Early detection and follow-up of colorectal neoplasia based on faecal volatile organic compounds.

AIM: Early detection and removal of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenomas (AAs) decreases the incidence of and mortality from the disease. We aimed to evaluate the potential of faecal volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for detection and follow-up of colorectal adenoma using advanced electronic nose technology. METHOD: This was a prospective multi-centre case-control cohort including two district hospitals and one tertiary referral hospital. Patients undergoing colonoscopy were instructed to collect a faecal sample prior to bowel cleansing and were included in the study when CRC, AAs, large adenomas (LAs; 0.5-1.0 cm), small adenomas (SAs; 0.1-0.5 cm) or no endoscopic abnormalities (controls) were observed. Patients undergoing polypectomy and controls were asked for a second sample after 3 months. Faecal VOCs were measured with gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry. Random forest, support vector machine, Gaussian process and neural net classification were used to evaluate accuracy. RESULTS: In total, 14 patients with CRC, 64 with AAs, 69 with LAs, 127 with SAs and 227 controls were included. A second sample was collected from 32 polypectomy patients and 32 controls. Faecal VOCs discriminated CRC and adenomas from control [AUC (95% CI): CRC vs control 0.96 (0.89-1); AA vs control 0.96 (0.93-1); LA vs control 0.96 (0.92-0.99); SA vs control 0.96 (0.94-0.99)]. There were no significant differences between CRC and adenoma groups. Patients with adenomas and controls were discriminated prior to polypectomy, whereas 3 months after polypectomy VOC profiles were similar [T0 adenoma vs control 0.98 (0.95-1); T1 adenoma vs control 0.55 (0.40-0.69)]. CONCLUSIONS: Faecal VOC profiles may be useful for early detection of CRC and adenomas and the timing of polyp surveillance as polypectomy led to a normalization of the VOC profile.

Risk stratification of symptomatic patients suspected of colorectal cancer using faecal and urinary markers.

AIM: Faecal markers, such as the faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin (FIT) and faecal calprotectin (FCP), have been increasingly used to exclude colorectal cancer (CRC) and colonic inflammation. However, in those with lower gastrointestinal symptoms there are considerable numbers who have cancer but have a negative FIT test (i.e. false negative), which has impeded its use in clinical practice. We undertook a study of diagnostic accuracy CRC using FIT, FCP and urinary volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms. METHOD: One thousand and sixteen symptomatic patients with suspected CRC referred by family physicians were recruited prospectively in accordance with national referring protocol. A total of 562 patients who completed colonic investigations, in addition to providing stool for FIT and FCP as well as urine samples for urinary VOC measurements, were included in the final outcome measures. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity for CRC using FIT was 0.80 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.93] and 0.93 (CI 0.91-0.95), respectively. For urinary VOCs, the sensitivity and specificity for CRC was 0.63 (CI 0.46-0.79) and 0.63 (CI 0.59-0.67), respectively. However, for those who were FIT-negative CRC (i.e. false negatives), the addition of urinary VOCs resulted in a sensitivity of 0.97 (CI 0.90-1.0) and specificity of 0.72 (CI 0.68-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: When applied to the FIT-negative group, urinary VOCs improve CRC detection (sensitivity rises from 0.80 to 0.97), thus showing promise as a second-stage test to complement FIT in the detection of CRC.

Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient from whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI to predict early response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: preliminary results.

AIM: To evaluate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis parameters, acquired from whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), as very early predictors of response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-institution prospective study, approved by the West Midlands-South Birmingham research ethics committee. All patients gave fully informed consent prior to imaging. Sixteen patients with histologically confirmed mCRC were enrolled to the study and 11 were successfully scanned with whole-body DW-MRI before (baseline) and 10.8±2.7 days after commencing chemotherapy (follow-up). Therapy response was assessed by RECIST 1.1. Mean ADC and histogram parameters (skewness, kurtosis, 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles) were compared between progressors and non-progressors at baseline and follow-up. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed for the statistically significant parameters. Data from metastases were also compared to normative tissue data acquired from healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Three patients had progressive disease (progressors) and eight had partial response/stable disease (non-progressors). Mean, 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles were significantly lower for progressors at baseline (p=0.012, 0.012, 0.012 and 0.025 respectively) with areas under the ROC curves (AUC)=0.58, 0.50, 0.58 and 0.63, respectively. Skewness and kurtosis were significantly lower for non-progressors at follow-up (p=0.001 and 0.003 respectively) with AUC=0.67 and 0.79 respectively. CONCLUSION: ADC histogram analysis shows potential in discriminating progressive from non-progressive disease in patients with mCRC, who underwent whole-body DW-MRI. The technique can potentially be tested as a response assessment methodology in larger trials.