Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 80
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 2024 Mar 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432412

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Implementing levels of maternal care is one strategy proposed to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. The levels of maternal care framework outline individual medical and obstetrical comorbidities, along with hospital resources required for individuals with these different comorbidities to deliver safely. The overall goal is to match individuals to hospitals so that all birthing people get appropriate resources and personnel during delivery to reduce maternal morbidity. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association between delivery in a hospital with an inappropriate level of maternal care and the risk of experiencing severe maternal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: The 40 birthing hospitals in Massachusetts were surveyed using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Levels of Care Assessment Tool. We linked individual delivery hospitalizations from the Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal Data System to hospital-level data from the Levels of Care Assessment Tool surveys. Level of maternal care guidelines were used to outline 16 high-risk conditions warranting delivery at hospitals with resources beyond those considered basic (level I) obstetrical care. We then used the Levels of Care Assessment Tool assigned levels to determine if delivery occurred at a hospital that had the resources to meet an individual's needs (ie, if a patient received risk-appropriate care). We conducted our analyses in 2 stages. First, multivariable logistic regression models predicted if an individual delivered in a hospital that did not have the resources for their risk condition. The main explanatory variable of interest was if the hospital self-assessed their level of maternal care to be higher than the Levels of Care Assessment Tool assigned level. We then used logistic regression to examine the association between delivery at an inappropriate level hospital and the presence of severe maternal morbidity at delivery. RESULTS: Among 64,441 deliveries in Massachusetts from January 1 to December 31, 2019, 33.2% (21,415/64,441) had 1 or more of the 16 high-risk conditions that require delivery at a center designated as a level I or higher. Of the 21,415 individuals with a high-risk condition, 13% (2793/21,415), equating to 4% (2793/64,441) of the entire sample, delivered at an inappropriate level of maternal care. Birthing individuals with high-risk conditions who delivered at a hospital with an inappropriate level had elevated odds (adjusted odds ratio, 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 2.24-4.96) of experiencing severe maternal morbidity after adjusting for patient comorbidities, demographics, average hospital severe maternal morbidity rate, hospital level of maternal care, and geographic region. CONCLUSION: Birthing people who delivered in a hospital with risk-inappropriate resources were substantially more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity. Delivery in a hospital with a discrepancy in their self-assessment and the Levels of Care Assessment Tool assigned level substantially predicted delivery in a hospital with an inappropriate level of maternal care, suggesting inadequate knowledge of hospitals' resources and capabilities. Our data demonstrate the potential for the levels of maternal care paradigm to decrease severe maternal morbidity while highlighting the need for robust implementation and education to ensure everyone receives risk-appropriate care.

2.
J Pediatr ; 245: 47-55, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35131283

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare prenatal exposures, hospital care processes, and hospitalization outcomes for opioid-exposed newborns before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, data were collected from 19 Massachusetts hospitals, including 5 academic and 14 community hospitals. The pre-COVID-19 cohort was defined as births occurring during March 1, 2019-February 28, 2020, and the COVID-19 cohort was defined as births occurring during March 1, 2020-December 31, 2020. Opioid-exposed newborns born at ≥35 weeks of gestation were included. Differences in prenatal substance exposures, hospital care processes, and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) outcomes, including pharmacologic treatment for NOWS (PharmTx), length of stay (LOS), and as-needed (prn) treatment failure rates, were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 663 opioid-exposed newborns in the pre-COVID-19 group and 476 in the COVID-19 group. No between-group differences were seen in prenatal substance exposures or the need for PharmTx. Compared with the pre-COVID-19 group, in the COVID-19 group there was less rooming-in after maternal discharge (53.8% vs 63.0%; P = .001) and less care in the pediatric unit setting (23.5% vs 25.3%; P = .001), longer LOS (adjusted risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), and a higher rate of breast milk receipt at discharge (aOR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.22-3.39). Within the subset of academic centers, more infants failed prn treatment in the COVID-19 group (53.8% vs 26.5%, P = .02; aOR, 3.77; 95% CI, 0.98-14.5). CONCLUSIONS: Among the hospitals in our collaborative, hospital processes for NOWS, including care setting, rooming-in, and LOS were negatively impacted in the COVID-19 group, particularly in academic medical centers.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Niño , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Hum Reprod ; 37(11): 2690-2699, 2022 10 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36149255

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: Do women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have a greater risk of adverse pregnancy complications (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, cesarean section, placental abnormalities) and neonatal outcomes (preterm birth, small for gestational age, prolonged delivery hospitalization) compared to women without a PCOS diagnosis and does this risk vary by BMI, subfertility and fertility treatment utilization? SUMMARY ANSWER: Deliveries to women with a history of PCOS were at greater risk of complications associated with cardiometabolic function, including gestational diabetes and preeclampsia, as well as preterm birth and prolonged length of delivery hospitalization. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Prior research has suggested that women with PCOS may be at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, findings have been inconsistent possibly due to lack of consistent adjustment for confounding factors, small samples size and other sources of bias. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Massachusetts deliveries among women ≥18 years old during 2013-2017 from state vital records linked to hospital discharges, observational stays and emergency department visits were linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) and the Massachusetts All-Payers Claims Database (APCD). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: PCOS was identified by ICD9 and ICD10 codes in APCD prior to index delivery. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CI for pregnancy and delivery complications were modeled using generalized estimating equations with a log link and a Poisson distribution to take multiple cycles into account and were adjusted a priori for maternal age, BMI, race/ethnicity, education, plurality, birth year, chronic hypertension and chronic diabetes. Tests for homogeneity investigated differences between maternal pre-pregnancy BMI categories (<30, ≥30, <25 and ≥25 kg/m2) and between non-infertile deliveries and deliveries that used ART or had a history of subfertility (defined by birth certificates, SART CORS records, APCD or hospital records). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among 91 825 deliveries, 3.9% had a history of PCOS. Women with a history of PCOS had a 51% greater risk of gestational diabetes (CI: 1.38-1.65) and a 25% greater risk of preeclampsia (CI: 1.15-1.35) compared to women without a diagnosis of PCOS. Neonates born to women with a history of PCOS were more likely to be born preterm (RR: 1.17, CI: 1.06-1.29) and more likely to have a prolonged delivery hospitalization after additionally adjusting for gestational age (RR: 1.23, CI: 1.09-1.40) compared to those of women without a diagnosis of PCOS. The risk for gestational diabetes for women with PCOS was greater among women with a pre-pregnancy BMI <30 kg/m2. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: PCOS was defined by ICD documentation prior to delivery so there may be women with undiagnosed PCOS or PCOS diagnosed after delivery included in the unexposed group. The study population is limited to deliveries within Massachusetts among most private insurance payers and inpatient or observational hospitalization in Massachusetts during the follow-up window, therefore there may be diagnoses and or deliveries outside of the state or outside of our sample that were not captured. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In this population-based study, women with a history of PCOS were at greater risk of pregnancy complications associated with cardiometabolic function and preterm birth. Obstetricians should be aware of patients' PCOS status and closely monitor for potential pregnancy complications to improve maternal and infant perinatal health outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the NIH (R01HD067270). S.A.M. receives grant funding from NIH, AbbVie and the Marriot Family Foundation; payment/honoraria from the University of British Columbia, World Endometriosis Research Foundation and Huilun Shanghai; travel support for attending meetings for ESHRE 2019, IASP 2019, National Endometriosis Network UK meeting 2019; SRI 2022, ESHRE 2022; participates on the data safety monitoring board/advisory board for AbbVie, Roche, Frontiers in Reproductive Health; and has a leadership role in the Society for Women's Health Research, World Endometriosis Research Foundation, World Endometriosis Society, American Society for Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE. The other authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Gestacional , Endometriosis , Infertilidad , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Preeclampsia , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , Humanos , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Cesárea , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Placenta , China , Resultado del Embarazo , Infertilidad/complicaciones , Sistema de Registros , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 226(6): 829.e1-829.e14, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35108504

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis and uterine fibroids are common gynecologic conditions associated with a greater risk for infertility. Previous research has suggested that these conditions are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, potentially because of increased utilization of fertility treatments. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate whether women with a history of endometriosis or fibroids had a greater risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and whether this risk varied by infertility history and fertility treatment utilization. STUDY DESIGN: Deliveries (2013-2017) recorded in Massachusetts' vital records were linked to assisted reproductive technology data, hospital stays, and all-payer claims database. We identified endometriosis and fibroids diagnoses via the all-payer claims database before index delivery. Adjusted relative risks for pregnancy complications were modeled using generalized estimating equations with a log link and Poisson distribution. The influence of subfertility or infertility and assisted reproductive technology was also investigated. RESULTS: Among 91,825 deliveries, 1560 women had endometriosis and 4212 had fibroids. Approximately 30% of women with endometriosis and 26% of women with fibroids experienced subfertility or infertility without utilizing assisted reproductive technology, and 34% of women with endometriosis and 21% of women with fibroids utilized assisted reproductive technology for the index delivery. Women with a history of endometriosis or fibroids were at a greater risk for pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, or eclampsia (endometriosis relative risk, 1.17; fibroids relative risk, 1.08), placental abnormalities (endometriosis relative risk, 1.65; fibroids relative risk, 1.38), and cesarean delivery (endometriosis relative risk, 1.22; fibroids relative risk, 1.17) than women with no history of those conditions. Neonates born to women with a history of endometriosis or fibroids were also at a greater risk for preterm birth (endometriosis relative risk, 1.24; fibroids relative risk, 1.17). Associations between fibroids and low birthweight varied by fertility status or assisted reproductive technology (P homogeneity=.01) and were stronger among noninfertile women. CONCLUSION: Endometriosis or fibroids increased the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, possibly warranting differential screening or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis , Infertilidad , Leiomioma , Nacimiento Prematuro , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Leiomioma/epidemiología , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Placenta , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Embarazo Múltiple , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas
5.
Matern Child Health J ; 26(10): 2020-2029, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35907127

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether a shorter length of stay (LOS) is associated with a higher risk of readmission among newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and examine the risk, causes, and characteristics associated with readmissions among newborns with NAS, using a longitudinally linked population-based database. METHODS: Our study sample included full-term singletons with NAS (n = 4,547) and without NAS (n = 327,836), born in Massachusetts during 2011-2017. We used log-binomial regression models to estimate the crude risk ratios (cRRs) and adjusted RRs with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the association between LOS and readmissions, controlling for maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, insurance, method of delivery, birthweight, adequacy of prenatal care, smoking, and abnormal conditions of newborn. RESULTS: Compared with infants without NAS, infants with NAS had a non-significantly higher risk of readmission within 2-42 days (2.8% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.17) and a significantly higher risk of readmission within 43-182 days (2.7% vs. 1.8%; p < 0.001). The risk of readmission within 2-42 days was significantly higher among infants with NAS with a LOS of 0-6 days compared to a LOS of 14-20 days (reference group) (aRR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.5). No significant differences in readmission rates between 43 and 182 days were observed across LOS categories. CONCLUSIONS: Among infants with NAS, a LOS of 0-6 days was associated with a significantly higher risk of readmission within 2-42 days of discharge compared to a longer LOS.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Tiempo de Internación , Edad Materna , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Embarazo
6.
Birth ; 48(1): 26-35, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32888362

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors for receipt of emergency room (ER) care and rehospitalization among opioid-exposed newborns in Massachusetts. DESIGN/METHODS: We analyzed two linked data sets from 2002 to 2010: (a) Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal Data System and (b) Massachusetts Bureau of Substance Abuse Services Management Information System. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess the independent association of maternal and infant characteristics with ER use and rehospitalization in the first year of life. RESULTS: Four thousand and five hundred and twenty-four maternal-infant dyads affected by OUD were included in the analysis. In adjusted analysis, risk factors for receipt of ER care included Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 1.63 [95% CI 1.30-2.05]), lower education levels (aOR 1.54-1.69 [95% CI 1.12-2.31]), nonprivate insurance (aOR 1.44 [95% CI 1.11-1.86]), and presence of maternal chronic conditions (aOR 1.14 [95% CI 1.01-1.29]). Risk factors for rehospitalization included prematurity (aOR 1.44 [95% CI 1.14-1.82]), low birthweight (aOR 2.02 [95% CI 1.63-2.49]), and nonprivate insurance (aOR 1.58 [95% CI 1.13-2.22]). Prolonged infant birth hospitalization was protective against both ER use (aOR 0.84 [95% CI 0.73-0.96]) and rehospitalization (aOR 0.63 [95% CI 0.53-0.75]). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics are risk factors for receipt of ER care and rehospitalization among opioid-exposed newborns in Massachusetts.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo
7.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 38(5): 1089-1100, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33606146

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We previously developed a subfertile comparison group with which to compare outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. In this study, we evaluated whether insurance claims data in the Massachusetts All Payers Claims Database (APCD) defined a more appropriate comparison group. METHODS: We used Massachusetts vital records of women who delivered between 2013 and 2017 on whom APCD data were available. ART deliveries were those linked to a national ART database. Deliveries were subfertile if fertility treatment was marked on the birth certificate, had prior hospitalization with ICD code for infertility, or prior fertility treatment. An infertile group included women with an APCD outpatient or inpatient ICD 9/10 infertility code prior to delivery. Fertile deliveries were none of the above. Demographics, health risks, and obstetric outcomes were compared among groups. Multivariable generalized estimating equations were used to calculate adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: There were 70,726 fertile, 4,763 subfertile, 11,970 infertile, and 7,689 ART-treated deliveries. Only 3,297 deliveries were identified as both subfertile and infertile. Both subfertile and infertile were older, and had more education, chronic hypertension, and diabetes than the fertile group and less than the ART-treated group. Prematurity (aRR = 1.15-1.17) and birthweight (aRR = 1.10-1.21) were increased in all groups compared with the fertile group. CONCLUSION: Although the APCD allowed identification of more women than the previously defined subfertile categorization and allowed us to remove previously unidentified infertile women from the fertile group, it is not clear that it offered a clinically significantly improved comparison group.


Asunto(s)
Fertilidad/fisiología , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/tendencias , Adulto , Grupos Control , Femenino , Fertilidad/genética , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso/metabolismo , Recién Nacido , Edad Materna , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Embarazo
8.
J Pediatr ; 218: 238-242, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843217
9.
Am J Public Health ; 110(12): 1828-1836, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33058701

RESUMEN

Objectives. To examine the extent to which differences in medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in pregnancy and infant neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) outcomes are associated with maternal race/ethnicity.Methods. We performed a secondary analysis of a statewide quality improvement database of opioid-exposed deliveries from January 2017 to April 2019 from 24 hospitals in Massachusetts. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to model the association between maternal race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or Hispanic) and prenatal receipt of MOUD, NOWS severity, early intervention referral, and biological parental custody at discharge.Results. Among 1710 deliveries to women with opioid use disorder, 89.3% (n = 1527) were non-Hispanic White. In adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black women (AOR = 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.18, 0.66) and Hispanic women (AOR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.27, 0.68) were less likely to receive MOUD during pregnancy compared with non-Hispanic White women. We found no statistically significant associations between maternal race/ethnicity and infant outcomes.Conclusions. We identified significant racial/ethnic differences in MOUD prenatal receipt that persisted in adjusted models. Research should focus on the perspectives and treatment experiences of non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women to ensure equitable care for all mother-infant dyads.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Custodia del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/complicaciones , Embarazo , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(29): 951-955, 2020 Jul 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32701936

RESUMEN

Opioid use disorder and neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) increased in Massachusetts from 1999 to 2013 (1,2). In response, in 2016, the state passed a law requiring birth hospitals to report the number of newborns who were exposed to controlled substances to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH)* by mandating monthly reporting of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnostic codes related to maternal dependence on opioids (F11.20) or benzodiazepines (F13.20) and to newborns affected by maternal use of drugs of addiction (P04.49) or experiencing withdrawal symptoms from maternal drugs of addiction (P96.1) separately.† MDPH uses these same codes for monthly, real-time crude estimates of NAS and uses P96.1 alone for official NAS state reporting.§ MDPH requested CDC's assistance in evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of either maternal or newborn codes to identify substance-exposed newborns, and of newborn exposure codes (both exposure [P04.49] or withdrawal [P96.1]) and the newborn code for withdrawal alone (P96.1) to identify infants with NAS cases related to three exposure scenarios: 1) opioids, 2) opioids or benzodiazepines, and 3) any controlled substance. Confirmed diagnoses of substance exposure and NAS abstracted from linked clinical records for 1,123 infants born in 2017 and their birth mothers were considered the diagnostic standard and were compared against hospital-reported ICD-10-CM codes. For identifying substance-exposed newborns across the three exposure scenarios, the newborn exposure codes had higher sensitivity (range = 31%-61%) than did maternal drug dependence codes (range = 16%-41%), but both sets of codes had high PPV (≥74%). For identifying NAS, for all exposure scenarios, the sensitivity for either newborn code (P04.49 or P96.1) was ≥92% and the PPV was ≥64%; for P96.1 alone the sensitivity was ≥79% and the PPV was ≥92% for all scenarios. Whereas ICD-10-CM codes are effective for NAS surveillance in Massachusetts, they should be applied cautiously for substance-exposed newborn surveillance. Surveillance for substance-exposed newborns using ICD-10-CM codes might be improved by increasing the use of validated substance-use screening tools and standardized facility protocols and improving communication between patients and maternal health and infant health care providers.


Asunto(s)
Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/diagnóstico , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/epidemiología , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/epidemiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
11.
Matern Child Health J ; 23(4): 451-458, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30542985

RESUMEN

Objectives Data on the potential effect of dental cleaning and community water fluoridation (CWF) on pregnancy outcomes are scarce. While numerous studies confirm the cost-effectiveness of fluoride in preventing dental caries, the benefit of CWF during pregnancy has not been well established. Methods This cross-sectional study used data from 2009 to 2016 Massachusetts Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System and restricted to singleton live births (n = 9234, weighted response rate = 64.3%). Our exposures were: (1) dental cleaning alone during pregnancy; (2) CWF alone; and (3) dental cleaning and CWF combined (DC-CWF). Women without dental cleaning during pregnancy and CWF comprised our reference group. The outcome was preterm birth, (birth < 37 weeks gestation). This study used multivariate logistic regression modeling, controlling for maternal sociodemographic characteristics, previous medical risk and behavioral factors, and calculated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results During 2009-2016, the prevalence of preterm birth among women with a singleton live birth was 8.5% in Massachusetts. Overall, 58.7% of women had dental cleaning during pregnancy, and 63.6% lived in CWF. After adjusting for potential confounders, the associations between dental cleaning alone and preterm birth (aRR = 0.74 [95% CI 0.55-0.98]), and DC-CWF and preterm birth (aRR = 0.74 [95% CI 0.57-0.95]) were significant, while the association between CWF alone and preterm birth was not significant (aRR = 0.81 [95% CI 0.63-1.05]), compared to women without dental cleaning and CWF. Conclusions for Practice This study shows that the prevalence of preterm birth was lower among women with DC only and DC-CWF.


Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Fluoruración/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Atención Odontológica/métodos , Femenino , Fluoruración/métodos , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Medición de Riesgo/métodos
12.
Matern Child Health J ; 23(11): 1489-1499, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31222597

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We examined the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in Massachusetts (MA) comparing children born via assisted reproductive technology (ART) and children born to women with indicators of subfertility but no ART (Subfertile), to children born to women with neither ART nor indicators of subfertility (Fertile). We assessed the direct, indirect, and total effects of ART and subfertility on ASD among singletons. METHODS: This study included 10,147 ART, 8072 Subfertile and 441,898 Fertile MA resident births from the MA Outcome Study of ART (MOSART) database linked with Early Intervention program participation data. ART included fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF), fresh intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and frozen embryo transfer. We estimated the prevalence of ASD by fertility group. We used logistic regression to assess the natural direct effect (NDE), natural indirect effect (NIE) through preterm birth, and total effects of each fertility group on ASD. RESULTS: The NDE indicated that, compared to the Fertile group, the odds of ASD were not statistically higher in the ART (ORNDE 1.07; 95% CI 0.88-1.30), Subfertile (ORNDE 1.11; 95% CI 0.89-1.38), IVF (ORNDE 0.91; 95% CI 0.68-1.22), or ICSI (ORNDE 1.13; 95% CI 0.84-1.51) groups, even if the rate of preterm birth was the same across all groups. The total effect (product of NDE and NIE) was not significant for ART (ORTotal Effect 1.08; 95% CI 0.89-1.30), Subfertile (ORTotal Effect 1.11; 95% CI 0.89-1.38), IVF (ORTotal Effect 0.92; 95% CI 0.69-1.23), or ICSI (ORTotal Effect 1.13; 95% CI 0.84-1.52). CONCLUSION: Compared to children born to Fertile women, children born to ART, ICSI, or IVF, or Subfertile women are not at increased risk of receiving an ASD diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista/diagnóstico , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fertilidad , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Infertilidad/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología
13.
Matern Child Health J ; 23(8): 989-995, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31055701

RESUMEN

Purpose Describe how Ohio and Massachusetts explored severe maternal morbidity (SMM) data, and used these data for increasing awareness and driving practice changes to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. Description For 2008-2013, Ohio used de-identified hospital discharge records and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes to identify delivery hospitalizations. Massachusetts used existing linked data system infrastructure to identify delivery hospitalizations from birth certificates linked to hospital discharge records. To identify delivery hospitalizations complicated by one or more of 25 SMMs, both states applied an algorithm of ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes. Ohio calculated a 2013 SMM rate of 144 per 10,000 delivery hospitalizations; Massachusetts calculated a rate of 162. Ohio observed no increase in the SMM rate from 2008 to 2013; Massachusetts observed a 33% increase. Both identified disparities in SMM rates by maternal race, age, and insurance type. Assessment Ohio and Massachusetts engaged stakeholders, including perinatal quality collaboratives and maternal mortality review committees, to share results and raise awareness about the SMM rates and identified high-risk populations. Both states are applying findings to inform strategies for improving perinatal outcomes, such as simulation training for obstetrical emergencies, licensure rules for maternity units, and a focus on health equity. Conclusion Despite data access differences, examination of SMM data informed public health practice in both states. Ohio and Massachusetts maximized available state data for SMM investigation, which other states might similarly use to understand trends, identify high risk populations, and suggest clinical or population level interventions to improve maternal morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Materna/normas , Morbilidad/tendencias , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/tendencias , Ciencia de los Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Massachusetts , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Ohio , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo
14.
Matern Child Health J ; 23(9): 1152-1158, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31267339

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The rate of severe maternal morbidity in the United States increased approximately 200% during 1993-2014. Few studies have reported on the health of the entire pregnant population, including women at low risk for maternal morbidity. This information might be useful for interventions aimed at primary prevention of pregnancy complications. To better understand this, we sought to describe the distribution of comorbid risk among all delivery hospitalizations in Massachusetts and its association with the distribution of severe maternal morbidity. METHODS: Using an existing algorithm, we assigned an obstetric comorbidity index (OCI) score to delivery hospitalizations contained in the Massachusetts pregnancy to early life longitudinal (PELL) data system during 1998-2013. We identified which hospitalizations included severe maternal morbidity and calculated the rate and frequency of these hospitalizations by OCI score. RESULTS: During 1998-2013, PELL contained 1,185,182 delivery hospitalizations; of these 5325 included severe maternal morbidity. Fifty-eight percent of delivery hospitalizations had an OCI score of zero. The mean OCI score increased from 0.60 in 1998 to 0.82 in 2013. Hospitalizations with an OCI score of zero comprised approximately one-third of all deliveries complicated by severe maternal morbidity, but had the lowest rate of severe maternal morbidity (22.8/10,000 delivery hospitalizations). CONCLUSIONS: The mean OCI score increased during the study period, suggesting that an overall increase in risk factors has occurred in the pregnant population in Massachusetts. Interventions that can make small decreases to the mean OCI score could have a substantial impact on the number of deliveries complicated by severe maternal morbidity. Additionally, all delivery facilities should be prepared for severe complications during low-risk deliveries.


Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
15.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 36(10): 1989-1997, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31414316

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Pre-pregnancy and post-delivery hospitalizations were compared as markers for health among women who conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART), non-ART medically assisted reproduction (MAR), no treatment (unassisted subfertile), and who were fertile. METHODS: We analyzed hospital discharge data linked to Massachusetts birth certificates from 2004 to 2013 within 5 years prior to pregnancy and 8-365 days post-delivery. ART deliveries were linked from a national ART database; MAR deliveries had fertility treatment but not ART; unassisted subfertile women had subfertility but no ART or MAR; and fertile women had none of these. Prevalence of diagnoses during hospitalization was quantified. Multivariable logistic regression models with fertile deliveries as reference were adjusted for maternal age, race, education, year, and plurality (post-delivery only) with results reported as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Of 170,605 privately insured, primiparous deliveries, 10,458 were ART, 3005 MAR, 1365 unassisted subfertile, and 155,777 fertile. Pre-pregnancy hospitalization occurred in 6.8% and post-delivery in 2.8% of fertile women. Subfertile groups had more pre-pregnancy hospitalizations (AOR, 95% CI: 1.84, 1.72-1.96 ART; 1.41, 1.24-1.60 MAR; 3.02, 2.62-3.47 unassisted subfertile) with endometriosis, reproductive organ disease, ectopic pregnancy/miscarriage, and disorders of menstruation, ovulation, and genital tract being common. Post-delivery hospitalizations were significantly more frequent in the ART (AOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.34) and unassisted subfertile (1.59, 1.23-2.07) groups with more digestive tract disorders, thyroid problems, and other grouped chronic disease conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Greater likelihood of hospitalization in the ART, MAR, and unassisted subfertile groups is largely explained by admissions for conditions associated with subfertility.


Asunto(s)
Fertilidad/genética , Infertilidad/genética , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Adulto , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso/fisiología , Recién Nacido , Infertilidad/fisiopatología , Edad Materna , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Embarazo Múltiple/fisiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/genética , Nacimiento Prematuro/fisiopatología
16.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 35(9): 1585-1593, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29926374

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine whether differences in birth outcomes among assisted reproductive technology (ART)-treated, subfertile, and fertile women exist in primiparous women with, singleton, vaginal deliveries. METHODS: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) data were linked to Massachusetts vital records and hospital discharges for deliveries between July 2004 and December 2010. Primiparous women with in-state vaginal deliveries, adequate prenatal care, and singleton birth at ≥ 20 weeks (n = 117,779) were classified as ART-treated (linked to ART data from SART CORS, n = 3138); subfertile (not ART-treated but with indicators of subfertility, n = 1507); or fertile (neither ART-treated nor subfertile, n = 113,134). Outcomes of prematurity (< 37 weeks), low birthweight (< 2500 g), perinatal death (death at ≥ 20 weeks to ≤ 7 days), and maternal prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS > 3 days) were compared using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared to fertile, higher odds were found for prematurity among ART-treated (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.50) and subfertile (AOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.50) women, low birthweight among ART-treated (AOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.23-1.62) and subfertile (AOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.15-1.71) women, perinatal death among subfertile (AOR 2.64, 95% CI 1.72-4.05), and prolonged LOS among ART-treated (AOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.19-1.48) women. Differences remained despite stratification by young age and absence of pregnancy/delivery complications. CONCLUSIONS: Greater odds of prematurity and low birthweight in ART-treated and subfertile, and perinatal death in subfertile deliveries are evident among singleton vaginal deliveries. The data suggest that even low-risk pregnancies to ART-treated and subfertile women be managed for adverse outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Fertilidad/fisiología , Paridad/fisiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/tendencias , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Infertilidad/epidemiología , Infertilidad/patología , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Transferencia de un Solo Embrión
17.
J Pediatr ; 191: 69-75, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29050752

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of maternal substance use disorders (SUDs) during pregnancy with adverse neonatal outcomes and infant hospital re-admissions, observational stays, and emergency department utilization in the first year of life. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 2 linked statewide datasets from 2002 to 2010: the Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal data system and the Massachusetts Bureau of Substance Abuse Services Management Information System. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess the association of maternal SUDs and neonatal outcomes and infant hospital-based care in the first year of life, controlling for maternal and infant characteristics. RESULTS: Maternal SUDs increased from 19.4 per 1000 live births in 2003 to 31.1 per 1000 live births in 2009. In the adjusted analysis, exposed neonates were more likely to be born preterm (aOR 1.85; 95% CI 1.75-1.96) and low birthweight (aOR 1.94; 95% CI 1.80-2.09). After controlling for maternal characteristics and preterm birth, SUD-exposed neonates were more likely to have intrauterine growth restriction, cardiac, respiratory, neurologic, infectious, hematologic, and feeding/nutrition problems, prolonged hospital stay, and higher mortality (aOR range 1.26-3.80). Exposed infants were more likely to be rehospitalized (aOR 1.10; 95% CI 1.04-1.17) but less likely to have an observational stay (aOR 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.99) or use the emergency department (aOR 0.87; 95% CI 0.83-0.90) in the first year of life. CONCLUSIONS: Infants born to mothers with SUD are at higher risk for adverse health outcomes in the perinatal period and are also more likely to be rehospitalized in the first year of life.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/etiología , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/terapia , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Massachusetts , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 217(3): 330.e1-330.e15, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28455086

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether the risk of adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies among subfertile women, conceived with and without in vitro fertilization, differs from those conceived spontaneously. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effects of fertility status on adverse perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies on a population basis. STUDY DESIGN: All twin live births of ≥22 weeks' gestation and ≥350 g birthweight to Massachusetts resident women in 2004 through 2010 were linked to hospital discharge records, vital records, and in vitro fertilization cycles. Women were categorized by their fertility status as in vitro fertilization, subfertile, or fertile, and by twin pair genders (all, like, unlike). Women whose births linked to in vitro fertilization cycles were classified as in vitro fertilization; those with indicators of subfertility but without in vitro fertilization treatment were classified as subfertile; all others were classified as fertile. Risks of 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes (gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, uterine bleeding, placental complications [placenta abruptio, placenta previa, and vasa previa], prenatal hospitalizations, and primary cesarean) and 9 adverse infant outcomes (very low birthweight, low birthweight, small-for-gestation birthweight, large-for-gestation birthweight, very preterm [<32 weeks], preterm, birth defects, neonatal death, and infant death) were modeled by fertility status with the fertile group as reference, using multivariate log binomial regression and reported as adjusted relative risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The study population included 10,352 women with twin pregnancies (6090 fertile, 724 subfertile, and 3538 in vitro fertilization). Among all twins, the risks for all 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes were significantly increased for the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups, with highest risks for uterine bleeding (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.92 and 2.58, respectively) and placental complications (adjusted relative risk ratios, 2.07 and 1.83, respectively). Among all twins, the risks for those born to subfertile women were significantly increased for very preterm birth and neonatal and infant death (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.36, 1.89, and 1.87, respectively). Risks were significantly increased among in vitro fertilization twins for very preterm birth, preterm birth, and birth defects (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.28, 1.07, and 1.26, respectively). CONCLUSION: Risks of all maternal and most infant adverse outcomes were increased for subfertile and in vitro fertilization twins. Among all twins, the highest risks were for uterine bleeding and placental complications for the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups, and neonatal and infant death in the subfertile group. These findings provide further evidence supporting single embryo transfer and more cautious use of ovulation induction.


Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro , Infertilidad , Embarazo Gemelar , Adulto , Presentación de Nalgas/epidemiología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Enfermedades Placentarias/epidemiología , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Transferencia de un Solo Embrión , Hemorragia Uterina/epidemiología
19.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 217(3): 327.e1-327.e14, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28400311

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Births to subfertile women, with and without infertility treatment, have been reported to have lower birthweights and shorter gestations, even when limited to singletons. It is unknown whether these decrements are due to parental characteristics or aspects of infertility treatment. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of maternal fertility status on the risk of pregnancy, birth, and infant complications. STUDY DESIGN: All singleton live births of ≥22 weeks' gestation and ≥350 g birthweight to Massachusetts resident women in 2004-2010 were linked to hospital discharge and vital records. Women were categorized by their fertility status as in vitro fertilization, subfertile, or fertile. Women whose births linked to in vitro fertilization cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System were classified as in vitro fertilization. Women with indicators of subfertility but not treated with in vitro fertilization were classified as subfertile. Women without indicators of subfertility or in vitro fertilization treatment were classified as fertile. Risks of 15 adverse outcomes (gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, antenatal bleeding, placental complications [placenta abruptio and placenta previa], prenatal hospitalizations, primary cesarean delivery, very low birthweight [<1500 g], low birthweight [<2500 g], small-for-gestation birthweight [z-score ≤-1.28], large-for-gestation birthweight [z-score ≥1.28], very preterm [<32 weeks], preterm [<37 weeks], birth defects, neonatal death [0-27 days], and infant death [0-364 days of life]) were modeled by fertility status with the fertile group as reference and the subfertile group as reference, using multivariate log binomial regression and reported as adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The study population included 459,623 women (441,420 fertile, 8054 subfertile, and 10,149 in vitro fertilization). Women in the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups were older than their fertile counterparts. Risks for 6 of 6 pregnancy outcomes and 6 of 9 infant outcomes were increased for the subfertile group, and 5 of 6 pregnancy outcomes and 7 of 9 infant outcomes were increased for the in vitro fertilization group. For 4 of the 6 pregnancy outcomes (uterine bleeding, placental complications, prenatal hospitalizations, and primary cesarean) and 2 of the infant outcomes (low birthweight and preterm) the risk was greater in the in vitro fertilization group, with nonoverlapping confidence intervals to the subfertile group, indicating a substantially higher risk among in vitro fertilization-treated women. The highest risks for the in vitro fertilization women were uterine bleeding (adjusted risk ratio, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 3.31-4.36) and placental complications (adjusted risk ratio, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 2.57-3.08), and for in vitro fertilization infants, very preterm birth (adjusted risk ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.52), and very low birthweight (adjusted risk ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.56). With subfertile women as reference, risks for the in vitro fertilization group were significantly increased for uterine bleeding, placental complications, prenatal hospitalizations, primary cesarean delivery, low and very low birthweight, and preterm and very preterm birth. CONCLUSION: These analyses indicate that, compared with fertile women, subfertile and in vitro fertilization-treated women tend to be older, have more preexisting chronic conditions, and are at higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly uterine bleeding and placental complications. The greater risk in in vitro fertilization-treated women may reflect more severe infertility, more extensive underlying pathology, or other unfavorable factors not measured in this study.


Asunto(s)
Fertilidad , Fertilización In Vitro , Infertilidad Femenina , Adulto , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Estudios Longitudinales , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Edad Materna , Enfermedades Placentarias/epidemiología , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Hemorragia Uterina/epidemiología
20.
Matern Child Health J ; 21(4): 893-902, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27832443

RESUMEN

Objectives Despite widely-known negative effects of substance use disorders (SUD) on women, children, and society, knowledge about population-based prevalence and impact of SUD and SUD treatment during the perinatal period is limited. Methods Population-based data from 375,851 singleton deliveries in Massachusetts 2003-2007 were drawn from a maternal-infant longitudinally-linked statewide dataset of vital statistics, hospital discharges (including emergency department (ED) visits), and SUD treatment records. Maternal SUD and SUD treatment were identified from 1-year pre-conception through delivery. We determined (1) the prevalence of SUD and SUD treatment; (2) the association of SUD with women's perinatal health service utilization, obstetric experiences, and birth outcomes; and (3) the association of SUD treatment with birth outcomes, using both bivariate and adjusted analyses. Results 5.5% of Massachusetts's deliveries between 2003 and 2007 occurred in mothers with SUD, but only 66% of them received SUD treatment pre-delivery. Women with SUD were poorer, less educated and had more health problems; utilized less prenatal care but more antenatal ED visits and hospitalizations, and had worse obstetric and birth outcomes. In adjusted analyses, SUD was associated with higher risk of prematurity (AOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.28-1.41) and low birth weight (LBW) (AOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.64-1.82). Women receiving SUD treatment had lower odds of prematurity (AOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.55-0.68) and LBW (AOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.49-0.61). Conclusions for Practice SUD treatment may improve perinatal outcomes among pregnant women with SUD, but many who need treatment don't receive it. Longitudinally-linked existing public health and programmatic records provide opportunities for states to monitor SUD identification and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/etiología , Atención Perinatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA