The t(14;18)(q32;q21)/IGH-MALT1 translocation in gastrointestinal extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma).

AIMS: Studies have indicated that the t(14;18)(q32;q21)/IGH-MALT1 translocation is present in extranodal marginal zone lymphomas of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma). However, only a few studies have investigated the incidence of t(14;18)/IGH-MALT1 in primary gastrointestinal MALT lymphomas or in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). The overall significance of t(14;18)/IGH-MALT1 in gastrointestinal MALT lymphomas is not clear. We examined 41 gastrointestinal MALT lymphoma and 23 DLBCL cases, with the aim of further understanding the role of t(14;18)/IGH-MALT1 in these diseases. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) assays for the detection of t(14;18)/IGH-MALT1 and t(11;18)(q21;q21)/API2-MALT1, along with immunostaining and histological evaluations, were performed on selected cases. Of the 64 analysed cases, one gastric MALT lymphoma and one colonic MALT lymphoma were positive for t(14;18)/IGH-MALT1. CONCLUSIONS: We describe what are, to our knowledge, the first reported primary colonic MALT lymphoma carrying t(14;18)(q32;q21)/IGH-MALT1, and one of the few reported cases of gastric MALT lymphoma with this translocation. As this translocation is seen in only a few gastrointestinal MALT lymphomas, it is not useful as a diagnostic marker for routine clinical services. Although these findings suggest that t(14;18)/IGH-MALT1 is a rare molecular event in gastrointestinal MALT lymphomas and DLBCLs, further studies to elucidate the role of this genetic alteration in these diseases are indicated.

t(11;18)(q21;q21) in extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue in stomach: a study of 48 cases.

Gastric extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MZL-MALT) is speculated to be immune mediated and is notable for responding to treatment by Helicobacter pylori eradication. However, the gastric MZL-MALT with t(11;18)(q21;q21) has been shown to be resistant to treatment by H. pylori eradication. We studied the molecular, immunohistochemical, and histological aspects of 48 cases of gastric MZL-MALT and used a reverse transcription real-time PCR assay to assess the presence of a t(11;18)(q21;q21) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Florescence in situ hybridization for t(11:18)(q21;q21) was used to confirm the real-time PCR results. Three distinct morphological subtypes were recognized: monocytoid, small lymphocytic, and plasmacytoid. Morphology, immunophenotype, and immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene rearrangement were correlated with the results of the t(11:18)(q21;q21) assay. Of the 48 analyzed cases, 15 (31%) were positive for t(11;18)(q21;q21) and 33 (69%) were monoclonal for IgH gene rearrangement. Of the 15, 13 (87%) cases with t(11;18)(q21;q21) translocation showed IgH gene rearrangement by PCR. Of the 33 t(11;18)(q21;q21)-negative cases tested, 20 cases (61%) showed IgH gene rearrangement. The 15 t(11;18)(q21;q21) translocation-positive cases had either monocytoid (12 of 15) or small lymphocytic morphology (3 of 15). Aberrant expression of CD43 was observed in 8 of 15 (53%) t(11;18)(q21;q21)-positive cases and 21 of 31 (68%) t(11;18)(q21;q21)-negative cases. Our data show that t(11;18)(q21;q21)-positive MZL-MALTs frequently show monocytoid morphology, less often small lymphocytic morphology, and not purely plasmacytoid morphology. Identification of a t(11;18)(q21;q21) by reverse transcription real-time PCR is highly specific for MZL-MALT and helps in the diagnosis of MZL-MALT. Studying the correlation between this translocation and morphological features may increase our understanding of the role of this translocation in the pathogenesis and the clinical behavior of gastric MZL-MALT.

Synovial sarcoma of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 10 cases.

Only a few synovial sarcomas arising in the gastrointestinal tract have been reported, most of them are from the esophagus. We report clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical features of 10 gastric synovial sarcomas. These tumors occurred in 4 males and 6 females with mean and median age of 52 years (range, 29 to 68 y). None of the patients had evidence of synovial sarcoma elsewhere. The tumor sizes ranged from 0.8 to 15 cm (mean, 3 cm). Two tumors were large transmural masses of 8 and 15 cm, and 8 were 0.8 to 6 cm, ulcerated cuplike or plaquelike or oval lesions predominantly involving the luminal side. Histologically, 9 tumors were monophasic one also having a poorly differentiated round cell component, and one was biphasic. Microscopic calcifications were present in 2 tumors. At least focal keratin (AE1/AE3 cocktail, keratin 7) and/or epithelial membrane antigen-positivity were detected in all tumors, and there was no CD34 or KIT-immunoreactivity. SYT-SSX fusion transcripts were demonstrated in 7 cases studied by a polymerase chain reaction-based fusion transcript assay. Five patients had a partial gastrectomy, and 5 underwent wedge or segmental resections. Two patients had received chemotherapy after surgery, but none had postoperative radiation. Four patients with plaquelike or cuplike tumors < or =3 cm were alive and well 1, 2, 2, and 18.5 years after surgery. Two patients died of tumor 25 and 29 months after surgery. One of them had a large 8-cm tumor, and another had a 2-cm tumor with a poorly differentiated component. Two patients were alive with recurrences 6 and 48 months after diagnosis. Synovial sarcoma rarely occurs as a gastric primary tumor. It has a variable prognosis depending on tumor size and differentiation, and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of KIT-negative gastric spindle cell neoplasms.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: differential diagnosis.

Availability of KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitors for specific treatment of GISTs has magnified the importance of accurate differential diagnosis of GIST from other tumors occurring in the GI tract and abdomen. The general problems in this distinction include histological mimicry of other mesenchymal tumors with GIST, occasional KIT-negativity of GIST, and KIT-positivity of non-GISTs. Up to 5% to 10% gastric GISTs and <2% of intestinal GISTs can be KIT-negative. The identification of these tumors as GISTs is based on knowledge of the spectrum of GIST morphology, and can be supported by molecular diagnosis of KIT and PDGFRA mutations (the latter pertain to gastric tumors). True smooth muscle tumors (rare in GI tract except in esophagus and colon) can be separated from GISTs by the eosinophilic tinctorial quality of tumor cells, positivity for smooth muscle markers, and negativity for KIT. Desmoids can form large GIST-like masses, but are composed of spindled or stellate-shaped cells in a densely collagenous stroma. Negativity for KIT and nuclear positivity for beta-catenin are differentiating features. GI schwannomas, melanoma, and rare primary clear cell sarcoma are S100-positive, usually with characteristic histology. The latter two can be KIT-positive. KIT-positive non-GISTs include some sarcomas, especially angiosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma, extramedullary myeloid tumor, seminoma, and a few carcinomas, notably small cell carcinoma of lung. Spurious KIT-positivity, seen with some polyclonal KIT antibodies, has been a source of confusion leading to probable false-positive results in fibroblastic tumors and occasional other sarcomas, such as leiomyosarcomas. Integration of histological features with carefully standardized immunohistochemistry, supported by KIT and PDGFRA mutation analysis, is the cornerstone of state-of-the art differential diagnosis of GIST. To comprehensively capture all GISTs, KIT immunostains should be performed on all unclassified epithelioid and mesenchymal tumors of the abdomen. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.

From the archives of the AFIP: abdominal neoplasms in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most common genetic disorders. NF1 is a complex disease resulting from a spectrum of mutations that may occur at many locations along the large, complex NF1 gene, which is located on chromosome 17. Mutations of the NF1 gene lead to abnormal tumor suppression. Consequently, patients with NF1 have an increased prevalence of benign and malignant neoplasms throughout the body. There are five categories of NF1 tumors that occur in the abdomen: neurogenic, neuroendocrine, nonneurogenic gastrointestinal mesenchymal, embryonal, and miscellaneous. Many of these tumors are age related, occur at specific anatomic locations, and have unique imaging features. Notably, many patients have a variety of organs affected because there is a high prevalence of multiple tumors occurring in the same patient. Neurofibromas are the most common benign neoplasms and may occur in the retroperitoneum or visceral organs. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor is an aggressive malignancy that is the most common malignant tumor of the abdomen in patients with NF1. Interpreting abdominal imaging studies in patients with NF1 can be challenging because of the wide spectrum and diverse nature of tumors that occur in this disease.

A distinctive novel epitheliomesenchymal biphasic tumor of the stomach in young adults ("gastroblastoma"): a series of 3 cases.

This report describes 3 cases of a distinctive, hitherto unreported gastric epitheliomesenchymal biphasic tumor that differs from other biphasic tumors of the stomach and elsewhere: carcinosarcoma, biphasic synovial sarcoma, teratoma, and mixed tumor. The tumors occurred in young adults, 2 males and 1 female, of ages 19, 27, and 30 years. Two tumors were located in the greater curvature in the gastric body and one in the antrum. The tumors measured 5, 6, and 15 cm in maximum diameter, and their mitotic rates were 0, 4, and 30 mitoses per 50HPF. There were 2 components: uniform oval or spindled cells in diffuse sheets, and clusters or cords of epithelial cells occasionally forming glandular structures with small lumens. The epithelial elements were positive for keratin cocktail AE1/AE3, keratin 18, and partly for keratin 7, but were negative for keratins 5/6, 20 and epithelial membrane antigen. The spindle cells were positive for vimentin and CD10. All components were negative for CD34, CD99, estrogen receptor, KIT, smooth muscle actin, desmin S100 protein, p63, calretinin, chromogranin, synaptophysin, CDX2, and thyroid transcription factor 1. In situ hybridization for SS18 rearrangement was negative in all cases separating this tumor from synovial sarcoma. All 3 patients were alive after follow-up of 3.5, 5, and 14 years. Because these tumors have some resemblance to blastomas of other organs, we propose the term "gastroblastoma" for this distinctive, at least low-grade malignant epitheliomesenchymal tumor of the stomach.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis: imaging features with clinicopathologic correlation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, pathologic, and imaging features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors that occur in patients with neurofibromatosis. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors that occur in patients with neurofibromatosis commonly originate from the proximal small intestine and are often multiple. The cross-sectional imaging appearance of gastrointestinal stromal tumors that occur in patients with neurofibromatosis is similar to that of gastrointestinal stromal tumors that occur in the general population.