Demonstration of stable, long-term operation of a nanosecond pulsed DPSSL at 10 J, 100 Hz.

We report on stable, long-term operation of a diode-pumped solid-state laser (DPSSL) amplifying 15 ns pulses at 1029.5 nm wavelength to 10 J energy at 100 Hz pulse rate, corresponding to 1 kW average power, with 25.4% optical-to-optical efficiency. The laser was operated at this level for over 45 minutes (∼3 · 105 shots) in two separate runs with a rms energy stability of 1%. The laser was also operated at 7 J, 100 Hz for 4 hours (1.44 · 106 shots) with a rms long-term energy stability of 1% and no need for user intervention. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that long-term reliable amplification of a kW-class high energy nanosecond pulsed DPSSL at 100 Hz has been demonstrated.

Validity of an ultrasound device to measure bone mineral density.

This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of the UltraScan650™, a portable ultrasound device, used to measure BMD at the 1/3rd radius position. Fifty-two female first responders and healthcare providers were assessed using DXA (forearm, femur, lumbar, and total body) and the UltraScan650™. Fat and lean mass were also assessed using the DXA. Pearson correlations, Bland-Altman plots, t-tests, and linear regressions were used to assess validity. Intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficients were used to assess reliability. Inter-rater reliability and repeatability were good (ICC = 0.896 [0.818; 0.942], p < 0.001) and excellent (ICC = 0.917 [0.785; 0.989], p < 0.001), respectively. BMD as measured by the UltraScan650™ was weakly correlated to the DXA (r = 0.382 [0.121; 0.593], p = 0.0052). Bland-Altman plots revealed that the UltraScan650™ underestimated BMD (-0.0569 g/cm2), this was confirmed with a significant paired t-test (p < 0.001). A linear regression was performed (0.4744 × UltraScan650™ + 0.4170) to provide more information as to the issue of agreement. Bland-Altman plots revealed a negligible bias, supported by a paired t-test (p = 0.9978). Pearson's correlation revealed a significant relationship (r = -0.771 [-0.862; -0.631], p < 0.0001) between adjusted UltraScan650™-DXA and the average of the two scans (i.e., adjusted UltraScan650™ and DXA), suggesting a proportional constant error and proportional constant variability in measurements of BMD from the UltraScan650™. The UltraScan650™ is not a valid alternative to DXA for diagnostic purposes; however, the UltraScan650™ could be used as a screening tool in the clinical and research setting given the linear transformation is employed.

Self-compassion improves emotion regulation and mental health outcomes: A pilot study of an online self-compassion program for autistic adults.

LAY ABSTRACT: Self-compassion is when we are aware of our feelings and thoughts, are friendly toward ourselves, and realize everyone feels pain and makes mistakes. Self-compassion is associated with having better mental health and well-being in autistic and non-autistic people. But we do not know if autistic people's self-compassion can be improved through psychoeducation and self-compassion practices. We co-produced an online self-guided self-compassion program based on evidence-based self-compassion practices for autistic adults called the Self-compassion Program for Autistic Adults. This program included live-experiences videos of autistic adults reflecting on their self-compassion and self-critical experiences. This study piloted the program with 39 autistic adults. We wanted to see if these autistic adults' self-compassion, emotion regulation, mental health, and psychological well-being improved after completing this program. We found that the autistic participants' self-compassion, emotion regulation, mental health, and psychological well-being improved significantly after completing the program over 5 weeks. We also found that just over half of the participants reported experiencing negative reactions associated with self-compassion practices. We suggested some clinical implications, including a recommendation for emotion regulation interventions to incorporate self-compassion to help promote access to the affiliative system. In addition, autistic adults who are psychologically vulnerable may need to work with mental health professionals while developing self-compassion to help manage the possible negative reactions associated with some self-compassion practices.

Community Priorities for Outcomes Targeted During Professional Supports for Autistic Children and their Families.

PURPOSE: Professional supports play an important role in aiding autistic children's learning, participation, and overall wellbeing. Yet, limited research exists on stakeholders' perspectives and preferences regarding targeted outcomes for children undergoing support facilitated by professionals. This study investigated stakeholder views on the priority and appropriateness of outcomes intentionally targeted during the provision of supports to autistic children. METHOD: A survey of 181 participants (including 72 autistic adults, 85 parents, and 69 professionals) from Australia and New Zealand was conducted. Participants rated the appropriateness and priority of 47 potential child and parent outcomes within the context of support. RESULTS: The highest priority outcome was improving child mental wellbeing, with the lowest being reducing sensory seeking or avoidant behaviours. Priority ratings for certain outcomes differed based on the child's age. Over half of the participants rated reducing sensory seeking/avoidant behaviours and reducing focused interests as inappropriate outcomes of supports. Further, variations in the appropriateness of outcomes differed among participant groups. CONCLUSION: Reflecting the growing acceptance of neurodiversity-affirming practices, these results underscore support for targeting outcomes that are meaningful to the autistic and autism communities, with less emphasis on those which reflect neurotypical behavioural standards.

