Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 122(11): 1523-31, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26206604

RESUMEN

People with Parkinson's disease (PD) can exhibit disabling gait symptoms such as freezing of gait especially when distracted by a secondary task. Quantitative measurement method of this type of cognitive-motor abnormality, however, remains poorly developed. Here we examined whether stepping-in-place (SIP) with a concurrent mental task (e.g., subtraction) can be used as a simple method for evaluating cognitive-motor deficits in PD. We used a 4th generation iPod Touch sensor system to capture hip flexion data and obtain step height (SH) measurements (z axis). The accuracy of the method was compared to and validated by kinematic video analysis software. We found a general trend of reduced SH for PD subjects relative to controls under all conditions. However, the SH of PD freezers was significantly worse than PD non-freezers and controls during concurrent serial 7 subtraction and SIP tasking. During serial 7 subtraction, SH was significantly associated with whether or not a PD patient was a self-reported freezer even when controlling for disease severity. Given that this SIP-based dual-task paradigm is not limited by space requirements and can be quantified using a mobile tracking device that delivers specifically designed auditory task instructions, the method reported here may be used to standardize clinical assessment of cognitive-motor deficits under a variety of dual-task conditions in PD.


Asunto(s)
Atención , Computadoras de Mano , Aplicaciones Móviles , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Anciano , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/fisiopatología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/diagnóstico , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/fisiopatología , Cadera , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/psicología , Autoinforme , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Grabación en Video , Tecnología Inalámbrica
2.
JAMA ; 313(6): 584-93, 2015 Feb 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25668262

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: There are no treatments available to slow or prevent the progression of Parkinson disease, despite its global prevalence and significant health care burden. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Exploratory Trials in Parkinson Disease program was established to promote discovery of potential therapies. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether creatine monohydrate was more effective than placebo in slowing long-term clinical decline in participants with Parkinson disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Long-term Study 1, a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 1:1 randomized efficacy trial. Participants were recruited from 45 investigative sites in the United States and Canada and included 1741 men and women with early (within 5 years of diagnosis) and treated (receiving dopaminergic therapy) Parkinson disease. Participants were enrolled from March 2007 to May 2010 and followed up until September 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to placebo or creatine (10 g/d) monohydrate for a minimum of 5 years (maximum follow-up, 8 years). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was a difference in clinical decline from baseline to 5-year follow-up, compared between the 2 treatment groups using a global statistical test. Clinical status was defined by 5 outcome measures: Modified Rankin Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, PDQ-39 Summary Index, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living scale, and ambulatory capacity. All outcomes were coded such that higher scores indicated worse outcomes and were analyzed by a global statistical test. Higher summed ranks (range, 5-4775) indicate worse outcomes. RESULTS: The trial was terminated early for futility based on results of a planned interim analysis of participants enrolled at least 5 years prior to the date of the analysis (n = 955). The median follow-up time was 4 years. Of the 955 participants, the mean of the summed ranks for placebo was 2360 (95% CI, 2249-2470) and for creatine was 2414 (95% CI, 2304-2524). The global statistical test yielded t1865.8 = -0.75 (2-sided P = .45). There were no detectable differences (P < .01 to partially adjust for multiple comparisons) in adverse and serious adverse events by body system. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with early and treated Parkinson disease, treatment with creatine monohydrate for at least 5 years, compared with placebo did not improve clinical outcomes. These findings do not support the use of creatine monohydrate in patients with Parkinson disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00449865.


Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Creatina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Creatina/efectos adversos , Creatina/sangre , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Neurosci Nurs ; 37(4): 204-10, 2005 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16206546

RESUMEN

The use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and dystonia is increasing. Although some published literature describes the methods for DBS programming, the time and nursing requirements to run a DBS surgical program have not been examined previously. For this study, we prospectively recorded the time required for both assessments and programming of the DBS from the preoperative period to 1 year after surgery in a variety of patients. Results showed that the mean total time spent programming the stimulator and assessing these patients ranged from 18.0-36.2 hours per patient. It took twice as long to program the stimulator in patients with Parkinson's disease as it did in patients with essential tremor or dystonia. When setting up a program for movement disorders surgery, nursing time spent on patient assessment and programming should be considered in the workload.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/enfermería , Trastornos del Movimiento/terapia , Enfermeras Clínicas/organización & administración , Evaluación en Enfermería/organización & administración , Carga de Trabajo , Actividades Cotidianas , Alberta , Algoritmos , Competencia Clínica , Comunicación , Árboles de Decisión , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/instrumentación , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/enfermería , Enfermeras Clínicas/educación , Rol de la Enfermera , Investigación en Administración de Enfermería , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/organización & administración , Atención Perioperativa/enfermería , Atención Perioperativa/organización & administración , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Tiempo y Movimiento , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA