Landscape and Treatment Trends of Obesity in India for Primary Care Physicians.

Objectives: The objective of this consensus article was to form a list of expert recommendations and an easily adaptable algorithm for obesity management in India by primary care physicians (PCPs). Methods: A Delphi-based model was followed to form a list of the consensus recommendations. Consensus statements were created from the results of a literature review that were graded as per the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. After being evaluated by an expert panel comprising diabetologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, bariatric surgeons, and gynecologists, the statements were revised and reevaluated by a larger group of practitioners, including PCPs and diabetologists, to arrive at a consensus. Results: The panel opined that obesity is increasing in prevalence in India and is projected to rise in the coming years. Body mass index and waist circumference were both recommended for better identification of people at risk of obesity-related comorbidities than either of them alone. The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) was suggested as being most suitable for the assessment (staging) of obesity. A multidisciplinary team was considered invaluable for assessing and managing patients with obesity. The use of once-a-week semaglutide (2.4 mg) via the subcutaneous route was suggested as the first-choice anti-obesity treatment when pharmacotherapy is deemed necessary. An algorithm considering all these aspects was proposed. Conclusion: Obesity needs to be recognized as a significant contributor to other comorbidities. The diagnosis and management of obesity should be comprehensive and consider patient psychology, the presence or absence of comorbidities, available pharmacologic agents, and long-term outcomes. The proposed algorithm could help clinicians in this aspect and improve the overall outcomes. How to cite this article: Deshpande NR, Kapoor N, Dalal JJ, et al. Consensus on Current Landscape and Treatment Trends of Obesity in India for Primary Care Physicians. J Assoc Physicians India 2023;71(10):69-77.

Telmisartan Plus Amlodipine as the Preferred Initial Combination in Newly Diagnosed Indian Patients with Hypertension: An Expert Consensus Statements.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension (HTN) remains one of the most important risk factors for cardiovascular (CV) diseases and a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Despite improvement in detection and treatment, poor blood pressure (BP) control rates are observed globally. The situation in India is alarming with only 22.5% of patients maintaining their BP under control. Initiating early and effective treatment for HTN helps control BP within normal limits and reduces associated health risks. In India, currently, there are no guidelines on the choice of dual combination treatment that can be considered an initial treatment for newly diagnosed HTN patients to achieve effective BP control and reduce CV risks. OBJECTIVE: To provide consensus recommendations for preferred initial combinations in newly diagnosed Indian patients with HTN. METHODOLOGY: A core group of 100 experts with HTN expertise conceptualized and formulated the four key questions based on answerability, effectiveness, potential for translation to clinical practice, novelty, and potential impact on the healthcare burden. A mix of Delphi and Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) methods was adopted for acceptance or refusal of recommendations. Likert scale 1-9 was used for scoring. A score of ≥7 was considered "statement accepted," >6.50 "near to acceptance" and <6.50 "not accepted." A vote of ≥7 by at least two-thirds of the experts (66.66%) was mandatory for acceptance of the recommendation. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy could be necessary for a majority of newly diagnosed Indian patients for effective BP control. It can manage HTN with better clinical outcomes. Based on mean rating scores from experts, telmisartan plus amlodipine can be considered the preferred initial combination in the management of newly diagnosed Indian patients with HTN to achieve better BP control and improve CV outcomes.

Screening of PCSK9 and LDLR genetic variants in Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients in India.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal, dominant, inherited disorder characterized by severely elevated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with high risk for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). There are limited genetic studies especially on genes other than Low Density Lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) conducted in Indian population. Thus, our aim was to screen the entire Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9 gene (PCSK9) gene & hotspot exons 3, 4 and 9 of LDLR gene in FH cases and controls. 50 FH cases were categorized into definite, probable and possible cases according to Dutch Lipid Network Criteria (DLNC) who were gender matched with 50 healthy controls. All 12 exons of PCSK9, and hotspot exons 3, 4 & 9 of LDLR gene were screened through High Resolution Melt (HRM) curve analysis. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay was performed to measure circulating PCSK9 levels. Total cholesterol and LDL-C were significantly high in all three groups of cases. Total 8 nonpathogenic variants in exon 1, 5, 7 and 9 of the PCSK9 gene were detected. In LDLR gene, 3 known pathogenic and 1 benign variant were found in exon 3 & 4. In FH cases, PCSK9 levels were significantly high compared to controls (P = 0.0001), and were directly correlated to LDL-C (P = 0.0001) and Total Cholesterol (P = 0.0001). Our study is first to screen the entire PCSK9 gene in western part of India. Since no pathogenic variants were identified, it is possible that PCSK9 variants are clinically less relevant. However, 3 known pathogenic variants were found in the LDLR gene. These findings support our understanding of the genetic spectrum of FH in India.

Retrospective, Observational Study to Determine the Choice of Antihypertensive agent According to Stage of Hypertension, Risk factors and Co-morbidities in Real World Setting in India: A Report of Baseline Data.

BACKGROUND: The present study intended to estimate the comorbidities and risk factors among patients with hypertension in India. Further, the current practice of hypertension management was evaluated and the choice of therapy was assessed based on hypertension grade, risk factors, and comorbidities. METHODS: Electronic medical record data (June 2017-June 2019) of Indian adult hypertensive patients (≥140/90 mmHg) who had two blood pressure (BP) readings were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, BP readings, comorbidities, medications and co-medications, and laboratory data were collected at baseline. Grids based on hypertension grade (I, II, and III), demographic factors, risk factors, and comorbidities were created and prescribed antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) in each grid were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 100,075 patients, the proportion of patients in 18-40 year, 40-65 year, and >65 year age groups were 11.4%, 65.1%, and 23.4%, respectively. Proportion of men and women was similar (52.0% vs 47.9%). Proportion of patients with BMI <25 Kg/m2 was 8.1%, 25-29.9 Kg/m2 was 11.9%, and >30 Kg/m2 was 8.8%. Mean BP of patients with hypertension was: grade I (145.05/90.73 mmHg), grade II (160.07/95.64 mmHg), and grade III (180.82/102.76 mmHg). Mean low density lipoprotein (113.26 mg/dL), serum creatinine (2.28 mg/dL), mean HbA1c (8.7%) levels were highest among patients with grade III hypertension. Commonly observed comorbidities were type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM: 51.5%), dyslipidemia (36.4%), and chronic kidney disease (CKD: 4.4%). Top concomitant medications included anti-diabetic therapies (34.6%), drugs for dyslipidemia (30.0%), and anti-platelet therapies (6.9%). CONCLUSION: Most prescribed AHD monotherapies were angiotensin receptor II blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and most prescribed combination therapies were ARBs + diuretics and ARBs + CCBs. Telmisartan and amlodipine+telmisartan for patients with comorbid T2DM or dyslipidemia and metoprolol for those with coronary artery disease were the commonly prescribed AHDs.

Screening for Hypertension in Asymptomatic Individuals in India: An Expert Consensus Statement.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension (HTN) is a rapidly growing epidemic in India. It is no larger restricted to older adults as more young Indians are being diagnosed with HTN. Despite its significant prevalence, the awareness, treatment, and control of HTN remain low in India. Thus, early diagnosis is essential to control HTN and prevent future complications. Screening for HTN can help identify undiagnosed and asymptomatic HTN, and thereby the early use of interventions to control the blood pressure (BP). However, no comprehensive guidelines have been established for effective HTN screening in asymptomatic individuals in an Indian setting. OBJECTIVE: To provide consensus recommendations for hypertension screening in India. CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS: Screening for HTN can provide more effective control of HTN and reduce the complications. Experts recommended that the initial age at screening should be 18 years. In individuals at a high risk of HTN, targeted screening can be undertaken. BP measurement using an electronic BP recorder (with at least two readings) are required for identifying HTN during screening. In asymptomatic adults with BP <130/85 mmHg and BP of 130-139/85- 89 mmHg, rescreening should be conducted every 3-5 years and at least every year, respectively. Screening for HTN can be cost effective even when universal screening of the entire population is undertaken. CONCLUSION: The consensus recommendations would increase the awareness of HTN screening. Screening for HTN can provide more effective control of HTN and reduce the complications.

Current Perspective on Use of NOAC in Clinical Practice in India.

Oral vitamin K antagonists (VKA) such as warfarin have been the mainstay of therapy for stroke prevention in patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) while low-molecular-weight heparin, fondaparinux and adjusted-dose warfarin or aspirin have been routinely used for thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement. However, VKAs are associated with considerable limitations, including increased risk of bleeding and narrow therapeutic window. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs, now referred as Non Vit K dependent oral anticoagulants), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and direct Factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban and apixaban are now approved alternatives to warfarin for prophylaxis of stroke and systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with NVAF and treatment and prophylaxis of VTE. The efficacy and safety of NOACs have been proven in several clinical trials. The advantages offered by NOACs such as rapid onset and termination of action, predictable anticoagulant effect, less frequent laboratory monitoring make them promising alternatives to warfarin. However, clinicians in India seek more information over the practical aspects that require due consideration to ensure proper use of these drugs. The article addresses some crucial aspects of NOAC therapy such as measurement of anticoagulant effects, transition between different agents, ensuring drug intake compliance, dealing with dosing errors, management of bleeding complications etc based on the guidance offered by the European Heart Rhythm Association in 2013.

Cardiac Biomarkers for Better Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) causes significant mortality and morbidity. Timely diagnosis allows clinicians to risk stratify their patients and select appropriate treatment. Biomarkers have been used to diagnose or rule out AMI. An increasing number of novel biomarkers have been identified to predict the outcome following AMI or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This may facilitate tailoring of appropriate therapy to high-risk patients. This review focuses on a variety of promising biomarkers which provide diagnostic and prognostic information.

Managing dyslipidaemia in young adults.

Indians have early onset atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and acquire the risk factors at a younger age, and hence we need to aggressively address the management of dyslipidemia in the young. Cholesterol levels early in life will influence the development of atherosclerosis. Young atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients (18-40 yrs) should receive lipid-lowering drugs to reduce LDL-C<55 mg. Due to the asymptomatic nature of dyslipidemia, early screening will enable the implementation of management strategies which will decrease future cardiovascular events. In this review, we will provide insights into identifying and managing dyslipidemia in the 18-40 years age group (young adults). It is suggested that early detection and more aggressive management of dyslipidemia in young adults with or without risk factors like diabetes, hypertension, tobacco and central obesity, might reduce the risk of CV events occurring later in life. Although lifestyle modification is the mainstay of treatment (dietary recommendations, exercise, tobacco cessation, weight reduction, etc.) but in certain young adults we suggest use of statins in low dose or non-statin drugs if they have associated risk factors, LDL-C >160 mg or a high coronary calcium score. Young adults who are carriers of FH gene should receive aggressive lifestyle modification and appropriate antilipidemic therapy.

Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Patients with Coexistent Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Dyslipidemia: A Retrospective Study from India.

BACKGROUND: Coexisting hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and dyslipidemia (triple disease) can lead to greater risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The present study sought to comprehend the prevalence, demographic traits, clinical traits, and treatment patterns in Indian patients with these coexisting conditions. METHODS: An electronic medical record (EMR)-based, retrospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted, and data were collected for patients who were diagnosed with coexistent hypertension, T2DM, and dyslipidemia. Baseline patient variables evaluated were the percentage of patients with triple comorbidity, demographic characteristics, diagnostic laboratory parameters, and treatment pattern details. RESULTS: Data from 4793 centers (clinics) were included, with a total of 6,722,173 patients. Of these, 427,835 (6.36%) patients were found to have coexistent hypertension, T2DM, and dyslipidemia. Most of the patients belonged to the 40-64 year age group (62.10%) and were males (57.00%), while 27.40% patients had a body mass index (BMI) within normal limits, 43.30% patients were pre-obese, and 20.90% patients were class 1 obese. Further, 3402 patients (0.80%) had a recorded history of smoking. Mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for the patients included in the study was 8.35 ± 1.96 g%. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 138.81 ± 19.59 mm Hg, while mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was 82.17 ± 10.35 mm Hg; 27.60% cases had SBP < 130 mm Hg, while 28.37% cases had DBP < 80 mm Hg. The mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL), total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in mg/dl were 98.38 ± 40.39, 174.75 ± 46.73, and 44.5 ± 10.05, respectively. Of the enrolled cases, 55.64% had serum LDL below 100 mg/dl, 72.03% cases had serum cholesterol below 200 mg/dl, and 44.15% males and 71.77% females had serum HDL below the normal prescribed range. The most common monotherapy used for managing hypertension was angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) (24.80%), followed by beta-blockers (24.30%). The most common combinations administered for management of hypertension were antihypertensives with diuretics (14.30%), followed by ARB plus calcium channel blockers (CCB) (13.30%). For dyslipidemia, the majority of patients (56.60%) received lipid-lowering medication in combination with drugs for other comorbidities. The most common antidiabetic agents prescribed were biguanides (74.60%). CONCLUSIONS: Coexistence of triple disease is not uncommon in the Indian population, with middle-aged patients diagnosed as pre-obese and obese being affected more commonly and receiving treatment for the same. The present study highlights that, though there are medications against the three chronic conditions, the rate of uncontrolled cases of hypertension, T2DM, and dyslipidemia remains high. Coexistence of triple disease increases the risk of cardiovascular and renal complications, which need to be closely monitored and effectively treated.

CSI clinical practice guidelines for dyslipidemia management: Executive summary.

