Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 120
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Immunol ; 256: 109776, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37742792

RESUMEN

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) occurs in a low-grade inflammatory milieu dependent on highly complex networks that span well-beyond the hepatic tissue injury. Dysfunctional systemic metabolism that characterizes the disease, is further induced in response to environmental cues that modify energy and metabolic cellular demands, thereby altering the availability of specific substrates that profoundly regulate, through epigenetic mechanisms, the phenotypic heterogeneity of immune cells and influence hematopoietic stem cell differentiation fate. This immuno-metabolic signaling drives the initiation of downstream effector pathways and results in the decompensation of hepatic homeostasis that precedes pro-fibrotic events. Recent evidence suggests that innate immune cells reside in different tissues in a memory effector state, a phenomenon termed trained immunity, that may be activated by subsequent exogenous (e.g., microbial, dietary) or endogenous (e.g., metabolic, apoptotic) stmuli. This process leads to long-term modifications in the epigenetic landscape that ultimately precondition the cells towards enhanced transcription of inflammatory mediators that accelerates MAFLD development and/or progression. In this mini review we aimed to present current evidence on the potential impact of trained immunity on the pathophysiology of MAFLD, shedding light on the complex immunobiology of the disease and providing novel potential therapeutic strategies to restrain the burden of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Inmunidad Innata , Hepatopatías , Humanos , Inmunidad Entrenada , Memoria Inmunológica
2.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(2)2023 Jan 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36837403

RESUMEN

The frail, elderly population is often characterized by poor immunogenicity post COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. "Inflame-ageing" and "immune-senescence" are pathogenetic mechanisms that might explain this phenomenon. Complex interplay with cytokines and microbiota is also implicated in this inflammatory cascade. The abovementioned population, although very important from immunologic perspective, has barely been included in the mRNA vaccination clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anciano Frágil , Humanos , Anciano , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Envejecimiento
3.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(3)2023 Mar 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36984505

RESUMEN

Helicobacter pylori infection consists a high global burden affecting more than 50% of the world's population. It is implicated, beyond substantiated local gastric pathologies, i.e., peptic ulcers and gastric cancer, in the pathophysiology of several neurodegenerative disorders, mainly by inducing hyperhomocysteinemia-related brain cortical thinning (BCT). BCT has been advocated as a possible biomarker associated with neurodegenerative central nervous system disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, and/or glaucoma, termed as "ocular Alzheimer's disease". According to the infection hypothesis in relation to neurodegeneration, Helicobacter pylori as non-commensal gut microbiome has been advocated as trigger and/or mediator of neurodegenerative diseases, such as the development of Alzheimer's disease. Among others, Helicobacter pylori-related inflammatory mediators, defensins, autophagy, vitamin D, dietary factors, role of probiotics, and some pathogenetic considerations including relevant involved genes are discussed within this opinion article. In conclusion, by controlling the impact of Helicobacter pylori-related hyperhomocysteinemia on neurodegenerative disorders might offer benefits, and additional research is warranted to clarify this crucial topic currently representing a major worldwide burden.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Hiperhomocisteinemia , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas , Humanos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/complicaciones , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Hiperhomocisteinemia/complicaciones , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas/complicaciones
4.
Gut ; 2022 Dec 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36591610

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use, effectiveness and safety of Helicobacter pylori empirical rescue therapy in third and subsequent treatment lines in Europe. DESIGN: International, prospective, non-interventional registry of the clinical practice of European gastroenterologists. Data were collected and quality reviewed until October 2021 at Asociación Española de Gastroenterología-Research Electronic Data Capture. All cases with three or more empirical eradication attempts were assessed for effectiveness by modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 2144 treatments were included: 1519, 439, 145 and 41 cases from third, fourth, fifth and sixth treatment lines, respectively. Sixty different therapies were used; the 15 most frequently prescribed encompassed >90% of cases. Overall effectiveness remained <90% in all therapies. Optimised treatments achieved a higher eradication rate than non-optimised (78% vs 67%, p<0.0001). From 2017 to 2021, only 44% of treatments other than 10-day single-capsule therapy used high proton-pump inhibitor doses and lasted ≥14 days. Quadruple therapy containing metronidazole, tetracycline and bismuth achieved optimal eradication rates only when prescribed as third-line treatment, either as 10-day single-capsule therapy (87%) or as 14-day traditional therapy with tetracycline hydrochloride (95%). Triple amoxicillin-levofloxacin therapy achieved 90% effectiveness in Eastern Europe only or when optimised. The overall incidence of adverse events was 31%. CONCLUSION: Empirical rescue treatment in third and subsequent lines achieved suboptimal effectiveness in most European regions. Only quadruple bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline (10-day single-capsule or 14-day traditional scheme) and triple amoxicillin-levofloxacin therapies reached acceptable outcomes in some settings. Compliance with empirical therapy optimisation principles is still poor 5 years after clinical practice guidelines update. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02328131.

5.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 20(10): 2243-2257, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34954341

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: After a first Helicobacter pylori eradication attempt, approximately 20% of patients will remain infected. The aim of the current study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of second-line empiric treatment in Europe. METHODS: This international, multicenter, prospective, non-interventional registry aimed to evaluate the decisions and outcomes of H pylori management by European gastroenterologists. All infected adult cases with a previous eradication treatment attempt were registered with the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology-Research Electronic Data Capture until February 2021. Patients allergic to penicillin and those who received susceptibility-guided therapy were excluded. Data monitoring was performed to ensure data quality. RESULTS: Overall, 5055 patients received empiric second-line treatment. Triple therapy with amoxicillin and levofloxacin was prescribed most commonly (33%). The overall effectiveness was 82% by modified intention-to-treat analysis and 83% in the per-protocol population. After failure of first-line clarithromycin-containing treatment, optimal eradication (>90%) was obtained with moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy or levofloxacin-containing quadruple therapy (with bismuth). In patients receiving triple therapy containing levofloxacin or moxifloxacin, and levofloxacin-bismuth quadruple treatment, cure rates were optimized with 14-day regimens using high doses of proton pump inhibitors. However, 3-in-1 single capsule or levofloxacin-bismuth quadruple therapy produced reliable eradication rates regardless of proton pump inhibitor dose, duration of therapy, or previous first-line treatment. The overall incidence of adverse events was 28%, and most (85%) were mild. Three patients developed serious adverse events (0.3%) requiring hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Empiric second-line regimens including 14-day quinolone triple therapies, 14-day levofloxacin-bismuth quadruple therapy, 14-day tetracycline-bismuth classic quadruple therapy, and 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy (as a single capsule) provided optimal effectiveness. However, many other second-line treatments evaluated reported low eradication rates. ClincialTrials.gov number: NCT02328131.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Quinolonas , Adulto , Amoxicilina , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bismuto , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Levofloxacino , Moxifloxacino/uso terapéutico , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Quinolonas/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Tetraciclina/uso terapéutico
6.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(2)2022 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35208631

RESUMEN

The persistence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has triggered research into limiting transmission, morbidity and mortality, thus warranting a comprehensive approach to guide balanced healthcare policies with respect to people's physical and mental health. The mainstay priority during COVID-19 is to achieve widespread immunity, which could be established through natural contact or vaccination. Deep knowledge of the immune response combined with recent specific data indicates the potential inferiority of induced immunity against infection. Moreover, the prevention of transmission has been founded on general non-pharmacological measures of protection, albeit debate exists considering their efficacy and, among other issues, their socio-psychological burden. The second line of defense is engaged after infection and is supported by a plethora of studied agents, such as antibiotics, steroids and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, antiviral medications and other biological agents that have been proposed, though variability in terms of benefits and adverse events has not allowed distinct solutions, albeit certain treatments might have a role in prevention and/or treatment of the disease. This narrative review summarizes the existing literature on the advantages and weaknesses of current COVID-19 management measures, thus underlining the necessity of acting based on the classical principle of "ofeleein i mi vlaptin", that is, to help or not to harm.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Pandemias , ARN Mensajero , Vacunación
7.
Int J Neurosci ; 131(3): 289-301, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32125206

RESUMEN

Background: Alzheimer disease (AD) is a leading cause of global burden with great impact on societies. Although research is working intensively on promising therapy, the problem remains up-to-date. Among the various proposed hypotheses regarding causality and therapy, emerging evidence supports the hypothesis that gastrointestinal microbiota through the so-called 'gut-brain axis' interacts with immune system and brain and shape the balance between homeostasis and disease; the involvement of gastrointestinal microbiota in the pathophysiology of AD is less defined, even though the role of 'gut-brain axis' has been well verified for other neurodegenerative conditions.Methods: We performed a systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE database from 1st January 1990 to 17th October 2018, to investigate the accessible literature regarding possible association between AD and gastrointestinal microbiota. Inclusion criteria were available full text in English language, original clinical papers implicating AD patients and any sort of gastrointestinal microbiota.Results: Through our query, an initial number of 241 papers has been identified. After removing duplicates and through an additional manual search, twenty-four papers met our inclusion criteria. The great majority of eligible publications supported a possible connection between AD and gastrointestinal microbiota. The most common investigated microorganism was Helicobacter pylori.Conclusion: Our own systematic review, showed a possible association between AD and gastrointestinal microbiota mainly including Helicobacter pylori, and thus further research is required for substantiation of causality as well as for the establishment of promising novel therapies.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/metabolismo , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/metabolismo , Helicobacter pylori/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/microbiología , Barrera Hematoencefálica/metabolismo , Barrera Hematoencefálica/microbiología , Encéfalo/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Mediadores de Inflamación/metabolismo
8.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(3)2021 Mar 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33803295

RESUMEN

The current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic warrants an imperative necessity for effective and safe vaccination, to restrain Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) including transmissibility, morbidity, and mortality. In this regard, intensive medical and biological research leading to the development of an arsenal of vaccines, albeit incomplete preconditioned evaluation, due to emergency. The subsequent scientific gap raises some concerns in the medical community and the general public. More specifically, the accelerated vaccine development downgraded the value of necessary pre-clinical studies to elicit medium- and long-term beneficial or harmful consequences. Previous experience and pathophysiological background of coronaviruses' infections and vaccine technologies, combined with the global vaccines' application, underlined the obligation of a cautious and qualitative approach, to illuminate potential vaccination-related adverse events. Moreover, the high SARS-CoV-2 mutation potential and the already aggregated genetical alterations provoke a rational vagueness and uncertainty concerning vaccines' efficacy against dominant strains and the respective clinical immunity. This review critically summarizes existing evidence and queries regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, to motivate scientists' and clinicians' interest for an optimal, individualized, and holistic management of this unprecedented pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inducido químicamente , Vacuna BNT162 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Aprobación de Drogas , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Juramento Hipocrático , Humanos , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo/inducido químicamente , Modelos Animales , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/uso terapéutico , Vacunas Sintéticas/uso terapéutico , Vacunas de ARNm
9.
Helicobacter ; 25(1): e12666, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31692137

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Helicobacter pylori infection (H pylori-I) affects more than half of the global population and consists an important burden to public health and healthcare expenditures, by contributing to many diseases' pathogenesis. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the current nonbismuth quadruple eradication regimens in a high antibiotic resistance area, such as Greece, concerning their cost-effectiveness, especially during financial crisis period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hundred and nine patients who received eradication treatment against H pylori-I were included to evaluate five different regimens, using amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole as antibiotics and one proton-pump inhibitor, based on their current eradication rates. Regimes compared 10-day concomitant use of (a) pantoprazole or (b) esomeprazole; 10-day sequential use of (c) pantoprazole or (d) esomeprazole; and 14-day hybrid using esomeprazole. Cost-effectiveness analysis ratio (CEAR) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated taking into account all direct costs and cases who needed second-line treatment. Additionally, sensitivity analysis was performed to predict all potential combinations. RESULTS: Ten-day concomitant regimen with esomeprazole was characterized by the lowest CEAR (179.17€) followed by the same regimen using pantoprazole (183.27€). Hybrid regimen, although equivalent in eradication rates, was found to have higher CEAR (187.42€), whereas sequential regimens were not cost-effective (CEAR: 204.12€ and 216.02€ respectively). DISCUSSION: This is the first study evaluating the cost-effectiveness of H pylori-I treatment regimens in a high clarithromycin-resistance (≈26.5%) European area, suggesting the 10-day concomitant regimen with generics using esomeprazole 40 mg as the most appropriate one. National and regional guidelines should include cost-effectiveness in their statements, and further studies are required to clarify the necessity of a wide "test and treat" policy for H pylori-I.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/economía , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amoxicilina/economía , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/economía , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Quimioterapia Combinada/economía , Femenino , Grecia , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Helicobacter pylori/genética , Helicobacter pylori/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/economía , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
10.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 56(3)2020 Mar 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32197498

RESUMEN

Helicobacter pylori (Hp) management has undoubtedly resulted in a notable economic burden on healthcare systems globally, including Greece. Its cost has never been estimated so far, especially during the recent 10-year unprecedented financial crisis. Direct medical and procedural costs for one attempt "outpatient" Hp eradication treatment were estimated as the following: (I) first-line regimens: 10 and 14 days standard triple, 10 and 14 days sequential, 10 and 14 days concomitant non-bismuth quadruple, 14 days hybrid, (II) second-line salvage regimens: 10 and 14 days levofloxacin-containing triple regimens. Treatment costs using prototypes and/or generic drugs were calculated. Drug prices were collected and confirmed from two official online medical databases including all medicines approved by the Greek National Organization for Medicines. Regimens based on generics were more affordable than prototypes and those including pantoprazole yielded the lowest prices (mean: 27.84 €). Paradoxically, 10-day concomitant and 14-day hybrid regimens (currently providing good (90-94%) first-line eradication rates in Greece) cost the same (mean: 34.76 €). The expenditures for Hp eradication treatment regimens were estimated thoroughly for the first time in Greece. These data should be taken into account by Public Health policymakers both in Greece and the European Union, aiming for a better and less expensive therapeutic approach.


