Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-aided capsule endoscopy (TOP100) in overt small bowel bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is the first-choice exploration in case of overt small bowel bleeding (SBB). An early CE is known to increase diagnostic yield, but long reading times may delay therapeutics. The study evaluates the diagnostic performance of the artificial intelligence tool TOP100 in patients with overt SBB undergoing early CE with Pillcam SB3. METHODS: Patients who underwent early CE (up to 14 days from the bleeding episode) for suspected overt SBB were included. One experienced endoscopist prospectively performed standard reading (SR) and a second blind experienced endoscopist performed a TOP100-based reading (TR). The primary endpoint was TR diagnostic accuracy for lesions with high bleeding potential (P2). RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were analyzed. The most common clinical presentation was melena (64%). CE showed angiodysplasias in 40.5% of patients (45/111). In per-patient analysis, TR showed a sensitivity of 90.48% (95% CI 82.09-95.80), specificity of 100% (95% CI 87.23-100) with a PPV of 100% (95% CI 94.01-100), NPV of 77.14% (95% CI 63.58-86.71) and diagnostic accuracy of 92.79 (86.29-96.84). At multivariate analysis, adequate intestinal cleansing was the only independent predictor of concordance between TR and SR (OR 2.909, p = 0.019). The median reading time for SR and TR was 23 min (18.0-26.8) and 1.9 min (range 1.7-2.1), respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TOP100 provides a fast-reading mode for early CE in case of overt small bowel bleeding. It identifies most patients with active bleeding and angiodysplasias, aiding in the prioritization of therapeutic procedures. However, its accuracy in detecting ulcers, varices and P1 lesions seems insufficient.

Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy Is Effective in Patients with Prior Abdominal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy (MSE) reduces procedure time and increases insertion depth into the small bowel; however, there is scarce evidence on factors affecting MSE efficacy. AIMS: To evaluate diagnostic yield and adverse events of MSE including patients with prior major abdominal surgery. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing MSE from June 2019 to December 2021. Demographic characteristics, procedure time, depth of maximum insertion (DMI), technical success, diagnostic yield, and adverse events were collected. RESULTS: Seventy-four anterograde (54.4%) and 62 retrograde (45.6%) enteroscopies were performed in 117 patients (64 males, median age 67 years). Fifty patients (42.7%) had prior major abdominal surgery. Technical success was 91.9% for anterograde and 90.3% for retrograde route. Diagnostic yield was 71.6% and 61.3%, respectively. The median DMI was 415 cm (264-585) for anterograde and 120 cm (37-225) for retrograde enteroscopy. In patients with prior major abdominal surgery, MSE showed significantly longer small bowel insertion time (38 vs 29 min, p = 0.004), with similar diagnostic yield (61 vs 71.4%, p = 0.201) and DMI (315 vs 204 cm, p = 0.226). The overall adverse event rate was 10.3% (SAE 1.5%), with no differences related to prior abdominal surgery (p = 0.598). Patients with prior surgeries directly involving the gastrointestinal tract showed lower DMI (189 vs 374 cm, p = 0.019) with equal exploration time (37.5 vs 38 min, p = 0.642) compared to those with other abdominal surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: MSE is effective and safe in patients with major abdominal surgery, although longer procedure times were observed. A lower depth of insertion was detected in patients with gastrointestinal surgery.

Is endoscopic treatment of small bowel strictures effective and safe in patients with Crohn's disease?

INTRODUCTION: there is very little scientific evidence about the efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) performed with balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) for the treatment of small bowel strictures (SBS) in Crohn's disease (CD). OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EBD using BAE in patients with CD and SBS. METHODS: a retrospective observational study was performed in a tertiary care medical center in patients with CD and SBS, evaluated by CT enterography or MRI enterography. RESULTS: from 2009 to 2019, 205 endoscopic dilations were performed in 80 patients with CD. 17 (21.25 %) had only SBS and 70.6 % were male with a median age of 42.2 (±14.4) years. The mean follow-up was 37.8 ±28.7 months. A total of 39 dilations were performed, 94.1 % were native and less than 5cm long, all strictures were ulcerated. The overall technical success was 82.4 % and clinical success was 88.2 %. During follow-up, 23.5 % of patients required surgery and 29.4 % were re-dilated. The long-term efficacy was 76.5 % and no severe adverse events (AE) were observed. No factors were identified to predict the need for surgery after dilation. CONCLUSIONS: SBS can be safely and effectively treated with EBD using BAE, thus reducing the need for surgery in the long term.

¿Es eficaz y seguro el tratamiento endoscópico de las estenosis de intestino delgado en pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn? / No disponible

INTRODUCCIÓN: existe poca evidencia científica sobre la eficacia de la dilatación endoscópica con balón (DEB) mediante enteroscopia en el tratamiento de las estenosis de intestino delgado (ID) en la enfermedad de Crohn (EC). OBJETIVO: evaluar la eficacia y la seguridad de la DEB mediante enteroscopia en pacientes con EC y estenosis en ID. MÉTODOS: estudio observacional retrospectivo en un centro de atención terciaria en pacientes con EC y estenosis de ID evaluadas por enteroTC o enteroRM. RESULTADOS: desde 2009 hasta 2019 se realizaron 205 dilataciones en 80 pacientes con EC; de ellos 17 (21,25 %) fueron pacientes con estenosis exclusivamente de ID (varones 70,6 %; edad media de 42,2 ± 14,4. El tiempo medio de seguimiento fue de 37,8 ± 28,7 meses. Se realizaron un total de 39 dilataciones. El 94,1 % eran nativas, con una longitud inferior que 5 cm y el 100 % estaban ulceradas. La tasa global de éxito técnico fue 82,4 %. El éxito clínico fue del 88,2 %. Durante el seguimiento, el 23,5 % de los sujetos requirieron de intervención quirúrgica (IQ), el 29,4 % de redilatación endoscópica y la eficacia a largo plazo fue del 76,5 %. No se produjeron complicaciones mayores. No se encontraron factores predictivos asociados con la necesidad de IQ tras la dilatación. CONCLUSIONES: las estenosis de ID pueden ser tratadas de forma segura y eficaz con DEB mediante enteroscopia asistida por balón (EAB) reduciend la necesidad de IQ a largo plazo

No disponible