Dyslipidemias are the most important coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factor. Proper management of dyslipidemia is crucial to control the epidemic of premature CAD in India. Cardiological Society of India strived to develop consensus-based guidelines for better lipid management for CAD prevention and treatment. The executive summary provides a bird's eye-view of the 'CSI: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dyslipidemia Management' published in this issue of the Indian Heart Journal. The summary is focused on the busy clinician and encourages evidence-based management of patients and high-risk individuals. The summary has serialized various aspects of lipid management including epidemiology and categorization of CAD risk. The focus is on management of specific dyslipidemias relevant to India-raised low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoproteins, triglycerides and lipoprotein(a). Drug therapies for lipid lowering (statins, non-statin drugs and other pharmaceutical agents) and lifestyle management (dietary interventions, physical activity and yoga) are summarized. Management of dyslipidemias in oft-neglected patient phenotypes-the elderly, young and children, and patients with comorbidities-stroke, peripheral arterial disease, kidney failure, posttransplant, HIV (Human immunodeficiency virus), Covid-19 and familial hypercholesterolemia is also presented. This consensus statement is based on major international guidelines (mainly European) and expert opinion of lipid management leaders from India with focus on the dictum: earlier the better, lower the better, longer the better and together the better. These consensus guidelines cannot replace the individual clinician judgement who remains the sole arbiter in management of the patient.

Lipid Association of India 2023 update on cardiovascular risk assessment and lipid management in Indian patients: Consensus statement IV.

OBJECTIVE: In 2016, the Lipid Association of India (LAI) developed a cardiovascular risk assessment algorithm and defined low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in Indians. The recent refinements in the role of various risk factors and subclinical atherosclerosis in prediction of ASCVD risk necessitated updating the risk algorithm and treatment goals. METHODS: The LAI core committee held twenty-one meetings and webinars from June 2022 to July 2023 with experts across India and critically reviewed the latest evidence regarding the strategies for ASCVD risk prediction and the benefits and modalities for intensive lipid lowering. Based on the expert consensus and extensive review of published data, consensus statement IV was commissioned. RESULTS: The young age of onset and a more aggressive nature of ASCVD in Indians necessitates emphasis on lifetime ASCVD risk instead of the conventional 10-year risk. It also demands early institution of aggressive preventive measures to protect the young population prior to development of ASCVD events. Wide availability and low cost of statins in India enable implementation of effective LDL-C-lowering therapy in individuals at high risk of ASCVD. Subjects with any evidence of subclinical atherosclerosis are likely to benefit the most from early aggressive interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This document presents the updated risk stratification and treatment algorithm and describes the rationale for each modification. The intent of these updated recommendations is to modernize management of dyslipidemia in Indian patients with the goal of reducing the epidemic of ASCVD among Indians in Asia and worldwide.

Post-marketing study of clinical experience of atorvastatin 80 mg vs 40 mg in Indian patients with acute coronary syndrome- a randomized, multi-centre study (CURE-ACS).

OBJECTIVE: To generate comparative clinical data in Indian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in terms of safety and efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg vis-à-vis atorvastatin 40 mg MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 236 patients with diagnosed ACS (with TIMI Risk score > or = 3) within preceding 10 days were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 80 mg or atorvastatin 40 mg once daily for 12 weeks. Out of 236 patients, data for 173 was analyzed who had both baseline and post-baseline lipid assessment. The primary end point of the trial was percentage change in LDL-C at the end of treatment from baseline. Other end points were change in high sensitivity C reactive protein, incidence of increase in liver enzymes > or = 3 times upper limit of normal and incidence of myotoxicity (with or without elevation of creatinine phosphokinase) at the end of treatment. RESULTS: A dose-dependent response was observed with greater reduction of LDL -C in atorvastatin 80 mg (27.5% vs 19.04%) than that of atorvastatin 40 mg group. Both the treatment groups had a significant reduction (p < 0.001) in LDL-C at the end of 6 and 12 weeks in comparison to baseline. hs-CRP was also significantly reduced (p < 0.001) in both the treatment groups i.e. atorvastatin 80 mg (76.15%) and atorvastatin 40 mg (84.4%) from baseline at the end of 12 weeks. Both doses of atorvastatin were well tolerated. No patient had elevation of (> or = 3 times of upper limit of normal) liver enzymes or creatinine phosphokinase. One patient on atorvastatin 80 mg complained of myalgia. There were no dose-related differences in incidence of adverse events between two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The CURE-ACS trial indicated that atorvastatin 80 mg was more effective than atorvastatin 40 mg in terms of reduction in LDL cholesterol and was as safe and well tolerated as 40 mg dose in Indian patients with ACS.