Videography in Pediatric Emergency Research: Establishing a Multicenter Collaborative and Resuscitation Registry.

OBJECTIVES: High-quality clinical research of resuscitations in a pediatric emergency department is challenging because of the limitations of traditional methods of data collection (chart review, self-report) and the low frequency of cases in a single center. To facilitate valid and reliable research for resuscitations in the pediatric emergency department, investigators from 3 pediatric centers, each with experience completing successful single-center, video-based studies, formed the Videography In Pediatric Emergency Research (VIPER) collaborative. METHODS: Our initial effort was the development of a multicenter, video-based registry and simulation-based testing of the feasibility and reliability of the VIPER registry. Feasibility of data collection was assessed by the frequency of an indeterminate response for all data elements in the registry. Reliability was assessed by the calculation of Cohen κ for dichotomous data elements and intraclass correlation coefficients for continuous data elements. RESULTS: Video-based data collection was completed for 8 simulated pediatric resuscitations, with at least 2 reviewers per case. Data were labeled as indeterminate by at least 1 reviewer for 18 (3%) of 524 relevant data fields. The Cohen κ for all dichotomous data fields together was 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.0). For all continuous (time-based) variables combined, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Initial simulation-based testing suggests video-based data collection using the VIPER registry is feasible and reliable. Our next step is to assess feasibility and reliability for actual pediatric resuscitations and to complete several prospective, hypothesis-based studies of specific aspects of resuscitative care, including of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, tracheal intubation, and teamwork and communication.

Effectiveness of interventions to improve medication use during rapid-sequence intubation in a pediatric emergency department.

PURPOSE: Results of a study to determine whether checklist-based interventions improved the selection and administration of rapid-sequence intubation (RSI) medications in a pediatric emergency department (ED) are reported. METHODS: A retrospective study of data collected during a quality-improvement project was conducted. Data sources included the electronic health record and video review. The central intervention was use of a 21-item RSI checklist, which included guidance for the physician team leader on medication selection and timing. A quick-reference card was developed to guide staff in preparing RSI medications. The main outcomes were (1) standard selection, defined as administration of indicated medications and avoidance of medications not indicated, and (2) efficient administration, defined as an interval of <30 seconds from sedative to neuromuscular blocker (NMB) infusion. RESULTS: A total of 253 consecutive patients underwent RSI during 3 consecutive periods: the historical (preimprovement) period (n = 136), the checklist only period (n = 68), and the checklist/card period (n = 49). The rate of standard selection of 3 RSI medications (atropine, lidocaine, and rocuronium) did not improve. The rate of efficient sedative and NMB administration improved from 56% in the historical period to 88% in the checklist period (p = 0.005). The median duration of RSI medication administration decreased from 28 seconds (interquartile range [IQR], 23-44 seconds) in the historical period to 19 seconds (IQR, 15-25 seconds) in the checklist/card period (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In a quality-improvement project in a pediatric ED, a checklist-based intervention improved RSI medication administration technique but not selection.

Studying the Safety and Performance of Rapid Sequence Intubation: Data Collection Method Matters.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe and compare chart and video review as data collection sources for the study of emergency department (ED) rapid sequence intubation (RSI). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compares the availability and content of key RSI outcome and process data from two sources: chart and video data from 12 months of pediatric ED RSI. Key outcomes included adverse effects (oxyhemoglobin desaturation, physiologic changes, inadequate paralysis, vomiting), process components (number of laryngoscopy attempts, end-tidal CO2 detection), and timing data (duration of preoxygenation and laryngoscopy attempts). RESULTS: We reviewed 566 documents from 114 cases with video data. Video review detected higher rates of adverse effects (67%) than did chart review (46%, p < 0.0001), identifying almost twice the rate of desaturation noted in the chart (34% vs. 18%, p = 0.0002). The performance and timing of key RSI processes were significantly more reliably available via video review (timing and duration of preoxygenation, as well as timing, duration, and number of laryngoscopy attempts, all p < 0.05). Video review identified 221 laryngoscopy attempts, whereas chart review only identified 187. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with video review for retrospective study of RSI in a pediatric ED, chart review significantly underestimated adverse effects, inconsistently contained data on important RSI process elements, rarely provided time data, and often conflicted with observations made on video review. Interpretation of and design of future studies of RSI should take into consideration the quality of the data source.

Reducing the incidence of oxyhaemoglobin desaturation during rapid sequence intubation in a paediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is the standard for definitive airway management in emergency medicine. In a video-based study of RSI in a paediatric emergency department (ED), we reported a high degree of process variation and frequent adverse effects, including oxyhaemoglobin desaturation (SpO2<90%). This report describes a multidisciplinary initiative to improve the performance and safety of RSI in a paediatric ED. METHODS: We conducted a local improvement initiative in a high-volume academic paediatric ED. We simultaneously tested: (1) an RSI checklist, (2) a pilot/copilot model for checklist execution, (3) the use of a video laryngoscope and (4) the restriction of laryngoscopy to specific providers. Data were collected primarily by video review during the testing period and the historical period (2009-2010, baseline). We generated statistical process control charts (G-charts) to measure change in the performance of six key processes, attempt failure and the occurrence of oxyhaemoglobin desaturation during RSI. We iteratively revised the four interventions through multiple plan-do-study-act cycles within the Model for Improvement. RESULTS: There were 75 cases of RSI during the testing period (July 2012-September 2013). Special cause variation occurred on the G-charts for three of six key processes, attempt failure and desaturation, indicating significant improvement. The frequency of desaturation was 50% lower in the testing period than the historical (16% vs 33%). When all six key processes were performed, only 6% of patients experienced desaturation. CONCLUSIONS: Following the simultaneous introduction of four interventions in a paediatric ED, RSI was performed more reliably, successfully and safely.