Potential differences in kidney allograft outcomes between ethnicities when converting to sirolimus base immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether ethnicity impacts graft outcomes in kidney transplant patients converted to sirolimus (SRL) and maintained on either calcineurin inhibitors (CI) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with steroids. METHODS: This study analyzed kidney transplants converted to SRL and transplanted between July 1991 and April 2007. Patients were divided into 4 groups: group 1: African-Americans converted to SRL + CI; group 2: non-African-Americans converted to SRL + CI; group 3: African-Americans converted to SRL + MMF; group 4: non-African-Americans converted to SRL + MMF. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients was included. Demographics, baseline immunosuppression, and reason for SRL conversion were similar among groups. Patients converted to SRL + CI regimens had significantly higher rates of acute rejection before SRL conversion, but equal rates after conversion. Development of proteinuria was similar across groups. African-American patients converted to SRL + MMF tended to have poorer outcomes compared with African-American patients converted to SRL + CI. Non-African-American patients converted to SRL + MMF tended to have better graft outcomes compared with non-African-American patients converted to SRL + CI. CONCLUSIONS: African-Americans converted to SRL may benefit from continued CI, whereas non-African-Americans converted to SRL seem to have better outcomes with MMF. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Renal transplantation at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center: an update of results in the cyclosporine era.

This chapter presents a summary of living-related, living-unrelated, and cadaver renal transplantation performed at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center between January 1984 and October 1992. Over the past 9 years, 895 patients (557 males, 338 females, mean age 42 yrs) received 942 renal transplants; 599 patients received kidneys from cadaver donors (n = 627) and 296 patients received kidneys (n = 315) from living donors of all types. During this period, 151 patients were retransplanted, sometimes more than once (159 total retransplants, 124 secondary grafts, and 35 third or more transplants). An analysis of patient ant graft survival rates (calculated by actuarial methods) for different categories of transplant recipients was performed. Black recipients, as a racial subcategory, had the poorest graft outcome, especially when followed over the long term. Graft survival rates for Black recipients who were retransplanted with cadaver grafts were even worse and were noted to be similar to the diabetic population that received cadaver retransplants (66% vs 62% at 1 yr and 32% vs 25% at 5 yrs). Diabetic recipients of living-donor transplants had excellent graft survival results, similar to nondiabetic, living-donor recipients (patient survival rates 98% and 92% vs 97% and 92% at 1 and 5 yrs; graft survival rates 92% and 82% vs 92% and 82% at 1 and 5 yrs). HLA-identical recipients of first cadaver grafts demonstrated the best outcome in the entire cadaver series (graft survival rates 91% and 83% at 1 and 5 yrs, respectively). HLA-identical recipients of second or more cadaver grafts had poorer results than expected (50% graft survival at 1 yr) despite a 100% patient survival rate. HLA-identical recipients of living-related grafts had the best graft survival rates (96% at 1 yr and 94% at 5 yrs) and superior graft survival rates for retransplanted grafts as well (100% at 1 and 5 yrs). We conclude that in the last decade, patient and graft survival rates for cadaveric and living-donor renal transplants have improved dramatically relative to the results obtained in the pre-CsA era. Long-term graft survival in Black recipients remains lower than in other races, suggesting the need to analyze other factors to explain poorer graft survival in this recipient population. Results in diabetic recipients continue to be excellent at our center, encouraging the continuation of our aggressive approach to try to transplant diabetics as early as possible, particularly when a living donor is available.