Pediatric Acute Compartment Syndrome in Long Bone Fractures: Who is at Risk?

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of large-scale data on the factors that suggest an impending or underlying extremity pediatric acute compartment syndrome (ACS). In addition, literature regarding the timing of operative fixation and the risk of ACS is mixed. We aimed to describe the factors associated with pediatric ACS. METHODS: Analysis of 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included patients aged <18 y diagnosed with upper extremity (UE) and lower extremity (LE) fractures. Burns and insect bites/stings were excluded. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of ACS. RESULTS: 61,537 had LE fractures, of which 0.5% developed ACS. 76,216 had UE fractures, of which 0.16% developed ACS. Multivariable regression analyses identified increasing age, male gender, motorcycle collision, and pedestrian struck mechanisms of injury, comminuted and open fractures, tibial and concurrent tibial and fibular fractures, forearm fractures, and operative fixation as predictors of ACS (P value <0.05). Among LE fractures, 34% underwent open reduction internal fixation (time to operation = 14 [8-20] hours), and 2.1% underwent ExFix (time to operation = 9 [4-17] hours). Among UE fractures, 54% underwent open reduction internal fixation (time to operation = 11 [6-16] hours), and 1.9% underwent ExFix (time to operation = 9 [4-14] hours). Every hour delay in operative fixation of UE and LE fractures was associated with a 0.4% increase in the adjusted odds of ACS (P value <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results may aid clinicians in recognizing children who are "at risk" for ACS. Future studies are warranted to explore the optimal timing for the operative fixation of long bone fractures to minimize the risk of pediatric ACS.

Emergency Department Shock Index Outperforms Prehospital and Delta Shock Indices in Predicting Outcomes of Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple shock indices (SIs), including prehospital, emergency department (ED), and delta (ED SI - Prehospital SI) have been developed to predict outcomes among trauma patients. This study aims to compare the predictive abilities of these SIs for outcomes of polytrauma patients on a national level. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2018). We included adult (≥18 y) trauma patients and excluded patients who were transferred, had missing vital signs, and those with severe head injuries (Head-Abbreviated Injury Scale>3). Outcome measures were 24-h and in-hospital mortality, 24-h packed red blood cells transfusions, and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. Predictive performances of these SIs were evaluated by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics for the entire study cohort and across all injury severities. RESULTS: A total of 750,407 patients were identified. Meanstandard deviation age and lowest systolic blood pressure were 53 ± 21 y, and 81 ± 32 mmHg, respectively. Overall, 24-h and in-hospital mortality were 1.2% and 2.5%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, all three SIs were independently associated with higher rates of 24-h and in-hospital mortality, blood product requirements, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (P < 0.001). ED SI was superior to prehospital and delta SIs (P < 0.001) for all outcomes. On subanalysis of patients with moderate injuries, severe injuries, and positive delta SI, the results remained the same. CONCLUSIONS: ED SI outperformed both prehospital and delta SIs across all injury severities. Trauma triage guidelines should prioritize ED SI in the risk stratification of trauma patients who may benefit from earlier and more intense trauma activations.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Genitourinary Trauma: A Nationwide Outcomes-Based Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Bladder and ureteral injuries are uncommon in trauma patients but are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Patients presenting with such injuries may undergo either open surgical repair or laparoscopic repair. We aimed to compare outcomes of open surgical approach and laparoscopy in trauma patients with isolated bladder and ureteral injury. We hypothesized that laparoscopy is associated with improved outcomes. METHODS: We performed a 2017 review of American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program and identified trauma patients with bladder and ureteral injury who underwent open surgical repair or laparoscopy. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed adjusting for demographics, emergency department vitals (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, Glasgow Coma Scale), mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, each body region Abbreviated Injury Scale score, and transfusion units. Outcomes were rates of in-hospital major complications and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1,004,440 trauma patients, 384 patients (open: 192 and laparoscopy: 192) were matched and included. The mean age was 36 ± 15 y, Injury Severity Score was 27 [27-48], 77% were males, and 56% of patients had a blunt mechanism of injury, and 44% had penetrating injuries. Overall mortality was 7.3%. On univariate analysis, mortality was lower in the open group as compared to the laparoscopy group (10.4% versus 4.2%, P = 0.019) and survivor-only hospital length of stay was longer in the open group (8 [8-9] versus 7 [5-11], P = 0.008). There was no difference in overall major complications (23% versus 21%, P = 0.621). On multivariate analysis, open surgical repair was independently associated with lower odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.405, 95% confidence interval: [0.17-0.95], P-value = 0.038) CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis open surgical repair of bladder and ureteral injuries was associated with lower mortality with other outcomes being similar when compared to laparoscopy. Laparoscopic surgical repair may not have an advantage over the open surgical repair for bladder and ureteral injuries. Further prospective studies are needed to delineate the ideal surgical approach for these injuries.

Predictors of Mortality in Blunt Cardiac Injury: A Nationwide Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Blunt thoracic injury (BTI) is one of the most common causes of trauma admission in the United States and is uncommonly associated with cardiac injuries. Blunt cardiac injury (BCI) after blunt thoracic trauma is infrequent but carries a substantial risk of morbidity and sudden mortality. Our study aims to identify predictors of concomitant cardiac contusion among BTI patients and the predictors of mortality among patients presenting with BCI on a national level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a 1-y (2017) analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included all adults (aged ≥ 18 y) with the diagnosis of BTI. We excluded patients who were transferred, had a penetrating mechanism of injury, and who were dead on arrival. Our primary outcomes were the independent predictors of concomitant cardiac contusions among BTI patients and the predictors of mortality among BCI patients. Our secondary outcome measures were in-hospital complications, differences in injury patterns, and injury severity between the survivors and nonsurvivors of BCI. RESULTS: A total of 125,696 patients with BTI were identified, of which 2368 patients had BCI. Mean age was 52 ± 20 y, 67% were male, and median injury severity score was 14 [9-21]. The most common type of cardiac injury was cardiac contusion (43%). Age ≥ 65 y, higher 4-h packed red blood cell requirements, motor vehicle collision mechanism of injury, and concomitant thoracic injuries (hemothorax, flail chest, lung contusion, sternal fracture, diaphragmatic injury, and thoracic aortic injuries) were independently associated with concomitant cardiac contusion among BTI patients (P value < 0.05). Age ≥ 65 y, thoracic aortic injury, diaphragmatic injury, hemothorax, and a history of congestive heart failure were independently associated with mortality in BCI patients (P value < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of concomitant cardiac contusion among BTI patients and mortality among BCI patients were identified. Guidelines on the management of BCI should incorporate these predictors for timely identification of high-risk patients.

Geriatric trauma, frailty, and ACS trauma center verification level: Are there any correlations with outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: It remains unclear whether geriatrics benefit from care at higher-level trauma centers (TCs). We aimed to assess the impact of the TC verification level on frail geriatric trauma patients' outcomes. We hypothesized that frail patients cared for at higher-level TCs would have improved outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Patients ≥65 years were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2017-2019). Patients transferred, discharged from emergency department (ED), and those with head abbreviated injury scale >3 were excluded. 11-factor modified frailty index was utilized. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. Outcomes included discharge to skilled nursing facility or rehab (SNF/rehab), withdrawal of life-supporting treatment (WLST), mortality, complications, failure-to-rescue, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ventilator days. RESULTS: 110,680 patients were matched (Frail:55,340, Non-Frail:55,340). Mean age was 79 (7), 90% presented following falls, and median ISS was 5 [2-9]. Level-I/II TCs had lower rates of discharge to SNF/rehab (52.6% vs. 55.8% vs. 60.9%; p < 0.001), failure-to-rescue (0.5% vs. 0.4% vs. 0.6%;p = 0.005), and higher rates of WLST (2.4% vs. 2.1% vs. 0.3%; p < 0.001) compared to level-III regardless of injury severity and frailty. Compared to Level-III centers, Level-I/II centers had higher complications among moderate-to-severely injured patients (4.1% vs. 3.3% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001), and lower mortality only among frail patients regardless of injury severity (1.8% vs. 1.5% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001). Patients at Level-I TCs were more likely to be admitted to ICU, and had longer hospital LOS and ventilator days compared to Level-II and III TCs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Frailty may play an important role when triaging geriatric trauma patients. In fact, the benefit of care at higher-level TCs is particularly evident for patients who are frail. Level III centers may be underperforming in providing access to palliative and end-of-life care.

Interfacility transfer of pediatric trauma patients to higher levels of care: The effect of transfer time and level of receiving trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Interfacility transfer of pediatric trauma patients to pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) after evaluation in nontertiary centers is associated with improved outcomes. We aimed to assess the outcomes of transferred pediatric patients based on their severity of the injury, transfer time, and level of receiving PTCs. METHODS: This is a 3-year (2017-2019) analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. All children (younger than 15 years) who were transferred from other facilities to Level I or II PTC were included and stratified by level of receiving PTCs and injury severity. Outcome measures were in-hospital mortality and major complications. RESULTS: A total of 67,726 transferred pediatric trauma patients were identified, of which 52,755 were transferred to Level I and 14,971 to Level II. The mean ± SD age and median Injury Severity Score were 7 ± 4 years and 4 (1-6), respectively. Eighty-five percent were transported by ground ambulance. The median transfer time for Levels I and II was 93 (70-129) and 90 (66-128) minutes, respectively ( p < 0.001). On multivariable regression, interfacility transfers to Level I PTCs were associated with decreased risk-adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality among the mildly to moderately injured group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.59; p = 0.037) and severely injured group with a transfer time of less than 60 minutes (adjusted odds ratio, 0.27; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Every minute increase in the interfacility transfer time is associated with a 2% increase in risk-adjusted odds of mortality among severely injured pediatric trauma patients. Factors other than the level of receiving PTCs, such as estimated transfer time and severity of injury, should be considered while deciding about transferring pediatric trauma patients to higher levels of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Dealing with the elder abuse epidemic: Disparities in interventions against elder abuse in trauma centers.

BACKGROUND: Elder abuse is a major cause of injury, morbidity, and death. We aimed to identify the factors associated with interventions against suspected physical abuse in older adults. METHODS: Analysis of the 2017-2018 ACS TQIP. All trauma patients ≥60 years with an abuse report for suspected physical abuse were included. Patients with missing information on abuse interventions were excluded. Outcomes were rates of abuse investigation initiation following an abuse report and change of caregiver at discharge among survivors with an abuse investigation initiated. Multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 727,975 patients, 1405 (0.2%) had an abuse report. Patients with an abuse report were younger (mean, 72 vs 75, p < 0.001), and more likely to be females (57% vs 53%, p = 0.007), Hispanic (11% vs 6%, p < 0.001), Black (15% vs 7%, p < 0.001), suffer from dementia (18% vs 11%, p < 0.001), functional disability (19% vs 15%, p < 0.001), have a positive admission drug screen (9% vs 5%, p < 0.001) and had a higher ISS (median [IQR], 9 [4-16] vs 6 [3-10], p < 0.001). Perpetrators were members of the immediate/step/extended family in 91% of cases. Among patients with an abuse report, 1060 (75%) had abuse investigations initiated. Of these, 227 (23%) resulted in a change of caregiver at discharge. On multivariate analysis for abuse investigation initiation, male gender, private insurance, and management at non-level I trauma centers were associated with lower adjusted odds (p < 0.05), while Hispanic ethnicity, positive admission drug screen, and penetrating injury were associated with higher adjusted odds (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis for change of caregiver, male gender, and private insurance were associated with lower adjusted odds (p < 0.05), while functional disability and dementia were associated with higher adjusted odds (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Significant gender, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities exist in the management of physical abuse of older adults. Further studies are warranted to expand on and address the contributing factors underlying these disparities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. STUDY TYPE: Therapeutic/Care Management.

Association Between Hemorrhage Control Interventions and Mortality in US Trauma Patients With Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures.

Importance: Management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures remains a challenge. Hemostatic interventions are used alone or in combination. There is a paucity of data on the association between the pattern of hemorrhage control interventions and outcomes after a severe pelvic fracture. Objective: To characterize clinical outcomes and study the patterns of hemorrhage control interventions in hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, a retrospective review was performed of data from the 2017 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, a national multi-institutional database of trauma patients in the United States. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with pelvic fractures who received early transfusions (≥4 units of packed red blood cells in 4 hours) and underwent intervention for pelvic hemorrhage control were identified. Use and order of preperitoneal pelvic packing (PP), pelvic angioembolization (AE), and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in zone 3 were examined and compared against the primary outcome of mortality. The associations between intervention patterns and mortality, complications, and 24-hour transfusions were further examined by backward stepwise regression analyses. Data analyses were performed in September 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were rates of 24-hour, emergency department, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were major in-hospital complications. Results: A total of 1396 patients were identified. Mean (SD) age was 47 (19) years, 975 (70%) were male, and the mean (SD) lowest systolic blood pressure was 71 (25) mm Hg. The median (IQR) Injury Severity Score was 24 (14-34), with a 24-hour mortality of 217 patients (15.5%), ED mortality of 10 patients (0.7%), in-hospital mortality of 501 patients (36%), and complication rate of 574 patients (41%). Pelvic AE was the most used intervention (774 [55%]), followed by preperitoneal PP (659 [47%]) and REBOA zone 3 (126 [9%]). Among the cohort, 1236 patients (89%) had 1 intervention, 157 (11%) had 2 interventions, and 3 (0.2%) had 3 interventions. On regression analyses, only pelvic AE was associated with a mortality reduction (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.82; P < .001). Preperitoneal PP was associated with increased odds of complications (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.80; P = .01). Increasing number of interventions was associated with increased 24-hour transfusions (ß = +5.4; 95% CI, +3.5 to +7.5; P < .001) and mortality (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.37; P = .03), but not with complications. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that among patients with pelvic fracture who received early transfusions and at least 1 invasive pelvic hemorrhage control intervention, more than 1 in 3 died, despite the availability of advanced hemorrhage control interventions. Only pelvic AE was associated with a reduction in mortality.

Failure-to-rescue and mortality after emergent pediatric trauma laparotomy: How are the children doing?

INTRODUCTION: Emergent trauma laparotomy is associated with mortality rates of up to 40%. There is a paucity of data on the outcomes of emergent trauma laparotomies performed in the pediatric population. The aim of our study was to describe the outcomes, including mortality and FTR, among pediatric trauma patients undergoing emergent laparotomy and identify factors associated with failure-to-rescue (FTR). METHODS: We performed a one-year (2017) retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program dataset. All pediatric trauma patients (age <18 years) who underwent emergent laparotomy (laparotomy performed within 2 h of admission) were included. Outcome measures were major in-hospital complications, overall mortality, and failure-to-rescue (death after in-hospital major complication). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with failure-to-rescue. RESULTS: Among 120,553 pediatric trauma patients, 462 underwent emergent laparotomy. Mean age was 14±4 years, 76% of patients were male, 49% were White, and 50% had a penetrating mechanism of injury. Median ISS was 25 [13-36], Abdomen AIS was 3 [2-4], Chest AIS was 2 [1-3], and Head AIS was 2 [0-5]. The median time in ED was 33 [18-69] minutes, and median time to surgery was 49 [33-77] minutes. The most common operative procedures performed were splenectomy (26%), hepatorrhaphy (17%), enterectomy (14%), gastrorrhaphy (14%), and diaphragmatic repair (14%). Only 22% of patients were treated at an ACS Pediatric Level I trauma center. The most common major in-hospital complications were cardiac (9%), followed by infectious (7%) and respiratory (5%). Overall mortality was 21%, and mortality among those presenting with hypotension was 31%. Among those who developed in-hospital major complications, the failure-to-rescue rate was 31%. On multivariate analysis, age younger than 8 years, concomitant severe head injury, and receiving packed red blood cell transfusion within the first 24 h were independently associated with failure-to-rescue. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that emergent trauma laparotomies performed in the pediatric population are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and failure-to-rescue rates. Quality improvement programs may use our findings to improve patient outcomes, by increasing focus on avoiding hospital complications, and further refinement of resuscitation protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV STUDY TYPE: Epidemiologic.

Does preinjury anticoagulation worsen outcomes among traumatic hemothorax patients? A nationwide retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Up to a quarter of all traumatic deaths are due to thoracic injuries. Current guidelines recommend consideration of evacuation of all hemothoraces with tube thoracostomy. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of pre-injury anticoagulation on outcomes of traumatic hemothorax patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a 4-year (2017 - 2020) analysis of the ACS-TQIP database. We included all adult trauma patients (age ≥18 years) presenting with hemothorax and no other severe injuries (other body regions <3). Patients with a history of bleeding disorders, chronic liver disease, or cancer were excluded from this study. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the history of preinjury anticoagulant use (AC, preinjury anticoagulant use: No-AC, no preinjury anticoagulant use). Propensity score matching (1:1) was done by adjusting for demographics, ED vitals, injury parameters, comorbidities, thromboprophylaxis type, and trauma center verification level. Outcome measures were interventions for hemothorax (chest tube, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS]), reinterventions (chest tube > once), overall complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and mortality. RESULTS: A matched cohort of 6,962 patients (AC, 3,481; No-AC, 3,481) was analyzed. The median age was 75 years, and the median ISS was 10. The AC and No-AC groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics. Compared to the No-AC group, AC group had higher rates of chest tube placement (46% vs 43%, p = 0.018), overall complications (8% vs 7%, p = 0.046), and longer hospital LOS (7[4-12] vs 6[3-10] days, p ≤ 0.001). Reintervention and mortality rates were similar between the groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of preinjury anticoagulants in hemothorax patients negatively impacts patient outcomes. Increased surveillance is required while dealing with hemothorax patients on pre-injury anticoagulants, and consideration should be given to earlier interventions for such patients.

The final decision among the injured elderly, to stop or to continue? Predictors of withdrawal of life supporting treatment.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on factors that influence the decision regarding withdrawal of life supporting treatment (WLST) in geriatric trauma patients. We aimed to identify predictors of WLST in geriatric trauma patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons- Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2019) included all severely injured (Injury Severity Score >15) geriatric trauma patients (≥65 years). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of WLST. RESULTS: There were 155,583 patients included. Mean age was 77 ± 7 years, 55% were male, 97% sustained blunt injury, and the median Injury Severity Score was 17 [16-25]. Overall WLST rate was 10.8%. On MLR analysis, increasing age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.37; p < 0.001), male sex (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-1.18; p < 0.001), White race (aOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.36-1.52; p < 0.001), frailty (aOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.34-1.50; p < 0.001), government insurance (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.20-1.33; p < 0.001), presence of advance directive limiting care (aOR, 2.55; 95% CI, 2.40-2.70; p < 0.001), severe traumatic brain injury (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.66-1.95; p < 0.001), ventilator requirement (aOR, 12.73; 95% CI, 12.09-13.39; p < 0.001), and treatment at higher level trauma centers (Level I aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.42-1.57; p < 0.001; Level II aOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.35-1.51; p < 0.001) were independently associated with higher odds of WLST. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that nearly one in 10 severely injured geriatric trauma patients undergo WLST. Multiple patient and hospital related factors contribute to decision making and directed efforts are necessary to create a more standardized process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Unequal Treatment? Confronting Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparity in Management of Survivors of Violent Suicide Attempt.

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric inpatient hospitalization is nearly always indicated for patients with recent suicidal behavior. We aimed to assess the factors associated with receiving mental health services during hospitalization or on discharge among survivors of suicide attempts in trauma centers. STUDY DESIGN: A 3-year analysis of the 2017 to 2019 American College of Surgeons TQIP. Adults (≥18 years) presenting after suicide attempts were included. Patients who died, those with emergency department discharge disposition, those with superficial lacerations, and those who were transferred to nonpsychiatric care facilities were excluded. Backward stepwise regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of receiving mental health services (inpatient psychiatric consultation/psychotherapy, discharge/transfer to a psychiatric hospital, or admission to a distinct psychiatric unit of a hospital). RESULTS: We identified 18,701 patients, and 56% received mental health services. The mean age was 40 ± 15 years, 72% were males, 73% were White, 57% had a preinjury psychiatric comorbidity, and 18% were uninsured. Of these 18,701 patients, 43% had moderate to severe injuries (Injury Severity Score > 8), and the most common injury was cut/stab (62%), followed by blunt mechanisms (falls, lying in front of a moving object, and intentional motor vehicle collisions) (18%) and firearm injuries (16%). On regression analyses, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, male sex, younger age, and positive admission alcohol screen were associated with lower odds of receiving mental health services (p < 0.05). Increasing injury severity, being insured, having preinjury psychiatric diagnosis, and positive admission illicit drug screen were associated with higher odds of receiving mental health services (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Significant disparities exist in the management of survivors of suicide attempts. There is a desperate need for improved access to mental health services. Further studies should focus on delineating the cause of these disparities, identifying the barriers, and finding solutions.

Time to Whole Blood Transfusion in Hemorrhaging Civilian Trauma Patients: There Is Always Room for Improvement.

BACKGROUND: Whole blood (WB) is becoming the preferred product for the resuscitation of hemorrhaging trauma patients. However, there is a lack of data on the optimum timing of receiving WB. We aimed to assess the effect of time to WB transfusion on the outcomes of trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons TQIP 2017 to 2019 database was analyzed. Adult trauma patients who received at least 1 unit of WB within the first 2 hours of admission were included. Patients were stratified by time to first unit of WB transfusion (first 30 minutes, second 30 minutes, and second hour). Primary outcomes were 24-hour and in-hospital mortality, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 1,952 patients were identified. Mean age and systolic blood pressure were 42 ± 18 years and 101 ± 35 mmHg, respectively. Median Injury Severity Score was 17 [10 to 26], and all groups had comparable injury severities (p = 0.27). Overall, 24-hour and in-hospital mortality rates were 14% and 19%, respectively. Transfusion of WB after 30 minutes was progressively associated with increased adjusted odds of 24-hour mortality (second 30 minutes: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.07, p = 0.015; second hour: aOR 2.39, p = 0.010) and in-hospital mortality (second 30 minutes: aOR 1.79, p = 0.025; second hour: aOR 1.98, p = 0.018). On subanalysis of patients with an admission shock index >1, every 30-minute delay in WB transfusion was associated with higher odds of 24-hour (aOR 1.23, p = 0.019) and in-hospital (aOR 1.18, p = 0.033) mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Every minute delay in WB transfusion is associated with a 2% increase in odds of 24-hour and in-hospital mortality among hemorrhaging trauma patients. WB should be readily available and easily accessible in the trauma bay for the early resuscitation of hemorrhaging patients.

Local Antibiotic Therapy for Open Long Bone Fractures: Appropriate Prophylaxis or Unnecessary Exposure for the Orthopedic Trauma Patient?

INTRODUCTION: Prophylactic local antibiotic therapy (LAbT) to prevent infection in open long bone fracture (OLBF) patients has been in use for many decades despite lack of definitive evidence confirming a beneficial effect. We aimed to evaluate the effect of LAbT on outcomes of OLBF patients on a nationwide scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of 2017-2018 American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, all adult (≥18 years) patients with isolated OLBF (non-extremity-Abbreviated Injury Scale < 3) were included. We excluded early deaths (<24 h) and those who had burns or non-extremity surgery. Outcomes were infectious complications (superficial surgical site infection, deep superficial surgical site infection, osteomyelitis, or sepsis), unplanned return to operating room, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS). Patients were stratified into two groups: those who received LAbT and those who did not receive LAbT (No-LAbT). Propensity score matching (1:3) and chi-square tests were performed. RESULTS: A total of 61,337 isolated OLBF patients were identified, among whom 2,304 patients were matched (LAbT: 576; No-LAbT: 1,728). Both groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics. Mean age was 43 ± 17 years, 75% were male, 14% had penetrating injuries, and the median extremity-Abbreviated Injury Scale was 1 (1-2). Most common fracture locations were tibia (66%), fibula (49%), femur (24%), and ulna (11%). About 52% of patients underwent external fixation, 79% underwent internal fixation, and 86% underwent surgical debridement. The median time to LAbT was 17 (5-72) h, and the median time to debridement was 7 (3-15) h (85% within 24 h). The LAbT group had similar rates of infectious complications (3.5% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.24) and unplanned return to the operating room (2.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.74) compared to the No-LAbT group. Patients who received LAbT had longer hospital LOS (16 [10-29] vs. 14 [9-24] days, P < 0.001) but similar intensive care unit LOS (4 [3-9] vs. 4 [2-7] days, P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that prophylactic LAbT for OLBF may not be beneficial over well-established standards of care such as early surgical debridement and systemic antibiotics. Prospective studies evaluating the efficacy, risks, costs, and indications of adjuvant LAbT for OLBF are warranted.

Feeling like an imposter: are surgeons holding themselves back?

Imposter syndrome is a psychological phenomenon where people doubt their achievements and have a persistent internalized fear of being exposed as a fraud, even when there is little evidence to support these thought processes. It typically occurs among high performers who are unable to internalize and accept their success. This phenomenon is not recognized as an official mental health diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; however, mental health professionals recognize it as a form of intellectual self-doubt. It has been reported that imposter syndrome is predominant in the high-stakes and evaluative culture of medicine, where healthcare workers are frequently agonized by feelings of worthlessness and incompetence. Imposter syndrome can lead to a variety of negative effects. These can include difficulty concentrating, decreased confidence, burnout, anxiety, stress, depression, and feelings of inadequacy. This article will discuss the prevalence of imposter syndrome among surgeons, its associated contributing factors, the effects it can have, and potential strategies for managing it. The recommended strategies to address imposter syndrome are based on the authors' opinions.

The unexpected paradox of geriatric traumatic brain injury outcomes: Uncovering racial and ethnic disparities.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare disparities have always challenged surgical care in the US. We aimed to assess the influence of disparities on cerebral monitor placement and outcomes of geriatric TBI patients. METHODS: Analysis of 2017-2019 ACS-TQIP. Included severe TBI patients ≥65 years. Patients who died within 24 h were excluded. Outcomes included mortality, cerebral monitors use, complications, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: We included 208,495 patients (White = 175,941; Black = 12,194) (Hispanic = 195,769; Non-Hispanic = 12,258). On multivariable regression, White race was associated with higher mortality (aOR = 1.26; p < 0.001) and SNF/rehab discharge (aOR = 1.11; p < 0.001) and less likely to be discharged home (aOR = 0.90; p < 0.001) or to undergo cerebral monitoring (aOR = 0.77; p < 0.001) compared to Black. Non-Hispanics had higher mortality (aOR = 1.15; p = 0.013), complications (aOR = 1.26; p < 0.001), and SNF/Rehab discharge (aOR = 1.43; p < 0.001) and less likely to be discharged home (aOR = 0.69; p < 0.001) or to undergo cerebral monitoring (aOR = 0.84; p = 0.018) compared to Hispanics. Uninsured Hispanics had the lowest odds of SNF/rehab discharge (aOR = 0.18; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the significant racial and ethnic disparities in the outcomes of geriatric TBI patients. Further studies are needed to address the reason behind these disparities and identify potentially modifiable risk factors in the geriatric trauma population.

Nonoperative management of blunt abdominal solid organ injury: Are we paying enough attention to patients on preinjury anticoagulation?

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the impact of pre-injury anticoagulant use on outcomes of isolated blunt abdominal SOI patients who underwent NOM. METHODS: A 1-year(2017) analysis of the ACS-TQIP. We included all ≥18yrs trauma patients with isolated blunt abdominal-SOI who underwent NOM. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their history of pre-injury anticoagulant use. Propensity score matching was performed. RESULTS: A matched cohort of 2709 patients (AC, 903; No-AC,1806) was analyzed. Compared to the No-AC group, the AC group had higher rates of failure of NOM(2.6% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.03), cardiac arrest (1.2%vs. 3.1%, p = 0.02), acute kidney injury (2.4% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.01), myocardial infarction (0.6% vs. 1.4%,p = 0.03), and mortality (5.1%vs. 7.6%,p = 0.01), and longer hospital LOS (17[10-24]vs.17[12-26]days,p = 0.04) and ICU LOS (11[6-17]vs.11[7-18]days,p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Among nonoperatively managed blunt abdominal SOI patients, preinjury use of anticoagulants negatively impacts outcomes. Extra surveillance is required while managing patients with blunt abdominal SOI on pre-injury anticoagulants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. STUDY TYPE: Therapeutic/care management.

Emergency readmissions following geriatric ground-level falls: How does frailty factor in?

BACKGROUND: Ground-level falls (GLFs) in older adults are increasing as life expectancy increases, and more patients are being discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for continuity of care. However, GLF patients are not a homogenous cohort, and the role of frailty remains to be assessed. Thus, the aim of this study is to examine the impact of frailty on the in-hospital and 30-day outcomes of GLF patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cohort analysis from the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2017. Geriatric (age ≥65 years) trauma patients presenting following GLFs were identified and grouped based on their frailty status. The associations between frailty and 30-day mortality and emergency readmission were examined by multivariate regression analyses adjusting for patient demographics and injury characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 100,850 geriatric GLF patients were identified (frail: 41% vs. non-frail: 59%). Frail GLF patients were younger (81[74-87] vs. 83[76-89] years; p<0.001) and less severely injured-Injury Severity Score [ISS] (4[1-9] vs. 5[2-9]; p<0.001). Frail patients had a higher index mortality (2.9% vs. 1.9%; p<0.001) and higher 30-day readmissions (14.0% vs. 9.8%; p<0.001). Readmission mortality was also higher in the frail group (15.2% vs. 10.9%; p<0.001), with 75.2% of those patients readmitted from an SNF. On multivariate analysis, frailty was associated with 30-day mortality (OR 1.75; p<0.001) and 30-day readmission (OR 1.49; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Frail geriatric patients are at 75% higher odds of mortality and 49% higher odds of readmission following GLFs. Of those readmitted on an emergency basis, more than one in seven patients died, 75% of whom were readmitted from an SNF. This underscores the need for optimization plans that extend to the post-discharge period to reduce readmissions and subsequent high-impact consequences.

Balanced hemostatic resuscitation for bleeding pediatric trauma patients: A nationwide quantitative analysis of outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The administration of balanced component therapy has been associated with improvements in outcomes in adult trauma. There is little to no specific data to guide transfusion ratios in children. The aim of our study is to compare outcomes among different transfusion strategies in pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: We conducted a (2014-2016) retrospective analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We selected all pediatric (age < 18) trauma patients who received at least one unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) within 4 h of admission. Patients were stratified based on their FFP:PRBC transfusion ratio in the first 4 h into: 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 1:3+. Primary outcomes were 24-mortality, in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were complications and 24 h PRBC transfusion requirements. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1,233 patients were identified of which 637 received transfusion ratio of 1:1, 365 1:2, 116 1:3, and 115 1:3+. Mean age was 11 ± 6y, 70% were male, ISS was 27 [20-38], and 62% sustained penetrating injuries. Patients in the 1:1 group had the lowest 24 h mortality (14% vs. 18% vs. 22% vs. 24%; p = 0.01) and in-hospital mortality (32% vs. 36% vs. 40% vs. 44%; p = 0.01). No difference was found between the groups in terms of complications (22% vs. 21% vs. 23% vs. 22%; p = 0.96) such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (3.3% vs. 3.6% vs. 0.9% vs. 0%; p = 0.10), and acute kidney injury (3% vs. 2.2% vs. 0.9% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.46). Additionally the 1:1 group had the lowest PRBC transfusion requirements (3[2-7] vs. 5[2-10] vs. 6[3-8] vs. 6[4-10]; p < 0.01). On regression analysis a progressive increase in the mortality adjusted odds ratio was observed as the FFP:PRBC transfusion ratio decreased. CONCLUSION: FFP:PRBC ratios closest to 1 were associated with increased survival in children. The resuscitation of pediatric patients should target a 1:1 ratio of FFP:PRBC. Further studies are needed for the development of massive transfusion protocols for this age group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV STUDY TYPE: Therapeutic/Care Management.