Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect Chemother ; 30(4): 315-322, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clarifying the presence of viable severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) rather than SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in inpatient rooms is important for infection control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we investigated levels of viral RNA and viable virus on environmental surfaces and in patient saliva. METHODS: Environmental samples from 23 sites in hospital rooms were collected every other day until patient discharge. Saliva specimens and samples from the inner surface of patient masks were also collected. Additionally, environmental samples were collected from 46 sites in hospital rooms on discharge day. The samples were examined using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and plaque assays. RESULTS: The 10 enrolled cases were classified as mild COVID-19, and patients were discharged after 6-9 days. The viral RNA was detected in 12.4% (105/849) of serially collected environmental samples during hospitalization, whereas viable virus was detected only in 0.47% (4/849), which were from sinks and tap levers. Although all patients recovered, three cases retained viable virus in the last saliva specimen collected. In the 15 discharged rooms, viral RNA was detected in 6.6% (45/682) of the samples, and viable virus was detected in only one sample from the sink. CONCLUSIONS: Although environmental surfaces surrounding patients with COVID-19 were frequently contaminated with viral RNA, the presence of viable virus was rare and limited only to areas around sinks. These results suggest that contact infection risk via fomites in hospital rooms is extremely rare.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Carga Viral , Hospitales , ARN Viral
2.
J Infect Chemother ; 29(6): 604-609, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36894016

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although crowds are considered to be a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 transmission, little is known about the changes in environmental surface contamination with the virus when a large number of people attend an event. In this study, we evaluated the changes in environmental surface contamination with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Environmental samples were collected from concert halls and banquet rooms before and after events in February to April 2022 when the 7-day moving average of new COVID-19 cases in Tokyo was reported to be 5000-18000 cases per day. In total, 632 samples were examined for SARS-CoV-2 by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) tests, and RT-qPCR-positive samples were subjected to a plaque assay. RESULTS: The SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection rate before and after the events ranged from 0% to 2.6% versus 0%-5.0% in environmental surface samples, respectively. However, no viable viruses were isolated from all RT-qPCR-positive samples by the plaque assay. There was no significant increase in the environmental surface contamination with SARS-CoV-2 after these events. CONCLUSIONS: These findings revealed that indirect contact transmission from environmental fomite does not seem to be of great magnitude in a community setting.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiología , ARN Viral/genética , Japón/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52055, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38344582

RESUMEN

Introduction Transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) often occurs among family members. Elucidating where viable SARS-CoV-2 virions, and not just residual viral RNA, are present in the house is necessary to prevent the further spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to evaluate the environmental surface contamination levels of both SARS-CoV-2 RNA and viable viruses in the homes of housebound patients with COVID-19. Methods Environmental samples were collected from the households of three patients in April and July 2022 when the number of new COVID-19 cases in Japan was reported to be approximately 50,000 and 200,000 cases per day, respectively. For each case, samples were obtained from 19-26 household sites for seven consecutive days. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was examined in 455 samples through reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and RT-qPCR-positive samples were subjected to plaque assay to detect viable viruses. Results Among the 455 samples, 63 (13.8%) that were collected from patients' pillows and comforters, doorknobs, chairs, and refrigerators tested positive by RT-qPCR. The maximum detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive samples in each case ranged from 20.0% to 57.7% on days 1 to 3. The detection rate gradually decreased to 0-5.3% as the days elapsed. Although all RT-qPCR-positive samples were examined, no viable viruses were detected in these samples. Conclusions Although environmental contamination of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was observed in the homes of housebound patients with COVID-19, no viable viruses were isolated. This suggests that the indirect transmission risk from fomites was low.

4.
Cureus ; 16(2): e54919, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38544617

RESUMEN

Introduction Hand hygiene is an infection control measure for COVID-19 in our daily lives; however, the contamination levels of SARS-CoV-2 in the hands of healthy individuals remain unclear. Thus, we aimed to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 contamination levels by detecting viral RNA and viable viruses in samples obtained from the hands of 925 healthy individuals. Methods Swab samples were collected from the palms and fingers of healthy participants, including office workers, public officers, university students, university faculty and staff, and hospital staff between December 2022 and March 2023. The collected swab samples were analyzed using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection. Viral RNA-positive samples were subjected to plaque assay to detect viable viruses. Results We collected 1,022 swab samples from the hands of healthy participants. According to the criteria for data collection, 97 samples were excluded, and 925 samples were analyzed using RT-qPCR. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in three of the 925 samples. The viral RNA detection rate was 0.32% (3/925), and the viral RNA copy numbers ranged from 5.0×103 to 1.7×105 copies/mL. The RT-qPCR-positive samples did not contain viable viruses, as confirmed by the plaque assay results. Conclusions The detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from the hands of healthy individuals was extremely low, and no viable viruses were detected. These results suggest that the risk of contact transmission via hands in a community setting is extremely rare.

5.
Jpn J Antibiot ; 56(4): 294-308, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14567254

RESUMEN

The in vitro antibacterial activities of cefozopran (CZOP), an agent of cephems, against various clinical isolates obtained between 1996 and 2001 were yearly evaluated and compared with those of other cephems, oxacephems, carbapenems, and penicillins. A total of 1,274 strains in 15 species of Gram-positive bacteria were isolated from the clinical materials annually collected from January to December, and consisted of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus avium, and Peptostreptococcus spp. CZOP possessed stable antibacterial activities against all strains tested throughout 6 years. The MIC90 of CZOP against MRSA and S. haemolyticus tended to decrease while against S. pneumoniae and Peptostreptococcus spp., tended to increase year by year. However, the MIC90 just changed a little and were consistent with the results from the studies performed until the new drug application approval. Increases in the MIC90 against S. pneumoniae were also observed with ceftazidime (CPR), cefepime (CFPM), flomoxef (FMOX), sulbactam/cefoperazone (SBT/CPZ), and imipenem (IPM). Increases in the MIC90 against Peptostreptococcus spp. were also observed with FMOX, SBT/CPZ, and IPM. In conclusion, the annual antibacterial activities of CZOP against the Gram-positive bacteria did not considerably change. It, therefore, was suggested that CZOP had maintained high antibacterial activity during 6 years of post marketing.


Asunto(s)
Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Cefepima , Bacterias Grampositivas/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Cefozoprán
6.
Jpn J Antibiot ; 56(4): 309-35, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14567255

RESUMEN

The in vitro antibacterial activities of cefozopran (CZOP), an agent of cephems, against various clinical isolates obtained between 1996 and 2001 were yearly evaluated and compared with those of other cephems, oxacephems and carbapenems. A total of 3,245 strains in 32 species of Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from the clinical materials annually collected from January to December, and consisted of Moraxella subgenus Branhamella catarrhalis, Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, Citrobacter koseri, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Proteus mirabillis, Proteus vulgaris, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp. (P. alcalifaciens, P. rettgeri, P. stuartii), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Burkholderia cepacia, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Haemophilus influenzae, Acinetobactor baumannii, Acinetobactor lwoffii, Bacteroides fragilis group (B. fragilis, B. vulgatus, B. distasonis, B. ovatus, B. thetaiotaomicron), and Prevotella spp. (P. melaninogenica, P. intermedia, P. bivia, P. oralis, P. denticola). CZOP possessed stable antibacterial activities against M. (B.) catarrhalis, E. coli, C. freundii, C. koseri, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, E. aerogenes, E. cloacae, S. marcescens, P. mirabilis, P. vulgaris, M. morganii, Providencia spp., P. aeruginosa, and A. lwoffii throughout 6 years. The MIC90 of CZOP against those strains were consistent with those obtained from the studies performed until the new drug application approval. On the other hand, the MIC90 of CZOP against H. influenzae yearly obviously increased with approximately 64-time difference during the study period. The MIC90 of cefpirome, cefepime, and flomoxef against H. influenzae also yearly tended to rise. The present results demonstrated that CZOP had maintained the antibacterial activity against almost Gram-negative strains tested. However, the decrease in antibacterial activities of CZOP against B. cepacia, and H. influenzae was suggested.


Asunto(s)
Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Cefepima , Cefoperazona/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Moraxella/efectos de los fármacos , Cefpiroma , Cefozoprán
7.
Jpn J Antibiot ; 55(2): 139-53, 2002 Apr.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12071093

RESUMEN

The in vitro antibacterial activities of cefozopran (CZOP), an agent of cephems, against various clinical isolates obtained between 1996 and 2000 were yearly evaluated and compared with those of other cephems, oxacephems, carbapenems, and penicillins. Fifteen species, 1,062 strains, of Gram-positive bacteria were isolated from the clinical materials annually collected from January to December, and consisted of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA; n = 127), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; n = 123), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 104), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (n = 58), Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 100), Streptococcus agalactiae (n = 50), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 125), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 150), Enterococcus faecium (n = 50), Enterococcus avium (n = 50), and Peptostreptococcus spp. (P. anaerobius, P. asaccharolyticus, P. magnus, P. micros, P. prevotii; n = 125). CZOP possessed stable antibacterial activities against all strains tested throughout 5 years. The MIC90 of CZOP against MRSA and S. haemolyticus tended to decrease while against S. pneumoniae and Peptostreptococcus spp., tended to increase year by year. However, the MIC90 just changed a little and were consistent with the results from the studies performed until the new drug application approval. Increases in the MIC90 against S. pneumoniae were also observed with cefpirome (CPR), cefepime (CFPM), flomoxef (FMOX), sulbactam/cefoperazone (SBT/CPZ), and imipenem (IPM). Increases in the MIC90 against Peptostreptococcus spp. were also observed with ceftazidime (CAZ), CPR, CFPM, FMOX, SBT/CPZ, and IPM. The decreases in the sensitivities were not always considered to depend upon generation of resistant bacteria because the annual MIC range of each antibacterial agent was almost generally wide every year and the annual sensitivity of each strain to the agents extremely varied. In conclusion, the annual antibacterial activities of CZOP against the Gram-positive bacteria did not considerably change. It, therefore, was suggested that CZOP had maintained high antibacterial activity during 5 years of post-marketing.


