Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 70
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Causes Control ; 30(9): 967-978, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31236792

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although the incidence rate of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is somewhat lower in African American (AA) than white women, survival is worse. The Ovarian Cancer in Women of African Ancestry (OCWAA) consortium will overcome small, study-specific sample sizes to better understand racial differences in EOC risk and outcomes. METHODS: We harmonized risk factors and prognostic characteristics from eight U.S. STUDIES: the North Carolina Ovarian Cancer Study (NCOCS), the Los Angeles County Ovarian Cancer Study (LACOCS), the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES), the Cook County Case-Control Study (CCCCS), the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS), the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC), and the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS). RESULTS: Determinants of disparities for risk and survival in 1,146 AA EOC cases and 2,922 AA controls will be compared to 3,368 white EOC cases and 10,270 white controls. Analyses include estimation of population-attributable risk percent (PAR%) by race. CONCLUSION: OCWAA is uniquely positioned to study the epidemiology of EOC in AA women compared with white women to address disparities. Studies of EOC have been underpowered to address factors that may explain AA-white differences in the incidence and survival. OCWAA promises to provide novel insight into disparities in ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas/etnología , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiología , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
2.
Int J Cancer ; 138(7): 1626-33, 2016 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26505275

RESUMEN

Epidemiological evidence of a relationship between vitamin D and kidney cancer risk has been inconsistent despite experimental data indicating that vitamin D and its metabolites may inhibit carcinogenesis. Previously we reported an inverse association between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) risk and occupational ultraviolet (UV) exposure among European men. In this study, we examined the association between occupational UV exposure and RCC risk among US residents and investigated whether this association varied by race and sex. Lifetime occupational data for 1,217 RCC cases and 1,235 controls in a population-based case-control study, conducted from 2002 to 2007, were assessed for occupational UV exposure. We evaluated exposure metrics in quartiles based on control exposure levels and calculated associations between RCC risk and occupational UV exposure using unconditional logistic regression adjusted for sex, race, body mass index, smoking, hypertension, center, education, family history of cancer and dietary vitamin D intake. A general pattern of decreasing RCC risk with increasing UV exposure was observed. Cases had significantly lower cumulative occupational UV exposure than controls (fourth quartile vs. first: odds ratio = 0.74 [95% confidence interval = 0.56-0.99], p-trend = 0.03). Similar results were observed for other UV exposure metrics. The association with occupational UV exposure was stronger for women than for men, but did not differ by race. Our findings suggest an inverse association between occupational UV exposure and RCC, particularly among women. Given the sex finding discrepancies in this study versus our previous study, additional research is need to clarify whether the protective effects of occupational UV exposure and RCC risk are real.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Adulto Joven
3.
Int J Cancer ; 139(3): 584-92, 2016 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27009534

RESUMEN

Analgesics are the most commonly consumed drugs worldwide. Evidence that analgesics increase kidney cancer risk has been mixed. We investigated the association between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and analgesic use in a large population-based case-control study and a post-trial observational cohort study. Findings were used to update a recent meta-analytic review. We analyzed data from 1,217 RCC cases and 1,235 controls in the US Kidney Cancer Study and 98,807 participants in the US Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO: n = 137 RCCs). Self-reported acetaminophen, aspirin and nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and duration information was assessed in relation to RCC. For the US Kidney Cancer Study, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using unconditional logistic regression. For PLCO, we computed hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%CIs using Cox regression. Among case-control participants, RCC risk was associated with over-the-counter acetaminophen use (OR = 1.35, 95%CI = 1.01-1.83). There was a positive trend with increasing duration (p-trend = 0.01), with a two-fold risk for use ≥10 years (OR = 2.01, 95%CI = 1.30-3.12). No association with prescription acetaminophen use was detected. In PLCO, acetaminophen use was also associated with increased RCC risk (HR = 1.68, 95%CI = 1.19-2.39), although elevated risk was absent among the few long-term users. No association with RCC risk was detected for aspirin or NSAIDs use in either study. An association between acetaminophen use and kidney cancer was supported by meta-analytic cohort (n = 4; summary relative risk = 1.34; 95%CI = 1.13-1.59; p-heterogeneity = 0.40) and case-control (n = 9, summary OR = 1.20; 95%CI = 1.01-1.42; p-heterogeneity = 0.05) findings. In brief, acetaminophen use may increase the risk of developing RCC.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/etiología , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Renales/etiología , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Am J Epidemiol ; 183(2): 85-91, 2016 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26656478

RESUMEN

Decades of research have established only a few etiological factors for glioma, which is a rare and highly fatal brain cancer. Common methodological challenges among glioma studies include small sample sizes, heterogeneity of tumor subtypes, and retrospective exposure assessment. Here, we briefly describe the Glioma International Case-Control (GICC) Study (recruitment, 2010-2013), a study being conducted by the Genetic Epidemiology of Glioma International Consortium that integrates data from multiple data collection sites, uses a common protocol and questionnaire, and includes biospecimen collection. To our knowledge, the GICC Study is the largest glioma study to date that includes collection of blood samples, which will allow for genetic analysis and interrogation of gene-environment interactions.


Asunto(s)
Glioma/genética , Cooperación Internacional , Epidemiología Molecular/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Interacción Gen-Ambiente , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Glioma/sangre , Glioma/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
5.
Cancer Causes Control ; 27(10): 1261-71, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27590306

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Previous studies assessing racial and ethnic differences in ovarian cancer (OVCA) diagnosis stage fail to present subtype-specific results and provide historic data on cases diagnosed between 10 and 20 years ago. The purpose of this analysis is to assess non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) differences in late-stage diagnosis including; (1) factors associated with late-stage diagnosis of invasive epithelial OVCA overall and by histologic subtypes, (2) potential changes across time and (3) current patterns of trends in a national cancer registry in the USA and Puerto Rico between 1998 and 2011. METHODS: NHB and NHW OVCA cases were derived from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Diagnosis stage was analyzed as a dichotomous and a four level-category variable, respectively; early (stages I and II; localized) versus late (stages III and IV; regional and distant) and stages I, II, III and IV. Diagnosis period was trichotomized (1998-2002, 2003-2007, 2008-2011). Racial differences in stage were tested using Chi-square statistics. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were estimated using multivariable binomial and generalized ordered logistic regressions. Interactions between race and diagnosis period were evaluated. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2011, 11,562 (7.8 %) NHB and 137,106 (92.2 %) NHW were diagnosed with OVCA. In adjusted models, NHB were significantly more likely diagnosed with late-stage OVCA than NHW (ORadj 1.26, 95 % CI 1.19-1.33). Interaction between race and diagnosis period was marginally significant (p value = 0.09), with racial differences in stage decreasing over time (1998-2002: ORadj 1.36, 95 % CI 1.23-1.49; 2003-2007: ORadj 1.27, 95 % CI 1.15-1.39; 2008-2011; ORadj 1.15, 95 % CI 1.05-1.27). NHB were also more likely to be diagnosed with stage 4 high-grade serous (ORadj 1.46, 95 % CI 1.22-1.74), clear cell (ORadj 2.71, 95 % CI 1.94-3.79) and mucinous (ORadj 2.78, 95 % CI 2.24-3.46) carcinomas than NHW. CONCLUSIONS: Racial differences in late-stage OVCA diagnosis exist; however, these differences are decreasing with time. Within NCDB, NHB are significantly more likely diagnosed with late-stage OVCA and more specifically high-grade serous, clear cell and mucinous carcinomas than NHW.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/etnología , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/etnología , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Hum Mol Genet ; 21(2): 456-62, 2012 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22010048

RESUMEN

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most lethal urologic cancer. Only two common susceptibility loci for RCC have been confirmed to date. To identify additional RCC common susceptibility loci, we conducted an independent genome-wide association study (GWAS). We analyzed 533 191 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for association with RCC in 894 cases and 1516 controls of European descent recruited from MD Anderson Cancer Center in the primary scan, and validated the top 500 SNPs in silico in 3772 cases and 8505 controls of European descent involved in the only published GWAS of RCC. We identified two common variants in linkage disequilibrium, rs718314 and rs1049380 (r(2) = 0.64, D ' = 0.84), in the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor, type 2 (ITPR2) gene on 12p11.23 as novel susceptibility loci for RCC (P = 8.89 × 10(-10) and P = 6.07 × 10(-9), respectively, in meta-analysis) with an allelic odds ratio of 1.19 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.26] for rs718314 and 1.18 (95% CI: 1.12-1.25) for rs1049380. It has been recently identified that rs718314 in ITPR2 is associated with waist-hip ratio (WHR) phenotype. To our knowledge, this is the first genetic locus associated with both cancer risk and WHR.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Cromosomas Humanos Par 12 , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Humanos
7.
Cancer Causes Control ; 25(8): 1007-13, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24890803

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The association between female reproductive factors and glioma risk is unclear, but most published studies have been limited by small sample size. We conducted a pooled multisite study of pre- and postmenopausal women, investigating the effect of female reproductive factors, including hormonal medications. METHODS: Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) assessing the effects of female reproductive factors and female hormonal medications in glioma cases and unrelated controls. RESULTS: Menarche over the age of 15 as compared to under 12 was associated with a statistically significant risk for glioma (OR 2.00, 95 % CI 1.47-2.71). Use of oral contraceptive pills (OCP) was inversely associated with risk of glioma (OR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.50-0.74), and there was an inverse trend with longer duration of OCP use (p for trend <0.0001). Use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was also inversely associated with risk of glioma (OR 0.55, 95 % CI 0.44-0.68), and there was an inverse trend with longer duration of use (p for trend <0.0001). Compared to those reporting neither OCP use nor HRT use, those who reported using both were less likely to have a diagnosis of glioma (OR 0.34, 95 % CI 0.24-0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Female reproductive hormones may decrease the risk for glioma. The association appears to be strongest with greater length of use and use of both HRT and OCP.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/metabolismo , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/administración & dosificación , Glioma/epidemiología , Glioma/metabolismo , Hormonas Esteroides Gonadales/metabolismo , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Cancer Causes Control ; 25(5): 633-7, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24532025

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Higher pathologic grade, suboptimal debulking surgery, and late-stage are markers of more aggressive and advanced ovarian cancer. Neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with more aggressive and advanced tumors for other cancer sites, and this may also be true for ovarian cancer. METHODS: We examined the association between neighborhood SES and ovarian cancer tumor characteristics using data on 581 women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer in Cook County, Illinois. Two complementary measures (concentrated disadvantage and concentrated affluence) were used to estimate neighborhood SES. Prevalence differences and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated in logistic regression models adjusted for age and race. RESULTS: Greater disadvantage was associated with higher grade tumors (p = 0.03) and suboptimal debulking (p = 0.05) and marginally associated with later tumor stage (p = 0.20). Greater affluence was inversely associated with stage at diagnosis (p = 0.004) and suboptimal debulking (p = 0.03) and (marginally) with tumor grade (p = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that lower SES, estimated by neighborhood SES, is associated with ovarian cancer tumor characteristics indicative of more advanced and aggressive disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/economía , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/economía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Femenino , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Características de la Residencia/clasificación , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
9.
Gynecol Oncol ; 135(2): 285-91, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25173584

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Less than half of women with ovarian cancer and blacks specifically receive therapy adherent to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. The purpose is to assess the effect of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) on black-white treatment differences in a population-based analysis in a highly-segregated community. METHODS: Illinois State Cancer Registry data for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in Cook County, IL in non-Hispanic white (NHW) or black (NHB) women from 1998 to 2009 was analyzed. As few women receive NCCN-adherent care, variables were constructed to assess extent of treatment, including receipt of: 1) debulking surgery; 2) any surgery; 3) multi-agent chemotherapy; and 4) any chemotherapy. Two measures (concentrated affluence and disadvantage) were used to estimate neighborhood-level SES. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), with generalized linear mixed models to account for hierarchical data. RESULTS: 2766 (81.0%) NHW and 647 (19.0%) NHB women were diagnosed. Adjusting for covariates, NHB were less likely to receive debulking surgery (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.30-0.50), any surgery (OR: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.29-0.49), multi-agent chemotherapy (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.45-0.71) and any chemotherapy (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.74). Concentrated affluence but not disadvantage was significant in final models for multi-agent and any chemotherapy, but not debulking or any surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Results identify black-white differences consistent across treatments that persist despite adjustment for neighborhood-level SES. IMPACT: Results advance inequality awareness beyond "ideal" NCCN-adherent care, indicating inequality exists in delivery of even the most basic oncologic care.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Ovariectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Características de la Residencia , Clase Social , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Chicago , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Exenteración Pélvica/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
10.
Support Care Cancer ; 22(5): 1349-62, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24382676

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Results from several studies suggest that there is value in evaluating the association between nonclinical characteristics of patients and quality of life (QoL), but few studies have focused on brain cancer. The primary goal of this feasibility study was to explore the relationship between clinical factors and nonclinical factors and QoL in brain cancer patients. METHODS: Participants in this cross-sectional study were drawn from two hospital sites. Eligible patients were 18-75 years old with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of a brain cancer histology and stable disease after treatment. Data were obtained from medical chart review and a self-administered survey consisting of main study variables and two QoL standardized measures. Independent sample t test was used to determine differences between patient factors and QoL measures. RESULTS: The sample population was comprised of 26 patients with a median age at survey of 57.5 years (range 33-72). Quality of life was adversely associated with younger age, having underage children and living alone. Patients' meaning of QoL differed by gender, however most patients viewed it as affecting multiple aspects of their lives. CONCLUSIONS: Nonclinical characteristics were significantly associated with QoL more often than clinical characteristics. Identifying these factors may help improve the quality of care for these patients. This effort demonstrates the relevancy and feasibility of conducting a larger scale study to confirm or refute these findings.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/psicología , Glioma/fisiopatología , Glioma/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Glioma/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Int J Cancer ; 132(11): 2640-7, 2013 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23150424

RESUMEN

To investigate whether renal cell carcinoma (RCC) histologic subtypes possess different etiologies, we conducted analyses of established RCC risk factors by subtype (clear cell, papillary and chromophobe) in two case-control studies conducted in the United States (1,217 cases, 1,235 controls) and Europe (1,097 cases, 1,476 controls). Histology was ascertained for 706 U.S. cases (58% of total) and 917 European cases (84%) through a central slide review conducted by a single pathologist. For the remaining cases, histology was abstracted from the original diagnostic pathology report. Case-only analyses were performed to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) summarizing subtype differences by age, sex and race. Case-control analyses were performed to compute subtype-specific ORs for other risk factors using polytomous regression. In case-only analyses, papillary cases (N = 237) were older (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.4 per 10-year increase), less likely to be female (OR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.4-0.8) and more likely to be black (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.8-3.9) as compared to clear cell cases (N = 1,524). In case-control analyses, BMI was associated with clear cell (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.3 per 5 kg/m(2) increase) and chromophobe RCC (N = 80; OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.4), but not papillary RCC (OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 1.0-1.2; test versus clear cell, p = 0.006). No subtype differences were observed for associations with smoking, hypertension or family history of kidney cancer. Our findings support the existence of distinct age, sex and racial distributions for RCC subtypes, and suggest that the obesity-RCC association differs by histology.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/etiología , Neoplasias Renales/etiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
12.
Neurooncol Pract ; 10(2): 203-213, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36970176

RESUMEN

Background: The Brain Tumor Registry of Canada was established in 2016 to enhance infrastructure for surveillance and clinical research on Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors. We present information on primary CNS tumors diagnosed among residents of Canada from 2010 to 2015. Methods: Data from 4 provincial cancer registries were analyzed representing approximately 67% of the Canadian population. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the 2011 Canadian population age distribution. Net survival was estimated using the Pohar-Perme method. Results: A total of 31 644 primary tumors were identified for an ASIR of 22.8 per 100 000 person-years. Nonmalignant tumors made up 47.1% of all classified tumors, with mixed behaviors present in over half of histology groupings. Unclassified were 19.5% of all tumors. The most common histological subtypes are meningiomas (ASIR = 5.5 per 100 000 person-years); followed by glioblastomas (ASIR 4.0 per 100 000 person-years). The overall 5-year net survival rate for CNS tumors was 65.5%; females 70.2% and males 60.4%. GBMs continue to be the most lethal CNS tumors for all sex and age groups. Conclusions: The low annual frequency of most CNS tumor subtypes emphasizes the value of population-based data on all primary CNS tumors diagnosed among Canadians. The large number of histological categories including mixed behaviors and the proportion of unclassified tumors emphasizes the need for complete reporting. Variation in incidence and survival across histological groups by sex and age highlights the need for comprehensive and histology-specific reporting. These data can be used to better inform research and health system planning.

13.
Curr Oncol ; 30(4): 4311-4328, 2023 04 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37185442

RESUMEN

Primary central nervous system (CNS) tumours are heterogeneous, with different treatment pathways and prognoses depending on their histological and molecular classification. Due to their anatomical location, all CNS tumours, regardless of malignancy, can be debilitating. We used vital statistics linked to Canadian Cancer Registry data to estimate the age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR), Kaplan-Meier survival rates (SR), and limited-duration prevalence proportions (PP) of 25 histology-specific CNS tumour groups that were classified based on site and histology. During 2010-2017, 45,115 patients were diagnosed with 47,085 primary CNS tumours, of which 19.0% were unclassified. The average annual ASIR was 21.48/100,000 person-years and did not vary by sex. The ASIR increased with age, particularly for meningioma, unclassified tumours, and glioblastoma. The eight-year PP was 102.1/100,000 persons (index date 1 January 2018). The most common histology was meningioma (ASIR: 5.19; PP: 31.6). The overall five-year SR among 51,310 patients diagnosed during 2008-2017 was 57.2% (95% CI: 56.8-57.7%). SRs varied by tumour behaviour, histology, and patient age, with the lowest SR among glioblastoma patients (5-year SRs ranged from 1.3-25.7%). For non-malignant tumours, the 5-year SRs ranged from 37.4-100%. We provide the most up-to-date histology-specific surveillance estimates for primary CNS tumours in Canada.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central , Glioblastoma , Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Humanos , Incidencia , Prevalencia , Meningioma/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/epidemiología , Sistema Nervioso Central , Neoplasias Meníngeas/epidemiología
14.
BMC Cancer ; 12: 344, 2012 Aug 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22873580

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of occupation in the etiology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is unclear. Here, we investigated associations between employment in specific occupations and industries and RCC, and its most common histologic subtype, clear cell RCC (ccRCC). METHODS: Between 2002 and 2007, a population-based case-control study of Caucasians and African Americans (1,217 cases; 1,235 controls) was conducted within the Detroit and Chicago metropolitan areas to investigate risk factors for RCC. As part of this study, occupational histories were ascertained through in-person interviews. We computed odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) relating occupation and industry to RCC risk using adjusted unconditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: Employment in the agricultural crop production industry for five years or more was associated with RCC (OR = 3.3 [95% CI = 1.0-11.5]) and ccRCC in particular (OR = 6.3 [95% CI = 1.7-23.3], P for trend with duration of employment = 0.0050). Similarly, RCC risk was elevated for employment of five years or longer in non-managerial agricultural and related occupations (ORRCC = 2.1 [95% CI = 1.0-4.5]; ORccRCC = 3.1 [95% CI = 1.4-6.8]). Employment in the dry-cleaning industry was also associated with elevated risk (ORRCC = 2.0 [95% CI = 0.9-4.4], P for trend = 0.093; ORccRCC = 3.0 [95% CI = 1.2-7.4], P for trend = 0.031). Suggestive elevated associations were observed for police/public safety workers, health care workers and technicians, and employment in the electronics, auto repair, and cleaning/janitorial services industries; protective associations were suggested for many white-collar jobs including computer science and administrative occupations as well employment in the business, legislative, and education industries. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide support for an elevated risk of RCC in the agricultural and dry-cleaning industries and suggest that these associations may be stronger for the ccRCC subtype. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Chicago/epidemiología , Diseño de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Industrias/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ocupaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Curr Oncol ; 29(3): 2091-2105, 2022 03 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35323369

RESUMEN

The incidence of BM among Canadian cancer patients is unknown. We aimed to estimate IP of BM at the time of cancer diagnosis and during the lifetime of patients with selected primary cancers. Data on BM at diagnosis from 2010-2017 was obtained from the CCR. Site-specific IPs of BM were estimated from provincial registries containing ≥90% complete data on BM. The CCR IP estimates and the IP estimates from literature were applied to the total diagnosed primary cancers to estimate the number of concurrent BM and lifetime BM from 2010-2017 in Canada, respectively. The annual average number of patients with BM at diagnosis from all cancer sites was approximately 3227. The site-specific IPs of BM at diagnosis were: lung (9.42%; 95% CI: 9.16-9.68%), esophageal (1.58%; 95% CI: 1.15-2.02%), kidney/renal pelvis (1.33%; 95% CI: 1.12-1.54%), skin melanoma (0.73%; 95% CI: 0.61-0.84%), colorectal (0.22%; 95% CI: 0.18-0.26%), and breast (0.21%; 95% CI: 0.17-0.24%). Approximately 76,546 lifetime BM cases (or 5.70% of selected fifteen primary cancers sites) were estimated to have occurred from the 2010-2017 cancer patient cohort. These findings reflect results of population analyses in the US and Denmark. We recommend improved standardization of the collection of BM data within the CCR.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Canadá/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia
16.
Neuroepidemiology ; 36(4): 230-9, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21677447

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Survival statistics commonly reflect survival from the time of diagnosis but do not take into account survival already achieved after a diagnosis. The objective of this study was to provide conditional survival estimates for brain tumor patients as a more accurate measure of survival for those who have already survived for a specified amount of time after diagnosis. METHODS: Data on primary malignant and nonmalignant brain tumor cases diagnosed from 1985-2005 from selected SEER state cancer registries were obtained. Relative survival up to 15 years postdiagnosis and varying relative conditional survival rates were computed using the life-table method. RESULTS: The overall 1-year relative survival estimate derived from time of diagnosis was 67.8% compared to the 6-month relative conditional survival rate of 85.7% for 6-month survivors (the probability of surviving to 1 year given survival to 6 months). The 10-year overall relative survival rate was 49.5% from time of diagnosis compared to the 8-year relative conditional survival rate of 79.2% for 2-year survivors. Conditional survival estimates and standard survival estimates varied by histology, behavior, and age at diagnosis. The 5-year relative survival estimate derived from time of diagnosis for glioblastoma was 3.6% compared to the 3-year relative conditional survival rate of 36.4% for 2-year survivors. For most nonmalignant tumors, the difference between relative survival and the corresponding conditional survival estimates were minimal. Older age groups had greater numeric gains in survival but lower conditional survival estimates than other age groups. Similar findings were seen for other conditional survival intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Conditional survival is a useful disease surveillance measure for clinicians and brain tumor survivors to provide them with better 'real-time' estimates and hope.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Glioma/epidemiología , Linfoma/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glioma/patología , Humanos , Tablas de Vida , Linfoma/patología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/patología , Programa de VERF , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
17.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 74: 102011, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416546

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) have not been fully examined in the Asian diasporas in the US, despite certain Asian countries having the highest incidence of specific HNSCCs. METHODS: National Cancer Database was used to compare 1046 Chinese, 887 South Asian (Indian/Pakistani), and 499 Filipino males to 156,927 Non-Hispanic White (NHW) males diagnosed with HNSCC between 2004-2013. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the association of race/ethnicity with two outcomes - site group and late-stage diagnosis. Temporal trends were explored for site groups and subsites. RESULTS: South Asians had a greater proportion of oral cavity cancer [OCC] compared to NHWs (59 % vs. 25 %; ORadj =7.3 (95 % CI: 5.9-9.0)). In contrast, Chinese (64 % vs. 9%; ORadj =34.0 (95 % CI: 26.5-43.6)) and Filipinos (47 % vs. 9%; ORadj =10.0 (95 % CI: 7.8-12.9)) had a greater proportion of non-oropharyngeal cancer compared to NHWs. All three Asian subgroups had a higher likelihood of being diagnosed by age 40 (14 % Chinese, 10 % South Asian and 8% Filipino compared to 3% in NHW; p < 0.001). Chinese males had lower odds of late-stage diagnosis, compared to NHWs. South Asian cases doubled from 2004 to 2013 largely due to an increase in OCC cases (34 cases in 2004 to 86 in 2013). CONCLUSION: Asian diasporas are at a higher likelihood of specific HNSCCs. Risk factors, screening and survival need to be studied further, and policy changes are needed to promote screening and to discourage high-risk habits in these Asian subgroups.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias de la Boca , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/epidemiología , Migración Humana , Humanos , Masculino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/epidemiología
18.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 44(6): 258-263, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33782334

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of glioblastoma (GBM) patients are considered for repeat resection, but evidence regarding best management remains elusive. Our aim was to measure the degree of clinical uncertainty regarding reoperation for patients with recurrent GBM. METHODS: We first performed a systematic review of agreement studies examining the question of repeat resection for recurrent GBM. An electronic portfolio of 37 pathologically confirmed recurrent GBM patients including pertinent magnetic resonance images and clinical information was assembled. To measure clinical uncertainty, 26 neurosurgeons from various countries, training backgrounds, and years' experience were asked to select best management (repeat surgery, other nonsurgical management, or conservative), confidence in recommended management, and whether they would include the patient in a randomized trial comparing surgery with nonsurgical options. Agreement was evaluated using κ statistics. RESULTS: The literature review did not reveal previous agreement studies examining the question. In our study, agreement regarding best management of recurrent GBM was slight, even when management options were dichotomized (repeat surgery vs. other options; κ=0.198 [95% confidence interval: 0.133-0.276]). Country of practice, years' experience, and training background did not change results. Disagreement and clinical uncertainty were more pronounced within clinicians with (κ=0.167 [0.055-0.314]) than clinicians without neuro-oncology fellowship training (κ=0.601 [0.556-0.646]). A majority (51%) of responders were willing to include the patient in a randomized trial comparing repeat surgery with nonsurgical alternatives in 26/37 (69%) of cases. CONCLUSION: There is sufficient uncertainty and equipoise regarding the question of reoperation for patients with recurrent glioblastoma to support the need for a randomized controlled trial.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Glioblastoma/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/psicología , Médicos/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Reoperación/psicología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/psicología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glioblastoma/patología , Glioblastoma/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/psicología , Pronóstico , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
19.
J Urol ; 184(6): 2254-8, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20952033

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To clarify the contemporary clinical epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma we present trends in clinical presentation and treatment in patients enrolled in a population based case-control study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Institute performed a population based case-control study in metropolitan Detroit and Chicago from 2002 through 2007. In 1,136 patients with renal cell carcinoma who consented to an epidemiological interview and medical record review we ascertained detailed information on social and medical history, methods of renal cell carcinoma detection and diagnosis, cancer severity and treatment(s) received. From these data we assessed the demographic and cancer specific characteristics of study cases, and trends in clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: Most patients with renal cell carcinoma had localized or regional tumors, including 52% with tumors 4 cm or less. The proportion of asymptomatic cases increased from 35% in 2002 to 50% in 2007 (p<0.001). Hypertension and diabetes were common in patients (58% and 17%, respectively) and 24% had at least 2 significant comorbid conditions at cancer diagnosis. While the use of laparoscopic surgery increased with time (p<0.001), fewer than 1/5 patients underwent nephron sparing surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients presenting with small, asymptomatic renal cell carcinoma continues to increase. Most of these cases are still treated with radical nephrectomy, although increasingly via a laparoscopic approach. Since most patients with small renal cell carcinomas have 1 or more renal function relevant comorbidities, there is an imperative to increase the use of nephron sparing surgery.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
20.
Nutr Cancer ; 62(6): 728-33, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20661820

RESUMEN

Persistent infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is the primary etiologic factor for cervical cancer. The synergistic effect of carotenoids on HPV persistence has not been examined. To explore these potential synergies, we developed 2 measures of carotenoid status using circulating and dietary intake nutrients in which each nutrient was given equal weighting. We then compared persistent HPV infection with its counterpart, intermittent infection. In the analysis using the Crude Index, no association was observed between circulating nutrients and persistent infection with oncogenic HPV [odds ratio (OR)(adjusted) = 0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.3-2.2)] or any type HPV (OR(adjusted) = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.3-2.1). Similar results were obtained using the Cumulative Index. However, associations between dietary intake and persistent infection were observed using both indexes. When the analysis was restricted to oncogenic HPV, a 50% higher risk was observed for women with low dietary carotenoid status using the Crude Index (OR(adjusted) = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.6-3.7). In the analysis using any type HPV, the adjusted OR for women with low dietary intake of combined carotenoids using the Cumulative Index was 2.4 (95% CI = 1.1-5.2). These results may be consistent with the hypothesis that low levels of carotenoids may increase the risk of persistent HPV infection.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Carotenoides/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Carotenoides/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA