Nutritional aspects in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders and motor dysfunction in the gut. Working team report of the Swedish Motility Group (SMoG).

In reviews regarding the management of patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders and motility disturbances within the gut nutritional aspects and dietary advice is often put forward as being of great importance. However, there are relatively few high-quality, interventional studies in the literature supporting an important role for general dietary advice to improve symptoms in these patients. Nutritional supplementation to patients with malnutrition due to severe dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract is of course less controversial, even though different views on how this should be performed exist. The content of this article is based on presentations given by the authors during the second meeting of the Swedish Motility Group held in Gothenburg in March 2005, and aims to give an overview on the role of dietary advice and nutritional supplementation to patients with gastrointestinal dysfunction of different severity.

Results of the Ripstein operation in the treatment of rectal prolapse and internal rectal procidentia.

Over 15 years 108 patients with either rectal prolapse or internal rectal procidentia were treated by the Ripstein operation. Postoperative evaluation was possible in 97 patients (mean observation time, 6.9 years). The mortality rate was 2.8 percent, and surgical complications occurred in an additional 3.7 percent. The recurrence rate was 4.1 percent. Preoperative and postoperative functional analysis was possible in 92 patients. The proportion of continent patients increased from 33 percent preoperatively to 72 percent postoperatively. Defecation difficulties increased from 27 percent to 43 percent following surgery, and were a major cause of dissatisfaction.

Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement.

Twenty-one patients suffering from rectal prolapse (n = 15) or internal rectal procidentia (n = 6) were investigated clinically and by anorectal manometry prior to and six months following retopexy. Rectal prolapse was associated with incontinence in 67% (10/15) of the patients preoperatively. The moderately or severely incontinent patients had lower than normal maximum anal resting pressures (MAP) and those with severe incontinence also had lower than normal maximum squeeze pressure (MSP). Postoperatively only 20% (3/15) of the patients remained incontinent and none of them suffered severe incontinence. MAP values increased significantly indicating that improvement of the function of the internal anal sphincter may be one of the factors contributing to better continence. Rectal sensibility was impaired in patients with rectal prolapse as compared to 15 controls. There was no postoperative change. Patients with internal rectal procidentia had normal MAP and MSP and no postoperative change could be demonstrated.

Evacuation difficulties and other characteristics of rectal function associated with procidentia and the Ripstein operation.

Twenty-one patients with rectal prolapse (N = 15) or internal rectal procidentia (N = 6) were investigated clinically and by anorectal manometry prior to and six months following rectopexy. Symptoms such as urgency, rectal pain, blood, and mucous discharge were markedly relieved by the operation. Rectal evacuation and number of bowel motions seemed to be unaffected. Rectal volume, sensibility, and compliance did not change following surgery. Rectal sensibility was reduced in these patients compared with 15 controls, but there was no difference in rectal volume or rectal compliance.

Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into total rectal prolapse.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to analyze how often internal rectal intussusception develops into total rectal prolapse. METHODS: Repeated investigations with defecography were performed in 312 patients because of persisting symptoms. In 79 patients who had a rectal intussusception at the first defecography, results of the second defecography and the patients' records were studied. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients had not undergone any surgical treatment of rectal intussusception or rectal prolapse between the first and second defecographies. One of these patients had a rectal prolapse at the second defecography, and another developed a clinical prolapse after the second defecography. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that the risk of developing a rectal prolapse in patients with rectal intussusception is small. This risk should, therefore, not be used as an indication for surgery.

Increased anal resting pressure following the Ripstein operation. A contribution to continence?

To investigate the physiology of improvement in continence following the Ripstein operation for procidentia, preoperative and postoperative anorectal manometry was performed on 11 patients. The mean maximum anal resting pressure increased from 39 to 55 mm Hg (P = 0.01). This probably reflects improved function of the internal anal sphincter, which might contribute to better continence by increasing the closing capacity of the anal canal.

Is paradoxical sphincter reaction provoked by needle electrode electromyography?

In 10 patients with emptying disturbances, the anal sphincter reaction was investigated clinically and by electromyography with needle and wire electrodes to elucidate whether pain during the investigation could provoke the paradoxical sphincter reaction. In eight of the patients, the paradoxical reaction was easily felt at digital examination. Two patients complained of pain during the needle electrode recording; none complained during the wire electrode investigation. Nevertheless, all 10 patients had paradoxical sphincter reaction independent of the electrode used at electromyography. With careful clinical investigation, most cases of paradoxical sphincter reaction can be diagnosed. When this is inconclusive, the diagnosis should be confirmed by electromyography, preferably by the wire technique.

Inhalation anaesthesia is cost-effective for ambulatory surgery: a clinical comparison with propofol during elective knee arthroscopy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cost consciousness has become increasingly important in anaesthesia as elsewhere in healthcare. Cost-minimization with uncompromised patient safety and quality requires systematic comparisons of alternative techniques. Inhalation anaesthesia with desflurane or sevoflurane is compared in this study with propofol delivered by the target controlled infusion technique. Directly measured drug consumption and costs and emergence times are compared. METHODS: Consumed anaesthetics were measured during elective arthroscopy of the knee, and costs were calculated for ASA I-II patients (n = 102) randomized to 3 groups: one group received anaesthesia using propofol administered by target controlled infusion, the others inhalation anaesthesia with either desflurane or sevoflurane in combination with nitrous oxide. A partial rebreathing system was used with a laryngeal mask airway. Vaporizers were weighed before and after each anaesthetic. RESULTS: Anaesthetic duration, postoperative pain and emesis as well as discharge time did not differ between groups. Inhaled anaesthetic techniques with desflurane or sevoflurane were associated with 2-3 min shorter emergence times (P < 0.001) and approximately 45% lower cost for consumed anaesthetics as compared with a propofol technique based on target controlled infusion. The inclusion of waste costs improved the cost reduction to 55%. CONCLUSIONS: For this patient group, use of inhalation anaesthesia reduced drug costs by half and shortened emergence times compared to target controlled infusion with propofol with equal perioperative patient conditions.

Long-term results and functional outcome after Ripstein rectopexy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate operative mortality, morbidity, and functional results after Ripstein rectopexy for rectal prolapse and internal rectal intussusception. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with rectal prolapse and 43 with internal rectal intussusception were included. All patient records were studied and complications registered. Long-term follow-up was possible in 105 patients and performed by clinical examination and standardized interview, telephone interview, or patient records. Seventy-six patients were prospectively evaluated, comparing bowel function before and after rectopexy. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. Operative morbidity was 33 percent, and most complications were minor. Severe early complications included one large-bowel obstruction and one transient ureteric stenosis. Median time of follow-up was seven years in patients with rectal prolapse and 5.4 years in patients with internal rectal intussusception. Late complications included two rectovaginal fistulas and one lethal sigmoid fecaloma. Five patients underwent subtotal colectomy for severe constipation. There was one recurrent prolapse (1.6 percent). Functional evaluation showed that incontinence improved (P = 0.049), whereas the number of bowel movements per week decreased (P < 0.001). Frequency of emptying difficulties did not change significantly in patients with rectal prolapse but increased in patients with internal rectal intussusception (P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Ripstein rectopexy can be performed with low mortality and recurrence rate, but with a high early complication rate. There were also some serious late complications. Continence was improved, although increased constipation was a problem in some patients, especially among those with internal rectal intussusception.

Enterocele is correctable using the Ripstein rectopexy.

PURPOSE: About one-third of the patients with rectal prolapse or rectal intussusception have concurrent enterocele at defecography. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Ripstein procedure on the concurrent enterocele and to study the outcome of the procedure with respect to the patients' symptoms. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with enterocele and either rectal prolapse or rectal intussusception at defecography were treated using the Ripstein procedure. Postoperatively, the patients were evaluated with clinical examination (22 patients) and defecography (16 patients). RESULTS: None of the patients had recurrence of enterocele, rectal prolapse, or intussusception at postoperative follow-up. Continence was improved in 15 of 16 incontinent patients. Emptying difficulties were unchanged in eight patients, improved in five patients, and had deteriorated in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: Enterocele is corrected by using the Ripstein rectopexy. Persisting defecation difficulties after the Ripstein procedure are unlikely to be secondary to enterocele. The Ripstein procedure can be an alternative in the treatment of enterocele, as a majority of these patients also have rectal prolapse or rectal intussusception.

Whole gut transit is prolonged after Ripstein rectopexy.

OBJECTIVE: To find out if there are changes in transit time after Ripstein rectopexy and whether measurement of whole gut transit time preoperatively can predict postoperative constipation. DESIGN: Prospective open study. SETTING: Teaching hospital, Sweden. SUBJECTS: 30 patients undergoing Ripstein rectopexy for rectal prolapse (n = 17) or internal rectal intussusception (n = 13). METHODS: Whole-gut transit studies and recording of symptoms of constipation preoperatively and postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Constipation and retention of markers. RESULTS: Significantly more markers were retained in postoperative compared with preoperative transit studies (p < 0.001). Constipation mainly presented as emptying difficulties and there was no increase in the total number of patients who reported emptying difficulties postoperatively. There was a weak but significant correlation between retention of markers preoperatively and postoperative emptying difficulties (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Whole gut transit was prolonged after Ripstein rectopexy. Preoperative retention of markers indicated an increased risk of postoperative constipation.

Preoperative electrophysiologic assessment cannot predict continence after rectopexy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative electrophysiologic assessment for prediction of anal continence after rectopexy. METHODS: Forty-three patients with rectal prolapse (n = 26) or internal rectal intussusception (n = 17) underwent concentric-needle electromyography, fiber density determination by single-fiber electromyography of the external anal sphincter, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency evaluation before Ripstein rectopexy. A detailed history was obtained from each patient preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Anal continence was improved after rectopexy, both in patients with rectal prolapse (P = 0.06) and in those with internal rectal intussusception (P = 0.003). Abnormal results were registered in one or several aspects of the electrophysiologic assessment in 31 (72 percent) of the patients. However, functional outcome with respect to continence was not predicted by preoperative electromyography or pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment results. CONCLUSION: Electrophysiologic examinations in the preoperative assessment of patients with rectal prolapse and internal rectal intussusception do not predict continence after the Ripstein rectopexy. The routine use of electrophysiologic assessment requires further definition.

Nitrous oxide: a valuable alternative for pain relief and sedation during routine colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patient-administered nitrous oxide in 50% oxygen has lately come into use as an alternative to combined opioid and benzodiazepine medication for colonoscopic procedures. A randomized study was carried out comparing intramuscular pethidine hydrochloride 1 mg/kg with inhalation of Medimix (a mixture of nitrous oxide in oxygen 50%) for relief of pain and anxiety during colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients (19 in the pethidine group and 19 in the nitrous oxide group) were studied. The following parameters were measured: blood pressure, pulse rate, and arterial oxygen saturation. At the end of the colonoscopy and before the patients left the ward, pain, nausea, and general well-being were evaluated by the patients using a visual analogue scale. The colonoscopy time, investigation conditions and the total length of hospital stay were registered. RESULTS: Colonoscopy time and the colonoscopists' opinions concerning the investigation conditions did not differ between the groups. Pain relief and patient evaluation of the total procedure were also equal between the patient groups. However, there was less nausea among the Medimix patients. Three patients in the pethidine group had oxygen saturations below 92%. There was no desaturation during and five minutes after colonoscopy in the Medimix group. Patients in the Medimix group left the hospital on average 34 minutes earlier than patients in the pethidine group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the use of nitrous oxide (Medimix) as an analgesic is as good as pethidine for colonoscopy. Medimix has clear advantages compared to pethidine in terms of reducing nausea and shortening the hospital stay.