A proposal of decision tree to screen putative antidepressants using forced swim and tail suspension tests.

Interstrain mice variability in response to antidepressant drugs has been reported in the most commonly utilized behavioural animal models of depression: the tail suspension test (TST) and the forced swimming test (FST). The behaviour of mice was examined in both tests for screening various antidepressants with different biochemical mechanism of action. Previous studies have revealed that drug sensitivity depends on the strain and test used. Swiss mice is the most sensitive strain to detect serotonin and/or noradrenaline antidepressants whereas C57BL/6J was the only strain sensitive to bupropion (dopaminergic agent) using the FST. In the TST, all antidepressants studied decreased the immobility time in Swiss and C57BL/6J strains. Detection of an antidepressant-like activity could be performed using only one test (TST with Swiss mice or FST with Swiss and C57Bl/6 Rj mice), but both tests are necessary to conclude on the mechanism of action.

Antidepressant-like effects in various mice strains in the forced swimming test.

RATIONALE: Strain differences in mice have been reported in response to drugs in the mouse forced swimming test (FST), even if few antidepressants were examined. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of genetic factors, using five antidepressants (imipramine, desipramine, citalopram, paroxetine and bupropion) in the mouse FST, in outbred strains (Swiss, NMRI) and inbred strains (DBA/2, C57BL/6J Rj). Moreover, whole brain levels of dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NA), serotonin (5-HT) in vehicle treated animals, which were or were not subjected to the FST, were measured by HPLC analysis in an attempt to explain behavioural differences. METHODS: For each antidepressant, a dose range (1-16 mg/kg) was tested in the locomotor apparatus and only non-psychostimulant doses were then tested in the FST in order to detect antidepressant-like activity. RESULTS: No baseline differences among Swiss, NMRI, DBA/2 and C57BL/6J Rj strains were observed in our experiments, allowing the comparison of different antidepressants in each strain. Imipramine (16 mg/kg), desipramine, citalopram (4-16 mg/kg) and paroxetine (8 and 16 mg/kg) treatment decreased the immobility time in the Swiss strain and the size of the effect reached more than 20% for each of these antidepressants. C57BL/6J Rj was the only strain sensitive to bupropion (2 and 4 mg/kg). In the NMRI strain, only paroxetine treatment decreased the immobility time (16 mg/kg). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that drug sensitivity is genotype dependent. FST results have shown that Swiss mice are the most sensitive strain to detect 5-HT and/or NA treatment. The use of DBA/2 inbred mice may be limited, as an absence of antidepressant-like response was observed in the FST. The lack of sensitivity to antidepressant treatment in DBA/2 strains could be due to high DA, NA and 5-HT whole brain concentrations.

Antidepressant-like effects in various mice strains in the tail suspension test.

Several studies have reported rodent strain differences in the response to antidepressants in animal models of depression. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential contribution of genetic factors to antidepressant response in an animal model of depression: the tail suspension test (TST). For this study four mice strains (Swiss and NMRI, two outbred strains and DBA/2 and C57BL/6J Rj, two inbred strains) were submitted to the TST after acute administration of five antidepressants: the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) imipramine and desipramine, the selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) paroxetine and citalopram and the dopamine reuptake inhibitor bupropion. The C57BL/6J Rj strain had a longer baseline immobility time in comparison to the other strains. All antidepressants studied in this work decreased immobility time in the Swiss and C57BL/6J Rj strains. However, the Swiss strain displayed greater sensitivity to citalopram (from 2mg/kg) and C57BL/6J Rj to paroxetine (from 0.5mg/kg). This latter presented a greater size-effect with citalopram than with other strains and reached more than 60% from 8mg/kg. Moreover the size-effect of desipramine, paroxetine and bupropion in Swiss mice was greater than in the other strains in the TST. The NMRI and DBA/2 mice only responded to 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, both selective (paroxetine, citalopram) or non-selective (imipramine). The NMRI strain was more sensitive to imipramine and presented a size-effect (43% at 8mg/kg) superior to those of other strains. DBA/2 strain was more sensitive to citalopram than paroxetine and imipramine. Our results suggest that response to an antidepressant treatment is under control of genetic factors and that the strain of mouse is an important parameter to consider.