Sustained influence of infections on prostate-specific antigen concentration: An analysis of changes over 10 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: To extend our previous observation of a short-term rise in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration, a marker of prostate inflammation and cell damage, during and immediately following sexually transmitted and systemic infections, we examined the longer-term influence of these infections, both individually and cumulatively, on PSA over a mean of 10 years of follow-up in young active duty U.S. servicemen. METHODS: We measured PSA in serum specimens collected in 1995-7 (baseline) and 2004-6 (follow-up) from 265 men diagnosed with chlamydia (CT), 72 with gonorrhea (GC), 37 with non-chlamydial, non-gonococcal urethritis (NCNGU), 58 with infectious mononucleosis (IM), 91 with other systemic or non-genitourinary infections such as varicella; and 125-258 men with no infectious disease diagnoses in their medical record during follow-up (controls). We examined the influence of these infections on PSA change between baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: The proportion of men with any increase in PSA (>0 ng/mL) over the 10-year average follow-up was significantly higher in men with histories of sexually transmitted infections (CT, GC, and NCNGU; 67.7% vs 60.8%, P = 0.043), systemic infections (66.7% vs 54.4%, P = 0.047), or any infections (all cases combined; 68.5% vs 54.4%, P = 0.003) in their military medical record compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: While PSA has been previously shown to rise during acute infection, these findings demonstrate that PSA remains elevated over a longer period. Additionally, the overall infection burden, rather than solely genitourinary-specific infection burden, contributed to these long-term changes, possibly implying a role for the cumulative burden of infections in prostate cancer risk.

Insight into infection-mediated prostate damage: Contrasting patterns of C-reactive protein and prostate-specific antigen levels during infection.

BACKGROUND: To investigate mechanisms underlying our previous observation of a large rise in serum prostate-specific antigen, a marker of prostate pathology, during both sexually transmitted and systemic infections, we measured serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a marker of systemic inflammation, in our previous case-control study of young, male US military members and compared our findings to those for PSA. METHODS: We measured hsCRP before and during infection for 299 chlamydia, 112 gonorrhea, and 59 non-chlamydial, non-gonococcal urethritis (NCNGU) cases; before and after infection for 55 infectious mononucleosis (IM) and 90 other systemic/non-genitourinary cases; and for 220-256 controls. RESULTS: Only gonorrhea cases were significantly more likely to have a large hsCRP rise (≥1.40 mg/L or ≥239%) during infection than controls (P < 0.01). However, gonorrhea, IM, and other systemic/non-genitourinary cases were more likely to have a rise of any magnitude up to one year post-diagnosis than controls (p = 0.038-0.077). CONCLUSIONS: These findings, which differ from those for PSA, suggest distinct mechanisms of elevation for hsCRP and PSA, and support both direct (eg, prostate infection) and indirect (eg, systemic inflammation-mediated prostate cell damage) mechanisms for PSA elevation. Future studies should explore our PSA findings further for their relevance to both prostate cancer screening and risk.

Infectious mononucleosis, other infections and prostate-specific antigen concentration as a marker of prostate involvement during infection.

Although Epstein-Barr virus has been detected in prostate tissue, no associations have been observed with prostate cancer in the few studies conducted to date. One possible reason for these null findings may be use of cumulative exposure measures that do not inform the timing of infection, i.e., childhood versus adolescence/early adulthood when infection is more likely to manifest as infectious mononucleosis (IM). We sought to determine the influence of young adult-onset IM on the prostate by measuring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a marker of prostate inflammation/damage among U.S. military members. We defined IM cases as men diagnosed with IM from 1998 to 2003 (n = 55) and controls as men without an IM diagnosis (n = 255). We selected two archived serum specimens for each participant, the first collected after diagnosis for cases and one randomly selected from 1998 to 2003 for controls (index), as well as the preceding specimen (preindex). PSA was measured in each specimen. To explore the specificity of our findings for prostate as opposed to systemic inflammation, we performed a post hoc comparison of other infectious disease cases without genitourinary involvement (n = 90) and controls (n = 220). We found that IM cases were more likely to have a large PSA rise than controls (≥ 20 ng/mL: 19.7% versus 8.8%, p = 0.027; ≥ 40% rise: 25.7% versus 9.4%, p = 0.0021), as were other infectious disease cases (25.7% versus 14.0%, p = 0.020; 27.7% versus 18.0%, p = 0.092). These findings suggest that, in addition to rising because of prostate infection, PSA may also rise because of systemic inflammation, which could have implications for PSA interpretation in older men.

Prostate-specific antigen concentration in young men: new estimates and review of the literature.

UNLABELLED: Study Type--Diagnostic (cohort) Level of Evidence 2b. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Although non-recommended PSA testing has been reported in men younger than 40 years of age, there are few recognized data on PSA in younger American men, particularly younger African-American men, to provide age- and race-specific references. Using data from an existing large study of young, male members of the US military, aged 28-36 years, the present study provides PSA reference distributions for young Caucasian-American men (median = 0.56, 95th percentile = 1.42, range: <0.01-3.34 ng/mL) and African-American men (median = 0.64, 95th percentile = 1.89, range: 0.12-6.45 ng/mL). Previous estimates from the literature are also summarized. OBJECTIVE: • To provide race-specific prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reference distributions for young men less than 40 years of age who might have undergone non-recommended PSA testing because of their family history of prostate cancer or inadvertently as part of a standard panel of tests. MATERIALS AND METHODS: • We used data from a large existing study of young, male Caucasian- and African-American members of the US military with stored serum in the Department of Defense serum repository. • As part of this previous study, we selected a random sample of 373 Caucasian- and 366 African-American men aged 28-36 years with an archived serum specimen collected for standard military purposes from 2004 to 2006. • We measured serum total PSA concentration in this specimen using the Beckman Coulter Access Hybritech PSA assay. RESULTS: • The PSA level ranged from <0.01 to 3.34 ng/mL among Caucasian-American men, with a median of 0.56 ng/mL and a 95th percentile of 1.42 ng/mL. • The PSA level ranged from 0.12 to 6.45 ng/mL among African-American men, with a median of 0.64 ng/mL and 95th percentile of 1.89 ng/mL. • The PSA level was significantly higher in African- than in Caucasian-American men (P= 0.001). CONCLUSION: • The PSA estimates, together with those summarized from the literature, provide age- and race-specific PSA reference distributions for young men who might have undergone non-recommended PSA testing. • Comparisons by race could also begin to inform the timing of divergence of prostate cancer risk by race.

A multicenter evaluation of the PCA3 molecular urine test: pre-analytical effects, analytical performance, and diagnostic accuracy.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) mRNA normalized to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mRNA in urine has been proposed as a marker for prostate cancer. METHODS: We investigated pre-analytical effects, analytical performance, and diagnostic accuracy of a quantitative assay for PCA3. RESULTS: Urine specimens collected without prostate manipulation demonstrated low informative rates. However, specimens collected following digital rectal examinations of 3 or 8 strokes per prostate lobe demonstrated informative rates >94%. Across all urine specimen types, median PCA3 results did not show statistically significant differences (P>0.8). Measurements of controls of known mRNA content demonstrated percent recoveries of 100+/-15% for both PCA3 and PSA mRNAs. PCA3 mRNA total, intra-assay, inter-assay, and inter-site CVs were < or =17.1%, < or =14.0%, < or =9.9%, and < or =3.2%, respectively. Corresponding CVs for PSA mRNA assay were < or =11.5%, < or =8.6%, < or =7.9%, and < or =8.3%. Blinded assay of urines from 72 men with known prostate biopsy outcomes yielded areas under the curve from receiver-operating characteristic analysis of 0.7 at both research sites. Deming regression of individual PCA3 results between sites yielded slope=0.94, intercept=0.48, R=0.9677 (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The PCA3 assay is insensitive to pre-analytical factors, performs well analytically and correctly classifies a high percent of subjects with known prostate cancer status across research sites.

Comparative evaluation of three FDA-approved HIV Ag/Ab combination tests using a genetically diverse HIV panel and diagnostic specimens.

BACKGROUND: HIV Ag/Ab combination assays are recommended by CDC for routine screening and several HIV Ag/Ab combination tests are now FDA-approved. Maintaining high specificity and consistent sensitivity across diverse HIV strains is critical for these assays to accurately detect HIV infection and expedite delivery of patient results. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate performance of three FDA-approved HIV tests: ARCHITECT HIV Combo (Abbott), ADVIA Centaur HIV Combo (Siemens) and BioPlex HIV Ag-Ab (Bio-Rad). STUDY DESIGN: Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using an extensive panel of 28 HIV infected human specimens and 17 cultured virus isolates representing multiple genotypes, 6 seroconversion panels, 4 human samples with acute infection, WHO p24 standard and 4020 clinical specimens. RESULTS: The p24 limit of detection (LOD) for the WHO standard was 0.19IU/ml, 0.70IU/ml, and 1.77IU/ml in BioPlex, ARCHITECT, and Centaur respectively. The distribution of LODs across 15 HIV-1 isolates was substantially narrower in ARCHITECT (5-33pg/ml) than in BioPlex (11-198pg/ml) and Centaur (6-384pg/ml). All assays detected antibodies to the majority of HIV-1 and HIV-2 variants. However, reduced sensitivity was observed for Centaur in detection of antibodies to HIV-1 group M (CRF02_AG), O and N variants. BioPlex and ARCHITECT showed better seroconversion sensitivity than Centaur, detecting one bleed (3-7 days) earlier in 4 (BioPlex) and 3 (ARCHITECT) of 6 seroconversion panels. ARCHITECT demonstrated the highest specificity (99.90-100%) compared to BioPlex (99.80%) and Centaur (99.42%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of ARCHITECT and BioPlex was superior to Centaur, especially for detection of acute HIV infection.

The presence of circulating tumor cells does not predict extravesical disease in bladder cancer patients prior to radical cystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Due to imprecise clinical staging, the finding of extravesical and node-positive disease at the time of radical cystectomy (RC) for patients with clinically localized bladder cancer is not uncommon. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been shown to be present in the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The object of this study was to evaluate the ability of CTCs to predict extravesical disease in bladder cancer patients prior to RC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood samples from 43 patients with bladder cancer were evaluated using the CellSearch (Veridex, LLC, Raritan, NJ) CTC assay prior to RC. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of CTC status in predicting extravesical disease was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to quantify the ability of CTCs to predict extravesical and node-positive disease. RESULTS: CTCs were detected in 9 (21%) patients prior to RC. The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of CTC status in predicting extravesical disease were 27%, 88% and 78%, respectively. The accuracy of CTC status in predicting extravesical (≥pT3 or node-positive) disease for the entire cohort was 0.576. In a model incorporating preoperative hydronephrosis, CTC status did not improve the predictive accuracy for extravesical disease (0.576 vs. 0.585, P = 0.915). CONCLUSION: CTCs were detected in low numbers in a small percentage (21%) of patients prior to undergoing RC at our institution. CTC status was not a robust predictor of extravesical or node-positive disease in this cohort. CTC status is not likely to be a clinically useful parameter for directing therapeutic decisions in patients with ≤cT2 bladder cancer.

Cytokine profiling of prostatic fluid from cancerous prostate glands identifies cytokines associated with extent of tumor and inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Cytokines are key mediators of inflammation that may relate to prostate cancer initiation and progression, and that may be useful markers of prostatic neoplasia and related inflammation. In order to better understand the relationship between cytokines and prostate cancer, we profiled cytokines in prostatic fluids obtained from cancerous prostate glands and correlated them to both cancer status and inflammatory grade. METHODS: Prostatic fluid was collected from fresh radical prostatectomy specimens and analyzed by cytokine antibody microarray. For comparison, cases were selected from patients with either minimal or extensive cancer volume on final pathology. Among the cytokines with the greatest difference between the tumor volume groups, eight had their levels quantitated by ELISA. In addition, the grade of prostatic inflammation by neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes was scored for each case and examined for correlations with cytokine levels. RESULTS: Among 174 cytokines analyzed, HGF was the most increased (6.57-fold), and along with IL18Bpa was significantly elevated in patients with extensive disease compared to those with minimal disease. IL17, GITR, and ICAM-1 were elevated in specimens with significant neutrophilic inflammation into gland lumina, and IL18Bpa, IL17, GITR, and ICAM-1 were elevated in specimens with significant lymphocytic inflammation in prostatic stroma. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatic fluid cytokines were identified that may be useful for early cancer detection and prognostication efforts and for assessment of prostatic inflammation, particularly if they can be found not only in prostatic fluids obtained ex vivo, but in expressed prostatic secretions or urine samples from men with prostates still in situ.

Sexually transmitted infections and prostatic inflammation/cell damage as measured by serum prostate specific antigen concentration.

PURPOSE: Although inflammation and cell damage due to STIs are hypothesized to contribute to the later development of prostate disease, few clinical studies have been done to investigate the extent to which sexually transmitted agents infect and induce an inflammatory immune response in the prostate. We indirectly investigated this question by measuring serum PSA, a possible marker of prostatic inflammation and cell damage, in men with documented STIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Archived serum specimens from young men with laboratory confirmed exudative STIs, including gonorrhea, chlamydia and trichomonosis, and young men with no STI diagnoses were identified in 2 prospective studies of patients at Baltimore City STI clinics, that is 84 in the STI Transmission and Acquisition Study, and 61 in the Mucosal Immunity Study. Serum specimens from visits before, during and after STI diagnoses in men with at least 1 exudative STI diagnosis and from all visits in men with no STI diagnoses were tested for total PSA concentration. RESULTS: After combining the studies patients with STIs were more likely to have a 40% or greater increase in PSA than patients with no STI diagnoses (32% vs 2%, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that STIs may contribute to prostatic inflammation and cell damage in a subset of infected men. Further studies are warranted to replicate study findings and determine host and infection characteristics associated with large PSA increases.