Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with severe/critical illness in the first wave versus the second wave.

Due to current advances and growing experience in the management of coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the outcome of COVID-19 patients with severe/critical illness would be expected to be better in the second wave compared with the first wave. As our hospitalization criteria changed in the second wave, we aimed to investigate whether a favorable outcome occurred in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with only severe/critical illness. Among 642 laboratory-confirmed hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the first wave and 1121 in the second wave, those who met World Health Organization (WHO) definitions for severe or critical illness on admission or during follow-up were surveyed. Data on demographics, comorbidities, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on admission, and outcomes were obtained from an electronic hospital database. Univariate analysis was performed to compare the characteristics of patients in the first and second waves. There were 228 (35.5%) patients with severe/critical illness in the first wave and 681 (60.7%) in the second wave. Both groups were similar in terms of age, gender, and comorbidities, other than chronic kidney disease. Median serum CRP levels were significantly higher in patients in the second wave compared with those in the first wave [109 mg/L (interquartile range [IQR]: 65-157) vs. 87 mg/L (IQR: 39-140); p < 0.001]. However, intensive care unit admission and mortality rates were similar among the waves. Even though a lower mortality rate in the second wave has been reported in previous studies, including all hospitalized COVID-19 patients, we found similar demographics and outcomes among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with severe/critical illness in the first and second wave.

Clinical characteristics of adult patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 has a great variation from asymptomatic infection to acute respiratory distress syndrome and eventually death. The mortality rates vary across the countries probably due to the heterogeneity in study characteristics and patient cohorts as well as treatment strategies. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia in Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: A total of 722 adult patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia were analyzed in this single-center retrospective study between March 15 and May 1, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 722 laboratory-confirmed patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were included in the study. There were 235 (32.5%) elderly patients and 487 (67.5%) non-elderly patients. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (251 [34.8%]), diabetes mellitus (198 [27.4%]), and ischemic heart disease (66 [9.1%]). The most common symptoms were cough (512 [70.9%]), followed by fever (226 [31.3%]), and shortness of breath (201 [27.8%]). Lymphocytopenia was present in 29.7% of the patients, leukopenia in 12.2%, and elevated CRP in 48.8%. By the end of May 20, 648 (89.7%) patients had been discharged and 60 (8.5%) patients had died. According to our study, while our overall mortality rate was 8.5%, this rate was 14.5% in elderly patients, and the difference was significant. CONCLUSIONS: This case series provides characteristics and outcomes of sequentially adult patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia in Turkey.

Does Adherence to Domiciliary NIMV Decrease the Subsequent Hospitalizations Rates and Cost for Patients Diagnosed with COPD?

Domiciliary noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is used for treating patients with hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to evaluate the association between adherence to the treatment and subsequent hospitalizations and costs. Data from 54 (27 adherent; 27 non-adherent) patients with COPD who were undergoing NIMV treatment at home for 6 months. We assessed adherence based on digitally recorded data and checked hospital records for clinical and laboratory data, rehospitalization rates, and costs during the following 6 months. Nocturnal NIMV usage, mean daily usage of the device, and time to first hospitalization were higher in the treatment-adherent group (p < .001, p < .001, and p=.006, respectively). The percentage of active smokers, device leaks above 30 L/min, length of hospital stay, rehospitalization rates, and costs were significantly higher in the treatment-non-adherent group (p = 05, p = 006, p = 004, p = 006, and p = 01, respectively). The most frequent reasons for not using NIMV in the treatment-non-adherent group were a decreased need, dry mouth, mask incompatibility, and gastrointestinal complaints. Adherence to NIMV treatment decreases the subsequent hospitalizations rates and noncompliance leads to complications. Findings of this study may help physicians in convincing patients diagnosed with COPD of the need for correct NIMV use to prevent hospitalizations and reduce the costs of COPD treatment.

Organizing pneumonia following ocrelizumab use in a patient with multiple sclerosis: A case report.

Ocrelizumab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of primary progressive and relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Although cases of organizing pneumonia have been reported in association with other antiCD20 agents such as rituximab, there is insufficient data in the literature on Ocrelizumab-associated lung involvement. Herein, we present a case of organizing pneumonia in a 37-year-old female patient with multiple sclerosis following Ocrelizumab use.

Characteristics of our hypoxemic COVID-19 pneumonia patients receiving corticosteroids and mortality-associated factors.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a disease associated with diffuse lung injury that has no proven effective treatment yet. It is thought that glucocorticoids may reduce inflammation-mediated lung injury, disease progression, and mortality. We aimed to evaluate our patient's characteristics and treatment outcomes who received corticosteroids for COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study and reviewed 517 patients admitted due to COVID-19 pneumonia who were hypoxemic and administered steroids regarding demographic, laboratory, and radiological characteristics, treatment response, and mortality-associated factors. RESULTS: Of our 517 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who were hypoxemic and received corticosteroids, the mortality rate was 24.4% (n = 126). The evaluation of mortality-associated factors revealed that age, comorbidities, a CURB-65 score of ≥ 2, higher SOFA scores, presence of MAS, high doses of steroids, type of steroids, COVID-19 treatment, stay in the intensive care unit, high levels of d-dimer, CRP, ferritin, and troponin, and renal dysfunction were associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Due to high starting and average steroid doses are more associated with mortality, high-dose steroid administration should be avoided. We believe that knowing the factors associated with mortality in these cases is essential for close follow-up. The use of CURB-65 and SOFA scores can predict prognosis in COVID-19 pneumonia.

Mediastinal lymphadenopathy may predict 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19.

PURPOSE: There is scarce data on the impact of the presence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy on the prognosis of coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to investigate whether its presence is associated with increased risk for 30-day mortality in a large group of patients with COVID-19. METHOD: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 650 adult laboratory-confirmed hospitalized COVID-19 patients were included. Patients with comorbidities that may cause enlarged mediastinal lymphadenopathy were excluded. Demographics, clinical characteristics, vital and laboratory findings, and outcome were obtained from electronic medical records. Computed tomography scans were evaluated by two blinded radiologists. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictive factors of 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Patients with enlarged mediastinal lymphadenopathy (n = 60, 9.2%) were older and more likely to have at least one comorbidity than patients without enlarged mediastinal lymphadenopathy (p = 0.03, p = 0.003). There were more deaths in patients with enlarged mediastinal lymphadenopathy than in those without (11/60 vs 45/590, p = 0.01). Older age (OR:3.74, 95% CI: 2.06-6.79; p < 0.001), presence of consolidation pattern (OR:1.93, 95% CI: 1.09-3.40; p = 0.02) and enlarged mediastinal lymphadenopathy (OR:2.38, 95% CI:1.13-4.98; p = 0.02) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: In this large group of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, we found that in addition to older age and consolidation pattern on CT scan, enlarged mediastinal lymphadenopathy were independently associated with increased mortality. Mediastinal evaluation should be performed in all patients with COVID-19.

Area under flow-volume loop may predict severe exacerbation in COPD patients with high grade of dyspnea.

OBJECTIVE: Exacerbations in patients with COPD may still be unpredictable, although the general risk factors have been well defined. We aimed to determine the role of a novel parameter, area under flow-volume loop, in predicting severe exacerbations. METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, 81 COPD patients over 40 years of age with high grade of dyspnea (having a CAT score of ≥10) and a history of ≥1 moderate exacerbation in the previous year were included. Area under flow-volume curve (AreaFE%) was obtained from pulmonary function test graph and calculated from Matlab programme. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent risk factors of the severe exacerbation. RESULTS: Patients with severe exacerbation (n = 70, 86.4 %) were older. They had lower FEV1%, FVC%, 6MWD, AreaFE% and higher CAT score than patients without exacerbation. After performing multivariate analysis, high CAT score and low AreaFE% value were found to be independent risk factors for severe exacerbation (OR: 1.12, 95 % CI: 1.065-1.724; p = 0.01 and OR: 1.18, 95 % CI: 0.732-0.974; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We found that a low AreaFE% value was an independent risk factor in addition to a high CAT score and these both have an excellent discriminative ability in predicting the risk of severe exacerbation.

Determining emphysema in adult patients with COPD-bronchiectasis overlap using a novel spirometric parameter: area under the forced expiratory flow-volume loop.

BACKGROUND: Defining the optimal therapeutic approach in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) bronchiectasis overlap (CBO) is challenging. The presence of emphysema suggests that COPD is the primary problem and it impacts therapeutic decision making. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We hypothesized that the AreaFE% performance will be reliable in diagnosing the presence of emphysema such that serial CT scanning may not be needed. In this retrospective chart review study, we included 113 CBO patients (52 having emphysema, 61 not having emphysema). We compared these two groups according to conventional spirometric parameters and AreaFE% values. RESULTS: 54% of all patients were female and mean age was 58 years.FEV1%, FEV1/FVC and AreaFE% were found to be significantly lower in patients with emphysema. 12% is the cutoff value for AreaFE% in determining emphysema with 73% sensitivity,75% specificity, and 72% diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.82) and it provides superior estimation than conventional parameters. CONCLUSIONS: We found that AreaFE% is more suitable for determining the presence of emphysema than conventional spirometric parameters in CBO patients. This novel parameter may be helpful instead of scanning thorax CT to indicate the presence of emphysema and manage treatment in the follow-up of CBO patients.

Performance of pneumonia severity index and CURB-65 in predicting 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the usefulness of CURB-65 and the pneumonia severity index (PSI) in predicting 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19, and to identify other factors associated with higher mortality. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in a pandemic hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, which included 681 laboratory-confirmed patients with COVID-19. Data on characteristics, vital signs, and laboratory parameters were recorded from electronic medical records. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to quantify the discriminatory abilities of the prognostic scales. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify other predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Higher CRP levels were associated with an increased risk for mortality (OR: 1.015, 95% CI: 1.008-1.021; p < 0.001). The PSI performed significantly better than CURB-65 (AUC: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.93 vs AUC: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.85-0.90; p = 0.01), and the addition of CRP levels to PSI did not improve the performance of PSI in predicting mortality (AUC: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.93 vs AUC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94; p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: In a large group of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, we found that PSI performed better than CURB-65 in predicting mortality. Adding CRP levels to PSI did not improve the 30-day mortality prediction.