[Conservative surgical treatment for diabetic foot ulcers under the metatarsal heads. A retrospective case-control study]. / Traitement chirurgical conservateur du mal perforant plantaire en regard des têtes de métatarsiens chez le diabétique. Étude rétrospective cas-témoins.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The plantar neuropathic ulcer is a classical and frequent complication of a pathology recognized as pandemic by the WHO: diabetes. Even if frequently encountered during medical practice, the neuropathic ulcer remains poorly understood in its pathophysiology. Its treatment is usually long and disappointing, resulting too often in an amputation. Paradoxically, medical literature is particularly scarce on the subject of surgical approaches to the plantar neuropathic ulcer. Beyond the cases of vascular lesions requiring above all a technique of revascularization, we have tested out an original approach enabling the surgical treatment of an overt neuropathic ulcer. Our purpose was to correct the architecture of the foot for a superior distribution of foot support points. We performed subtraction osteotomies ahead of the neuropathic ulcer in order to redress the deformed bone axis. Standing with full weight on the foot is prescribed from the following day of the intervention in almost all cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have evaluated the effectiveness of this innovative conservative surgical treatment on neuropathic ulcers of metatarsal heads by comparing it with the usual medical treatment. Two groups of patients have thus been analysed for this retrospective comparative study in order to determinate whether the use of this surgical technique benefits the patient. The studied criteria were healing time, recurrence rate, amputation rate and overall failure rate of the treatment, represented by the occurrence of the event "recurrence or amputation". RESULTS: All the differences found were in favour of the surgical technique with, in particular, significant differences in healing time, amputation rate and occurrence rate of the event "recurrence or amputation". The difference in recurrence rate was also clearly in favour of the surgery group, but it was not significant. CONCLUSION: The conservative surgical treatment by proximal osteotomy is therefore an innovative technique enabling a significant improvement in healing time and treatment after-effects of neuropathic ulcers in non-arteritis diabetic patients.

Outcome of patients with diabetes with negative percutaneous bone biopsy performed for suspicion of osteomyelitis of the foot.

AIMS: To assess the outcome of patients with diabetes with suspicion of osteomyelitis of the foot who had undergone a percutaneous bone biopsy that yielded negative microbiological results, with focus on the occurrence of osteomyelitis at the biopsied site. METHODS: Medical charts of adult patients with diabetes with a negative percutaneous bone biopsy were reviewed. Patients' outcome was evaluated at least 2 years after the initial bone biopsy according to wound healing, the results of a new bone biopsy and bone imaging evaluation when applicable. RESULTS: From January 2001 to January 2008, 41 patients with diabetes (30 men/11 women; mean age 58.1 ± 9.6 years; mean diabetes duration 15.8 ± 6.7 years) met study criteria. Osteomyelitis was suspected based on combined clinical and imaging diagnostic criteria. On follow-up at a mean duration of 41.2 ± 22.5 months post-bone biopsy, 16 patients had complete wound healing (39.0%). Of the 25 other patients, 15 had a new bone biopsy performed, six of which yielded positive microbiological results, and among the 10 patients who neither healed nor underwent bone biopsy, comparative radiography of the foot showed a stable aspect of the biopsied site in six of them, for whom the data were available. Finally, osteomyelitis of the foot at the site where the initial bone biopsy had been performed was confirmed during follow-up in six patients (14.6%) and was suspected in four additional patients (9.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that, of patients with diabetes with the suspicion of osteomylelitis and a negative percutaneous bone biopsy, only one out of four will develop osteomyelitis within 2 years of the biopsy.

A proof-of-concept study of the effectiveness of a removable device for offloading in patients with neuropathic ulceration of the foot: the Ransart boot.

AIM: To undertake a proof-of-concept study to determine whether a removable offloading device (the Ransart boot) for the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) was as effective as reports of non-removable devices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This observational study used the Ransart boot for patients with DFU, in seven specialist centres. If a patient had two or more ulcers, one was selected as the index ulcer. Ulcers were classified by the University of Texas (UT) system. RESULTS: There were 135 patients (mean age 60.3 +/- 11.4 years); 96 (71.1%) male. Median ulcer duration at presentation was 90 [interquartile range (IQR) 30-1825] days. Seven were lost to follow-up, seven developed other major illnesses and four died; outcomes were documented in the remaining 117. Eighty-two (70.1% of 117) healed, after a median (IQR) 60 (43-99) days, while 22 (18.8%) ulcers were resolved by amputation (one major). The remaining 13 (11.1%) patients were judged non-compliant. There was a close correlation between ulcer classification at baseline and both time to healing (P < 0.001 chi(2)-test) and amputation (P < 0.001; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient). There was a positive correlation between ulcer duration at presentation and time to healing (P < 0.02), UT class (P < 0.01), glycated haemoglobin (P < 0.02) and amputation (P < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Time to healing and incidence of amputation were comparable with those previously reported for non-removable devices. Given that a removable device is much more acceptable to the patient, the effectiveness, cost and acceptability of the removable devices, such as the Ransart boot, need to be compared with a non-removable device in a randomized trial. Diabet. Med. 26, 778-782 (2009).

Comparison between Leukoscan (Sulesomab) and Gallium-67 for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.

OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic foot is difficult both clinically and radiologically. An early diagnosis is crucial to optimize therapeutic strategy. Among the diagnostic methods currently used, scintigraphy with ex-vivo labelled white blood cells is the gold standard, but cannot be performed in all centers; therefore 67Gallium citrate (67Ga) imaging in combination with a bone scintigraphy is still widely used. METHOD: The results of imaging 24 diabetic patients with 31 suspected osteomyelitic lesions using the antigranulocyte Fab' fragment (Sulesomab or LeukoScan or immunoscintigraphy) were prospectively compared with results from the bone scan coupled with 67Ga. The diagnosis of osteomyelitis was confirmed by either biopsy or follow-up, radiological imaging and clinical outcome. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Sulesomab correctly identified 12 of 18 osteomyelitic lesions while 67Ga was able to detect only 8 of 18. Therefore the sensitivity is 67% for Sulesomab and 44% for 67Ga. Among the 13 non-osteomyelitic lesions imaging with Sulesomab was able to rule out infection in 11 cases and 67Ga in 10 cases. The specificity is therefore 85% for Sulesomab and 77% for 67Ga. Image interpretation for Sulesomab in this group of patients is occasionally suboptimal when imaging is performed at 3 hours post injection. High vascular background in the early images may obscure infection especially in small bones. Practically, scintigraphy with Sulesomab is fast and simple due to ease of labeling, no ex-vivo handling of blood, low radiation and provides rapid diagnosis. The diagnosis of osteomyelitis obtained by the antibody fragment scintigraphy influences the management (guided biopsy) and therapy. In several patients, imaging with Sulesomab was able to rule out osteomyelitis, helping to avoid useless antibiotic therapy and its associated side effects.

[Thyroid dysfunctions related to amiodarone. Prospective survey with 116 patients]. / Dysfonctions thyroïdiennes liées à l'amiodarone. Enquête prospective chez 116 sujets.

Thyroid hormones, TSH and antithyroid antibodies were prospectively controlled in 116 patients treated with amiodarone. Hypothyroidism occurred in 4 patients (3.7%) mainly early (average = 6 months). Hyperthyroidism was seen among 13 patients (11.9%) and its prevalence was proportional to therapy duration.