Asunto(s)
Erradicación de la Enfermedad/economía , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Costo de Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Grecia/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Infecciones por Helicobacter/economía , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Pantoprazol/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico
11.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 56(7)2020 Jul 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32650518

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the most common functional gastrointestinal disorders; it has a great impact on patient quality of life and is difficult to treat satisfactorily. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of trimebutine maleate (TM) in patients with FD. Materials and Methods: Α multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, prospective study was conducted, including 211 patients with FD. Participants were randomized to receive TM 300 mg twice per day (BID, 108 patients) or placebo BID (103 patients) for 4 weeks. The Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score (GDSS) was used to evaluate the relief of dyspepsia symptoms. Moreover, as a pilot secondary endpoint, a substudy (eight participants on TM and eight on placebo) was conducted in to evaluate gastric emptying (GE), estimated using a 99mTc-Tin Colloid Semi Solid Meal Scintigraphy test. Results: Of the 211 patients enrolled, 185 (87.7%) (97 (52.4%) in the TM group and 88 (47.6%) in the placebo group) completed the study and were analyzed. The groups did not differ in their demographic and medical history data. Regarding symptom relief, being the primary endpoint, a statistically significant reduction in GDSS for the TM group was revealed between the first (2-week) and final (4-week) visit (p-value = 0.02). The 99 mTc-Tin Colloid Semi Solid Meal Scintigraphy testing showed that TM significantly accelerated GE obtained at 50 min (median emptying 75.5% in the TM group vs. 66.6% in the placebo group, p = 0.036). Adverse effects of low to moderate severity were reported in 12.3% of the patients on TM. Conclusion: TM monotherapy appears to be an effective and safe approach to treating FD, although the findings presented here warrant further confirmation.


Asunto(s)
Dispepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Trimebutino/farmacología , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Dispepsia/fisiopatología , Femenino , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/farmacología , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Grecia , Humanos , Jordania , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos , Polonia , Estudios Prospectivos , Rumanía , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Trimebutino/uso terapéutico , Turquía
12.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 53(2): 89-101, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30575637

RESUMEN

Acute liver failure is a rare hepatic emergent situation that affects primarily young people and has often a catastrophic or even fatal outcome. Definition of acute liver failure has not reached a universal consensus and the interval between the appearance of jaundice and hepatic encephalopathy for the establishment of the acute failure is a matter of debate. Among the wide variety of causes, acetaminophen intoxication in western societies and viral hepatitis in the developing countries rank at the top of the etiology list. Identification of the clinical appearance and initial management for the stabilization of the patient are of vital significance. Further advanced therapies, that require intensive care unit, should be offered. The hallmark of treatment for selected patients can be orthotopic liver transplantation. Apart from well-established treatments, novel therapies like hepatocyte or stem cell transplantation, additional new therapeutic strategies targeting acetaminophen intoxication and/or hepatic encephalopathy are mainly experimental, and some of them do not belong, yet, to clinical practice. For clinicians, it is substantial to have the alertness to timely identify the patient and transfer them to a specialized center, where more treatment opportunities are available.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Hepático Agudo/terapia , Humanos , Fallo Hepático Agudo/etiología , Fallo Hepático Agudo/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Hígado , Selección de Paciente
14.
Helicobacter ; 23(1)2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29181894

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori has changed radically gastroenterologic world, offering a new concept in patients' management. Over time, more medical data gave rise to diverse distant, extragastric manifestations and interactions of the "new" discovered bacterium. Special interest appeared within the field of neurodegenerative diseases and particularly Alzheimer's disease, as the latter and Helicobacter pylori infection are associated with a large public health burden and Alzheimer's disease ranks as the leading cause of disability. However, the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and Alzheimer's disease remains uncertain. METHODS: We performed a narrative review regarding a possible connection between Helicobacter pylori and Alzheimer's disease. All accessible relevant (pre)clinical studies written in English were included. Both affected pathologies were briefly analyzed, and relevant studies are discussed, trying to focus on the possible pathogenetic role of this bacterium in Alzheimer's disease. RESULTS: Data stemming from both epidemiologic studies and animal experiments seem to be rather encouraging, tending to confirm the hypothesis that Helicobacter pylori infection might influence the course of Alzheimer's disease pleiotropically. Possible main mechanisms may include the bacterium's access to the brain via the oral-nasal-olfactory pathway or by circulating monocytes (infected with Helicobacter pylori due to defective autophagy) through disrupted blood-brain barrier, thereby possibly triggering neurodegeneration. CONCLUSIONS: Current data suggest that Helicobacter pylori infection might influence the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease. However, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are mandatory to clarify a possible favorable effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology, before the recommendation of short-term and cost-effective therapeutic regimens against Helicobacter pylori-related Alzheimer's disease.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Helicobacter pylori/fisiología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/fisiopatología , Animales , Barrera Hematoencefálica/patología , Tracto Gastrointestinal/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Humanos , Vías Olfatorias/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA