Drug allergy in tertiary care in Turkey: results of a national survey. The ADAPT study: adult drug allergy perception in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: No data are available on the incidence of drug hypersensitivity (DH) reactions in outpatient settings of tertiary allergy/immunology clinics. Our aims were to document the frequency of outpatient hospital admissions due to DH reactions to allergy/immunology clinics in adults and the management of these reactions in real life. We also investigated whether drug allergy affected social and medical behaviours of the patients. METHODS: This multi-centre study was performed for one year with the participation of 11 out of 16 tertiary allergy/clinical immunology clinics in Turkey. The study group consisted of the patients with DH reactions. Results of a questionnaire including drug reactions and management were recorded. RESULTS: Among 54,863 patients, 1000 patients with DH were enrolled with a median of 2.1% of all admissions. In real life conditions, the majority of approaches were performed for finding safe alternatives (65.5%; 1102 out of 1683) with 11.7% positivity. Diagnostic procedures were positive in 27% (154/581) of the patients. The majority of the patients had higher VAS scores for anxiety. A total of 250 subjects (25%) reported that they delayed some medical procedures because of DH. CONCLUSION: Our results documented the frequency of admissions due to DH reactions to allergy/clinical immunology clinics for the first time. Although physicians mostly preferred to perform drug tests in order to find safe alternatives, considering the fact that DH was confirmed in 27% of the patients, use of diagnostic tests should be encouraged, if no contraindication exists in order to avoid mislabelling patients as DH.

Are drug provocation tests still necessary to test the safety of COX-2 inhibitors in patients with cross-reactive NSAID hypersensitivity?

BACKGROUND: COX-2 inhibitors are safe alternatives in patients with cross-reactive non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity. These drugs are recommended to these patients after negative drug provocation tests (DPTs). However, cumulative data on encouraging results about the safety of COX-2 inhibitors in the majority of these patients bring the idea as to whether a DPT is always mandatory for introducing these drugs in all patients with cross-reactive NSAID hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVE: To document the safety of COX-2 inhibitors currently available and to check whether or not any factor predicts a positive response. METHODS: This study included the retrospective analysis of cases with cross-reactive NSAID hypersensitivity who underwent DPTs with COX-2 inhibitors in order to find safe alternatives. DPTs were single-blinded and placebo controlled. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 309 patients. COX-2 inhibitors were well tolerated in the majority of the patients [nimesulide: 91.9%; meloxicam: 90.2%; rofecoxib: 94.9%; and celecoxib: 94.9%)]. Twenty-five patients (30 provocations) reacted to COX-2 inhibitors. None of the factors were found be associated with positive response. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest to follow the traditional DPT method to introduce COX-2 inhibitors for finding safe alternatives in all patients with cross-reactive NSAID hypersensitivity before prescription as uncertainty of any predictive factor for a positive response continues. However, these tests should be performed in hospital settings in which emergency equipment and experienced personnel are available.

Prevalence of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease in patients with asthma in Turkey: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: There are no country-based data focused on aspirin (ASA)-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) in Turkey. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of AERD in adult patients with asthma. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was administered via face-to-face interview by a specialist in pulmonology/allergy at seven centres across Turkey. RESULTS: A total of 1344 asthma patients (F/M: 1081/263: 80.5%/19.5%, mean age: 45.7 ± 14.2 years) were enrolled. Atopy rate was 47%. Prevalence of allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis/rhinitis, and nasal polyposis (NP) were 49%, 69% and 20%, respectively. Of 270 patients with NP, 171 (63.3%) reported previous nasal polypectomy and 40 (25%) had a history of more than three nasal polypectomies. Aspirin hypersensitivity was diagnosed in 180 (13.6%) asthmatic patients, with a reliable history in 145 (80.5%), and oral ASA provocation test in 35 (19.5%) patients. Clinical presentations of ASA hypersensitivity were respiratory in 76% (n=137), respiratory/cutaneous in 15% (n=27), and systemic in 9% (n=16) of the patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that a family history of ASA hypersensitivity (p: 0.001, OR: 3.746, 95% CI: 1.769-7.929), history of chronic rhinosinusitis/rhinitis (p: 0.025, OR: 1.713, 95% CI: 1.069-2.746) and presence of NP (p<0.001, OR: 7.036, 95% CI: 4.831-10.247) were independent predictors for AERD. CONCLUSION: This cross-sectional survey showed that AERD is highly prevalent among adult asthmatics and its prevalence seems to be affected by family history of ASA hypersensitivity, history of rhinosinusitis and presence of NP.

Meloxicam-associated anaphylactic reaction.

Anaphylactic reaction to meloxicam has never been reported to date. We report 2 cases of meloxicam-induced anaphylactic reaction with no sensitivity to another selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor. A thorough drug allergy work-up should be done before other cyclooxygenase inhibitors are prescribed.

Lipoxin A4 levels in asthma: relation with disease severity and aspirin sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Lipoxin (LX) A4, an endogenous anti-inflammatory eicosanoid, has been found to be low in patients with severe asthma. However, few studies also suggested more diminished LX A4 levels in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) when compared with aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA). It is, therefore, currently not clear whether the asthma severity or the presence of AERD has a primary role in the disturbed LX metabolism. OBJECTIVE: To detect LX A4 and 15-epi-LX A4 levels in asthma patients with and without AERD of comparable severity. METHODS: The study groups consisted of 22 subjects with AERD, 22 subjects with ATA and 10 volunteers without asthma and aspirin sensitivity. Whole-blood samples were stimulated with calcium ionophore, A23187 (5 x 10(-5) m) and A23187 (5 x 10(-5) m)+aspirin (10(-4) m). LX A4 and 15-epi-LX A4 levels were analysed by the enzyme immune assay method. RESULTS: Severe asthma patients in both AERD [0.5 (0.8)] ng/mL and ATA [0.5 (0.45) ng/mL] groups showed diminished generation for LX A4 to stimulation with A23187 in comparison with other severity degrees in their groups (P=0.02 and 0.046, respectively). LX A4 generation in both severe groups was comparable with each other (P>0.05). Although severe cases with AERD showed a diminished capacity to generate 15-epi-LX A4, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that diminished LX A4 generation was unique to severe asthma phenotype regardless of comorbid aspirin sensitivity. Clinical Implications Lower LX A4 levels in severe asthma would suggest a possibility for LX analogues as future treatment options in these patients.

Are drug provocation tests still necessary to test the safety of COX-2 inhibitors in patients with cross-reactive NSAID hypersensitivity?

Background: COX-2 inhibitors are safe alternatives in patients with cross-reactive non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity. These drugs are recommended to these patients after negative drug provocation tests (DPTs). However, cumulative data on encouraging results about the safety of COX-2 inhibitors in the majority of these patients bring the idea as to whether a DPT is always mandatory for introducing these drugs in all patients with cross-reactive NSAID hypersensitivity. Objective: To document the safety of COX-2 inhibitors currently available and to check whether or not any factor predicts a positive response. Methods: This study included the retrospective analysis of cases with cross-reactive NSAID hypersensitivity who underwent DPTs with COX-2 inhibitors in order to find safe alternatives. DPTs were single-blinded and placebo controlled. Results: The study group consisted of 309 patients. COX-2 inhibitors were well tolerated in the majority of the patients [nimesulide: 91.9%; meloxicam: 90.2%; rofecoxib: 94.9%; and celecoxib: 94.9%)]. Twenty-five patients (30 provocations) reacted to COX-2 inhibitors. None of the factors were found be associated with positive response. Conclusion: Our results suggest to follow the traditional DPT method to introduce COX-2 inhibitors for finding safe alternatives in all patients with cross-reactive NSAID hypersensitivity before prescription as uncertainty of any predictive factor for a positive response continues. However, these tests should be performed in hospital settings in which emergency equipment and experienced personnel are available (AU)