Asunto(s)
Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Bacterias Grampositivas/aislamiento & purificación , Penicilinas/farmacología , Factores de Tiempo , Cefozoprán
8.
Jpn J Antibiot ; 55(2): 154-80, 2002 Apr.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12071094

RESUMEN

The in vitro antibacterial activities of cefozopran (CZOP), an agent of cephems, against various clinical isolates obtained between 1996 and 2000 were yearly evaluated and compared with those of other cephems, oxacephems, and carbapenems. Thirty-two species 2,697 strains of Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from the clinical materials annually collected from January to December, and consisted of Moraxella subgenus Branhamella catarrhalis (n = 125), Escherichia coli (n = 250), Citrobacter freundii (n = 153), Citrobacter koseri (n = 97), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 150), Klebsiella oxytoca (n = 100), Enterobacter aerogenes (n = 50), Enterobacter cloacae (n = 125), Serratia marcescens (n = 153), Proteus mirabillis (n = 103), Proteus vulgaris (n = 77), Morganella morganii (n = 141), Providencia spp. (P. alcalifaciens, P. rettgeri, P. stuartii; n = 154), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 211), Pseudomonas putida (n = 49), Burkholderia cepacia (n = 102), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 101), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 210), Acinetobactor baumannii (n = 63), Acinetobactor Iwoffii (n = 30), Bacteroides fragilis group (B. fragilis, B. vulgatus, B. distasonis, B. ovatus, B. thetaiotaomicron; n = 129), and Prevotella spp. (P. melaninogenica, P. intermedia, P. bivia, P. oralis, P. denticola; n = 124). CZOP possessed stable antibacterial activities against M. (B.) catarrhalis, E. coli, C. freundii, C. koseri, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, E. aerogenes, E. cloacae, S. marcescens, P. mirabilis, P. vulgaris, M. morganii, Providencia spp., P. aeruginosa, and A. lowffii throughout 5 years. The MIC90 of CZOP against those strains were consistent with those obtained from the studies performed until the new drug application approval. On the other hand, the MIC90 of CZOP against H. influenzae yearly obviously increased with approximately 65-time difference during study period. The MIC90 of cefpirome, cefepime, and flomoxef against H. influenzae also yearly tended to rise. The present results demonstrated that CZOP had maintained the antibacterial activity against almost Gram-negative strains tested. However, the decrease in the antibacterial activity of CZOP against H. influenzae was suggested.


Asunto(s)
Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Factores de Tiempo , Cefozoprán
9.
J Infect Chemother ; 13(2): 79-86, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17458674

RESUMEN

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been defined as S. aureus having the mecA gene or showing a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of oxacillin higher than 4 mg/l. However, some clinical isolates are mecA-positive and oxacillin-susceptible. Therefore, we surveyed the occurrence of S. aureus having the mecA gene and an MIC of oxacillin of less than 2 mg/l (oxacillin-susceptible MRSA; OS-MRSA) in a total of 480 strains of S. aureus collected from 11 hospitals in different location in Japan isolated from 2003 through 2005. We found 6 strains matching the criteria for OS-MRSA. All 6 strains were staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC) mec-positive, without exception, and 4 strains showed the SCCmec type III-variant, which is unique in Japan. These OS-MRSAs were least resistant to oxacillin among the MRSAs tested and they were within the susceptible range to seven other beta-lactam antibiotics tested. Thus, OS-MRSA may become a high-resistant MRSA upon the treatment of patients with beta-lactam antibiotics. To characterize whether these OS-MRSAs were hospital-acquired or community-acquired MRSAs, we tested for the presence of the genes encoding toxins. Genes encoding hemolysin, exfoliative toxin, enterotoxin, toxic shock syndrome toxin-1, and Panton-Valentine leukocidin were found in 6, 4, 0, 0, and 0 strains, respectively. These results revealed that OS-MRSAs could be classified as a new type of MRSA that exhibits properties distinguishable from either hospital- or community-acquired MRSA. Coagulase typing of the OS-MRSAs supported the above conclusion. In this study, the occurrence of OS-MRSA at a certain frequency was noted; precautions are called for in the classification of oxacillin-resistant S. aureus and in the treatment of OS-MRSA infection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Resistencia a la Meticilina/genética , Oxacilina/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Toxinas Bacterianas/genética , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/genética , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/genética , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Humanos , Japón , Resistencia a la Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Staphylococcus aureus/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA