Levofloxacin prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma (TEAMM): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Myeloma causes profound immunodeficiency and recurrent, serious infections. Around 5500 new cases of myeloma are diagnosed per year in the UK, and a quarter of patients will have a serious infection within 3 months of diagnosis. We aimed to assess whether patients newly diagnosed with myeloma benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infection, and to investigate the effect on antibiotic-resistant organism carriage and health care-associated infections in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. METHODS: TEAMM was a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial in patients aged 21 years and older with newly diagnosed myeloma in 93 UK hospitals. All enrolled patients were within 14 days of starting active myeloma treatment. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to levofloxacin or placebo with a computerised minimisation algorithm. Allocation was stratified by centre, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and intention to proceed to high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. All investigators, patients, laboratory, and trial co-ordination staff were masked to the treatment allocation. Patients were given 500 mg of levofloxacin (two 250 mg tablets), orally once daily for 12 weeks, or placebo tablets (two tablets, orally once daily for 12 weeks), with dose reduction according to estimated glomerular filtration rate every 4 weeks. Follow-up visits occurred every 4 weeks up to week 16, and at 1 year. The primary outcome was time to first febrile episode or death from all causes within the first 12 weeks of trial treatment. All randomised patients were included in an intention-to-treat analysis of the primary endpoint. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN51731976, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, number 2011-000366-35. FINDINGS: Between Aug 15, 2012, and April 29, 2016, we enrolled and randomly assigned 977 patients to receive levofloxacin prophylaxis (489 patients) or placebo (488 patients). Median follow-up was 12 months (IQR 8-13). 95 (19%) first febrile episodes or deaths occurred in 489 patients in the levofloxacin group versus 134 (27%) in 488 patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·51-0·86; p=0·0018. 597 serious adverse events were reported up to 16 weeks from the start of trial treatment (308 [52%] of which were in the levofloxacin group and 289 [48%] of which were in the placebo group). Serious adverse events were similar between the two groups except for five episodes (1%) of mostly reversible tendonitis in the levofloxacin group. INTERPRETATION: Addition of prophylactic levofloxacin to active myeloma treatment during the first 12 weeks of therapy significantly reduced febrile episodes and deaths compared with placebo without increasing health care-associated infections. These results suggest that prophylactic levofloxacin could be used for patients with newly diagnosed myeloma undergoing anti-myeloma therapy. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research.

Vosaroxin and vosaroxin plus low-dose Ara-C (LDAC) vs low-dose Ara-C alone in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

The development of new treatments for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia is an active area, but has met with limited success. Vosaroxin, a quinolone-derived intercalating agent has several properties that could prove beneficial. Initial clinical studies showed it to be well-tolerated in older patients with relapsed/refractory disease. In vitro data suggested synergy with cytarabine (Ara-C). To evaluate vosaroxin, we performed 2 randomized comparisons within the "Pick a Winner" program. A total of 104 patients were randomized to vosaroxin vs low-dose Ara-C (LDAC) and 104 to vosaroxin + LDAC vs LDAC. When comparing vosaroxin with LDAC, neither response rate (complete recovery [CR]/complete recovery with incomplete count recovery [CRi], 26% vs 30%; odds ratio [OR], 1.16 (0.49-2.72); P = .7) nor 12-month survival (12% vs 31%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.94 [1.26-3.00]; P = .003) showed benefit for vosaroxin. Likewise, in the vosaroxin + LDAC vs LDAC comparison, neither response rate (CR/CRi, 38% vs 34%; OR, 0.83 [0.37-1.84]; P = .6) nor survival (33% vs 37%; HR, 1.30 [0.81-2.07]; P = .3) was improved. A major reason for this lack of benefit was excess early mortality in the vosaroxin + LDAC arm, most obviously in the second month following randomization. At its first interim analysis, the Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee recommended closure of the vosaroxin-containing trial arms because a clinically relevant benefit was unlikely.

A new subtype-specific monoclonal antibody for IAP-survivin identifies high-risk patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and improves the prognostic value of bcl-2.

Anti-apoptotic factors including IAP-survivin and bcl-2 are involved in carcinogenesis and predict for disease outcome for patients with cancer. We used RT-PCR and specific primers to generate two recombinant IAP-survivin proteins; one encoding for the full-length protein and the second comprising the survivin sequence incorporating amino acids 98 to 142. Both proteins were used to immunize mice and as capture antigens to screen NS1/immune splenocyte hybridoma supernatants for anti-survivin antibody in ELISA assays. The antibody designated F2-9C3 was most effective and reacted with both recombinant proteins and with the native protein present in lysates of A549 (lung carcinoma) and Jurkat cells in Western blots, immunoprecipitation and formalin-fixed tissue sections. Immunohistochemical staining of normal and neoplastic tissues showed association of the F2-9C3 antibody with the mitotic spindles. Expression of survivin was not detected elsewhere in sections of normal tissue while all neoplastic tissues examined, including those from patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), showed significant expression of survivin. The intensity and localization of staining in these tumours varied and was observed in cytoplasm and/or nuclei. High nuclear expression of survivin predicted the disease outcome in patients with DLBCL. This association was evident when relating intensity to patient survival (p=0.0321) and strengthened when a score was calculated based on both staining intensity and the proportion of the reactive tumour cells (p=0.0128; reduction in the mean survival times: 35% and 46%, respectively). Elevated expression of bcl-2 protein also identified the high-risk patients (p=0.0095; reduction in mean survival time: 37%). Over-expression of both factors was a more powerful indicator of poor prognosis than either marker alone (p=0.0054, 70% reduction in mean survival time). In conclusion, our novel F2-9C3 monoclonal antibody is effective in determination of expression of IAP-survivin in neoplastic tissue. Nuclear overexpression of IAP-survivin using this antibody predicts the disease outcome in patients with DLBCL and significantly improves the predictive power of bcl-2 in these patients.

The prognostic value of CD38 expression and its quantification in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL).

A large number of prognostic factors are available to help predict the outcome of patients who present with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). These include clinical stage, leukemic cell morphology, lymphocyte doubling time, the pattern of infiltration in bone marrow trephine biopsies, cytogenetic abnormalities, p53 function and serum factors such as beta-2 microglobulin. Two recently described major prognostic factors are immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgVH) mutation status and cell membrane expression of CD38. These are both highly significant independent prognostic factors, but are not closely correlated. Whereas IgVH mutational status is a time consuming and demanding technique, only available in a limited number of centres, CD38 expression by flow cytometry is relatively simple and rapidly obtained in most diagnostic laboratories. The predictive value of CD38 expression is enhanced by measurement of antigen density in terms of antibody binding capacity (ABC) rather than as the percentage of cells expressing the antigen. ABC correlates closely with relative median fluorescence (RMF), a parameter which is even more simply and cheaply obtained by flow cytometry. One of these methods of determining CD38 expression should be employed routinely. Recent work suggests that membrane ZAP-70 expression determined by flow cytometry will prove to be an accurate proxy for IgVH mutational status and this assay will be within the reach of any laboratory skilled in flow cytometry. The combination of ZAP-70 expression, CD38 antigen density, p53 function and the concentration of serum factors such as soluble CD23, is likely to provide extremely accurate prognostic information in future studies. This will assist in identifying Stage A patients who may benfit from early and/or more intensive treatment, as well as Stage B and C patients who may require alternative treatment strategies at the outset.

Quantification of CD38 expression in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL): a comparison between antibody binding capacity (ABC) and relative median fluorescence (RMF).

We have previously shown that quantification of CD38 expression using microbeads of specific antibody binding capacity (ABC) improves the prognostic value of CD38 expression in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, particularly for Binet Stage A patients. Quantification of CD38 expression using beads is expensive, time consuming and could be difficult to implement in a routine clinical laboratory. The calculation of relative median fluorescence (RMF) using the median fluorescence intensities of the test and control samples, is even more simply and cheaply obtained by flow cytometry and could be used as an alternative way of quantifying antigen expression. The present study demonstrates that RMF is an effective prognostic indicator in B-CLL that correlates closely with ABC in predicting disease-specific survival and time to progression for all patients. RMF predicted overall survival and time to progression in all patients (P < 0.0001 for both), in Binet Stage A patients (P < 0.0001 for both) and in Stage A patients under 60 years (P = 0.0299 and P = 0.0143, respectively). ABC predicted overall survival and time to progression in all patients (P < 0.0001 for both) in Stage A patients (P = 0.0024 and P < 0.0001, respectively) and in Stage A patients under 60 (P = 0.0379 and P = 0.0032, respectively). RMF is more effective than percentage CD38 positivity > 30% or > 20% in predicting disease-specific survival in Stage A patients of all ages (CD38 < > 30%: P = 0.0853, CD38 < > 20%: P = 0.0894) and in those under 60 years old (CD38 < > 30%: P = 0.5438, CD38 < > 20%: P = 0.2872). Also, RMF is more effective in predicting time to progression of Binet Stage A patients less than 60 years (P = 0.0143), while percentage CD38 positivity of 30%, 20% or 7% did not achieve statistical significance (P = 0.1103, = 0.0547, = 0.3399, respectively). We suggest that CD38 RMF could be used clinically as an alternative to ABC to identify patients with B-CLL that are likely to progress and require early treatment.

Immunophenotyping of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) defines multiple sub-groups of germinal centre-like tumours displaying different survival characteristics.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) forms a heterogeneous collection of aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in which three principle classes of neoplasia have been defined according to gene expression and immunophenotyping studies. The present investigation sought to examine the immunophenotype of proposed subgroups and relate these to patient survival. A series of 155 DLBCL treated uniformly with anthracycline therapy in clinical trials, were stratified upon the basis of common biomarker expression with combination immunophenotype being related to patient overall survival. Stratification of tumours with respect to combined expression profiles of the three biological markers (CD10, Bcl-6 and MUM-1) revealed six groups showing significant differences in survival (p=0.014). The greatest difference resided between distinct populations of germinal centre (GC) cell tumours; the first being CD10-, Bcl-6+, MUM-1- and the second CD10+ Bcl-6+ MUM-1+ (p=0.002). The former group displayed median survival time of 143 months, the latter only 11 months. A third population of GC tumours (CD10+ Bcl-6+ and MUM-1-) also displayed a relative short median survival (32 months). Of the three groups presenting a non-GC or activated B cell (NGC/ABC) phenotype, only one (CD10-, Bcl-6+ and MUM-1+) presented short-term median survival (27 months) comparable with poor prognosis GC sub-populations. Within the remaining ABC tumour groups (CD10- Bcl-6- MUM-1- and CD10- Bcl-6- MUM-1+) patients presented intermediate median survival times of 54 and 58 months, respectively. Thus, the GC phenotype did not act as a universal indicator of good clinical prognosis, but rather multiple groups of GC tumours were associated with distinct overall survival profiles. Ultimately, the data allowed definition of a predictive algorithm defining three groups predicting poor, intermediate and good clinical prognosis. The first of these comprised two patient sub-populations with GC-like tumours together with one sub-population of NGC/ABC, the second two sub-populations of ABC-like tumours, and the final a single group of GC-like tumours associated with optimal long-term survival.

Quantification improves the prognostic value of CD38 expression in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Recent studies have shown that CD38 expressed as a percentage of the antigen positivity can predict prognosis and disease progression in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL). The present study showed that quantification of CD38 expressed as antibody-binding capacity (ABC) improves the prognostic value of the percentage of CD38 positivity in B-CLL. In a cohort of 81 patients with B-CLL, a level of CD38 expression of > or = 30% and an ABC value of 250 proved statistically valid cut-off points to predict disease progression (% CD38: P=0.0027; ABC: P < 0.0001). There was a positive and significant correlation between the percentage of CD38 expression and ABC (r=0.7; P < 0.0001). There was a better discrimination of survival using ABC rather than percentage CD38 positivity (P < 0.0001 compared with P=0.0027). Only ABC predicted for survival in patients under 60 years of age (P=0.0076) or with stage A disease (P=0.0195). Both percentage CD38 and ABC discriminated between time to first treatment for all patients but only ABC predicted time to treatment for stage A patients (P=0.0004). In conclusion, CD38 positivity is an important prognostic factor in B-CLL. However, quantification of CD38 is superior to the percentage positivity and should be used clinically in conjunction with other variables of predictive value to identify B-CLL patients that are likely to progress.