Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e995-e1003, 2023 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35879465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections after solid organ transplant (SOT) are not well characterized. Here we aimed to describe these factors. METHODS: Retrospective, multinational, 1:2 matched case-control study that included SOT recipients ≥12 years old diagnosed with NTM infection from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018. Controls were matched on transplanted organ, NTM treatment center, and post-transplant survival greater than or equal to the time to NTM diagnosis. Logistic regression on matched pairs was used to assess associations between risk factors and NTM infections. RESULTS: Analyses included 85 cases and 169 controls (59% male, 88% White, median age at time of SOT of 54 years [interquartile range {IQR} 40-62]). NTM infection occurred in kidney (42%), lung (35%), heart and liver (11% each), and pancreas transplant recipients (1%). Median time from transplant to infection was 21.6 months (IQR 5.3-55.2). Most underlying comorbidities were evenly distributed between groups; however, cases were older at the time of NTM diagnosis, more frequently on systemic corticosteroids and had a lower lymphocyte count (all P < .05). In the multivariable model, older age at transplant (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.04; 95 confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.07), hospital admission within 90 days (aOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.41-6.98), receipt of antifungals (aOR, 5.35; 95% CI, 1.7-16.91), and lymphocyte-specific antibodies (aOR, 7.73; 95% CI, 1.07-56.14), were associated with NTM infection. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of NTM infection in SOT recipients was associated with older age at SOT, prior hospital admission, receipt of antifungals or lymphocyte-specific antibodies. NTM infection should be considered in SOT patients with these risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas , Trasplante de Órganos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Receptores de Trasplantes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antifúngicos , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/microbiología , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Micobacterias no Tuberculosas
2.
BMJ ; 375: e068060, 2021 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34728476

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine if inhaled and intranasal ciclesonide are superior to placebo at decreasing respiratory symptoms in adult outpatients with covid-19. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. SETTING: Three Canadian provinces (Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia). PARTICIPANTS: 203 adults aged 18 years and older with polymerase chain reaction confirmed covid-19, presenting with fever, cough, or dyspnoea. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomised to receive either inhaled ciclesonide (600 µg twice daily) and intranasal ciclesonide (200 µg daily) or metered dose inhaler and nasal saline placebos for 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was symptom resolution at day 7. Analyses were conducted on the modified intention-to-treat population (participants who took at least one dose of study drug and completed one follow-up survey) and adjusted for stratified randomisation by sex. RESULTS: The modified intention-to-treat population included 203 participants: 105 were randomly assigned to ciclesonide (excluding two dropouts and one loss to follow-up) and 98 to placebo (excluding three dropouts and six losses to follow-up). The median age was 35 years (interquartile range 27-47 years) and 54% were women. The proportion of participants with resolution of symptoms by day 7 did not differ significantly between the intervention group (42/105, 40%) and control group (34/98, 35%); absolute adjusted risk difference 5.5% (95% confidence interval -7.8% to 18.8%). Results might be limited to the population studied, which mainly included younger adults without comorbidities. The trial was stopped early, therefore could have been underpowered. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, the combination of inhaled and intranasal ciclesonide did not show a statistically significant increase in resolution of symptoms among healthier young adults with covid-19 presenting with prominent respiratory symptoms. As evidence is insufficient to determine the benefit of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of covid-19, further research is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04435795.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Pregnenodionas/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pregnenodionas/uso terapéutico , Autoinforme , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can ; 5(3): 201-208, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36341314

RESUMEN

A 21-year-old, previously healthy male presented to hospital following 1 week of bilateral asymmetric ascending paralysis, odynophagia, and dysphagia. Initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine revealed an abnormal increased T2 signal with predominant dorsal column involvement and sparing of white matter throughout the cervical cord and extending to T5. The initial presumptive diagnosis was an acute infectious, versus inflammatory, myelitis. On reviewing the history, family members recalled a bat scratch on the left hand, sustained months prior, for which the patient did not seek or receive post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Rabies virus (RABV) RNA was detected by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in two saliva samples, while nuchal skin biopsy and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were negative. Serum was negative for RABV neutralizing antibody. Sequencing and phylogenetic analyses identified the infecting RABV as a variant associated with silver-haired bats. Following risk assessment of exposure, 67 health care workers and several family members were offered PEP.


Un homme de 21 ans auparavant en santé a consulté à l'hôpital parce qu'il souffrait de paralysie ascendante, asymétrique et bilatérale, d'odynophagie et de dysphagie depuis une semaine. Une première imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM) du rachis a révélé une augmentation anormale du signal T2 avec atteinte prédominante de la colonne dorsale et épargne de la matière blanche dans toute la colonne cervicale jusqu'à la vertèbre T5. Le diagnostic provisoire en était un de myélite infectieuse, et non inflammatoire. À la prise de l'histoire, les membres de la famille se sont souvenus d'une égratignure de chauve-souris sur la main gauche du patient plusieurs mois auparavant, qui n'a pas été suivie d'une prophylaxie postexposition (PPE). Les chercheurs ont décelé l'ARN du virus de la rage (RABV) par amplification en chaîne par polymérase quantitative de transcription inverse (RT-qPCR) dans deux échantillons de salive, mais constaté un résultat négatif de la biopsie de la peau nucale et du liquide céphalorachidien. Le sérum était négatif à l'anticorps neutralisant du RABV. Les analyses de séquençage et de phylogénétique ont confirmé une contamination par une variante du RABV associée aux chauves-souris argentées. Après une évaluation du risque d'exposition, 67 travailleurs de la santé et plusieurs membres de la famille se sont fait offrir une PPE.

4.
Am J Surg ; 211(5): 963-7, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26997305

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction and effective management of postoperative complaints are important factors in determining the success of outpatient surgery programs. METHODS: In September 2013, a 24-hour postdischarge telephone follow-up (TFU) call was initiated by surgical day care nurses at the Royal Jubilee Hospital in Victoria, BC. The study group was contacted to evaluate the effectiveness of the TFU in identifying and addressing postoperative complaints and determining the level of satisfaction with discharge instructions and care. RESULTS: A total of 854 patients were contacted. Overall, 313 (36.7%) received TFU and 541 (63.3%) did not; these served as our control group. Independent sample t-tests revealed that patients who received TFU had significantly fewer postoperative complaints compared with the controls (.19 vs .28, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Day surgery patients receiving TFU reported fewer postoperative concerns. Results of this study suggest that a TFU call results in increased patient satisfaction with discharge care and is an appropriate tool to address patients' postoperative complaints and improve patient-reported outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Teléfono/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Colombia Británica , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Centros de Día/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA