RESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Maldigestion in cystic fibrosis (CF) affects approximately 90% of patients. As soon as pancreatic insufficiency is identified, enzyme supplementation is prescribed even with breast fed infants. A pancreatic enzyme preparation developed particularly for infants, Creon for children (CfC), contains smaller granules to be administered with a dosing spoon (5000 lipase units per scoop). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomised, multi-centre study, 40 infants and toddlers received both CfC and Creon 10000 (C10) for two weeks each in a cross-over design. Dosing of pancreatic enzymes was continued as applied before the study. The primary endpoint was the parents' treatment preference. Secondary endpoints included coefficient of fat absorption (CFA), clinical symptoms and safety parameters. RESULTS: 20 parents (51%) from the N=39 intent to treat sample preferred CfC, 9 (23%) preferred C10, and 10 (26%) had no preference The applied doses led to a mean CFA with similar results for both treatments (77.8% vs. 78.7%). Gastrointestinal symptoms were reported on a number of study days, and some children had abnormal results for laboratory parameters of malabsorption. Safety and tolerability of the preparations were good and all these parameters were comparable for both treatments. CONCLUSION: Those parents who had a preference favoured CfC over C10. Both enzyme preparations improved malabsorption to a similar degree, although the applied dosages could have been too low in some children reflected in a suboptimal CFA. These data support the use of CfC for young patients with cystic fibrosis improving the daily care of this cohort detected mainly now through neonatal screening programmes.
Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Quística/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Pancrelipasa/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Preescolar , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Estudios Cruzados , Fibrosis Quística/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Metabolismo de los Lípidos/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Microesferas , Padres , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Incidence and prevalence of chronic pancreatitis (CP) are poorly known and prospective nationwide epidemiologic estimation has never been performed. AIMS: To estimate prospectively national incidence and prevalence of patients attending gastroenterologists for CP in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study was proposed to all of the French gastroenterologists (N=3215) of whom 753 accepted to participate (24% private, 40% hospital and 36% both). Were included all patients suffering from proved or suspected CP, from 04-2003 to 07-2003. Certain diagnostic criteria were pancreatic calcifications, ductal or histological abnormalities. For all of non-responder gastroenterologists, a tracking system was used (mail or by phone). RESULTS: A total of 456 gastroenterologists returned at least 1 case on 1748 patients. Median patient age was 51 years; sex-ratio was 5.07. Median duration between the first CP sign and the inclusion was 41 months. CP cause was alcoholism (84%), hereditary (1%), cystic fibrosis (1%), idiopathic (9%), other (6%). CP diagnosis was certain in 77%: calcifications (85%), ductal abnormalities (57%), and histology (8%). CP symptoms were: chronic abdominal pain (53%), acute pancreatitis episodes (67%), pseudocysts (40%), bi-liary tract compression (21%), diabetes mellitus (32%), pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (36%). Maximal annual incidence was 4,646 (crude annual incidence: 7.7 per 100,000; 12.9 in male; 2.6 in female) and prevalence was 15,832 cases (crude prevalence: 26.4 per 100,000; 43.8 in male; 9.0 in female). CONCLUSION: New CP patients attending gastroenterologists are about 5,000 a year. CP prevalence is about 16,000 patients (in France: 60,400,000 inhabitants). Frequency of main complications is close to hospital series, confirming that results issued from these centers are not or a few biased.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis Crónica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Recolección de Datos , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Gastroenterología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis Alcohólica/epidemiología , Pancreatitis Crónica/complicaciones , Pancreatitis Crónica/diagnóstico , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
AIMS: Heath-related quality of life (QoL) is decreased in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) but the relationship between symptom intensity of IBS and QoL remains largely unknown. The aim of this prospective survey was to investigate the relationship between intensity of IBS and changes in QoL. METHODS: Eight hundred and fifty-eight patients with IBS, according to Rome II criteria, completed a symptom questionnaire to measure intensity of IBS, and the gastrointestinal quality of life (GIQLI) questionnaire, which is a general QoL measure in patients with gastrointestinal disorders. RESULTS: 37.2% of the patients had constipation-predominant type IBS, 37.3% had diarrhea-predominant IBS and 25.4% had alternating diarrhea and constipation type symptoms. IBS was considered to be in remission or mild in 8.3% of patients; 41.3% had moderate IBS and 50.4% had severe IBS. The mean GIQLI score was 88 +/- 20. There was a significant correlation between symptom intensity and changes in QoL. Other significantly related factors were the type of bowel abnormality and gender. CONCLUSION: In IBS patients, symptom intensity and type of IBS have a negative impact on health-related QoL.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Colon Irritable/diagnóstico , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIM: Little data is available on the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in daily practice. The purpose of our study was to study the relationship between the severity of IBS and healthcare consumption. METHODS: During a cross-sectional epidemiological study undertaken by 330 private gastro-enterologists, the severity of IBS symptoms experienced by patients was quantified with Francis' score (limits 0-500) to study the relationship with the healthcare consumption. RESULTS: Data obtained from 1407 patients (mean age: 52.3 +/- 15 years, females: 68%) were analysed. Symptoms were usually long-lasting (mean duration: 134.1 +/- 128.4 months); they had required on average 5.7 +/- 4.5 medical visits in the past year including 2.3 +/- 2.1 visits to a gastroenterologist. The mean number of additional investigations performed by patient was 1.3 +/- 1.4. Ninety one percent of them took at least one medication. The mean severity score was 268.5 +/- 85.2. Patients' distribution according to severity showed that 47.3% of the patients had symptoms of moderate severity and 44.9% of high severity. There was a significant relationship between, in one hand, severity of symptoms and, in the other hand, the number of visits (P<0.001), the number of additional investigations (P<0.001) and the number of prescribed medications (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: There was a positive relationship between the severity of symptoms and the healthcare consumption in private gastroenterological practice. The data confirm the significant burden of IBS in France.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Funcionales del Colon/epidemiología , Gastroenterología/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Privada/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Funcionales del Colon/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Funcionales del Colon/economía , Enfermedades Funcionales del Colon/terapia , Costo de Enfermedad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Gastroenterología/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Práctica Privada/economía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: The attention given by the physician and the quality of the patient-physician relationship mainly determine the outcome of a consultation. Care seeking is a main characteristic of patients with functional bowel disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), while patients with suspected organic disease (Org) would rather expect a precise answer about their condition. The aim of this study was thus to evaluate the outcome of the consultation with a gastroenterologist in IBS patients, as compared to a group of patients with suspected organic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter cross-sectional study "one given week" included 158 patients consulting for the first time 18 gastroenterologists. Patients were consulting for abdominal pain and were classified as IBS or Org on the basis of the physician's clinical impression. Questionnaires including 27 common questions were distributed to the patients and the physicians at the end of the consultation and filled separately. RESULTS: The diagnosis of IBS was done in 110 patients and that of Org in 48. Groups were comparable for the characteristics, the intensity and the frequency of attacks of abdominal pain. The index of satisfaction of the patients was not different between groups (IBS: 8.7 +/- 1.4; Org: 9.1 +/- 1.4; P=0.16). The intensity of abdominal pain was reported in the same range by the patient (IBS: 5.1 +/- 2.9; Org: 4.5 +/- 2.8) and the physician (IBS: 4.6 +/- 2.3; Org: 4.8 +/- 2.6) in both groups. Digestive and extra-digestive symptoms were quoted equally by physicians, whatever the group the patient belonged to. Information given by the physician on diagnosis and therapy were equally well perceived by patients of both groups. However, the physician tended to evaluate the efficacy of the prescribed therapy to be lower in IBS (7.1 +/- 2.0) than in Org patients (8.0 +/- 1.7; P<0.01). CONCLUSION: In this study, the consultation with a gastroenterologist is equally well perceived by IBS and Org patients and it seems to meet the expectancy of the patient in most cases. However, the physician appeared less confident in the efficacy of the therapy proposed to IBS patients.