RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgery and treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) in the elderly patient increase the risk of developing post-operative complications, losing functional independence, and worsening health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There is a lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials evaluating the potential benefit of exercise as a countermeasure. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based multicomponent exercise program for improving HRQoL and functional capacity in older adults undergoing CRC surgery and treatment. METHODS: This randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, single-center trial aims to randomize 250 patients (>74 years) to either an intervention or a control group (i.e., usual care). The intervention group will perform an individualized home-based multicomponent exercise program with weekly telephone supervision from diagnosis until three months post-surgery. The primary outcomes will be HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30; CR29; and ELD14) and functional capacity (Barthel Index and Short Physical Performance Battery), which will be assessed at diagnosis, at discharge, and one, three, and six months after surgery. Secondary outcomes will be frailty, physical fitness, physical activity, inspiratory muscle function, sarcopenia and cachexia, anxiety and depression, ambulation ability, surgical complications, and hospital length of stay, readmission and mortality. DISCUSSION: This study will examine the effects of an exercise program in older patients with CRC across a range of health-related outcomes. Expected findings are improvement in HRQoL and physical functioning. If proven effective, this simple exercise program may be applied in clinical practice to improve CRC care in older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05448846.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Anciano , Ejercicio Físico , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Aptitud Física , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoAsunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Hepatectomía , Proctectomía , Neoplasias del Recto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Hepatectomía/métodos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Proctectomía/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Advantages of laparoscopic approach in colon cancer surgery have been previously demonstrated in controlled, randomized trials and in retrospective analysis of large administrative databases. Nevertheless, evidence of these advantages in prospective, observational studies from real-life settings is scarce. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational study, including a consecutive series of patients that underwent elective colonic resection for cancer in 52 Spanish hospitals. Pre-/intraoperative data, related to patient, tumor, surgical procedure, and hospital, were recorded as well as 60-day post-operative outcomes, including wound infection, complications, anastomotic leak, length of stay, and mortality. A univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine the influence of laparoscopy on short-term post-operative outcome. A sub-analysis of the effect of laparoscopy according to patients' pre-operative risk (ASA Score I-II vs. III-IV) was also performed. RESULTS: 2968 patients were included: 44.2% were initially operated by laparoscopy, with a 13.9% conversion rate to laparotomy. At univariate analysis, laparoscopy was associated with a decreased mortality (p = 0.015), morbidity (p < 0.0001), wound infection (p < 0.0001), and post-operative length of stay (p < 0.0001). At multivariate analysis, laparoscopy resulted as an independent protective factor for morbidity (OR 0.7; p = 0.004), wound infection (OR 0.6; p < 0.0001), and length of post-operative stay (Effect-2 days; p < 0.0001), compared to open approach. These advantages were more relevant in high-risk patients (ASA III-IV), even if the majority of them were operated by open approach (67.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-life setting, laparoscopy decreases wound infection rate, post-operative complications, and length of stay, especially in ASA III-IV patients.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Anciano , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Femenino , Anciano Frágil , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
There is no international consensus on the definition of the type of oncological resection that corresponds to each of the colectomies existing in the current literature. The objective is to define for each colectomy described in the literature: embryological dissection plane, vascular pedicles in which to perform central ligation, the extent of the colectomy, and the need for resection of the greater momentum. A consensus of experts is carried out through the Delphi methodology through two rounds from the Coloproctology Section of the Spanish Association of Surgeons. Study period: November 2021-January 2023. 120 experts were surveyed. Degrees of consensus: Very strong: >90%, Strong: 80%-90%, Moderate: 50%-80%, No consensus: <50%. The definition for each oncological colectomy was established by very strong, and strong recommendations. Each oncological colectomy was established as Right hemicolectomy (RHC), RHC with D3 lymphadenectomy, Extended-RHC, transverse colon segmental colectomy, splenic flexure segmental colectomy, subtotal colectomy, total colectomy, left hemicolectomy (LHC), extended-LHC, sigmoidectomy.
RESUMEN
Many different options of neoadjuvant treatments for advanced colon cancer are emerging. An accurate preoperative staging is crucial to select the most appropriate treatment option. A retrospective study was carried out on a national series of operated patients with T4 tumors. Considering the anatomo-pathological analysis of the surgical specimen as the gold standard, a diagnostic accuracy study was carried out on the variables T and N staging and the presence of peritoneal metastases (M1c). The parameters calculated were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as the overall accuracy. A total of 50 centers participated in the study in which 1950 patients were analyzed. The sensitivity of CT for correct staging of T4 colon tumors was 57%. Regarding N staging, the overall accuracy was 63%, with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 62%; however, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.7 and 0.58, respectively. For the diagnosis of peritoneal metastases, the accuracy was 94.8%, with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 98%; in the case of peritoneal metastases, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 24.4 and 0.61, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CT in the setting of advanced colon cancer still has some shortcomings for accurate diagnosis of stage T4, correct classification of lymph nodes, and preoperative detection of peritoneal metastases.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades del Colon/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
No disponible