Are physical fitness, a history of childbirth and injury history related to knee valgus in female Canadian Armed Forces members during a bodyweight overhead squat movement?

OBJECTIVES: A history of childbirth is associated with musculoskeletal injury (MSKi) in female members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF). While previous injury and pregnancy impact knee kinematics, it is unclear if a history of childbirth is associated with medial knee displacement (MKD) in an overhead squat movement screen. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between MKD and (1) MSKi and (2) parity status in female CAF members. METHODS: 24 nulliparous and 21 parous female participants employed by the CAF completed a comprehensive physical fitness assessment of muscular flexibility, power, strength, endurance, aerobic capacity and a bodyweight overhead squat movement screen (recorded using two-dimensional video, and hip-knee-ankle angle measured using Kinovea software). Interactions between MKD, parity status and MSKi history were assessed by one-way analysis of variance and two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) (adjusted for age). RESULTS: An interaction between parity status and acute injury of the lower extremity was observed (F=4.379, p=0.043, η2 =0.099) in MKD of the right knee. The two-way ANCOVA examining acute injury of the lumbopelvic hip complex (lower back, pelvis, hip) yielded an interaction between acute injury to the lumbopelvic hip complex and parity status (F=4.601, p=0.038, η2=0.103) in MKD asymmetry. DISCUSSION: Parous participants with acute injury to the lower extremity had larger MKD than parous without this injury type. Parous participants without acute injury to the lumbopelvic hip complex had greater MKD asymmetry than nulliparous without this injury type. Our findings suggest that researchers and clinicians should consider parity status in conjunction with MSKi history when assessing knee kinematics in female military members.

A qualitative exploration of an autism-specific self-compassion program: The ASPAA.

LAY ABSTRACT: Autistic people often struggle to find the right support for their mental health. We wanted to change that by trying a new approach to help autistic adults with their emotions and well-being. We focused on something called "self-compassion," which is a way of being kind and understanding toward ourselves. This approach has worked well for many people, but we didn't know if it would work for autistic individuals. We invited 39 autistic adults to join an online program that taught them about self-compassion. The program lasted 5 weeks and included educational materials, meditation exercises, and self-reflection activities. We asked the participants for feedback each week and at the end of the program. From their responses, we discovered four important things. First, self-compassion had a big positive impact on the well-being of autistic adults. Second, they faced some challenges during the program. Third, they saw self-compassion as a journey that takes time and practice. Finally, they described how they valued changes to help autistic people engage with the program. Our findings show that self-compassion can really help autistic adults. We learned about the benefits they experienced and the difficulties they faced. Most importantly, we found that personalized support is crucial for autistic individuals. By creating programs that consider their specific needs, we can improve their mental health and make their lives better.

Exploring Identity Importance for Autistic Adults and Associations with Disclosure Experiences: A Brief Report.

Background: A strong autistic identity can help to support mental well-being, reduce anxiety and depression, increase self-esteem, and strengthen a shared community for autistic people. Autistic people are regularly faced with a decision to disclose their autistic identity to others and report a range of experiences after disclosure. The purpose of this brief report was to examine the association between identity and disclosure decisions in a sample of autistic adults to gather preliminary evidence justifying future research. Specifically, we were interested in learning more about how autistic identity is associated with one's approach to disclosure, while also exploring associations with other identities such as ethnic, gender, sexual, and religious identity. Methods: Participants (N = 111) completed an online questionnaire about their intersecting identities and their approach to disclosure. The research team that conducted this study was composed of both autistic and nonautistic researchers. Results: Results demonstrated that participants who felt their autistic identity and sexual identity were highly important also reported frequent disclosure of being autistic. Religious, gender, and ethnic identity were not associated with one's disclosure decisions or their disclosure outcomes. Conclusion: Overall, the results of this study emphasize the link between autistic and sexual identities and autism disclosure, but more research in this space is needed to better support the wider autism community.

Why is this an important issue?: Autistic identity is when a person feels a connection to others who are autistic, or to the larger autistic community. Disclosure, or sharing being autistic, is a complex decision that can have a significant impact on an autistic person's life. Both disclosure and autistic identity can be linked to the quality of life for many autistic adults. What was the purpose of this study?: We wanted to know whether autistic identity and disclosure were connected. We wondered whether people who felt a stronger sense of autistic identity would be more likely to share that they were autistic with other people. We also studied other identities such as religious identity, sexual identity, and gender identity­to see whether they were also connected to a person's autism disclosure decisions. What did the researchers do?: We used an online survey to ask 111 autistic adults about their identity and their autism disclosure decisions. The research team that conducted this study included both autistic and nonautistic researchers. What were the results of the study?: Autistic participants in our study who felt their autistic identity and sexual identity were highly important also told us they disclosed their autistic identity often to others in their life. Other identities, such as religious identity and ethnic identity, did not seem to relate to a person's autism disclosure in our study. What do these findings add to what was already known?: This research is the start of what we know about the connection between the identities of an autistic person and their disclosure decisions. Preliminary research like this study helps to show a reason for more research on this topic to increase knowledge and acceptance. What are potential weaknesses in the study?: This study does not cover the experiences of all autistic people, only those who could use technology to complete an online survey. Also, the design of the study only allows us to conclude that disclosure and identity are related, but we cannot yet say whether one influences the other. How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?: This research can help to justify additional investigations into this topic and demonstrate the importance of listening to autistic voices to understand their experiences with disclosure and how they may be influenced by their identities. For practitioners such as educators or therapists who work with autistic adults, this research can lead to knowledge that supports mental well-being.

Using Experience Sampling Methodology to Capture Disclosure Opportunities for Autistic Adults.

Background: Despite a recent surge in literature contributing to our understanding of autistic individuals' disclosure experiences, the findings remain mixed. Research based on autistic people's perspective often indicates negative outcomes, while research that focuses on nonautistic perspectives is more positive. In addition, no disclosure study has used ecologically valid research methods, which help to reduce the risk of memory biases and are more representative of real-world experiences. The aim of this research was to capture outcomes from real-world disclosure opportunities as reported by a diverse range of autistic adults. Methods: Thirty-six autistic adults reported their disclosure opportunities through experience sampling methodology (58% female, 28% male, and 14% nonbinary), multiple times per day or week for 2 months. Importantly, we embedded coproduction from conception to dissemination, ensuring that the outputs are relevant and beneficial for the autistic community. Results: In total, participants recorded 231 disclosure opportunities (M = 6.42, SD = 4.83). Two-thirds of opportunities (n = 153) were categorized as disclosure, where the participants decided to share they were autistic, and 33.8% (n = 78) were labeled nondisclosure, where the participants decided not to share that they were autistic. Qualitative thematic analysis of open responses resulted in five themes that illustrated the thought processes during disclosure opportunities, the reactions of others, and reflections following disclosure for autistic adults in our study. Conclusion: These findings show that disclosure decisions and outcomes are complex and are influenced by both internal and external factors. Both support for autistic adults navigating this process and knowledge for nonautistic individuals on the experiences of their autistic friends, family, and community members will help to alleviate negative experiences and improve the mental well-being of autistic adults who face these decisions daily.

Why is this an important issue?: Disclosure is choosing to tell someone that you are autistic. Nondisclosure is choosing not to tell someone you are autistic. This can be difficult for many people and can have a significant impact on their life. What was the purpose of this study?: We wanted to explore disclosure opportunities for autistic people. We wanted to know what these experiences looked like over 2 months and on a daily basis. What did the researchers do?: The research team asked autistic adults to complete a survey through a smartphone application every time they considered sharing that they were autistic over 2 months. The questions asked participants about their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors right after the experience. What were the results of the study?: Our participants shared 231 disclosure opportunities with us over 2 months. Some people shared no experiences, while others shared up to 19 experiences. On average, people shared six experiences. People told us how these opportunities went, and we found five common threads ("themes") across their experiences. First, when deciding whether to disclose or not, autistic people considered how safe they felt in their environment and with the people around them. Autistic people often thought about what they were hoping to gain by disclosing, and if there was nothing to gain, they decided against it. We learned that disclosure takes a lot of energy. We also learned that other people responded to disclosure in positive, neutral, and negative ways across all contexts. Finally, we found that our participants tried to learn from their experiences before the next time they thought about disclosure. What do these findings add to what was already known?: Our findings were similar to previous research that explored how complex autistic disclosure is. However, by gathering information in real time (instead of relying on recall), we learned that a decision to disclose is not only weighing up personal advantages and disadvantages, but also takes into consideration how safe the person feels in a particular environment and how much energy they feel they have at the time. We also learned that sometimes people do not disclose because they are worried about how someone might respond, but other times they simply feel there is no benefit to disclosure. What are the potential weaknesses in the study?: We understand that the experiences of our participants may not apply to all autistic people. Also, because participants had to use a computer or smartphone to be in the study, the findings may be different for individuals who were not able to participate. How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?: The findings help us to listen to autistic voices and learn about their experiences. We have used the results to make resource guides. This includes a guide for autistic people (including an easy English version) and a guide for nonautistic people. These resource guides can be found within the Supplementary Data, on our research website, or by getting in touch with the authorship team.Link to "a guide for autistic people" https://www.autismspectrum.org.au/uploads/documents/Research/Disclosure-opportunities-resource-guide-for-Autistic-people-Easy-English.pdf Link to "easy English version" https://www.autismspectrum.org.au/uploads/documents/Research/Disclosure-opportunities-resource-guide-for-Autistic-people_2022-12-12-005526_vgvt.pdf Link to "non-autistic people" https://www.autismspectrum.org.au/Supporting-Autistic-people-who-may-want-to-disclose.