Assessment of an optimized manufacturing process for inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity study in children and adults.

BACKGROUND: GSK has modified the licensed monovalent bulk manufacturing process for its split-virion inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4) to harmonize the process among different strains, resulting in an increased number of finished vaccine doses, while compensating for the change from inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3) to IIV4. To confirm the manufacturing changes do not alter the profile of the vaccine, a clinical trial was conducted to compare IIV4 made by the currently licensed process with a vaccine made by the new (investigational) process (IIV4-I). The main objectives were to compare the reactogenicity and safety of IIV4-I versus IIV4 in all age groups, and to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody responses based on the geometric mean titer ratio of IIV4-I versus IIV4 in children. METHODS: The Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multinational study included three cohorts: adults (18-49 years; N = 120), children (3-17 years; N = 821), and infants (6-35 months; N = 940). Eligible subjects in each cohort were randomized 1:1 to receive IIV4-I or IIV4. Both vaccines contained 15 µg of hemagglutinin antigen for each of the four seasonal virus strains. Adults and vaccine-primed children received one dose of vaccine, and vaccine-unprimed children received two doses of vaccine 28 days apart. All children aged ≥9 years were considered to be vaccine-primed and received one dose of vaccine. RESULTS: The primary immunogenicity objective of the study was met in demonstrating immunogenic non-inferiority of IIV4-I versus IIV4 in children. The IIV4-I was immunogenic against all four vaccine strains in each age cohort. The reactogenicity and safety profile of IIV4-I was similar to IIV4 in each age cohort, and there was no increase in the relative risk of fever (≥38 °C) with IIV4-I versus IIV4 within the 7-day post-vaccination period in infants (1.06; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.75, 1.50; p = 0.786). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that in adults, children, and infants, the IIV4-I made using an investigational manufacturing process was immunogenic with a reactogenicity and safety profile that was similar to licensed IIV4. These results support that the investigational process used to manufacture IIV4-I is suitable to replace the current licensed process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02207413 ; trial registration date: August 4, 2014.

Linkages between observed, modeled Saharan dust loading and meningitis in Senegal during 2012 and 2013.

The Sahara desert transports large quantities of dust over the Sahelian region during the Northern Hemisphere winter and spring seasons (December-April). In episodic events, high dust concentrations are found at the surface, negatively impacting respiratory health. Bacterial meningitis in particular is known to affect populations that live in the Sahelian zones, which is otherwise known as the meningitis belt. During the winter and spring of 2012, suspected meningitis cases (SMCs) were with three times higher than in 2013. We show higher surface particular matter concentrations at Dakar, Senegal and elevated atmospheric dust loading in Senegal for the period of 1 January-31 May during 2012 relative to 2013. We analyze simulated particulate matter over Senegal from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model during 2012 and 2013. The results show higher simulated dust concentrations during the winter season of 2012 for Senegal. The WRF model correctly captures the large dust events from 1 January-31 March but has shown less skill during April and May for simulated dust concentrations. The results also show that the boundary conditions are the key feature for correctly simulating large dust events and initial conditions are less important.

Immunogenicity and Safety of an EB66 Cell-Culture-Derived Influenza A/Indonesia/5/2005(H5N1) AS03-Adjuvanted Vaccine: A Phase 1 Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cell-culture-derived (CC) influenza vaccine production methods could provide benefits over classical embryonated-egg technology, including a higher production capacity and the faster creation of a supply that meets demand. METHODS: A CC-inactivated split-virus influenza A/Indonesia/5/2005(H5N1) vaccine derived from the EB66 cell line (hereafter, "CC-H5N1") was investigated in a phase 1 randomized, blinded study. Healthy adults (n = 521) received 2 vaccine doses (days 0 and 21) of either investigational CC-H5N1 vaccine (1.9 µg or 3.75 µg of hemagglutinin antigen [HA] with the AS03 adjuvant system or 15 µg of plain HA), embryonated-egg-derived vaccines (3.75 µg of HA with AS03 or 15 µg of plain HA), or placebo. Assessment of the adjuvant effect and immunogenicity was performed using Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research acceptability criteria 21 days after dose 2. Safety was assessed until month 12. RESULTS: AS03-adjuvanted CC-H5N1 elicited a homologous hemagglutination inhibition antibody response that satisfied immunogenicity criteria 21 days after dose 2 and persisted at month 12. Adjuvant effect and immune response against a drift-variant strain were demonstrated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. The immunogenicity and safety of the CC-H5N1 formulation containing 3.75 µg of HA and AS03 appeared to be similar to those for the licensed egg-derived AS03-adjuvanted control vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of the EB66 cell line to produce an immunogenic influenza vaccine with acceptable safety profile was demonstrated. Antigen sparing was achieved through combination with AS03 adjuvant. This CC-H5N1 might contribute to the rapid access of vaccine in the event of an influenza A(H5N1) pandemic. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01236040.

AS03B-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine in children 6 months through 17 years of age: a phase 2/3 randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND: This phase 2/3, randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded study assessed the immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of an inactivated, split-virion H5N1 influenza vaccine (A/Indonesia/5/2005) in children aged 6 months through 17 years. METHODS: Children received 2 influenza vaccine doses 21 days apart, each containing 1.9 µg of hemagglutinin and AS03B adjuvant (5.93 mg of α-tocopherol). The randomization ratio was 8:3 for vaccine to placebo, with equal allocation between 3 age strata (6-35 months, 3-8 years, and 9-17 years). Immunogenicity against the vaccine strain was assessed 21 days after the first and second vaccine doses for all vaccinees, at day 182 for half, and at day 385 for the remaining half. Reactogenicity after each dose and safety up to 1 year after vaccination were evaluated. RESULTS: Within each age stratum, the lower limit of the 98.3% confidence interval for the day 42 seroprotection rate was ≥70%, thus fulfilling the US and European licensure criteria. The immune responses elicited by vaccine persisted well above baseline levels for 1 year. The vaccine was more reactogenic than placebo, but no major safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: AS03B-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine was immunogenic and showed an acceptable safety profile in all age groups studied. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01310413.

Heterologous prime-boost vaccination using an AS03B-adjuvanted influenza A(H5N1) vaccine in infants and children<3 years of age.

BACKGROUND: Protecting young children from pandemic influenza should also reduce transmission to susceptible adults, including pregnant women. METHODS: An open study assessed immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a heterologous booster dose of A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005(H5N1)-AS03B (AS03B is an Adjuvant System containing α-tocopherol and squalene in an oil-in-water emulsion [5.93 mg tocopherol]) in infants and children aged 6 to <36 months that was given 6 months following 2-dose primary vaccination with A/Indonesia/05/2005(H5N1)-AS03B. Vaccines contained 1.9 µg of hemagglutinin antigen and AS03B. Hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) responses, microneutralization titers, and antineuraminidase antibody levels were assessed for 6 months following the booster vaccination. RESULTS: For each age stratum (defined on the basis of the subject's age at first vaccination as 6 to <12 months, 12 to <24 months, and 24 to <36 months) and overall (n=113), European influenza vaccine licensure criteria were fulfilled for responses to A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005(H5N1) 10 days following the booster vaccination. Local pain and fever increased with consecutive doses. Anamnestic immune responses were demonstrated for HI, neutralizing, and antineuraminidase antibodies against vaccine-homologous/heterologous strains. Antibody responses to vaccine-homologous/heterologous strains persisted in all children 6 months following the booster vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Prevaccination of young children with a clade 2 strain influenza A(H5N1) AS03-adjuvanted vaccine followed by heterologous booster vaccination boosted immune responses to the homologous strain and a related clade, with persistence for at least 6 months. The results support a prime-boost vaccination approach in young children for pandemic influenza preparedness. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01323946.

Long-term booster schedules with AS03A-adjuvanted heterologous H5N1 vaccines induces rapid and broad immune responses in Asian adults.

BACKGROUND: The pandemic potential of avian influenza A/H5N1 should not be overlooked, and the continued development of vaccines against these highly pathogenic viruses is a public health priority. METHODS: This open-label extension booster study followed a Phase III study of 1206 adults who had received two 3.75 µg doses of primary AS03A-adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted H5N1 split-virus vaccine (A/Vietnam/1194/2004; clade 1) (NCT00449670). The aim of the extension study was to evaluate different timings for heterologous AS03A-adjuvanted booster vaccination (A/Indonesia/5/2005; clade 2.1) given at Month 6, 12, or 36 post-primary vaccination. Immunogenicity was assessed 21 days after each booster vaccination and the persistence of immune responses against the primary vaccine strain (A/Vietnam) and the booster strain (A/Indonesia) was evaluated up to Month 48 post-primary vaccination. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: After booster vaccination given at Month 6, HI antibody responses to primary vaccine, and booster vaccine strains were markedly higher with one dose of AS03A-H5N1 booster vaccine in the AS03A-adjuvanted primary vaccine group compared with two doses of booster vaccine in the non-adjuvanted primary vaccine group. HI antibody responses were robust against the primary and booster vaccine strains 21 days after boosting at Month 12 or 36. At Month 48, in subjects boosted at Month 6, 12, or 36, HI antibody titers of ≥1:40 against the booster strain persisted in 39.2%, 61.2%, and 95.6% of subjects, respectively. Neutralizing antibody responses and cell-mediated immune responses also showed that AS03A-H5N1 heterologous booster vaccination elicited robust immune responses within 21 days of boosting at Month 6, 12, or 36 post-primary vaccination. The booster vaccine was well tolerated, and no safety concerns were raised. CONCLUSIONS: In Asian adults primed with two doses of AS03A-adjuvanted H5N1 pandemic influenza vaccine, strong cross-clade anamnestic antibody responses were observed after one dose of AS03A-H5N1 heterologous booster vaccine given at Month 6, 12, or 36 after priming, suggesting that AS03A-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccines may provide highly flexible prime-boost schedules. Although immunogenicity decreased with time, vaccinated populations could potentially be protected for up to three years after vaccination, which is likely to far exceed the peak of the a pandemic.

Safety and immunogenicity of a split-virion AS03A-adjuvanted A/Indonesia/05/2005 (H5N1) vaccine in Taiwanese adults.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This study evaluated the immune response elicited by two formulations of an AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 A/Indonesia/05/2005 prepandemic influenza vaccine, developed using manufacturing processes with or without thiomersal. In addition, it also evaluated compliance to the Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research and Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) immunogenicity guidance criteria for pandemic influenza vaccines in adults. METHODS: This phase III, observer-blind, randomized study (NCT00812981) enrolled 320 subjects aged 18-60 years into two groups to receive, 21 days apart, two doses of the formulation manufactured using either the thiomersal-containing process (Group TC) or the thiomersal-free process (Group TF). Blood samples collected before vaccination, 21 days after the second vaccine dose, and 6 months following the first vaccine dose (Days 0, 42, and 180) were analysed using a hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. Safety assessments were made for the entire study period. RESULTS: Twenty-one days after the second dose of vaccine, both groups met the CHMP criteria for vaccine-homologous HI response (seroprotection rates/seroconversion rates ≥ 98.7%, seroconversion factor ≥ 121.9) and also for a heterologous HI response against the A/Vietnam/1194/2004 strain (seroprotection rates/seroconversion rates ≥ 81.3%, seroconversion factor ≥ 10.8). Six months after the first dose of vaccine, a marked persistence of the vaccine-homologous HI response was observed that still met one or more CHMP criteria. Pain at the injection site (Group TF 95%, Group TC 91.8%) and myalgia (Group TF 68.8%, Group TC 63.5%) were the most frequently recorded solicited symptoms. Overall, both formulations had a clinically acceptable safety profile. CONCLUSION: Administration of two doses of the AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 prepandemic influenza vaccine was found to be highly immunogenic in adults with a clinically acceptable safety profile. The ability to confer cross-clade protective immunity makes it a suitable option for mitigation of the morbidity and mortality of outbreaks and pandemics due to H5N1 and drifted strains.

Immunogenicity profile of a 3.75-µg hemagglutinin pandemic rH5N1 split virion AS03A-adjuvanted vaccine in elderly persons: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Elderly persons often experience a reduced immune response to influenza vaccination. We evaluated the usual dose of AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 pandemic vaccine (3.75 µg hemagglutinin of A/Vietnam/1194/2004-like strain) compared with a double dose in an elderly population. METHODS: This phase 2, open-label study (NCT00397215; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) randomized participants (age, ≥61 years) to receive, on days 0 and 21: (1) a single dose of AS03(A)-adjuvanted vaccine (n=152), (2) a single dose of nonadjuvanted vaccine (n=54), (3) a double dose of AS03(A)-adjuvanted vaccine (n=145), or (4) a double dose of nonadjuvanted vaccine (n=44). The primary end point was hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and neutralizing antibody response against vaccine antigen (according-to-protocol cohort). RESULTS: Day 42 geometric mean titers for HI antibodies were 126.8 and 237.3 for single and double doses of the AS03(A)-adjuvanted vaccine, respectively. Corresponding values for neutralizing antibodies were 447.3 and 595.8. Although the immune response was higher with the double dose, European Committee for Human Medicinal Products criteria for seroconversion and seroprotection rates were achieved in both AS03(A)-adjuvanted groups. Antigen-specific CD4 T cell responses were elicited. Immune response persistence at 6 months was high. Immune response in the non-adjuvanted groups was considerably less. CONCLUSIONS: The AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine can be administered elderly persons at the same dose and schedule as in younger adults.

H5N1 influenza vaccine formulated with AS03 A induces strong cross-reactive and polyfunctional CD4 T-cell responses.

OBJECTIVE: Adjuvantation of an H5N1 split-virion influenza vaccine with AS03(A) substantially reduces the antigen dose required to produce a putatively protective humoral response and promotes cross-clade neutralizing responses. We determined the effect of adjuvantation on antibody persistence and B- and T-cell-mediated immune responses. METHODS: Two vaccinations with a split-virion A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1, clade 1) vaccine containing 3.75-30 µg hemagglutinin and formulated with or without adjuvant were administered to groups of 50 volunteers aged 18-60 years. RESULTS: Adjuvantation of the vaccine led to better persistence of neutralizing and hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies and higher frequencies of antigen-specific memory B cells. Cross-reactive and polyfunctional H5N1-specific CD4 T cells were detected at baseline and were amplified by vaccination. Expansion of CD4 T cells was enhanced by adjuvantation. CONCLUSION: Formulation of the H5N1 vaccine with AS03(A) enhances antibody persistence and induces stronger T- and B-cell responses. The cross-clade T-cell immunity indicates that the adjuvanted vaccine primes individuals to respond to either infection and/or subsequent vaccination with strains drifted from the primary vaccine strain.

Immunogenicity and safety of an AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine in a Taiwanese population.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: A multicenter study (NCT00449670) conducted across Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong and Thailand evaluated the safety and manufacturing consistency of four formulations of an AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine in terms of immune response against the vaccine-homologous strain (A/Vietnam/1194/2004). This manuscript presents data from the Taiwanese population. METHODS: A total of 400 individuals, aged 18-60 years, were randomized into six groups (2:2:2:2:1:1 ratio) to receive two doses (21 days apart) of one of the four adjuvanted formulations (H5N1-AS03(A)-groups) or one of the two nonadjuvanted formulations (H5N1-DIL-groups). Blood samples collected before vaccination (Day 0) and 21 days after each vaccine dose were analyzed using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: All four AS03(A)-adjuvanted formulations induced comparable immune responses against the A/Vietnam/1194/2004 strain; following the second dose, immune response in terms of HI antibodies was higher in the H5N1-AS03(A)-groups {seroprotection rate=91.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 87.9-94.4]; geometric mean titer (GMT)=177.6 (95% CI: 153.2-206.0)} compared with the H5N1-DIL-groups [seroprotection rates=5.0% (95% CI: 1.4-12.3); GMT=6.3 (95% CI: 5.4-7.4)]. Immune response against the heterologous A/Indonesia/05/2005 strain was also stronger in the H5N1-AS03(A)-groups [seroprotection rate=45.6% (95% CI: 40.0-51.4); GMT=20.5 (95% CI: 17.8-23.7)] compared with the H5N1-DIL groups [seroprotection rate=0.0% (95% CI: 0.0-4.5); GMT=5.0 (95% CI: 5.0-5.0)]. The overall reactogenicity profile of the adjuvanted formulations was clinically acceptable. CONCLUSION: The AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine formulations induced stronger immune response against the vaccine-homologous and heterologous strains than the nonadjuvanted formulations. The AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine demonstrated a good immunogenicity and an acceptable safety profile in the Taiwanese population.

Cross-clade immunogenicity and antigen-sparing with an AS03(A)-adjuvanted prepandemic influenza vaccine in a Thai population.

OBJECTIVE: The present study (NCT00449670) in Asian subjects (18-60 years) evaluated the manufacturing consistency of four formulations of 3.75 mg AS03(A)-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine, in terms of post-immunization Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) titers against the A/Vietnam/1194/2004 and A/Indonesia/05/2005 strains. The immunogenicity and safety of the vaccine in the Thai population are reported herein. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Subjects were randomized (2:2:2:2.:1:1) between four vaccine groups and two control groups to receive two doses of either the AS03(A)-adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine formulations, 21 days apart. Sera were assayed for HI antibody titers against the two strains. RESULTS: After the second dose of AS03(A)-adjuvanted vaccine, 94.2% subjects in the H5N1-AS03(A) groups seroconverted and 94.9% subjects were seroprotected against the A/Vietnam/1194/2004 strain. Cross-clade immune response against the A/Indonesia/05/2005 strain was observed. All vaccine formulations had an acceptable safety profile. CONCLUSION: This antigen-sparing AS03(A)-adjuvanted influenza vaccine could be a suitable candidate for combating and mitigating future influenza pandemics.

Immune responses to the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine in immunocompromised adults: a comprehensive overview.

Immunocompromised (IC) persons are at increased risk for herpes zoster (HZ) and its complications, mainly due to impairment of cell-mediated immunity (CMI). The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) demonstrated efficacy against HZ in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) recipients and hematologic malignancy (HM) patients. We review immune responses to RZV in 5 adult IC populations, 4 of which were receiving multiple, concomitant immunosuppressive medications: auto-HSCT and renal transplant recipients, HM and solid tumor patients, and human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults. Although administered in most cases when immunosuppression was near its maximum, including concomitantly with chemotherapy cycles, RZV induced robust and persistent humoral and, more importantly, CMI responses in all 5 IC populations. Based on the overall clinical data generated in older adults and IC individuals, RZV is expected to provide benefit in a broad adult population at risk for HZ.

Immunogenicity and Safety of AS03-adjuvanted H5N1 Influenza Vaccine in Children 6-35 Months of Age: Results From a Phase 2, Randomized, Observer-blind, Multicenter, Dose-ranging Study.

BACKGROUND: This phase 2 observer-blind, randomized, multicenter, dose-ranging study evaluated immunogenicity and safety of different formulations of an AS03-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine in children 6-35 months of age. METHODS: One hundred eighty-five children randomized into 5 groups [1.9 µg hemagglutinin (HA)/AS03B, 0.9 µg HA/AS03C, 1.9 µg HA/AS03C, 3.75 µg HA/AS03C or 3.75 µg HA/AS03D] were to receive 2 doses administered 21 days apart (primary vaccination). AS03 was classified by amount of DL-α-tocopherol, with AS03B the highest amount. One year later, all subjects were to receive unadjuvanted 3.75 µg HA as antigen challenge. Immunogenicity was assessed 21 days after primary vaccination (day 42) and 7 days after antigen challenge (day 392). Immunogenicity-fever index, based on hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization antibody titers at day 42 and fever 7 days after each vaccination, was used to guide the selection of an acceptable formulation. RESULTS: After primary vaccination, formulations elicited strong homologous immune responses with all subjects' hemagglutination inhibition titers ≥1:40 post-vaccination. Immunogenicity-fever index based on hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization assays showed that 1.9 µg HA/AS03B ranked the highest. Antibody levels persisted >4 times above baseline 12 months after primary vaccination with all formulations (day 385). Antibodies increased >4-fold after antigen challenge (day 392/day 385) with 1.9 µg HA/AS03B, 0.9 µg HA/AS03C and 1.9 µg HA/AS03C formulations. Overall per subject, the incidence of fever ranged from 28.6% (3.75 µg HA/AS03D) to 60.5% (1.9 µg HA/AS03B). CONCLUSIONS: All formulations were highly immunogenic and demonstrated acceptable safety profiles, with the 1.9 µg HA/AS03B providing the most favorable balance of immunogenicity versus reactogenicity for use in children 6-35 months of age.

A phase II, open-label, multicentre study to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of an adjuvanted prepandemic (H5N1) influenza vaccine in healthy Japanese adults.

BACKGROUND: Promising clinical data and significant antigen-sparing have been demonstrated for a pandemic H5N1 influenza split-virion vaccine adjuvanted with AS03A, an α-tocopherol-containing oil-in-water emulsion-based Adjuvant System. Although studies using this formulation have been reported, there have been no data for Japanese populations. This study therefore aimed to assess the immunogenicity and tolerability of a prepandemic (H5N1) influenza vaccine adjuvanted with AS03A in Japanese adults. METHODS: This open-label, single-group study was conducted at two centres in Japan in healthy Japanese males and females aged 20-64 years (n = 100). Subjects received two doses of vaccine, containing 3.75 µg haemagglutinin of the A/Indonesia/5/2005-like IBCDC-RG2 Clade 2.1 (H5N1) strain adjuvanted with AS03A, 21 days apart. The primary endpoint evaluated the humoral immune response in terms of H5N1 haemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titres against the vaccine strain (Clade 2.1) 21 days after the second dose. Ninety five percent confidence intervals for geometric mean titres, seroprotection, seroconversion and seropositivity rates were calculated. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included the assessment of the humoral response in terms of neutralising antibody titres, the response against additional H5N1 strains (Clade 1 and Clade 2.2), as well as the evaluation of safety and reactogenicity. RESULTS: Robust immune responses were elicited after two doses of the prepandemic influenza vaccine adjuvanted with AS03A. Overall, vaccine HI seroconversion rates and seroprotection rates were 91% 21 days after the second vaccination. This fulfilled all regulatory acceptance criteria for the vaccine-homologous HI antibody level. A substantial cross-reactive humoral immune response was also observed against the virus strains A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005 (Clade 2.2) and A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (Clade 1) after the second vaccine administration. A marked post-vaccination response in terms of neutralising antibody titres was demonstrated and persistence of the immune response was observed 6 months after the first dose. The vaccine was generally well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: The H5N1 candidate vaccine adjuvanted with AS03A elicited a strong and persistent immune response against the vaccine strain A/Indonesia/5/2005 in Japanese adults. Vaccination with this formulation demonstrated a clinically acceptable reactogenicity profile and did not raise any safety concerns in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00742885.

Characterization of Bacteria on Aerosols From Dust Events in Dakar, Senegal, West Africa.

We identify bacteria types on collected dust samples in Dakar Senegal, a region that experiences frequent Saharan dust events. We use classical techniques to identify bacteria types from dust samples. Seventy-seven bacteria types are identified from samples collected by spatula and the QuickTake® 30 air sampling pump. The dominant groups in the first batch of 51 bacteria (collected via deposition) are Micrococcus (33.33%), Bacillus (13.73%), Kytococcus (11.76%), Pseudomonas (9.80%), and Burkholderia (7.84%) and dominants in the second batch of 26 bacteria (collected with aerosol sampling vacuum pump): Pseudomonas (38.61%), Burkholderia (26.92%), Micrococcus (11.54%), and Brucella spp (7.69%). These bacteria are found in earlier studies from desert sources and can potentially cause respiratory diseases to exposed populations. Future work will use molecular methods is necessary to search for additional pathogens, including viruses on dust aerosols.

Observed and Modeled Seasonal Air Quality and Respiratory Health in Senegal During 2015 and 2016.

In this work, we use existing particulate matter (PM) data from Dakar, Senegal, satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to evaluate the role of dust transport from the Sahara and PM concentrations and exposure into other administrative districts of Senegal during 2015 and 2016. We also use data from the Ministry of Health to examine spatial and temporal patterns of acute respiratory infections, asthma, bronchitis, and tuberculosis across Senegal with an emphasis on Northern Hemisphere winter December-February, when air quality is poor, and June-August when there is an improvement in air quality. Measurements in Dakar, Senegal, suggest hazardous PM10 concentrations associated with Saharan dust storms but lower PM10 concentrations during the summer. The WRF dust simulations show a similar temporal pattern to the observations in Dakar, Senegal, with notable biases. However, the WRF model suggests that the highest dust concentrations are found across the northern half of Senegal during the winter season where there are no currently PM measurements. Health data during 2015-2016 show the highest prevalence of asthma and bronchitis in Dakar, Senegal, suggesting that other sources of air pollution are important. Acute respiratory infection is prevalent throughout the country with the high prevalence found in rural zones, for children between 12 and 59 months. All measures including real-time monitoring, air quality forecast, and communication should be used to protect the public from potentially hazardous environmental conditions during the winter season.

Antigen sparing and cross-reactive immunity with an adjuvanted rH5N1 prototype pandemic influenza vaccine: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Antigen sparing is regarded as crucial for pandemic vaccine development because worldwide influenza vaccine production capacity is limited. Adjuvantation is an important antigen-sparing strategy. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant H5N1 split-virion vaccine formulated with a proprietary adjuvant system and investigated whether it can induce cross-reactive immunity. METHODS: Two doses of an inactivated split A/Vietnam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14 (recombinant H5N1 engineered by reverse genetics) vaccine were administered 21 days apart to eight groups of 50 volunteers aged 18-60 years. We studied four antigen doses (3.8 microg, 7.5 microg, 15 microg, and 30 microg haemagglutinin) given with or without adjuvant. Blood samples were collected to analyse humoral immune response. Adverse events were recorded up through study day 51. Safety analyses were of the whole vaccinated cohort and immunogenicity analyses per protocol. This trial is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00309634. FINDINGS: All eight vaccine formulations had a good safety profile. No serious adverse events were reported. The adjuvanted vaccines induced more injection-site symptoms and general symptoms than did the non-adjuvanted vaccines, but most were mild to moderate in intensity and transient in nature. The adjuvanted formulations were significantly more immunogenic than the non-adjuvanted formulations at all antigen doses. At the lowest antigenic dose (3.8 microg), immune responses for the adjuvanted vaccine against the recombinant homologous vaccine strain (A/Vietnam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14, clade 1) met or exceeded all US Food and Drug Administration and European Union licensure criteria. Furthermore, 37 of 48 (77%) participants receiving 3.8 microg of the adjuvanted vaccine seroconverted for neutralising antibodies against a strain derived by reverse genetics from a drifted H5N1 isolate (A/Indonesia/5/2005, clade 2). INTERPRETATION: Adjuvantation conferred significant antigen sparing that could increase the production capacity of pandemic influenza vaccine. Moreover, the cross-clade neutralising antibody responses recorded imply that such a vaccine could be deployed for immunisation before a pandemic.

Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine co-administered with a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine versus separate administration, in adults ≥50years of age: Results from a phase III, randomized, non-inferiority trial.

INTRODUCTION: We compared co-administration versus separate administration of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4) with a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) in adults at high risk of complications of influenza and pneumococcal infection. METHODS: This phase III, placebo-controlled, observer-blind trial (NCT02218697) was conducted in France and Belgium during the 2014-2015 influenza season. Adults≥50years of age meeting their country's vaccination recommendations were randomized 1:1 to co-administration or separate administration. Immunogenicity was assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers for IIV4 and 22F-inhibition ELISA for PPV23. Co-primary objectives were to demonstrate non-inferiority of co-administration versus separate administration in terms of geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio for each influenza strain in the IIV4 and geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratio for six pneumococcal serotypes (1, 3, 4, 7F, 14, 19A) in the PPV23 in the per-protocol cohort (N=334). RESULTS: The study met its co-primary objectives, with the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the GMT and GMC ratios (separate administration over co-administration) being ≤2.0 for all four antigens of the IIV4 and the six pre-selected serotypes of the PPV23, respectively. Immunogenicity of the IIV4 and PPV23 was similar regardless of administration schedule. In a post hoc analysis pooling participants ≥60years of age from the co-administration and separate administration groups, IIV4 immunogenicity was similar in higher risk adults with comorbidities (diabetes; respiratory, heart, kidney, liver, or neurological diseases; morbid obesity) versus those without. Both vaccines had an acceptable safety and reactogenicity profile; pain was the most common symptom, occurring more often with co-administration than separate administration. CONCLUSION: The IIV4 and PPV23 can be co-administered without reducing antibody responses reflecting protection against influenza or pneumococcal disease. Co-administration of PPV23 at the annual influenza vaccination visit may improve uptake. Comorbidities had no impact on IIV4 immunogenicity, supporting its value in older adults with chronic medical conditions. Clinical Trial Registry Number: NCT02218697.

Evaluation of a primary course of H9N2 vaccine with or without AS03 adjuvant in adults: A phase I/II randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Avian influenza A H9N2 strains have pandemic potential. METHODS: In this randomized, observer-blind study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01659086), 420 healthy adults, 18-64years of age, received 1 of 10 H9N2 inactivated split-virus vaccination regimens (30 participants per group), or saline placebo (120 participants). H9N2 groups received 2 doses (days 0, 21) of 15µg hemagglutinin (HA) without adjuvant, or 1.9µgHA+AS03A, 1.9µgHA+AS03B, 3.75µgHA+AS03A, or 3.75µgHA+AS03B; followed by the same H9N2 formulation or placebo (day 182). AS03 is an adjuvant system containing α-tocopherol (AS03A: 11.86mg; AS03B: 5.93mg) and squalene in an oil-in-water emulsion. Immunogenicity (hemagglutination inhibition [HI] and microneutralization assays) and safety were assessed up to day 546. RESULTS: All adjuvanted formulations exceeded regulatory immunogenicity criteria at days 21 and 42 (HI assay), with seroprotection and seroconversion rates of ≥94.9% and ≥89.8% at day 21, and 100% and ≥98.1% at day 42. Immunogenicity criteria were also met for unadjuvanted vaccine, with lower geometric mean titers. In groups administered a third vaccine dose (day 182), an anamnestic immune response was elicited with robust increases in HI and microneutralization titers. Injection site pain was reported more frequently with adjuvanted vaccines. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: All H9N2 vaccine formulations were immunogenic with a clinically acceptable safety profile; adjuvanted formulations were 4-8 times dose-sparing (3.75-1.9vs 15µgHA). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01659086.

Assessment of Prime-boost Vaccination Using an AS03B-adjuvanted Influenza A (H5N1) Vaccine: A Randomized Trial in Children of Three to Less Than Eighteen Years of Age.

BACKGROUND: Heterologous prime-boost vaccination is a pandemic response strategy utilizing subtype-matched vaccine at pandemic onset followed by strain-matched vaccine once available. Persistence of immune response and safety of influenza A (H5N1) vaccine adjuvanted with adjuvant system containing α-tocopherol and squalene in an oil-in-water emulsion (AS03B) were evaluated. METHODS: An open phase 3 active-controlled study (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01379937) assessed immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a heterologous booster dose of A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005-H5N1-AS03B in children 3 to <18 years of age, given 6 months after 2-dose priming with A/Indonesia/05/2005-H5N1-AS03B (H5N1(2) -H5N1 group) compared with a single dose of A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005-H5N1-AS03B in unprimed subjects (hepatitis A vaccine (HAV)-H5N1 group). Hemagglutinin inhibition responses and microneutralization antibodies were assessed to 6 months after booster vaccination. RESULTS: Hemagglutinin inhibition antibody responses against A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005-H5N1 were superior in the H5N1(2)-H5N1 versus the hepatitis A vaccine-H5N1 group overall and in each age strata (3 to <10 and 10 to <18 years). Anamnestic immune responses were demonstrated against vaccine-homologous/heterologous strains in the H5N1(2)-H5N1 group. Injection site pain and fever increased with consecutive doses for children <6 years (H5N1(2)-H5N1). Immune responses to vaccine-homologous/heterologous strains persisted to 6 months after booster vaccination in the H5N1(2)-H5N1 group. CONCLUSIONS: Heterologous H5N1-AS03B-adjuvanted booster vaccination in children/adolescents was immunogenic for vaccine-homologous and heterologous strains following 2-dose priming, with immune persistence for at least 6 months. Prime-boost strategies using H5N1-AS03 could be effectively employed in this age group.