Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Skeletal Radiol ; 44(8): 1111-7, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25761727

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic value of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional radiography (CR) after acute small bone or joint trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2013 and January 2014, 231 patients with recent small bone or joint trauma underwent CR and subsequent CBCT. CR and CBCT examinations were independently assessed by two readers, blinded to the result of the other modality. The total number of fractures as well as the number of complex fractures were compared, and inter- and intraobserver agreement for CBCT was calculated. In addition, radiation doses and evaluation times for both modalities were noted and statistically compared. RESULTS: Fracture detection on CBCT increased by 35% and 37% for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively, and identification of complex fractures increased by 236% and 185%. Interobserver agreement for CBCT was almost perfect, as was intraobserver agreement for reader 1. The intraobserver agreement for reader 2 was substantial. Radiation doses and evaluation time were significantly higher for CBCT. CONCLUSION: CBCT detects significantly more small bone and joint fractures, in particular complex fractures, than CR. In the majority of cases, the clinical implication of the additionally detected fractures is limited, but in some patients (e.g., fracture-dislocations), the management is significantly influenced by these findings. As the radiation dose for CBCT substantially exceeds that of CR, we suggest adhering to CR as the first-line examination after small bone and joint trauma and keeping CBCT for patients with clinical-radiographic discordance or suspected complex fractures in need of further (preoperative) assessment.


Asunto(s)
Artrografía/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulaciones/lesiones , Exposición a la Radiación/análisis , Película para Rayos X , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Dosis de Radiación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Método Simple Ciego , Adulto Joven
2.
Skeletal Radiol ; 43(5): 699-702, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24276680

RESUMEN

We report an 89-year-old woman with bilateral atraumatic scapular spine fracture several months after bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Recently, RTSA has gained popularity in the surgical treatment of complex shoulder disorders such as cuff tear arthropathy. However, scapular fractures may occur several months after surgery as a late complication of this procedure. In this case report we focus on a relatively uncommon subtype, the scapular spine fracture. Although well-known in the orthopedic literature, radiologists are less familiar with this complication. To the best of our knowledge, bilateral scapular fractures have not yet been reported.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo/efectos adversos , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Escápula/lesiones , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/rehabilitación , Humanos , Radiografía , Cintigrafía , Escápula/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico
3.
Radiology ; 255(3): 866-72, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20501723

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare non-echo-planar (non-EP) diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging, delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and the combination of both techniques in the evaluation of patients with cholesteatoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional review board-approved study, for which the need to obtain informed consent was waived, included 57 patients clinically suspected of having a middle ear cholesteatoma without a history of surgery and 63 patients imaged before "second-look" surgery. Four blinded radiologists evaluated three sets of MR images: a set of delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, a set of non-EP DW images, and a set of both kinds of images. Overall sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV), as well as intra- and interobserver agreement, were assessed and compared among methods. To correct for the correlation between different readings, a generalized estimating equations logistic regression model was fitted. Results were compared with surgical results, which were regarded as the standard of reference. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were significantly different between the three methods (P < .005). Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 56.7% and 67.6% with the delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images and 82.6% and 87.2% with the non-EP DW images. Sensitivity for the combination of both kinds of images was 84.2%, while specificity was 88.2%. The overall PPV was 88.0% for delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, 96.0% for non-EP DW images, and 96.3%for the combination of both kinds of images. The overall NPV was 27.0% for delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, 56.5% for non-EP DW images, and 59.6% for the combination of both kinds of images. CONCLUSION: MR imaging for detection of middle ear cholesteatoma can be performed by using non-EP DW imaging sequences alone. Use of the non-EP DW imaging sequence combined with a delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted sequence yielded no significant increases in sensitivity, specificity, NPV, or PPV over the use of the non-EP DW imaging sequence alone.


Asunto(s)
Colesteatoma del Oído Medio/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Medios de Contraste , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Femenino , Gadolinio DTPA , Humanos , Masculino , Meglumina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organometálicos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
4.
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol ; 3(1): 59-80, 1999.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11387127

RESUMEN

The presence of a soft tissue mass in children is of concern to parents and physicians. Fortunately, these masses are rare and usually benign or pseudotumoral. When dealing with malignant soft tissue tumors, therapeutic options and long-term survival are strongly related to the disease stage at the time of diagnosis. Therefore, when children present with indeterminate or persisting symptoms and posttraumatic, metabolic, or infectious disorders have been ruled out, one should perform dedicated imaging studies (conventional radiography, computed tomography [CT], or both; sonography; magnetic resonance [MR] imaging) to exclude the possibility of a nonpalpable soft tissue mass or to characterize the mass when present. An overview of the use of the different imaging modalities for evaluating soft tissue tumors in the pediatric patient is presented. Because of the numerous benign, malignant, and pseudotumoral soft tissue masses that are often encountered in children, clinical, histologic, and imaging features are presented as concise tables.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA