Diagnostic value of salivary gland ultrasonography for secondary Sjögren syndrome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Salivary gland ultrasound (SGUS) is a reliable technique for assessing the salivary glands in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS); however, the role of SGUS for diagnosis of secondary SS (sSS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was not examined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic value of SGUS for sSS in patients with SLE, and to investigate the relationship between SGUS findings with clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with SLE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 49 patients with SLE. The diagnosis of sSS was confirmed according to the 2016 ACR/EULAR criteria. Salivary gland US was performed for all patients and graded using a validated Hocevar scoring system. A complete clinical and laboratory workup for SLE was assessed. Schirmer's test and the ocular staining were performed. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients with a mean age of 30.2 ± 9.6 years, 98% were female. 19 (38.8%) had sSS. SGUS changes consistent with sSS (≥17) were found in 29 (59.2%) of the patients. Patients with higher SGUS score had more sicca findings as well as positive anti-Ro, anti-La antibodies, and poorer psychological stress (p < 0.05). The SGUS (≥17) showed a sensitivity of 84.2% and a specificity of 56.7% for sSS diagnosis, with an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.91). CONCLUSION: We propose salivary gland ultrasound as a non-invasive method in the diagnostic workup for sSS in patients with SLE. Further studies to confirm the diagnostic value of SGUS in a larger sample of patients with sSS will be necessary.

Prophylaxis of macular edema after cataract surgery in diabetic patients, topical Nepafenac versus intravitreal Ranibizumab.

PURPOSE: To compare effect of topical Nepafenac versus intravitreal Ranibizumab on macular thickness after cataract surgery in diabetic patients with no preoperative macular edema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study recruited diabetic patients with visually significant cataract and no diabetic macular edema (DME). Patient underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and were randomly assigned to receive post-operative topical Nepafenac, intra-operative intravitreal Ranibizumab, or no prophylactic treatment. Changes in subfoveal and perifoveal macular thickness were assessed by SD-OCT. RESULTS: The mean central macular thickness showed a significant increase in all study groups 1 week and 1 month postoperative when compared to baseline. At 3 months postoperative, there was a significant difference between Nepafenac and Control group (p = 0.017), Ranibizumab and Control groups (p = 0.009) with no significant difference between Nepafenac and Ranibizumab group (p = 0.545) regarding CMT. Comparable results could be detected as regarding peri-foveal macular thickness changes. Concerning BCVA, there was a significant difference between topical Nepafenac/control (p = 0.001) and intravitreal Ranibizumab/control (p = 0.004) at 1-week visit. No significant difference in BCVA was observed between Nepafenac and Ranibizumab group throughout the whole study period. In postoperative visits, cystoid macular edema occurred in three patients (7.9%) in Nepafenac group, one patient (2.7%) in Ranibizumab group, and seven patients (17.07%) in control group. CONCLUSION: Both postoperative topical Nepafenac and intra-operative intra-vitreal Ranibizumab are effective adjunctive to phacoemulsification in diabetic patients for prophylaxis of macular edema.

Comparison of structural and functional outcome of aflibercept versus ranibizumab in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization.

PURPOSE: To compare visual functional improvement and retinal structural changes of aflibercept versus ranibizumab for the management of treatment-naïve choroidal neovascularization related to pathological myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study included patients suffering from myopic choroidal neovascularization. Patients received three intravitreal injections of aflibercept (2 mg) or ranibizumab (0.5 mg) in 1:1 ratio every 4 weeks. Ophthalmic evaluation and optical coherence tomography were performed at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months after last injection. Primary outcome measure was the visual acuity change from baseline to month 3 after injection. Secondary outcome measures included change in retinal thickness and the relation of morphological and functional changes to baseline assessment parameters. RESULTS: A total of 48 myopic patients (48 eyes) suffering from myopic choroidal neovascularization were randomly assigned to receive either aflibercept (Group A) or ranibizumab (Group B). In Group A, best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved from 0.53 ± 0.10 logMAR to 0.38 ± 0.11 logMAR, at 3 months, and from 0.55 ± 0.11 logMAR to 0.39 ± 0.12 logMAR in Group B. Whereas, retinal thickness reduced from 317.7 ± 53.6 µm to 164.5 ± 81.9 µm in Group A, and from 321.1 ± 98.8 µm at baseline to 178.9 ± 64.5 µm in Group B at month 3. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness were statistically insignificant between the two groups at final visit. CONCLUSION: Both aflibercept and ranibizumab provided a significant improvement in visual acuity and retinal thickness in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization. Comparable functional and architectural results were achieved by both treatment modalities.

Comparison of the phaco chop and drill-and-crack techniques for phacoemulsification of hard cataracts: A fellow eye study.

PURPOSE: To quantify the intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes after using the phaco chop technique in one eye and drill-and-crack technique in the other eye in patients with bilateral dense brunescent cataract. METHODS: The Lens Opacities Classification System III grading system was used to select 132 eyes of 66 patients with bilateral nuclear opalescence (NO) grade NO4 or grade NO5. One eye in each patient with bilateral dense brunescent cataract was subjected to phacoemulsification using the phaco chop technique, while the other eye was subjected to phacoemulsification with the drill-and-crack technique for nucleus disassembly. The intraoperative parameters were quantified. Surgical outcome was assessed preoperatively and 1 day, 4 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively, and the outcomes of the two techniques were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the techniques in operative parameters [cumulative dissipated energy (p = 0.74), surgical time (p = 0.68) or surgical difficulty during nucleus disassembly (p = 0.80)]. There was no significant difference in the postoperative change in central corneal thickness between the techniques at day 1, 4 weeks and 12 weeks or in corneal endothelial cell density loss at 4 and 12 weeks (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the techniques in the mean corrected distance visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle resolution) at 4 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: The phaco chop and drill-and-crack techniques are equally effective for disassembly of hard NO4 and NO5 cataracts.

Early weaning versus prolonged administration of aqueous suppressants for prevention of hyperencapsulation in paediatric Ahmed glaucoma valve.

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of early and prolonged administration of aqueous suppressants in reduction of hyperencapsulation and intraocular pressure (IOP) control after paediatric Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation. METHODS: A prospective randomized interventional study recruited children who had AGV implantation for paediatric glaucoma. All patients received postoperative Timolol 0.5% for either 12 months (Group A) or 3 months (Group B). Additional IOP-reducing medications were added if IOP exceeded 21 mmHg or hyperencapsulation developed in either group. Primary outcome measures were rate of hyperencapsulation and reduction of IOP. RESULTS: Eighty sex children completed the 12-month follow-up visits. Baseline IOP was significantly reduced from 31.95 ± 9.1 to 16.94 ± 3.4 mmHg at 12 months in Group A and from 32.7 ± 7.4 to 19.85 ± 6.9 mmHg at 12 months in Group B. IOP was significantly lower in Group A than B at 6-, 9- and 12-month follow-up visits. In the first 4 months, the hyperencapsulation rate was similar in both Group A (six eyes, 13.3%) and Group B (seven eyes, 17.1%). However, the hyperencapsulation rate was significantly lower in Group A than B at both 6 months (22.5% versus 36.6%) and 12 months (31.1% versus 46.3%). Anti-glaucoma medications were significantly lower in Group A than B at both 6 months (1.3 versus 3.2 drugs) and 12 months (1.5 versus 3.6 drugs). CONCLUSION: Early and prolonged use of aqueous suppressants significantly reduced the rate of hyperencapsulation and provided better IOP control after paediatric AGV implantation.

Serum 14-3-3η protein is associated with clinical and serologic features of Sjögren's syndrome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional analysis.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjögren's syndrome (SS) may coexist and carry a higher risk for future comorbidities. Although 14-3-3η protein is recently a known diagnostic marker in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), its role has not been investigated in SLE. The aim of this study was to compare serum 14-3-3η protein level in SLE and RA patients and to examine its association with clinical and laboratory features in SLE patients. METHODS: Eighty-four SLE patients and 39 RA patients were included. Sociodemographic, SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI), and damage index were assessed for SLE patients. Data about secondary SS were collected. 14-3-3η was measured by ELISA; titres above 0.19 ng/ml were considered positive. RESULTS: Serum 14-3-3η protein in SLE was significantly lower than in RA (0.37 ± 0.09 vs 1.5 ± 0.51; p < 0.001). 14-3-3η protein level was comparable between SLE patients with and without arthritis (0.29 ± 0.8 vs 0.15 ± 0.08 respectively; p = 0.20). Serum 14-3-3η protein level was higher in SLE with secondary SS features compared to those without (0.22 ± 0.10 IU/ml vs 0.11 ± 0.04 IU/ml; respectively, p < 0.001). There were no differences in 14-3-3η positivity for other lupus criteria or correlation of 14-3-3η titer with SLEDAI. 14-3-3η protein at 1.11 ng/mL yield a secondary SS diagnostic accuracy of 71%. CONCLUSIONS: Serum 14-3-3η protein level is high in SLE-associated SS. The 14-3-3η protein level was able to distinguish patients with secondary SS among patients with SLE. Studying the role of 14-3-3η protein in Sjögren's syndrome would be considered in further larger scale studies to confirm the impact of any association. Key Points • Serum 14-3-3η protein level is significantly higher in systemic lupus patients with secondary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) in comparison to those without. • Serum 14-3-3η protein can be used as a useful marker to distinguish patients with secondary SS among patients with systemic lupus. • 14-3-3η protein level shows no difference between systemic lupus patients with and without arthritis.

Comparison of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Flap Morphology and Predictability by WaveLight FS200 Femtosecond Laser and Moria Microkeratome: An Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap thickness predictability and morphology by femtosecond (FS) laser and microkeratome (MK) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. METHODS: Fifty-two candidates for the LASIK procedure were stratified into two groups: FS laser-assisted (Allegretto FS-200) and MK flap creation (Moria 2). Flap thickness was determined at five points. The side-cut angle was measured in three directions at the margin interface. LASIK flap assessment was performed one month postoperatively by Spectralis anterior segment optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (93 eyes) were recruited; 49 eyes were stratified to the FS group and 44 eyes to the MK group. The FS group had relatively even flap configurations, and the MK group had meniscus-shaped flaps. Mean differences between planned and actual flap thickness were 12.93 ± 8.89 and 19.91 ± 5.77 µm in the FS and MK groups, respectively. In thin flaps (100 to 110 µm), there was a significant disparity between the two groups (7.80 ± 4.71 and 19.44 ± 4.46 µm in the FS and MK groups, respectively). However, in thicker flaps (130 µm), comparable flap thickness disparity was achieved (18.54 ± 9.52 and 20.83 ± 5.99 µm in the FS and MK groups, respectively). Mean side-cut angle was 74.29 ± 5.79 degrees and 32.34 ± 4.94 degrees in the FS and MK groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable flap thickness predictability was achieved in thicker flaps (130 µm), while the FS laser technique yielded a more predictable result in thinner flaps (100 to 110 µm). Different flap morphology was observed in meniscus flaps in MK-LASIK and flap morphology in FS-LASIK.

Switching to Aflibercept in Diabetic Macular Edema after Unsatisfactory Response to Other Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Drugs.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of switching to aflibercept in diabetic macular edema (DME) with suboptimal response to previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections. METHODS: A prospective interventional case series study recruited patients from a single center diagnosed with DME with suboptimal response to anti-VEGF injections. Three consecutive monthly injections of aflibercept were performed. The primary outcome measure was mean change in visual acuity after switching to aflibercept. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (42 eyes) were included. Baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity was 0.87 ± 0.23 and improved significantly to 0.62 ± 0.29, 0.56 ± 0.34, and 0.46 ± 0.35 at 1, 2, and 3 months, respectively, after the first injection. Mean baseline retinal thickness was 451.57 ± 107.09 µm and decreased significantly at 1, 2, and 3 months after switching to aflibercept (346.52 ± 79.03, 328.24 ± 81.98, and 313.71 ± 85.79 µm, respectively). Both visual improvement and mean change in retinal thickness were significant in patients with pre-aflibercept best-corrected visual acuity less than 1.0 logMAR but were not significant in patients with best-corrected visual acuity more than 1.0 logMAR. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to aflibercept in DME patients with an unsatisfactory response to previous anti-VEGF injections provided acceptable short-term visual and retinal architectural improvement.

Comparison between Ologen implant and different concentrations of Mitomycin C as an adjuvant to trabeculectomy surgery.

CONTEXT: Trabeculectomy is the most common surgical procedure for treatment of glaucoma. To improve success rates, adjuvants were utilized as Mitomycin C (MMC) and Ologen implant. AIMS: This study aims to establish efficacy and safety of Ologen implant versus MMC in trabeculectomy. SETTING AND DESIGN: A prospective, comparative clinical study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Assiut University, between December 2014 and April 2016. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (OAG), primary narrow-angle glaucoma and secondary OAG were assigned equally to trabeculectomy with Ologen, 0.4 mg/mL or 0.2 mg/mL MMC. The study outcome measures were reduction in intra-ocular pressure (IOP), success rates, survival analysis, and rate of complications. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: SPSS software Version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., IL, USA) was utilized. RESULTS: Thirty eyes were included in the study. Mean baseline IOP in Ologen, MMC 0.4 and MMC 0.2 groups were 27.43 ± 2.97, 28.4 ± 3.24, and 27.56 ± 2.69 mmHg, respectively. At week 24 follow-up, mean IOP in Ologen, MMC 0.4 and MMC 0.2 groups were 18.55 ± 3.18, 16.2 ± 3.22, and 16.93 ± 3.04 mmHg, respectively. No significant inter-group difference was noticed at any visits. Complete success was achieved in 10%, 40%, and 30%, whereas incomplete success in 70%, 50%, and 60%, respectively in Ologen, MMC 0.4 and MMC 0.2 groups. No treatment group difference was reported by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Shallow anterior chamber occurred more in Ologen and MMC 0.4 groups. A single case of serous choroidal effusion had occurred in MMC 0.4 group. CONCLUSION: Ologen implant is a promising alternative to MMC for improving the success rate of trabeculectomy.