Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 33(3): 368-72, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23662968

RESUMEN

In the following point-counterpoint article, internationally-acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the order, Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer-reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point-Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Recreativas , Miopía/prevención & control , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Luz Solar , Visión Ocular/fisiología , Humanos , Miopía/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA