RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intensified systemic chemotherapy has the highest primary cure rate for advanced-stage, classical Hodgkin lymphoma but this comes with a cost of severe and potentially life long, persisting toxicities. With the new regimen of brentuximab vedotin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, and dexamethasone (BrECADD), we aimed to improve the risk-to-benefit ratio of treatment of advanced-stage, classical Hodgkin lymphoma guided by PET after two cycles. METHODS: This randomised, multicentre, parallel, open-label, phase 3 trial was done in 233 trial sites across nine countries. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≤60 years) with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage, classical Hodgkin lymphoma (ie, Ann Arbor stage III/IV, stage II with B symptoms, and either one or both risk factors of large mediastinal mass and extranodal lesions). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to four or six cycles (21-day intervals) of escalated doses of etoposide (200 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1-3), doxorubicin (35 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1), and cyclophosphamide (1250 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1), and standard doses of bleomycin (10 mg/m2 intravenously on day 8), vincristine (1·4 mg/m2 intravenously on day 8), procarbazine (100 mg/m2 orally on days 1-7), and prednisone (40 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14; eBEACOPP) or BrECADD, guided by PET after two cycles. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. Hierarchical coprimary objectives were to show (1) improved tolerability defined by treatment-related morbidity and (2) non-inferior efficacy defined by progression-free survival with an absolute non-inferiority margin of 6 percentage points of BrECADD compared with eBEACOPP. An additional test of superiority of progression-free survival was to be done if non-inferiority had been established. Analyses were done by intention to treat; the treatment-related morbidity assessment required documentation of at least one chemotherapy cycle. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02661503). FINDINGS: Between July 22, 2016, and Aug 27, 2020, 1500 patients were enrolled, of whom 749 were randomly assigned to BrECADD and 751 to eBEACOPP. 1482 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The median age of patients was 31 years (IQR 24-42). 838 (56%) of 1482 patients were male and 644 (44%) were female. Most patients were White (1352 [91%] of 1482). Treatment-related morbidity was significantly lower with BrECADD (312 [42%] of 738 patients) than with eBEACOPP (430 [59%] of 732 patients; relative risk 0·72 [95% CI 0·65-0·80]; p<0·0001). At a median follow-up of 48 months, BrECADD improved progression-free survival with a hazard ratio of 0·66 (0·45-0·97; p=0·035); 4-year progression-free survival estimates were 94·3% (95% CI 92·6-96·1) for BrECADD and 90·9% (88·7-93·1) for eBEACOPP. 4-year overall survival rates were 98·6% (97·7-99·5) and 98·2% (97·2-99·3), respectively. INTERPRETATION: BrECADD guided by PET after two cycles is better tolerated and more effective than eBEACOPP in first-line treatment of adult patients with advanced-stage, classical Hodgkin lymphoma. FUNDING: Takeda Oncology.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Brentuximab Vedotina/administración & dosificación , Brentuximab Vedotina/efectos adversos , Brentuximab Vedotina/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico , Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación , Dacarbazina/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Etopósido/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/mortalidad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Combined-modality treatment consisting of chemotherapy and consolidation radiotherapy is standard of care for patients with early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma. However, the use of radiotherapy can have long-term sequelae, which is of particular concern, as Hodgkin lymphoma is frequently diagnosed in young adults with a median age of approximately 30 years. In the German Hodgkin Study Group HD17 trial, we investigated whether radiotherapy can be omitted without loss of efficacy in patients who have a complete metabolic response after receiving two cycles of escalated doses of etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin, and regular doses of bleomycin, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) plus two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy (2â+â2). METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, patients (aged 18-60 years) with newly diagnosed early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma (all histologies) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less were enrolled at 224 hospitals and private practices in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, and the Netherlands. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either standard combined-modality treatment, consisting of the 2â+â2 regimen (eBEACOPP consisted of 1250 mg/m2 intravenous cyclophosphamide on day 1, 35 mg/m2 intravenous doxorubicin on day 1, 200 mg/m2 intravenous etoposide on days 1-3, 100 mg/m2 oral procarbazine on days 1-7, 40 mg/m2 oral prednisone on days 1-14, 1·4 mg/m2 intravenous vincristine on day 8 [maximum dose of 2 mg per cycle], and 10 mg/m2 intravenous bleomycin on day 8; ABVD consisted of 25 mg/m2 intravenous doxorubicin, 10 mg/m2 intravenous bleomycin, 6 mg/m2 intravenous vinblastine, and 375 mg/m2 intravenous dacarbazine, all given on days 1 and 15) followed by 30 Gy involved-field radiotherapy (standard combined-modality treatment group) or PET4-guided treatment, consisting of the 2â+â2 regimen followed by 30 Gy of involved-node radiotherapy only in patients with positive PET at the end of four cycles of chemotherapy (PET4; PET4-guided treatment group). Randomisation was done centrally and used the minimisation method and seven stratification factors (centre, age, sex, clinical symptoms, disease localisation, albumin concentration, and bulky disease), and patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation until central review of the PET4 examination had been completed. With the final analysis presented here, the primary objective was to show non-inferiority of the PET4-guided strategy in a per-protocol analysis of the primary endpoint of progression-free survival. We defined non-inferiority as an absolute difference of 8% in the 5-year progression-free survival estimates between the two groups. Safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01356680. FINDINGS: Between Jan 13, 2012, and March 21, 2017, we enrolled and randomly assigned 1100 patients to the standard combined-modality treatment group (n=548) or to the PET4-guided treatment group (n=552); two patients in each group were found ineligible after randomisation. At a median follow-up of 46·2 months (IQR 32·7-61·2), 5-year progression-free survival was 97·3% (95% CI 94·5-98·7) in the standard combined-modality treatment group and 95·1% (92·0-97·0) in the PET4-guided treatment group (hazard ratio 0·523 [95% CI 0·226-1·211]). The between-group difference was 2·2% (95% CI -0·9 to 5·3) and excluded the non-inferiority margin of 8%. The most common grade 3 or 4 acute haematological adverse events were leucopenia (436 [83%] of 528 patients in the standard combined-modality treatment group vs 443 [84%] of 529 patients in the PET4-guided treatment group) and thrombocytopenia (139 [26%] vs 176 [33%]), and the most frequent acute non-haematological toxic effects were infection (32 [6%] vs 40 [8%]) and nausea or vomiting (38 [7%] vs 29 [6%]). The most common acute radiotherapy-associated adverse events were dysphagia (26 [6%] in the standard combined-modality treatment group vs three [2%] in the PET4-guided treatment group) and mucositis (nine [2%] vs none). 229 serious adverse events were reported by 161 (29%) of 546 patients in the combined-modality treatment group, and 235 serious adverse events were reported by 164 (30%) of 550 patients in the PET4-guided treatment group. One suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction (infection) leading to death was reported in the PET4-guided treatment group. INTERPRETATION: PET4-negativity after treatment with 2â+â2 chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma allows omission of consolidation radiotherapy without a clinically relevant loss of efficacy. PET4-guided therapy could thereby reduce the proportion of patients at risk of the late effects of radiotherapy. FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/radioterapia , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Adolescente , Adulto , Bleomicina/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Procarbazina/administración & dosificación , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Data on non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) after classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are scarce. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis comprising 11·841 cHL patients who had first-line treatment within the randomized German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD7-HD15 studies. After a median follow-up of 106 months, 175 patients (1·5%) had developed NHL. The median time to NHL was 44 months, the median age at NHL diagnosis was 54 years. The five-year event-free survival and overall survival estimates from the diagnosis of NHL were 36·9% and 44·2%, respectively. Thus, NHL after cHL is a rare event primarily affecting older individuals and often resulting in the patient´s death.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Linfoma no Hodgkin/mortalidad , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/mortalidad , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The optimal treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is ill defined. To shed more light on treatment options and outcome, we performed an analysis using the database of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Ninety-nine patients who had received first-line treatment within 12 prospective GHSG studies conducted between 1993 and 2009, and subsequently developed disease recurrence (n = 91) or had primary disease progression (n = 8), were included. At initial NLPHL diagnosis, the median age was 40 years and 76% of patients were male. First-line treatment consisted of radiotherapy (RT) alone (20%), chemotherapy with or without RT (74%), and the anti-CD20 antibody (Ab) rituximab (6%), respectively. The median follow-up from initial diagnosis was 11.2 years. The median time to disease recurrence was 3.7 years. The applied salvage approaches included single-agent anti-CD20 Ab treatment or RT alone (37%), conventional chemotherapy (CT) with or without anti-CD20 Ab treatment with or without RT (27%) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (31%). No salvage treatment was given in 4% of patients. The 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival estimates after NLPHL recurrence were 75.6% and 89.5% (74.1% and 97.2% after single-agent anti-CD20 Ab treatment or RT alone; 68.0% and 77.8% after CT with or without anti-CD20 Ab treatment with or without RT; 84.6% and 89.8% after HDCT and ASCT). Hence, patients with relapsed or refractory NLPHL had a good overall prognosis. Factors such as time to disease recurrence and previous treatment may guide the choice of the optimal salvage approach for the individual patient.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Linfocitos/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/radioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Terapia Recuperativa , Trasplante de Células Madre , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The intensive polychemotherapy regimen eBEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone in escalated doses) is very active in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma, albeit at the expense of severe toxicities. Individual patients might be cured with less burdensome therapy. We investigated whether metabolic response determined by PET after two cycles of standard regimen eBEACOPP (PET-2) would allow adaption of treatment intensity, increasing it for PET-2-positive patients and reducing it for PET-2-negative patients. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, parallel-group phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma in 301 hospitals and private practices in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic. After central review of PET-2, patients were assigned (1:1) to one of two parallel treatment groups on the basis of their PET-2 result. Patients with positive PET-2 were randomised to receive six additional cycles of either standard eBEACOPP (8â×âeBEACOPP in total) or eBEACOPP with rituximab (8â×âR-eBEACOPP). Those with negative PET-2 were randomised between standard treatment with six additional cycles of eBEACOPP (8â×âeBEACOPP) or experimental treatment with two additional cycles (4â×âeBEACOPP). A protocol amendment in June, 2011, introduced a reduction of standard therapy to 6â×âeBEACOPP; after this point, patients with positive PET-2 were no longer randomised and were all assigned to receive 6â×âeBEACOPP and patients with negative PET-2 were randomly assigned to 6â×âeBEACOPP (standard) or 4â×âeBEACOPP (experimental). Randomisation was done centrally using the minimisation method including a random component, stratified according to centre, age (<45 vs ≥45 years), stage (IIB, IIIA vs IIIB, IV), international prognostic score (0-2 vs 3-7), and sex. eBEACOPP was given as previously described; rituximab was given intravenously at a dose of 375 mg/m2 (maximum total dose 700 mg). The primary objectives were to show superiority of the experimental treatment in the PET-2-positive cohort, and to show non-inferiority of the experimental treatment in the PET-2-negative cohort in terms of the primary endpoint, progression-free survival. We defined non-inferiority as an absolute difference of 6% in the 5-year progression-free survival estimates. Primary analyses in the PET-2-negative cohort were per protocol; all other analyses were by intention to treat. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00515554. FINDINGS: Between May 14, 2008, and July 18, 2014, we recruited 2101 patients, of whom 137 were found ineligible before randomisation and a further 19 were found ineligible after randomisation. Among 434 randomised patients (217 per arm) with positive PET-2, 5-year progression-free survival was 89·7% (95% CI 85·4-94·0) with eBEACOPP and 88·1% (83·5-92·7) with R-eBEACOPP (log-rank p=0·46). Patients with negative PET-2 randomly assigned to either 8â×âeBEACOPP or 6â×âeBEACOPP (n=504) or 4â×âeBEACOPP (n=501) had 5-year progression-free survival of 90·8% (95% CI 87·9-93·7) and 92·2% (89·4-95·0), respectively (difference 1·4%, 95% CI -2·7 to 5·4). 4â×âeBEACOPP was associated with fewer severe infections (40 [8%] of 498 vs 75 [15%] of 502) and organ toxicities (38 [8%] of 498 vs 91 [18%] of 502) than were 8â×âeBEACOPP or 6â×âeBEACOPP in PET-2-negative patients. Ten treatment-related deaths occurred: four in the PET-2-positive cohort (one [<1%] in the 8â×âeBEACOPP group, three [1%] in the 8â×âR-eBEACOPP group) and six in the PET-2-negative group (six [1%] in the 8â×âeBEACOPP or 6â×âeBEACOPP group). INTERPRETATION: The favourable outcome of patients treated with eBEACOPP could not be improved by adding rituximab after positive PET-2. PET-2 negativity allows reduction to only four cycles of eBEACOPP without loss of tumour control. PET-2-guided eBEACOPP provides outstanding efficacy for all patients and increases overall survival by reducing treatment-related risks for patients with negative PET-2. We recommend this PET-2-guided treatment strategy for patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe, Swiss State Secretariat for Education and Research, and Roche Pharma AG.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Austria , Bleomicina/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , República Checa , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Etopósido/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Alemania , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Países Bajos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Procarbazina/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Suiza , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine sulfate, and dacarbazine (ABVD) is associated with severe toxicity in older patients, particularly from bleomycin-induced lung toxicity (BLT). Therefore, using bleomycin has been questioned in older Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients, especially in early-stage HL. We therefore analyzed feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of ABVD or AVD in 287 older early-stage favorable HL patients. We included patients ≥60 years of age in the German Hodgkin Study Group HD10 and HD13 trials randomized to either 2 cycles of ABVD (2×ABVD; n = 137) or AVD (2×AVD; n = 82), each followed by involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT), with patients randomized to 4×ABVD+IF-RT (n = 68). Patients' median age was 65 years (range, 60-75) with comparable patient and disease characteristics. Grade III-IV adverse event rates were similar in patients receiving 2×AVD and 2×ABVD (40% and 39%, respectively), but considerably higher in patients receiving 4×ABVD (65%). Similarly, BLT was rare in patients receiving 2×ABVD/AVD, but occurred in 7/69 (10%) of patients randomized to 4×ABVD, with 3 lethal events. In conclusion, no effects of bleomycin on toxicity rates were detectable in older patients receiving 2 cycles of chemotherapy. However, we found a high risk of severe toxicity of bleomycin in older HL patients receiving more than 2 cycles of ABVD. These trials are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov and www.isrctn.com as #NCT00265018 (HD10) and #ISRCTN63474366 (HD13).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bleomicina/administración & dosificación , Bleomicina/efectos adversos , Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación , Dacarbazina/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/radioterapia , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Enfermedades Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Inducción de Remisión , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación , Vinblastina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma represents a heterogeneous group of patients with different risk profiles. Data suggests that interim PET assessment during chemotherapy is superior to baseline international prognostic scoring in terms of predicting long-term treatment outcome in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma. We therefore hypothesised that early interim PET-imaging after two courses of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) might be suitable for guiding treatment in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. We aimed to assess whether intensifying standard chemotherapy (BEACOPPescalated) by adding rituximab would improve progression-free survival in patients with positive PET after two courses of chemotherapy. METHODS: In this open-label, international, randomised, phase 3 study, we recruited patients aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma from 160 hospitals and 77 private practices in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic. Interim PET-imaging was done after two cycles of BEACOPPescalated and centrally assessed by an expert panel. Patients with a positive PET after 2 cycles of BEACOPPescalated chemotherapy (PET-2) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive six additional courses of either BEACOPPescalated (BEACOPPescalated group) or BEACOPPescalated plus rituximab (R-BEACOPPescalated group). PET-2 was assessed using a 5-point scale with 18FDG uptake higher than the mediastinal blood pool (corresponding to Deauville scale 3) defined as positive. BEACOPPescalated was given as previously described; rituximab was given intravenously at a dose of 375 mg/m2 (maximum total dose 700 mg), the first administration starting 24 h before starting the fourth cycle of BEACOPPescalated (day 0 and day 3 in cycle 4, day 1 in cycles 5-8). Randomisation was done centrally and used the minimisation method including a random component, stratified according to centre, age, stage, international prognostic score, and sex. The primary efficacy endpoint was 5 year progression-free survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. We are reporting this second planned interim analysis as the final report of the trial. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00515554. FINDINGS: Between May 14, 2008, and May 31, 2011, we enrolled 1100 patients. 440 patients had a positive PET-2 and were randomly assigned to either the BEACOPPescalated group (n=220) or the R-BEACOPPescalated group (n=220). With a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 25-42) for progression-free survival, estimated 3 year progression-free survival was 91·4% (95% CI 87·0-95·7) for patients in the BEACOPPescalated group and 93·0% (89·4-96·6) for those in the R-BEACOPPescalated group (difference 1·6%, 95% CI -4·0 to 7·3; log rank p=0·99). Common grade 3-4 adverse events were leucopenia (207 [95%] of 218 patients in the BEACOPPescalated group vs 211 [96%] of 220 patients in the R-BEACOPPescalated group), and severe infections (51 [23%] vs 43 [20%] patients). Based on a futility analysis, the independent data monitoring committee recommended publication of this second planned interim analysis as the final result. Six (3%) of 219 patients in the BEACOPPescalated group and ten (5%) of 220 in the R-BEACOPPescalated group died; fatal treatment-related toxic effects occurred in one (<1%) patient in the BEACOPPescalated group and three (1%) in the R-BEACOPPescalated group, all of them due to infection. INTERPRETATION: The addition of rituximab to BEACOPPescalated did not improve the progression-free survival of PET-2 positive patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, progression-free survival for PET-2 positive patients was much better than expected, exceeding even the outcome of PET-2-unselected patients in the previous HD15 trial. Thus, PET-2 cannot identify patients at high-risk for treatment failure in the context of the very effective German Hodgkin Study Group standard treatment for advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe; Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI); and Roche Pharma.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Adulto , Bleomicina/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Agencias Internacionales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Procarbazina/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Tasa de Supervivencia , Vincristina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A high proportion of patients with relapsed classical Hodgkin's lymphoma achieve a response with the antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin, and the drug is well tolerated. We modified the escalated BEACOPP regimen (eBEACOPP; bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) and implemented brentuximab vedotin with the aim to reduce toxic effects while maintaining the protocol's efficacy. METHODS: We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 2 study at 20 study sites in Germany. Adult patients (aged 18-60 years) with newly diagnosed, advanced, classical Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with six cycles of either BrECAPP (brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg on day 1, etoposide 200 mg/m2 on days 2-4, doxorubicin 35 mg/m2 on day 2, cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m2 on day 2, procarbazine 100 mg/m2 on days 2-8, and prednisone 40 mg/m2 on days 2-15) or BrECADD (brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg on day 1, etoposide 150 mg/m2 on days 2-4, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 2, cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m2 on day 2, dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 on days 3-4, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 2-5). Randomisation was done centrally by stratified minimisation, with study site and sex as stratification factors. The co-primary endpoints were complete response to chemotherapy and complete remission at the end of treatment, which were assessed by intention to treat. Patients who were found not to meet inclusion criteria after randomisation or without restaging data after two cycles of study treatment were excluded from the primary endpoint analysis. All patients who started study treatment were assessable for safety. This report presents the final analysis at a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 13·2-21·5). The preplanned 2-year follow-up analysis is yet to be reported. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01569204. FINDINGS: Between Oct 26, 2012, and May 15, 2014, 104 patients were enrolled to the study (52 were assigned to each study arm). Two patients dropped out before the start of study treatment because of acute infection (n=1) and withdrawal of consent (n=1) and one patient was excluded because of intermediate-stage disease (all were assigned BrECAPP). 42 (86%, 95% CI 73-94) of 49 patients assigned BrECAPP achieved a complete response after chemotherapy and 46 (94%, 95% CI 83-99) had complete remission as their final treatment outcome. In the BrECADD group, 46 (88%, 95% CI 77-96) of 52 patients achieved both a complete response after chemotherapy and complete remission as their final treatment outcome. 58 serious adverse events were reported, 32 events in 21 of 50 patients who received BrECAPP and 26 events in 18 of 52 patients who received BrECADD. The most common grade 3-4 toxic effects were haematological adverse events (91 [89%] of 102 patients). Grade 3-4 organ toxic effects were reported in seven (17%) of 42 patients assigned BrECAPP and two (4%) of 46 allocated BrECADD. 16 (32%) of 50 patients assigned BrECAPP and 18 (35%) of 52 allocated BrECADD had grade 1-2 peripheral neuropathy, and one (2%) patient assigned BrECAPP developed grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; all but one case (allocated BrECAPP) resolved. No deaths were reported during the follow-up period. INTERPRETATION: Both eBEACOPP variants met the co-primary efficacy endpoints. Particularly, the BrECADD regimen was associated with a more favourable toxicity profile and was, therefore, selected to challenge standard eBEACOPP for the treatment of advanced classical Hodgkin's lymphoma in the phase 3 HD21 study by the German Hodgkin Study Group (NCT02661503), which aims to further reduce treatment-related morbidity. FUNDING: Takeda Pharmaceuticals.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/mortalidad , Inmunoconjugados/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bleomicina/administración & dosificación , Bleomicina/efectos adversos , Brentuximab Vedotina , Intervalos de Confianza , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Femenino , Alemania , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Procarbazina/administración & dosificación , Procarbazina/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Médula Ósea/diagnóstico por imagen , Médula Ósea/patología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma might have persistent fatigue even years after treatment. However, knowledge of the development of fatigue persisting long after completion of treatment is limited. Therefore, we did a detailed analysis of fatigue in our first-line clinical trials for early-stage favourable (HD13 trial), early-stage unfavourable (HD14 trial), and advanced-stage (HD15 trial) Hodgkin's lymphoma. Beyond the description of fatigue from diagnosis up to 5 years after treatment, we aimed to assess any effect of patient characteristics, disease characteristics, or treatment characteristics on persistent fatigue. METHODS: In this longitudinal study, we included patients with early-stage favourable, early-stage unfavourable, and advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma from the HD13, HD14, and HD15 trials, respectively, aged between 18 and 60 years. Eligible patients for these trials had newly diagnosed, histologically proven Hodgkin's lymphoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, HIV negativity, and absence of comorbidity disallowing protocol treatment. We used the fatigue scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire to assess fatigue from diagnosis up to 5 years after the end of treatment. The primary outcomes of interest in this study were fatigue scores in the second and fifth year after end of treatment. We estimated the effect of different disease, patient, and treatment characteristics on fatigue with multiple regression analyses and identified fatigue trajectories with growth mixture models. The regression analyses and growth mixture models used robust and full information maximum likelihood estimates to account for missing data. The HD13, HD14, and HD15 trials are registered as international standard randomised controlled trials, ISRCTN63474366, ISRCTN04761296, and ISRCTN32443041, respectively. FINDINGS: The HD13 trial enrolled patients with early-stage favourable disease from Jan 28, 2003, to Sept 30, 2009; the HD14 trial enrolled patients with early-stage unfavourable disease from Jan 28, 2003, to Dec 23, 2009; and the HD15 trial enrolled patients with advanced-stage disease from Jan 28, 2003, to April 18, 2008. 5306 patients were enrolled in these trials. We analysed 4215 patients with any valid fatigue assessment up to 5 years after the end of treatment. Patients with higher tumour burden at diagnosis had more fatigue at baseline (mean fatigue score in HD13: 30·8 [SD 28·0]; in HD14: 39·8 [29·4], and in HD15: 49·0 [30·2]). Fatigue scores (FA) in the second year after the end of treatment were 28·5 (24·7) in HD13, 28·8 (24·4) in HD14, and 30·7 (24·4) in HD15; in the fifth year after the end of treatment FA was 30·8 (26·0) in HD13, 27·1 (24·8) in HD14, and 28·2 (24·9) in HD15. Predictors of fatigue in the second and fifth year after end of treatment were baseline fatigue (p<0·0001) and age as a continuous variable (p<0·0001). In addition to preceding fatigue and age, patient sex and Hodgkin's lymphoma specific risk factors at baseline did not consistently and significantly improve the prognosis of fatigue in the first, second, and fifth year after end of treatment. There was no significant effect of treatment on fatigue scores in the second and fifth year after treatment. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show a high incidence of severe acute and persistent fatigue in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors, which is largely independent of tumour stage and treatment. Our results contribute to a better understanding of fatigue in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors and could inform development of urgently needed intervention strategies. FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe.
Asunto(s)
Fatiga/etiología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/complicaciones , Sobrevivientes , Adolescente , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of bleomycin and dacarbazine in the ABVD regimen (ie, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) has been questioned, especially for treatment of early-stage favourable Hodgkin's lymphoma, because of the drugs' toxicity. We aimed to investigate whether omission of either bleomycin or dacarbazine, or both, from ABVD reduced the efficacy of this regimen in treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, multicentre trial (HD13) we compared two cycles of ABVD with two cycles of the reduced-intensity regimen variants ABV (doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine), AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine), and AV (doxorubicin and vinblastine), in patients with newly diagnosed, histologically proven, classic or nodular, lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma. In each treatment group, 30 Gy involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) was given after both cycles of chemotherapy were completed. From Jan 28, 2003, patients were centrally randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) with a minimisation method to the four groups. Because of high event rates, assignment to the AV and ABV groups stopped early, on Sept 30, 2005, and Feb 10, 2006; assignment to ABVD and AVD continued (1:1) until Sept 30, 2009. Our primary objective was to show non-inferiority of the experimental variants compared with ABVD in terms of freedom from treatment failure (FFTF), by excluding a difference of 6% after 5 years corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.72, via a 95% CI. Analyses reported here include qualified patients only, and between-group comparisons include only patients recruited during the same period. The trial was registered, number ISRCTN63474366. FINDINGS: Of 1502 qualified patients, 566, 198, 571, and 167 were randomly assigned to receive ABVD, ABV, AVD, or AV, respectively. 5 year FFTF was 93.1%, 81.4%, 89.2%, and 77.1% with ABVD, ABV, AVD, and AV, respectively. Compared with ABVD, inferiority of the dacarbazine-deleted variants was detected with 5 year differences of -11.5% (95% CI -18.3 to -4.7; HR 2.06 [1.21 to 3.52]) for ABV and -15.2% (-23.0 to -7.4; HR 2.57 [1.51 to 4.40]) for AV. Non-inferiority of AVD compared with ABVD could also not be detected (5 year difference -3.9%, -7.7 to -0·1; HR 1.50, 1.00 to 2.26). 178 (33%) of 544 patients given ABVD had WHO grade III or IV toxicity, compared with 53 (28%) of 187 given ABV, 142 (26%) of 539 given AVD, and 40 (26%) of 151 given AV. Leucopenia was the most common event, and highest in the groups given bleomycin. INTERPRETATION: Dacarbazine cannot be omitted from ABVD without a substantial loss of efficacy. With respect to our predefined non-inferiority margin, bleomycin cannot be safely omitted either, and the standard of care for patients with early-stage favourable Hodgkin's lymphoma should remain ABVD followed by IFRT. FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe and Swiss State Secretariat for Education and Research.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bleomicina/administración & dosificación , Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes (t-AML/MDS) represent severe late effects in patients treated for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Because more recent data are scarce, we retrospectively analyzed incidence, outcome, and risk factors for the development of t-AML/MDS after HL. A total of 11,952 patients treated for newly diagnosed HL within German Hodgkin Study Group trials between 1993 and 2009 were considered. At a median follow-up of 72 months, t-AML/MDS was diagnosed in 106/11,952 patients (0.9%). Median time from HL treatment to t-AML/MDS was 31 months. The median age of patients with t-AML/MDS was higher than in the whole patient group (43 vs 34 years, P < .0001). Patients who received 4 or more cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) had an increased risk to develop t-AML/MDS when compared with patients treated with less than 4 cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) or no BEACOPP chemotherapy (1.7% vs 0.7% vs 0.3%, P < .0001). The median overall survival (OS) for all t-AML/MDS patients was 7.2 months. However, t-AML/MDS patients proceeding to allogeneic stem cell transplantation had a significantly better outcome with a median OS not reached after a median follow-up of 41 months (P < .001).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/inducido químicamente , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Bleomicina/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Incidencia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/mortalidad , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Procarbazina/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Vincristina/efectos adversos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Accurate clinical staging is crucial for adequate risk-adapted treatment in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) to prevent patients from under- or over-treatment. Within the latest German Hodgkin Study Group trial generation, diagnostic findings such as histopathology, computerized tomography imaging and clinical risk factors were re-evaluated by expert panels. Here, we retrospectively analysed 5965 patients and identified 399 in who major discordant findings changed their first-line treatment allocation. Histopathology review did not confirm the initial diagnosis of HL in 87 patients. Treatment allocation was revised in 312 of the remaining 5878 patients: 176 were assigned to a higher and 128 to a lower risk group, respectively; the correct treatment group remained unclear in 8 patients. Cases of revised treatment allocation accounted for 9·8%, 6·0%, 0·8%, and 14·8% of patients initially assigned to the HD13, HD14, HD15 trials and stage IA lymphocyte-predominant HL project, respectively. Most revisions were due to wrong application of clinical stage (20·5% of 312 patients with revised treatment group), histological subtype (9·0%) or the risk factors ≥3 involved areas (46·8%) or large mediastinal mass (9·3%). In conclusion, centralized review by experienced experts changed risk-adapted first-line treatment in a relevant proportion of HL patients. Quality control measures clearly improve the accuracy of treatment and should be implemented in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Control de Calidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Femenino , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Mediastino/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ajuste de Riesgo , Diseño de Software , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is characterized by a paucity of neoplastic Hodgkin/Reed Sternberg (HRS) cells within a complex cellular milieu that is rendered immunologically incapable of reacting against CD30(+) HRS cells due to a plethora of immune escape mechanisms initiated by the neoplastic cells. Accounting for 25% of all lymphomas and nearly 95% of all Hodgkin lymphomas, patients with cHL are typically young adults. Besides traditional prognostic factors, such as the International Prognostic Index (IPI), newer imaging and ancillary biomarkers (CD68, Galectin-1 and plasma microRNA) have shown promise. Furthermore, the evolution of gene expression profiling (GEP) in recent years has enabled the development of several practically feasible GEP-based predictors with prognostic relevance. This review discusses the current status of clinical prognostication in cHL, the critical role of histological evaluation in light of several mimicking entities, and the relevance of tissue as well as serum biomarkers pertaining to immune escape mechanisms and recent GEP studies.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , PronósticoRESUMEN
GS-1101 (CAL-101) is an oral PI3Kδ-specific inhibitor that has shown preclinical and clinical activity in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. To investigate the potential role of PI3Kδ in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), we screened 5 HL cell lines and primary samples from patients with HL for PI3Kδ isoform expression and constitutive PI3K pathway activation. Inhibition of PI3Kδ by GS-1101 resulted in the inhibition of Akt phosphorylation. Cocultures with stroma cells induced Akt activation in HL cells, and this effect was blocked by GS-1101. Conversely, production of the stroma-stimulating chemokine, CCL5, by HL cells was reduced by GS-1101. GS-1101 also induced dose-dependent apoptosis of HL cells at 48 hours. Reductions in cell viability and apoptosis were enhanced when combining GS-1101 with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus. Our findings suggest that excessive PI3Kδ activity is characteristic in HL and support clinical evaluation of GS-1101, alone and in combination, as targeted therapy for HL.
Asunto(s)
Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Microambiente Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Purinas/farmacología , Quinazolinonas/farmacología , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Puntos de Control del Ciclo Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Línea Celular Tumoral , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Quimiocina CCL5/metabolismo , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasa Clase Ia/metabolismo , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/enzimología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Immunoblotting , Inmunohistoquímica , Inhibidores de las Quinasa Fosfoinosítidos-3 , Análisis de Matrices TisularesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Most patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are cured with modern combined modality first-line treatments. Even ~ 50% of patients with relapsed/refractory HL can be cured with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation. However, chemotherapy and radiotherapy cause significant acute and long-term side effects and patients relapsing after HDCT have a dismal prognosis. New drugs are therefore needed to reduce the toxicity of first-line treatments and to increase the efficacy of relapse treatments. Moreover, new drugs are needed for the treatment of older patients with HL because results with current treatments are disappointing. AREAS COVERED: This article discusses promising new drugs for the treatment of classical HL that have been evaluated in the last years. There is a focus on the antibody drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin and its potential for the future treatment of HL. Moreover, data on the histone deacetylase inhibitors panobinostat and mocetinostat, the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus, the Janus kinase 2 inhibitor SB1518 and the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide are summarized. EXPERT OPINION: Besides improving the prognosis of relapsed patients, new drugs should be used to replace the most toxic compounds in first-line therapy to reduce acute and long-term toxicities of the treatment.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Brentuximab Vedotina , Inhibidores de Histona Desacetilasas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Quinasas Janus/antagonistas & inhibidores , Lenalidomida , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several treatment strategies are available for adults with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma, but studies assessing two alternative standards of care-increased dose bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPescalated), and doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD)-were not powered to test differences in overall survival. To guide treatment decisions in this population of patients, we did a systematic review and network meta-analysis to identify the best initial treatment strategy. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline, and conference proceedings for randomised controlled trials published between January, 1980, and June, 2013, that assessed overall survival in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma given BEACOPPbaseline, BEACOPPescalated, BEACOPP variants, ABVD, cyclophosphamide (mechlorethamine), vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (C[M]OPP), hybrid or alternating chemotherapy regimens with ABVD as the backbone (eg, COPP/ABVD, MOPP/ABVD), or doxorubicin, vinblastine, mechlorethamine, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, and prednisone combined with radiation therapy (the Stanford V regimen). We assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed their quality. We then pooled the data and used a Bayesian random-effects model to combine direct comparisons with indirect evidence. We also reconstructed individual patient survival data from published Kaplan-Meier curves and did standard random-effects Poisson regression. Results are reported relative to ABVD. The primary outcome was overall survival. FINDINGS: We screened 2055 records and identified 75 papers covering 14 eligible trials that assessed 11 different regimens in 9993 patients, providing 59â651 patient-years of follow-up. 1189 patients died, and the median follow-up was 5·9 years (IQR 4·9-6·7). Included studies were of high methodological quality, and between-trial heterogeneity was negligible (τ(2)=0·01). Overall survival was highest in patients who received six cycles of BEACOPPescalated (HR 0·38, 95% credibility interval [CrI] 0·20-0·75). Compared with a 5 year survival of 88% for ABVD, the survival benefit for six cycles of BEACOPPescalated is 7% (95% CrI 3-10)-ie, a 5 year survival of 95%. Reconstructed individual survival data showed that, at 5 years, BEACOPPescalated has a 10% (95% CI 3-15) advantage over ABVD in overall survival. INTERPRETATION: Six cycles of BEACOPPescalated significantly improves overall survival compared with ABVD and other regimens, and thus we recommend this treatment strategy as standard of care for patients with access to the appropriate supportive care.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/mortalidad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Bleomicina/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Procarbazina/administración & dosificación , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
The primary analysis of the GHSG HD16 trial indicated a significant loss of tumor control with PET-guided omission of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This analysis reports long-term outcomes. Overall, 1150 patients aged 18-75 years with newly diagnosed early-stage favorable HL were randomized between standard combined-modality treatment (CMT) (2x ABVD followed by PET/CT [PET-2] and 20 Gy involved-field RT) and PET-2-guided treatment omitting RT in case of PET-2 negativity (Deauville score [DS] < 3). The study aimed at excluding inferiority of PET-2-guided treatment and assessing the prognostic impact of PET-2 in patients receiving CMT. At a median follow-up of 64 months, PET-2-negative patients had a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 94.2% after CMT (n = 328) and 86.7% after ABVD alone (n = 300; HR = 2.05 [1.20-3.51]; p = 0.0072). 5-year OS was 98.3% and 98.8%, respectively (p = 0.14); 4/12 documented deaths were caused by second primary malignancies and only one by HL. Among patients assigned to CMT, 5-year PFS was better in PET-2-negative (n = 353; 94.0%) than in PET-2-positive patients (n = 340; 90.3%; p = 0.012). The difference was more pronounced when using DS4 as cut-off (DS 1-3: n = 571; 94.0% vs. DS ≥ 4: n = 122; 83.6%; p < 0.0001). Taken together, CMT should be considered standard treatment for early-stage favorable HL irrespective of the PET-2-result.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Humanos , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Dacarbazina/efectos adversos , Vinblastina/efectos adversos , Bleomicina , Doxorrubicina , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The intensity of chemotherapy and need for additional radiotherapy in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma has been unclear. We did a prospective randomised clinical trial comparing two reduced-intensity chemotherapy variants with our previous standard regimen. Chemotherapy was followed by PET-guided radiotherapy. METHODS: In this parallel group, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority trial (HD15), 2182 patients with newly diagnosed advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma aged 18-60 years were randomly assigned to receive either eight cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) (8×B(esc) group), six cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) (6×B(esc) group), or eight cycles of BEACOPP(14) (8×B(14) group). Randomisation (1:1:1) was done centrally by stratified minimisation. Non-inferiority of the primary endpoint, freedom from treatment failure, was assessed using repeated CIs for the hazard ratio (HR) according to the intention-to-treat principle. Patients with a persistent mass after chemotherapy measuring 2·5 cm or larger and positive on PET scan received additional radiotherapy with 30 Gy; the negative predictive value for tumour recurrence of PET at 12 months was an independent endpoint. This trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN32443041. FINDINGS: Of the 2182 patients enrolled in the study, 2126 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis set, 705 in the 8×B(esc) group, 711 in the 6×B(esc) group, and 710 in the 8×B(14) group. Freedom from treatment failure was sequentially non-inferior for the 6×B(esc) and 8×B(14) groups as compared with 8×B(esc). 5-year freedom from treatment failure rates were 84·4% (97·5% CI 81·0-87·7) for the 8×B(esc) group, 89·3% (86·5-92·1) for 6×B(esc) group, and 85·4% (82·1-88·7) for the 8×B(14) group (97·5% CI for difference between 6×B(esc) and 8×B(esc) was 0·5-9·3). Overall survival in the three groups was 91·9%, 95·3%, and 94·5% respectively, and was significantly better with 6×B(esc) than with 8×B(esc) (97·5% CI 0·2-6·5). The 8×B(esc) group showed a higher mortality (7·5%) than the 6×B(esc) (4·6%) and 8×B(14) (5·2%) groups, mainly due to differences in treatment-related events (2·1%, 0·8%, and 0·8%, respectively) and secondary malignancies (1·8%, 0·7%, and 1·1%, respectively). The negative predictive value for PET at 12 months was 94·1% (95% CI 92·1-96·1); and 225 (11%) of 2126 patients received additional radiotherapy. INTERPRETATION: Treatment with six cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) followed by PET-guided radiotherapy was more effective in terms of freedom from treatment failure and less toxic than eight cycles of the same chemotherapy regimen. Thus, six cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) should be the treatment of choice for advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. PET done after chemotherapy can guide the need for additional radiotherapy in this setting. FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe and the Swiss Federal Government.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/radioterapia , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Adolescente , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bleomicina/efectos adversos , Bleomicina/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Etopósido/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Procarbazina/efectos adversos , Procarbazina/uso terapéutico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Análisis de Supervivencia , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/efectos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a lymphoid malignancy characterized by the production of various cytokines possibly involved in immune deregulation. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) serum levels have been associated with clinical outcome in patients with HL. Because host genetic variations are known to alter the expression and function of cytokines and their receptors, we investigated whether genetic variations influence clinical outcome of patients with HL. METHODS: A total of 301 patients with HL who were treated within randomized trials by the German Hodgkin Study Group were included in this exploratory retrospective study. Gene variations of IL-10 (IL-10(-597AC), rs1800872; IL-10(-824CT), rs1800871; IL-10(-1087AG), rs1800896; IL-10(-3538AT), rs1800890; IL-10(-6208CG), rs10494879; IL-10(-6752AT), rs6676671; IL-10(-7400InDel)), IL-13 (IL-13(-1069CT), rs1800925; IL-13(Q144R), rs20541), and IL-4R (IL-4R(I75V), rs1805010; IL-4R(Q576R), rs1801275) were genotyped. RESULTS: Inferior freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) was found in patients harboring the IL-10(-597AA), IL-10(-824TT), or the IL-10(-1087AA) genotype. In contrast, the IL-10(-1087G-824C-597C) haplotype present in about 48% of analyzed HL patients is nominally significant for a better FFTF in a Cox-Regression model accounting for stage and treatment. No associations were observed between the other IL-10 gene variations, IL-13(-1069CT), IL-13(Q144R), IL-4R(I75V), IL-4R(Q576R) and the clinical outcome of patients with HL. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides further evidence that proximal IL-10 promoter gene variations are associated with clinical course of patients with HL. However, treatment success and survival rates are already at a very high rate, supporting the need to design studies focusing on identification of predictors to reduce the side effects of therapy.