Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 43(11): 2225-2232, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30459403

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Obesity is a chronic disease, a risk factor for other chronic conditions and for early mortality, and is associated with higher health care utilization. Annual spending among obese individuals is at least 30% higher vs. that for normal-weight peers. In contrast, higher cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is related to many health benefits. We sought to examine the association between CRF and health care costs across the spectrum of body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Data from 3,924 men (58.1 ± 11.1 years, 29.2 ± 5.3 kg.m-2) who completed a maximal exercise test for clinical reasons and to estimate CRF were recorded prospectively at the time of testing. Cost data (USD) from each subject during a 6-year period after the exercise test were merged with the exercise database and compared according to BMI and estimated CRF (CRFe). Subjects were categorized as normal-weight (BMI < 25.0 kg.m-2), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg.m-2), and obese (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg.m-2). We also formed four CRFe categories based on age-stratified quartiles of metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved: least-fit (5.1 ± 1.5 METs; n = 1,044), moderately-fit (7.6 ± 1.5 METs; n = 938), fit (9.4 ± 1.5 METs; n = 988), and highly-fit (12.4 ± 2.2 METs; n = 954). RESULTS: Average annual costs per person adjusted for age and presence of cardiovascular disease were $37,018, $40,572, and $45,683 for normal-weight, overweight, and obese subjects, respectively (p < 0.01). For each 1-MET incremental increase in CRFe, annual cost savings per person were $3,272, $4,252, and $6,103 for normal-weight, overweight, and obese subjects, respectively. Stratified by CRFe categories, annual costs for normal-weight, overweight, and obese subjects in the highest CRFe quartile were $28,028, $31,669, and $32,807 lower, respectively, compared to subjects in the lowest CRFe quartile (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Higher CRFe is associated with lower health care costs. Cost savings were particularly evident in obese subjects, suggesting that the economic burden of obesity may be reduced through interventions that target improvements in CRF.


Asunto(s)
Capacidad Cardiovascular/fisiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/economía , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Am J Med ; 132(9): 1084-1090, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31047866

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the association between cardiorespiratory fitness and healthcare expenditures among individuals with and without diabetes. METHODS: Health care costs were quantified among 3924 consecutive men (mean age 58 ± 11 years) referred for a maximal exercise test, and compared according to presence (n = 2457) and absence (n = 1467) of diabetes and fitness. Fitness was classified into 4 categories based on age-stratified quartiles of peak metabolic equivalents: least-fit (5.1 ± 1.5 metabolic equivalents; n = 1044), moderately-fit (7.6 ± 1.5 metabolic equivalents; n = 938), fit (9.4 ± 1.5 metabolic equivalents; n = 988), and highly-fit (12.4 ± 2.2 metabolic equivalents; n = 954). Annual costs per subject were quantified over an 8-year period. RESULTS: Age, BMI, and presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were similar between subjects with and without diabetes. After adjusting for age and presence of CVD, annual costs per person were higher among diabetics vs. non-diabetics. Individuals with and without diabetes in the highly-fit category had annual costs (US dollars x 103) (mean ± standard deviation) that were on average $32,178 and $30,816 lower, respectively, than individuals in the least-fit category. For each 1-metabolic equivalent higher fitness, annual cost savings per person were $5,193 and $3,603 for individuals with and without diabetes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Higher fitness is associated with lower health care costs. Cost savings associated with higher fitness are particularly evident among individuals with diabetes. The economic burden of diabetes may be reduced through interventions that target improvements in fitness.


Asunto(s)
Capacidad Cardiovascular , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Ahorro de Costo , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Veteranos
3.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 93(1): 48-55, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29195922

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and annual health care costs in Veterans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The sample included 9942 subjects (mean age, 59±11 years) undergoing a maximal exercise test for clinical reasons between January 2005 and December 2012. Cardiorespiratory fitness, expressed as a percentage of age-predicted peak metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved, was categorized in quartiles. Total and annualized health care costs, derived from the Veterans Administration Allocated Resource Center, were compared using multiple regression, controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: A gradient for reduced health care costs was observed as CRF increased, with subjects in the least-fit quartile having approximately $14,662 (P<.001) higher overall costs per patient per year compared with those in the fittest quartile, after controlling for potential confounding variables. Each 1-MET higher increment in fitness was associated with a $1592 annual reduction in health care costs (5.6% lower cost per MET), and each higher quartile of fitness was associated with a $4163 annual cost reduction per patient. The effect of CRF was more pronounced among subjects without cardiovascular disease (CVD), suggesting that the results were not driven by the possibility that less-fit individuals had greater CVD. Cost savings attributable to higher fitness were greatest in overweight and obese subjects, with lower savings observed among those individuals with a body mass index less than 25 kg/m2. In a model including historical, clinical, and exercise test responses, heart failure was the strongest predictor of health care costs, followed by CRF (P<.01). CONCLUSION: Low CRF is associated with higher health care costs. Efforts to improve CRF may not only improve health but also result in lower health care costs.


Asunto(s)
Capacidad Cardiovascular/fisiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Terapia por Ejercicio/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aptitud Física/fisiología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA