Characteristics of Anaplastic Oligodendrogliomas Short-Term Survivors: A POLA Network Study.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic oligodendrogliomas IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted (AO) occasionally have a poor outcome. Herein we aimed at analyzing their characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of 44 AO patients with a cancer-specific survival <5 years (short-term survivors, STS) and compared them with those of 146 AO patients with a survival ≥5 years (classical survivors, CS) included in the POLA network. RESULTS: Compared to CS, STS were older (P = .0001), less frequently presented with isolated seizures (P < .0001), more frequently presented with cognitive dysfunction (P < .0001), had larger tumors (P = .= .003), a higher proliferative index (P = .= .0003), and a higher number of chromosomal arm abnormalities (P = .= .02). Regarding treatment, STS less frequently underwent a surgical resection than CS (P = .= .0001) and were more frequently treated with chemotherapy alone (P = .= .009) or with radiotherapy plus temozolomide (P = .= .05). Characteristics independently associated with STS in multivariate analysis were cognitive dysfunction, a number of mitosis > 8, and the absence of tumor resection. Based on cognitive dysfunction, type of surgery, and number of mitosis, patients could be classified into groups of standard (18%) and high (62%) risk of <5 year survival. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that although STS poor outcome appears to largely result from a more advanced disease at diagnosis, surgical resection may be particularly important in this population.

Frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies for lesions of the brainstem-a series of 103 consecutive biopsies.

PURPOSE: Targeted treatment for brainstem lesions requires above all a precise histopathological and molecular diagnosis. In the current technological era, robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies represent an accurate and safe procedure for tissue diagnosis. We present our center's experience in frameless robot-assisted biopsies for brainstem lesions. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients benefitting from a frameless robot-guided stereotactic biopsy at our University Hospital, from 2001 to 2017. Patients consented to the use of data and/or images. The NeuroMate® robot (Renishaw™, UK) was used. We report on lesion location, trajectory strategy, histopathological diagnosis and procedure safety. RESULTS: Our series encompasses 96 patients (103 biopsies) treated during a 17 years period. Mean age at biopsy: 34.0 years (range 1-78). Most common location: pons (62.1%). Transcerebellar approach: 61 procedures (59.2%). Most common diagnoses: diffuse glioma (67.0%), metastases (7.8%) and lymphoma (6.8%). Non conclusive diagnosis: 10 cases (9.7%). After second biopsy this decreased to 4 cases (4.1%). Overall biopsy diagnostic yield: 95.8%. Permanent disability was recorded in 3 patients (2.9%, all adults), while transient complications in 17 patients (17.7%). Four cases of intra-tumoral hematoma were recorded (one case with rapid decline and fatal issue). Adjuvant targeted treatment was performed in 72.9% of patients. Mean follow-up (in the Neurosurgery Department): 2.2 years. CONCLUSION: Frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies can provide the initial platform towards a safe and accurate management for brainstem lesions, offering a high diagnostic yield with low permanent morbidity.

Incidence and characteristics of pseudoprogression in IDH-mutant high-grade gliomas: A POLA network study.

BACKGROUND: Incidence and characteristics of pseudoprogression in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant high-grade gliomas (IDHmt HGG) remain to be specifically described. METHODS: We analyzed pseudoprogression characteristics and explored the possibility of pseudoprogression misdiagnosis in IDHmt HGG patients, treated with radiotherapy (RT) (with or without chemotherapy [CT]), included in the French POLA network. Pseudoprogression was analyzed in patients with MRI available for review (reference cohort, n = 200). Pseudoprogression misdiagnosis was estimated in this cohort and in an independent cohort (control cohort, n = 543) based on progression-free survival before and after first progression. RESULTS: In the reference cohort, 38 patients (19%) presented a pseudoprogression after a median time of 10.5 months after RT. Pseudoprogression characteristics were similar across IDHmt HGG subtypes. In most patients, it consisted of the appearance of one or several infracentimetric, asymptomatic, contrast-enhanced lesions occurring within 2 years after RT. The only factor associated with pseudoprogression occurrence was adjuvant PCV CT. Among patients considered as having a first true progression, 7 out of 41 (17%) in the reference cohort and 35 out of 203 (17%) in the control cohort were retrospectively suspected to have a misdiagnosed pseudoprogression. Patients with a misdiagnosed pseudoprogression were characterized by a time to event and an outcome similar to that of patients with a pseudoprogression but presented with larger and more symptomatic lesions. CONCLUSION: In patients with an IDHmt HGG, pseudoprogression occurs later than in IDH-wildtype glioblastomas and seems not only frequent but also frequently misdiagnosed. Within the first 2 years after RT, the possibility of a pseudoprogression should be carefully considered.