Overall Survival with Brentuximab Vedotin in Stage III or IV Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Five-year follow-up in a trial involving patients with previously untreated stage III or IV classic Hodgkin's lymphoma showed long-term progression-free survival benefits with first-line therapy with brentuximab vedotin, a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate, plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD), as compared with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). A planned interim analysis indicated a potential benefit with regard to overall survival; data from a median of 6 years of follow-up are now available. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive up to six cycles of A+AVD or ABVD. The primary end point, modified progression-free survival, has been reported previously. The key secondary end point was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 664 patients were assigned to receive A+AVD and 670 to receive ABVD. At a median follow-up of 73.0 months, 39 patients in the A+AVD group and 64 in the ABVD group had died (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 0.88; P = 0.009). The 6-year overall survival estimates were 93.9% (95% CI, 91.6 to 95.5) in the A+AVD group and 89.4% (95% CI, 86.6 to 91.7) in the ABVD group. Progression-free survival was longer with A+AVD than with ABVD (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.86). Fewer patients in the A+AVD group than in the ABVD group received subsequent therapy, including transplantation, and fewer second cancers were reported with A+AVD (in 23 vs. 32 patients). Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was recommended after an increased incidence of febrile neutropenia was observed with A+AVD. More patients had peripheral neuropathy with A+AVD than with ABVD, but most patients in the two groups had resolution or amelioration of the event by the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received A+AVD for the treatment of stage III or IV Hodgkin's lymphoma had a survival advantage over those who received ABVD. (Funded by Takeda Development Center Americas and Seagen; ECHELON-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01712490; EudraCT number, 2011-005450-60.).

Superior outcomes and high-risk features with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone combination therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: Results of the multicenter KMMWP2201 study.

Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) combination therapy improves the survival of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Nonetheless, evidence on the use of KRd in Asian populations remains scarce. Accordingly, this study aimed at investigating this regimen's efficacy in a large group of patients. This retrospective study included patients with RRMM who were treated with KRd at 21 centers between February 2018 and October 2020. Overall, 364 patients were included (median age: 63 years). The overall response rate was 90% in responseevaluable patients, including 69% who achieved a very good partial response or deeper responses. With a median follow-up duration of 34.8 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23.4 months and overall survival (OS) was 59.5 months. Among adverse factors affecting PFS, highrisk cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, and doubling of monoclonal protein within 2 to 3 months prior to start of KRd treatment significantly decreased PFS and overall survival (OS) in multivariate analyses. Patients who underwent post-KRd stem cell transplantation (i.e.delayed transplant) showed prolonged PFS and OS. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were observed in 56% of the patients, and non-fatal or fatal AE's that resulted in discontinuation of KRd were reported in 7% and 2% of patients, respectively. Cardiovascular toxicity was comparable to that reported in the ASPIRE study. In summary, KRd was effective in a large real-world cohort of patients with RRMM with long-term follow-up. These findings may further inform treatment choices in the treatment of patients with RRMM.

Real-world outcome of patients with extensively pretreated multiple myeloma who were treated with selinexor and dexamethasone: a Korean multicenter retrospective analysis.

The outcomes of patients with myeloma after exposed to penta-classes are extremely poor. Selinexor is the first approved exportin inhibitor for those patients, but intractable toxicities may limit its use. This retrospective study evaluated the real-world efficacy and safety of selinexor plus dexamethasone (XD) and involved 48 patients with multiple myeloma, who were treated from November 2020 to October 2022. Their median age was 64 years, and the median number of prior lines of therapy was 6. The overall response rate was 25%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.7-2.5). Patients on a reduced initial dose, delayed treatment, and dose reduction had better PFS. After XD treatment failure, 17 patients received subsequent therapy and had a median PFS of 2.4 months. The median overall survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.3-6.9). Among the patients, 12 (25%) and 17 (35%) experienced dose reduction and delayed treatment, respectively. Our data show that the real-world efficacy of XD treatment in heavily pretreated patients was modest and that improving treatment adherence through reducing initial doses or delaying treatments may improve patient outcomes.

Busulfan plus melphalan versus high-dose melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma with high-risk features (KMM 2015).

Despite the development of effective agents for multiple myeloma (MM), the management of patients with high-risk MM (HRMM) is challenging. High-dose treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is regarded as upfront treatment for transplant-eligible patients with HRMM. In the present study, we retrospectively investigated the efficacies of two conditioning regimens for upfront ASCT in newly diagnosed patients with MM and high-risk features: high-dose melphalan (HDMEL; 200 mg/m2) and busulfan plus melphalan (BUMEL). In total, 221 patients underwent ASCT between May 2005 and June 2021; among these 221 patients, 79 had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. In patients with high-risk cytogenetics, BUMEL showed a tendency toward longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to HDMEL (median OS; not reached vs. 53.2 months; P = 0.091, median PFS; not reached vs. 31.7 months; P = 0.062). Additionally, multivariate analysis revealed that BUMEL was significantly associated with PFS (hazard ratio = 0.37, 95% confidence interval = 0.15-0.89, P = 0.026). We compared BUMEL with HDMEL in patients with other high-risk features, such as high lactate dehydrogenase level, extramedullary disease, and poor response to frontline therapy. Notably, among patients with less than very good partial response (VGPR) to frontline therapy, median PFS was significantly longer in the BUMEL group than in the HDMEL group (55.1 vs. 17.3 months, respectively; P = 0.011). These findings indicate that BUMEL may be an effective conditioning regimen for upfront ASCT in MM patients with high-risk cytogenetics; BUMEL may be more appropriate than HDMEL for patients with less than VGPR to frontline therapy.

Carfilzomib in addition to lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Asian patients with RRMM outside of a clinical trial.

Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) effectively improve survival in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, the outcome of KRd treatment in Asian patients reflecting a general RRMM population outside of a clinical trial has not been reported. Fifty-five RRMM patients who were treated with carfilzomib in combination with Rd from the time of the first approval of KRd in the Republic of Korea were analyzed. The median age was 61 years. The percentage of patients with an ECOG performance status ≥ 3, creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min, high-risk cytogenetics, and ≥ 4 lines of prior treatment were 9%, 22%, 31%, and 27%, respectively. Forty-one patients started treatment with KRd, whereas the remaining 14 patients (25%) were added carfilzomib during the Rd treatment. In the whole cohort, the overall response rate was 73% and progression-free survival was 8.8 months. The addition of carfilzomib in patients who were refractory or had disease progression during Rd treatment reattained a response in half of the patients. The advantage of carfilzomib with Rd was significant in patients in the first relapse. Toxicity profile was acceptable, excluding severe infections. Carfilzomib in combination with Rd is effective and has a reasonable adverse event rate in Asian patients with RRMM.

Analysis of laboratory parameters for optimal autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection from lymphoma and myeloma patients.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection is important for successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study aimed to investigate the laboratory parameters associated with the optimal timing of autologous PBSC collection from lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from 1105 PBSC apheresis procedures performed on 379 adult patients at the National Cancer Center between June 2005 and December 2019. Laboratory parameters, including cutoff values for the number of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) and circulating CD34+ cells, were analyzed to determine their association with CD34+ cell yield. RESULTS: The pre-apheresis HPC and CD34+ cell count were statistically significant variables associated with harvested CD34+ cell in lymphoma and MM patients. The optimal cutoff values were 18 × 106 /L for pre-HPC count (66.8% sensitivity, 66.4% specificity) and 11/µL for pre-CD34+ cell count (85.8% sensitivity, 87.2% specificity), to achieve CD34+ cell yields ≥ 1.0 × 106 /kg for each apheresis procedure. Moreover, the optimal cutoff values were 23 × 106 /L for pre-HPC count (71.0% sensitivity, 69.0% specificity) and 18/µL for pre-CD34+ cell count (87.5% sensitivity, 86.3% specificity) to achieve CD34+ cell yields ≥ 2.0 × 106 /kg for each apheresis procedure. CONCLUSION: HPC count is a potential surrogate marker for monitoring the starting time for PBSC collection. Applying cutoff values for the number of HPC and CD34+ cells may be clinically useful for optimizing the timing of PBSC collection.

Comparison of spectra optia and amicus cell separators for autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation has become a standard treatment option for many oncology patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two cell separators, Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT, Japan) and Amicus (Fresenius-Kabi) for autologous PBSC collection. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 56 apheresis by Spectra Optia with Continuous Mononuclear Cell Collection (cMNC) from 20 patients, and 50 apheresis by Amicus from 27 patients between December 2018 and December 2019. CD34+ collection efficiency (CE2) and platelet (PLT) loss were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in CD34+ CE2 between Spectra Optia with cMNC (median, 28.8%) and Amicus (median, 33.1%; P = 0.537). PLT loss was significantly lower in Amicus (median, 28.6%) than in Spectra Optia with cMNC (median, 37.8%; P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: CD34+ CE2 was comparable between Spectra Optia and Amicus, and PLT loss was significantly lower in Amicus. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report comparing autologous PBSC collection of the Spectra Optia and Amicus. These results may provide general guidance with regard to device selection to apheresis clinics that use both separators for optimal outcomes depending on each patient's characteristics.

Correction to: Clinical outcomes in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma with a partial response to first-line R-CHOP chemotherapy: prognostic value of secondary International Prognostic Index scores and Deauville scores.

An additional affiliation for the first author was not indicated. Hyewon Lee is also affiliated with: Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Clinical features and treatment outcomes of limited-stage mantle cell lymphoma: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma report.

Limited-stage (Ann Arbor stage I or II) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an extremely rare disease. Thus, there is little data on the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with early-stage MCL. We examined consecutive stage I or II MCL 41 cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 in 16 institutions of the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma group. All cases were pathologically confirmed and systemic evaluation was performed for staging. The clinical features were reviewed, and the treatment outcomes were analyzed. The median age of patients was 66 years (range 19-85 years); there were more men (n = 31, 75.6%) than women. Most patients (n = 28, 68.3%) had stage 2 disease, and 29 (70.7%) were symptomatic. The elevation of lactate dehydrogenase (n = 2, 4.9%) was not common; thus, 39 patients (95.1%) had a low-risk score (0 or 1) for the International Prognostic Index, and 28 (68.3%) had a low-risk score (1-3) for the MCL International Prognostic Index. Most patients (n = 37, 90.1%) received chemotherapy as the first therapeutic strategy, while some received radiotherapy (n = 2), surgical resection (n = 1), or no treatment (n = 1). Of the patients who received chemotherapy, 23 (56.9%) received a rituximab-containing regimen, and R-CHOP (n = 17) and R-bendamustine (n = 5) were commonly used. The best response was noted in 97.4% (n = 38) of patients, including 32 who showed a complete response (78%). With a median follow-up duration of 40.6 months, the 42 months relapse-free survival was 59.1%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 80.4%. Limited-state MCL showed indolent clinical and low-risk prognostic features. Chemotherapy could be effective for controlling localized MCL lesions, with high complete response rates.

A phase II study of etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin (ESHAOx) for patients with refractory or relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma.

We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin (ESHAOx) combination chemotherapy in patients with refractory or relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). This was an open-label, non-randomized, multi-center phase II study. The ESHAOx regimen consisted of intravenous (i.v.) etoposide 40 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4, i.v. methylprednisolone 500 mg on days 1 to 5, i.v. cytarabine 2 g/m2 on day 5, and i.v. oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1. Cycles (up to six) were repeated every 3 weeks. In an effort to identify prognostic markers, the serum levels of cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were measured at the time of study entry. A total of 37 patients were enrolled, and 36 were available for evaluation of tumor response. The overall response rate was 72.2% (26/36) (complete response, 33.3% [12/36]; partial response, 38.9% [14/36]). The median time to progression was 34.9 months (95% confidence interval, 23.1-46.7 months). The most common grade 3 or 4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (16/37, 43.2%), followed by thrombocytopenia (10/37, 27.0%). Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse events were nausea (3/37, 8.1%), anorexia (2/37, 5.4%), mucositis (1/37, 2.7%), and skin rash (1/37, 2.7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. High levels of TNF-α and CRP were significantly associated with poorer overall survival (p = 0.00005 for TNF-α, p = 0.0004 for CRP, respectively). The ESHAOx regimen exhibited antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with refractory or relapsed HL. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered February 21, 2011, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01300156.

The effectiveness and safety of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in real-world clinical practice: a study of the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP-151 study).

Although lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (RD) is a therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), limited real-world clinical data exist. The purpose of this study was to estimate efficacy and safety of RD in RRMM patients of the clinical practice. Data from patients at 25 university hospitals in South Korea between October 2009 and December 2016 were collected retrospectively. We report the effectiveness and safety of RD in 546 RRMM patients in routine clinical practice in South Korea. Patients (median age, 65 years) typically received median 7 cycles of RD, and 184 (33.7%) patients were treated with 10 or more cycles of RD. Patients with renal impairment (CLCr < 40 mL/min; 10.4%), comorbid conditions (≥ 2; 12.0%), and poor performance status (≥ 2; 25.1%) were included. The overall response rate was 64.2%: complete response (13.1%), very good partial response (VGPR 19.9%). With median follow-up duration of 18.6 months, median PFS and OS were 11.2 months and 25.2 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, less than 2 comorbid conditions, normal LDH, failed one chemotherapy prior to RD, and ≥ 10 cycles of RD therapy had significantly prolonged PFS (P = 0.007, P = 0.011, P = 0.007, and P < 0.001, respectively). Adverse events were acceptable. RD is effective and safe in real-life clinical practice, including patients with comorbidities. RD is an effective and safe treatment in a real clinical setting which includes patients with comorbidities. Early and continual use of RD treatment may improve RRMM survival outcomes.

Pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for elderly patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A study of the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP-164 study).

Patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have a short life expectancy, especially when they have failed both the proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulator therapies. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (PCd) in elderly patients with RRMM. This phase 2 clinical trial recruited 55 elderly patients with RRMM. The patients underwent a 28-day treatment cycle: pomalidomide (4 mg/day on days 1-21, administered orally) and cyclophosphamide (400 mg/day on days 1, 8, and 15; administered orally) plus dexamethasone. The median (range) age of the patients was 73.3 (64-86) years, and 8 (14.5%) patients who were ≥ 80 years old. Eight (14.5%) and 31 (56.4%) patients exhibited stage III (revised international staging system) and frail status (simplified frailty scale), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of PCd therapy were 58.2% and 72.7%, respectively. The median PFS and median overall survival (OS) were 6.90 months (95% CI, 4.7-9.0) and 18.48 months (95% CI, 9.4-27.6), respectively. The incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicities was 70.8%. In particular, the incidence rate of primary infection was 45.4%, including 21.8% for pneumonia, 9.0% for sepsis, and 14.6% for febrile neutropenia. In conclusion, PCd is an effective regimen for elderly patients with RRMM who had failed both bortezomib and lenalidomide treatments, but in whom the treatment-associated infection is the main cause of morbidity and mortality.

Analysis of factors associated with successful allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell collection in healthy donors.

BACKGROUND: The collection of a sufficient number of stem cells is important for success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with successful allogeneic peripheral stem cell (PBSC) collection in healthy donors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of allogeneic PBSC collection in 175 donors from 2007 to 2017 at the National Cancer Center, Korea. This study analyzed factors associated with the CD34+ cell yield such as the characteristics of donors, including age, laboratory results before apheresis, and data of procedures on the first day. The CD34+ cell dose of ≥ 4.0 × 106/kg have recently been the accepted minimum recommended dose in allogeneic HSCT settings, and this was the target dose in our study. RESULTS: The factors associated with the CD34+ cell yield were age (p = 0.007), baseline platelet (PLT) (p = 0.014), and pre-collection hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) (p = 0.001) by multivariate analysis. This study represented that age, baseline platelet count, and pre-collection HPC count are important predictive factors as shown in other previous studies. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that young age, high baseline platelet counts and high HPC counts before collection might be useful for identifying successful mobilizers.

A Phase I/II, Open-Label, Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lower Doses of Bortezomib Plus Busulfan and Melphalan as a Conditioning Regimen in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: The KMM103 Study.

A phase I/II trial was conducted to explore the safety and activity of the addition of bortezomib on days -6, -3, and +1 relative to the day of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to a conditioning regimen with busulfan and melphalan (BuMel; 3.2 mg/kg/day busulfan on days -5 to -3 and 140 mg/m2/day melphalan on day -2) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) following bortezomib-based induction chemotherapy. In phase I, doses of bortezomib (.7, 1.0, and 1.3 mg/m2) with BuMel were administered to groups of 3 patients each. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The maximum tolerated dose of bortezomib was 1.3 mg/m2/day. A subsequent cohort with 41 patients was analyzed in a phase II trial to identify safety and efficacy. The phase II trial showed a 75% response rate, including very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and a 55% rate of complete response (CR) at 3 months; For post-transplantation best response, an 83% rate of VGPR or better (68% CR) was observed. With a median follow-up of 31.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 26.8 months. The probability of 2 year-PFS was 56.5%, and median overall survival (OS) could not calculated. Specifically, high-risk cytogenetics were associated with adverse survival outcomes compared with standard-risk cytogenetics (median PFS, 12.2 months versus 35.7 months, P = .039; median OS, 26.7 months versus 73.3 months; P = .086). With a median of 11 days to neutrophil engraftment and 10 days for platelet engraftment, no graft failure or delayed engrafting were observed. The most common grade 3 or severe nonhematologic adverse events included neutropenic fever (73.2%) and stomatitis (14.6%). Except for 3 patients with transplantation-related mortality due to sepsis, other adverse events were manageable. These findings demonstrate that bortezomib is safe and has a potential role in conditioning regimens in combination with BuMel for patients with transplantation-eligible MM.

Brief report: Clinical experiences after emergency use of daratumumab monotherapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in real practice.

Despite the recently reported efficacy of daratumumab monotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, outcomes in real practice following daratumumab monotherapy have yet to be investigated. A multi-center retrospective study of 16 Korean patients receiving daratumumab monotherapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma was conducted. The overall response rate was 56.3%. Three patients with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min even achieved an overall response. The median progression-free survival was 2.7 months with 28.9% (95% CI, 9.0-52.8) of 6-month progression-free survival. All infusion-related reactions, including ≥Grade 3 back pain (6.3%) and dyspnea (6.3%), were manageable. The most common hematologic and non-hematological adverse events were anemia (62.5%) and upper respiratory infection (43.8%). ≥Grade 3 bacterial infectious adverse events were identified, including upper and lower respiratory infection (12.5% and 18.8%) and death following sepsis (6.3%). We observed acceptable outcomes of daratumumab monotherapy on relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients including even a few subjects with high comorbidity, despite relatively frequent infectious adverse events.

Phase 2 Study of an Intravenous Busulfan and Melphalan Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (KMM150).

This prospective study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of intravenous busulfan and melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A total of 99 patients with MM, enrolled between January 2013 and March 2016, received intravenous busulfan (9.6 mg/kg) and melphalan (140 mg/m2) before ASCT. The median time to transplant was 6.2 months, and 90 (90.9%) patients underwent ASCT within 12 months of the diagnosis. The overall response rate after ASCT was 94.0%, including 43.5% with a stringent complete response/complete response, 27.3% with very good partial response, and 23.2% with partial response. The most common severe nonhematologic toxicity (grade 3 to 4) was infection (26.3%) and stomatitis (15.2%). Three (3.2%) patients developed veno-occlusive disease. No treatment-related mortality was observed. After a median follow-up of 26.1 months, the median progression-free survival was 27.2 months (range, 13.0 to 41.4 months) and median overall survival was not reached. In conclusion, a conditioning regimen of intravenous busulfan and melphalan was effective and tolerable. ClinicalTrials.gov. number: NCT01923935.

Phase I study of CKD-581, a pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma refractory to standard therapy.

Background The objective of this study was to assess the safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor efficacy of CKD-581, a novel pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma (MM) refractory to standard therapy. Methods In this phase I study, CKD-581 was intravenously administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. A standard 3 + 3 cohort design was used to determine the MTD. Acetylated histones H3 and H4 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were measured for pharmacodynamic assessment in a subpopulation of patients. Results Thirty-nine patients were treated with CKD-581 at 9 dose levels from 10 mg/m2 to 210 mg/m2. The DLTs were grade 3 neutropenia that delayed the treatment for >2 weeks (one patient at a dose of 50 mg/m2) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (two patients at a dose of 210 mg/m2). The MTD of CKD-581 was 160 mg/m2. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n = 5, 12.8%) and neutropenia (n = 2, 5.1%). The peak concentration and area under the curve values for CKD-581 increased in proportion to the dose, indicating linear pharmacokinetics. A partial response was observed in 2 patients (5.6%), and stable disease was observed in 16 (44.4%) patients. In the pharmacodynamic evaluation, acetylation of H3 and H4 was observed at all doses of ≥50 mg/m2. Conclusion CKD-581 was well tolerated by the patients with lymphoma or MM refractory to standard therapy. It exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and modest anti-tumor efficacy.

Frontline rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone with bortezomib (VR-CAP) or vincristine (R-CHOP) for non-GCB DLBCL.

This phase 2 study evaluated whether substituting bortezomib for vincristine in frontline rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy could improve efficacy in non-germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (non-GCB DLBCL), centrally confirmed by immunohistochemistry (Hans method). In total, 164 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive six 21-day cycles of rituximab 375 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), and doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), all IV day 1, prednisone 100 mg/m(2) orally days 1-5, plus either bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) IV days 1, 4, 8, 11 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone with bortezomib [VR-CAP]; n = 84) or vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) (maximum 2 mg) IV day 1 (R-CHOP; n = 80). There were no significant differences between VR-CAP and R-CHOP in complete response rate (64.5%, 66.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.91; P = .80), overall response rate (93.4%, 98.6%; OR, 0.21; P = .11), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; P = .76), or overall survival (HR, 0.89; P = .75). Rates of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs; 88%, 89%), serious AEs (38%, 34%), discontinuations due to AEs (7%, 3%), and deaths due to AEs (2%, 5%) were similar with VR-CAP and R-CHOP. Grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy rates were 6% and 3%, respectively. VR-CAP did not improve efficacy vs R-CHOP in non-GCB DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01040871.

Nilotinib combined with multiagent chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We investigated the effects of nilotinib plus multiagent chemotherapy, followed by consolidation/maintenance or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for adult patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive (Ph-pos) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Study subjects received induction treatment that comprised concurrent vincristine, daunorubicin, prednisolone, and nilotinib. After achieving complete hematologic remission (HCR), subjects received either 5 courses of consolidation, followed by 2-year maintenance with nilotinib, or allo-HCT. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed at HCR, and every 3 months thereafter. The molecular responses (MRs) were defined as MR3 for BCR-ABL1/G6PDH ratios ≤10(-3) and MR5 for ratios <10(-5). Ninety evaluable subjects, ages 17 to 71 years, were enrolled in 17 centers. The HCR rate was 91%; 57 subjects received allo-HCT. The cumulative MR5 rate was 94%; the 2-year hematologic relapse-free survival (HRFS) rate was 72% for 82 subjects that achieved HCR, and the 2-year overall survival rate was 72%. Subjects that failed to achieve MR3 or MR5 were 9.1 times (P = .004) or 6.3 times (P = .001) more prone to hematologic relapse, respectively, than those that achieved MR3 or MR5. MRD statuses just before allo-HCT and at 3 months after allo-HCT were predictive of 2-year HRFS. Adverse events occurred mainly during induction, and most were reversible with dose reduction or transient interruption of nilotinib. The combination of nilotinib with high-dose cytotoxic drugs was feasible, and it effectively achieved high cumulative complete molecular remission and HRFS rates. The MRD status at early postremission time was predictive of the HRFS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00844298.

Clinical outcomes in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma with a partial response to first-line R-CHOP chemotherapy: prognostic value of secondary International Prognostic Index scores and Deauville scores.

After introducing a rituximab-containing chemoimmunotherapy (R-CHOP) for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a partial response (PR) which is regarded as treatment failure is still observed. To investigate the prognostic factors for the DLBCL patients with a PR to R-CHOP, we retrospectively evaluated 758 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. After R-CHOP, 88 (11.6%) achieved a PR. Three-year progression-free and overall survival rates measured from the date of PR achievement (PFS2 and OS2) were 57.4 and 67.8%, respectively. The secondary International Prognostic Index (IPI2) scores after R-CHOP were low (0-1) in 68.2% and high (2-3) in 31.8% of the patients. The Deauville scores from 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after R-CHOP showed low (2-3) in 58.0% and high (4) in 42.0% of the patients. High IPI2 and high Deauville scores were associated with worse PFS2 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.009) and OS2 (P = 0.013 and P = 0.067). The high-risk group defined by the IPI2 and Deauville scores, whose scores were both high, showed significantly lower 3-year PFS2 (P < 0.001) and OS2 (P = 0.006) rates compared with those of the other groups. In multivariate analyses, the IPI score of ≥ 3 at diagnosis and bone marrow involvement at diagnosis were independent prognostic factors. In addition, high IPI2-Deauville score after R-CHOP was significantly associated with poor PFS2 (P = 0.009) and demonstrated a trend toward inferior OS2. In conclusion, DLBCL patients who partially responded to R-CHOP are still a heterogeneous group, for which IPI2 and Deauville scores should be evaluated for prediction of prognosis.