Fracture characteristics and outcomes of acetabular fracture management with minimally invasive approach and percutaneous fixation.

PURPOSE: The aim was to assess acetabular fracture outcomes of percutaneous fixation (PF) with or without minimally invasive surgery (MIS). METHODS: Between July 2011 and October 2016, acetabular fractures fixed with PF with or without MIS were included. Data collected are demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, time to surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, fracture characteristics, surgical techniques, fracture reduction, secondary osteoarthritis (OA), revision surgery, patient survival and complications. RESULTS: Of 26 patients with a mean age of 56 years (19-86) (22 males and 4 females), 11 were < 50 years age (U50) and 15 were > 50 years (A50). Most common pattern was anterior column with posterior hemi-transverse. Three out of 11 U50 were minimally displaced and had PF only; the rest had MIS and PF. All had good fracture reduction, but 2 had secondary OA at follow-up but no further surgery. Eight out of 26 had secondary OA but only 3 needed surgery. Three (A50 with PF) with fair/poor reduction (deemed unfit for open reduction) had secondary OA but no further intervention. Three more (A50 with MIS + PF) had secondary OA treated with primary total hip replacement (THR). Complications were as follows: one foot drop recovered after immediate repositioning of screw, one cardiac event and one pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: Fracture mal-reduction predicts secondary OA, but good fracture reduction does not prevent secondary OA. MIS and PF in elderly are useful even with suboptimal reduction as it sets the bed for a non-complex THR. Despite MIS surgery, medical complications are potentially significant.

Current concepts in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of fracture-related infection (FRI).

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is one of the most challenging complications following operative management of fractures. It can have profound implications for the patient, can be associated with considerable morbidity and often lead to impaired outcomes. There are significant healthcare-related costs. In recent years, there has been significant progress towards developing preventative strategies. Furthermore, diagnostic algorithms and management protocols have recently been reported. Lack of a strong evidence base has previously hindered efforts to implement these and develop established standards of care. There are multiple aspects of care that need to be considered and a multi-disciplinary approach is recommended. In this narrative review, we present the most up-to-date recommendations in the prevention, diagnosis and management of FRI.

Penthrox® (Methoxyflurane) as an Analgesic for Removal of Circular External Fixators and Minor Procedures during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction: Methoxyflurane has excellent analgesic properties and is approved for use in the United Kingdom and Ireland since 2015. It is currently used in emergency departments for analgesia during fracture reductions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, with theatre access severely restricted, Penthrox® had the potential to provide adequate pain relief to aid frame and wire removal in the clinic setting. Materials and methods: Patients presenting to the limb reconstruction service elective clinic and requiring frame removal or minor procedures were included in the study. Patients with renal, cardiac or hepatic disease, a history of sensitivity to fluorinated anaesthetic agents and those on any nephrotoxic or enzyme-inducing drugs were excluded. All procedures were performed in an appropriate isolated room in the clinic. Patient demographics, procedure details, visual analogue score, Richmond Agitation Scale and patient satisfaction were recorded. Results: A total of 39 patients were included in the study of which 17 had Ilizarov frames removed, 10 had hexapod removals, nine had heel rings removed and three had an external fixator removed. Eleven patients received additional pain relief in the form of oral analgesia. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the experience. One patient required a general anaesthetic for the removal of a wire that could not be removed in the clinic due to bony overgrowth. Conclusion: Patient satisfaction was very high (>95%), and it was possible to perform frame removals and minor procedures in the clinic environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. We see potential for regular use of Penthrox® in the future for the removal of external fixation outside of the operating theatre. Clinical significance: Penthrox as an analgesic for frame adjustments and removals is safe and has the potential for significant financial savings for the National Health Service (NHS). How to cite this article: Debuka E, Birkenhead P, Shah S, et al. Penthrox® (Methoxyflurane) as an Analgesic for Removal of Circular External Fixators and Minor Procedures during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):82-86.

Rust score-An adequate rehabilitation guide for diaphyseal femur fractures managed by TENS.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal mode of treatment among the wide variety of surgical and nonsurgical treatment options for children between 5 and 15 years of age continues to be controversial. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of long bone fractures in the skeletally immature has gained widespread popularity because of its clinical effectiveness and low risk of complications. METHODS AND METHODOLOGY: From Jan 2015 to August 2016, 35 patients including 37 limbs with diaphyseal fractures of the femur in the age group 5-15 years were managed by Titanium Elastic nailing and their clinico-radiological and functional outcome was assessed at 1 year post operatively as per the Flynn's criteria. RUST score was used as a guide for post-operative rehabilitation. RESULTS: 37 patients were managed by TENS nailing including 28 males and 9 females. The outcome in proximal, middle or distal fractures of the shaft were found to be similar and the difference was statistically insignificant. Similarly, the difference in the outcomes as per fracture patterns was also found to be statistically insignificant. Partial weight bearing was allowed after a score of 6 was achieved and full weight bearing after a score of 8. CONCLUSION: As per the Flynn's criteria, 75% of the patients (28 out of 37) were found to have an excellent outcome while 7 had a satisfactory outcome and two had a poor outcome. RUST score can be used as an effective guide for post op rehabilitation.