A phase I study of the HDM2 antagonist SAR405838 combined with the MEK inhibitor pimasertib in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: This phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of combination therapy with the HDM2 inhibitor SAR405838 and the MEK1/2 inhibitor pimasertib administered orally once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) in locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours (NCT01985191). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours with documented wild-type TP53 and RAS or RAF mutations were enroled. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was employed. The primary objective was to assess maximum tolerated dose (MTD). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated with SAR405838 200 or 300 mg QD plus pimasertib 60 mg QD or 45 mg BID. The MTD was SAR405838 200 mg QD plus pimasertib 45 mg BID. The most common dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia. The most frequently occurring treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (81%), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (77%), nausea (62%) and vomiting (62%). No significant drug-drug interactions were observed. The biomarkers MIC-1 and pERK were, respectively, upregulated and downregulated in response to study treatment. In 24 efficacy-evaluable patients, one patient (4%) had a partial response and 63% had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of SAR405838 and pimasertib combined was consistent with the safety profiles of both drugs. Preliminary antitumour activity was observed.

First-in-human trial of the PI3Kß-selective inhibitor SAR260301 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) ß is the dominant isoform for PI3K activity in many phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-deficient tumor models. This was a first-in-human study to determine the maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary activity of SAR260301, a potent PI3Kß-selective inhibitor (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01673737). METHODS: Successive cohorts of patients with advanced solid tumors received increasing doses of oral SAR260301 according to a Bayesian escalation with an overdose-control process based on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity in the first 28-day cycle. Adverse events, tumor response, PK, and the effect of food on PK were evaluated. Target engagement was assessed in platelets. Physiologically-based PK modeling was used for exposure predictions. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients received treatment at doses ranging from 100 mg once daily to 440 mg/m2 twice daily. Dose-limiting toxicities included 1 episode of grade 3 pneumonitis (400 mg twice daily) and 1 grade 3 γ-glutamyltransferase increase (600 mg twice daily). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most frequently occurring treatment-related adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea (14% each). Pharmacologically active concentrations were reached, but SAR260301 was rapidly cleared, and exposures associated with antitumor activity in preclinical models were not maintained at the highest dose tested. Food further decreased SAR260301 exposure. CONCLUSIONS: SAR260301 had an acceptable safety profile, but exposure sufficient to inhibit the PI3K pathway was unachievable because of rapid clearance, and clinical development was terminated. These results demonstrate the importance of PK and pharmacodynamic assessments in early drug development. Cancer 2018;124:315-24. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of SAR439459, a TGFß inhibitor, as monotherapy and in combination with cemiplimab in patients with advanced solid tumors: Findings from a phase 1/1b study.

SAR439459 (SAR'459), a "second-generation" human anti-transforming growth factor beta (TGFß) monoclonal antibody, enhances the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this phase I/Ib study, we evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of SAR'459 ± cemiplimab (intravenous) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Increasing doses of SAR'459 were administered every 2 or 3 weeks (Q2W, Q3W) alone (Part 1A) or with 3 mg/kg cemiplimab Q2W or 350 mg Q3W (Part 1B). In Part 2A (dose expansion), melanoma patients were randomly (1:1) administered 22.5 or 7.5 mg/kg SAR'459. In Part 2B (dose expansion), 22.5 mg/kg SAR'459 and 350 mg cemiplimab Q3W were administered. The primary end points were maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD; Part 1), preliminary antitumor activity (Part 2B), and optimal monotherapy dose (Part 2A). Twenty-eight and 24 patients were treated in Parts 1A and 1B, respectively; MTD was not reached, MAD was 15 (Q2W) and 22.5 mg/kg (Q3W) alone and in combination, respectively. Fourteen and 95 patients, including 14 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, were treated in Parts 2A and 2B, respectively. The population PK model yielded satisfactory goodness-of-fit plots and adequately described the observed data by a two-compartment PK model with linear elimination. Objective responses were not observed in Parts 1 and 2A. In Part 2B, objective response rate was 8.4% and 7.1% across tumor types and the HCC cohort, respectively. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse effects were hemorrhagic events (43.5%), keratoacanthoma (6.8%), and skin neoplasms (6.2%). Fatal bleeding occurred in 21.4% HCC patients despite the implementation of mitigation measures. SAR'459 monotherapy and combination with cemiplimab appeared relatively safe and tolerable in limited number of patients in dose escalation. However, the study was discontinued due to the unclear efficacy of SAR'459 and bleeding risk, particularly in HCC patients.

Biomarker and pharmacodynamic activity of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGFß) inhibitor SAR439459 as monotherapy and in combination with cemiplimab in a phase I clinical study in patients with advanced solid tumors.

SAR439459, a 'second-generation' human anti-transforming growth factor-beta (TGFß) monoclonal antibody, inhibits all TGFß isoforms and improves the antitumor activity of anti-programmed cell death protein-1 therapeutics. This study reports the pharmacodynamics (PD) and biomarker results from phase I/Ib first-in-human study of SAR439459 ± cemiplimab in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03192345). In dose-escalation phase (Part 1), SAR439459 was administered intravenously at increasing doses either every 2 weeks (Q2W) or every 3 weeks (Q3W) with cemiplimab IV at 3 mg/kg Q2W or 350 mg Q3W, respectively, in patients with advanced solid tumors. In dose-expansion phase (Part 2), patients with melanoma received SAR439459 IV Q3W at preliminary recommended phase II dose (pRP2D) of 22.5/7.5 mg/kg or at 22.5 mg/kg with cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W. Tumor biopsy and peripheral blood samples were collected for exploratory biomarker analyses to assess target engagement and PD, and results were correlated with patients' clinical parameters. SAR439459 ± cemiplimab showed decreased plasma and tissue TGFß, downregulation of TGFß-pathway activation signature, modulation of peripheral natural killer (NK) and T cell expansion, proliferation, and increased secretion of CXCL10. Conversion of tumor tissue samples from 'immune-excluded' to 'immune-infiltrated' phenotype in a representative patient with melanoma SAR439459 22.5 mg/kg with cemiplimab was observed. In paired tumor and plasma, active and total TGFß1 was more consistently elevated followed by TGFß2, whereas TGFß3 was only measurable (lower limit of quantitation ≥2.68 pg/mg) in tumors. SAR439459 ± cemiplimab showed expected peripheral PD effects and TGFß alteration. However, further studies are needed to identify biomarkers of response.

The search for therapeutic targets in lung cancer: Preclinical and human studies of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 expression and its associated molecular landscape.

OBJECTIVES: CEACAM5 is a cell-surface glycoprotein expressed on epithelial cells of some solid tumors. Tusamitamab ravtansine (SAR408701), a humanized antibody-drug conjugate targeting CEACAM5, is in clinical development for nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ-NSCLC) with CEACAM5 high expression (HE), defined as membranous CEACAM5 immunohistochemistry staining at ≥ 2+ intensity in ≥ 50% of tumor cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated correlations between CEACAM5 expression by immunohistochemistry, CEACAM5 protein expression by ELISA, and CEACAM5 RNA expression by RNA-seq in NSQ-NSCLC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, and tumor responses to tusamitamab ravtansine in these models. We assessed prevalence of CEACAM5 HE, clinicopathologic characteristics and molecular markers in patients with NSQ-NSCLC in clinical cohorts. RESULTS: In a lung PDX set of 10 NSQ-NSCLC specimens, correlations between CEACAM5 by IHC, ELISA and RNA-seq ranged from 0.72 to 0.88. In a larger lung PDX set, higher H-scores were present in NSQ- (n = 93) vs SQ-NSCLC (n = 128) models, and in 12 of these NSQ-NSCLC models, more tumor responses to tusamitamab ravtansine occurred in CEACAM5 HE (5/8; 62.5%) versus moderate or negative expression (1/4; 25%), including 3 with KRAS mutations among the 6 responders. In clinical NSQ-NSCLC samples, CEACAM5 HE prevalence was (52/214; 24.3%) in primary tumors and (6/17; 35.3%) in metastases. In NSQ-NSCLC primary tumors, CEACAM5 HE prevalence was significantly higher in KRAS-altered versus wild-type (35.0% vs 19.5%; P = 0.028) and in programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) negative (tumor cells 0%)/low (1-49%) versus high (≥50%) (33.3%, 26.1%, 5.0%; P = 0.031), but not significantly different in EGFR-mutated versus wild-type (20.0% vs 25.7%, P = 0.626). CONCLUSIONS: In NSQ-NSCLC tumors, CEACAM5 HE prevalence was 24.3% overall and was higher with KRAS altered and with PD-L1 negative/low tumors but similar regardless of EGFR mutation status. These findings support targeting CEACAM5 and the clinical development of tusamitamab ravtansine for patients with NSQ-NSCLC with CEACAM5 HE.

Early quantitative evaluation of a tumor vasculature disruptive agent AVE8062 using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the early tumor vasculature disrupting effects of the AVE8062 molecule and the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) in the quantitative assessment of these effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: AVE8062 was administered at a single dose (41 mg/kg) to 40 melanoma-bearing nude mice, which were all imaged before and after drug administration (5 + 15 minutes, 1, 6, and 24 hours). Using an ultrasound scanner (Aplio, Toshiba), intratumor vessels were counted in power Doppler mode and tumor microvasculature was assessed in a specific harmonic mode associated with a perfusion and quantification software for contrast-uptake quantification (Sonovue, Bracco). The peak intensity (PI), time-to-PI (T PI), and full-width at half maximum (FWHM) were extracted from the time-intensity curves expressed as linear raw data. Histologic analysis evaluated microvessel density (MVD) and necrosis at each time point studied. Statistical significance was estimated (paired sum rank and Mann-Whitney tests) to evaluate drug activity and to compare its efficacy at the different time points. RESULTS: In power Doppler mode, intratumoral vessels depletion started 15 minutes postinjection (32%, P = 0.004) and the decrease was maximal at 6 hours (51%, P = 0.002). PI decreased by 3.5- and 45.7-fold at 1 and 6 hours, respectively, compared with preinjection values (P = 0.016 and P = 0.008). The decrease at 6 hours was significantly different from the variation at 1 hour (P = 0.0012) and at 24 hours (P = 0.0008). T PI and FWHM showed a significant increase exclusively at 6 hours (P = 0.0034, P = 0.0039). Histology revealed significantly decreased MVD and increased necrosis at 24 hours (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: DCE-US allowed quantitative in vivo evaluation of the functional effects of AVE8062, which was found most effective on tumoral microvasculature 6 hours after its administration. A clinical phase-1 study of AVE8062 is ongoing using the same ultrasonography methodology before and 6 and 24 hours postadministration.

Characterization of a large panel of patient-derived tumor xenografts representing the clinical heterogeneity of human colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Patient-derived xenograft models are considered to represent the heterogeneity of human cancers and advanced preclinical models. Our consortium joins efforts to extensively develop and characterize a new collection of patient-derived colorectal cancer (CRC) models. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From the 85 unsupervised surgical colorectal samples collection, 54 tumors were successfully xenografted in immunodeficient mice and rats, representing 35 primary tumors, 5 peritoneal carcinoses and 14 metastases. Histologic and molecular characterization of patient tumors, first and late passages on mice includes the sequence of key genes involved in CRC (i.e., APC, KRAS, TP53), aCGH, and transcriptomic analysis. RESULTS: This comprehensive characterization shows that our collection recapitulates the clinical situation about the histopathology and molecular diversity of CRC. Moreover, patient tumors and corresponding models are clustering together allowing comparison studies between clinical and preclinical data. Hence, we conducted pharmacologic monotherapy studies with standard of care for CRC (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and cetuximab). Through this extensive in vivo analysis, we have shown the loss of human stroma cells after engraftment, observed a metastatic phenotype in some models, and finally compared the molecular profile with the drug sensitivity of each tumor model. Through an experimental cetuximab phase II trial, we confirmed the key role of KRAS mutation in cetuximab resistance. CONCLUSIONS: This new collection could bring benefit to evaluate novel targeted therapeutic strategies and to better understand the basis for sensitivity or resistance of tumors from individual patients.

A secreted anti-activator, OspD1, and its chaperone, Spa15, are involved in the control of transcription by the type III secretion apparatus activity in Shigella flexneri.

Bacteria of Shigella spp. are responsible for shigellosis in humans and use a type III secretion (TTS) system to enter epithelial cells and trigger apoptosis in macrophages. Transit of translocator and effector proteins through the TTS apparatus is activated upon contact of bacteria with host cells. Transcription of approximately 15 genes encoding effectors is regulated by the TTS apparatus activity and controlled by MxiE, an AraC family activator, and its coactivator IpgC, the chaperone of IpaB and IpaC translocators. Using a genetic screen, we identified ospD1 as a gene whose product negatively controls expression of genes regulated by secretion activity. OspD1 associates with the chaperone Spa15 and the activator MxiE and acts as an anti-activator until it is secreted. The mechanism regulating transcription in response to secretion activity involves an activator (MxiE), an anti-activator (OspD1), a co-anti-activator (Spa15), a coactivator (IpgC) and two anti-coactivators (IpaB and IpaC) whose alternative and mutually exclusive interactions are controlled by the duration of the TTS apparatus activity.

Regulation of transcription by the activity of the Shigella flexneri type III secretion apparatus.

The virulence plasmid-encoded type III secretion system of Shigella flexneri consists of the Mxi-Spa secretion apparatus, secreted proteins IpaA-D and IpgD involved in entry of bacteria into epithelial cells,cytoplasmic chaperones IpgC and IpgE and 15 other secreted proteins of unknown function, including VirA and members of the IpaH family. The activity of the Mxi-Spa apparatus is regulated by external signals, and transcription of virA and IpaH genes is specifically induced in conditions of active secretion. We present genetic evidence that regulation of these genes involves both MxiE, the transcriptional activator of the AraC family encoded by the mxi operon, and IpgC, the chaperone for IpaB and IpaC. We also show that together MxiE and IpgC are sufficient to activatevirA and IpaH 9.8 promoters in Escherichia coli. InS. flexneri, increasing the expression of IpgC led to a concomitant increase in IpaH production in conditions of non-secretion. This suggests that the activity of secretion is sensed by the presence of free IpgC, which acts as a coactivator to allow MxiE to activate transcription at its target promoters.