RESUMEN
Clinical trials have identified ARID1A mutations as enriched among patients who respond favorably to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in several solid tumor types independent of microsatellite instability. We show that ARID1A loss in murine models is sufficient to induce anti-tumor immune phenotypes observed in ARID1A mutant human cancers, including increased CD8+ T cell infiltration and cytolytic activity. ARID1A-deficient cancers upregulated an interferon (IFN) gene expression signature, the ARID1A-IFN signature, associated with increased R-loops and cytosolic single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Overexpression of the R-loop resolving enzyme, RNASEH2B, or cytosolic DNase, TREX1, in ARID1A-deficient cells prevented cytosolic ssDNA accumulation and ARID1A-IFN gene upregulation. Further, the ARID1A-IFN signature and anti-tumor immunity were driven by STING-dependent type I IFN signaling, which was required for improved responsiveness of ARID1A mutant tumors to ICB treatment. These findings define a molecular mechanism underlying anti-tumor immunity in ARID1A mutant cancers.
Asunto(s)
Linfocitos T CD8-positivos , Proteínas de Unión al ADN , Interferón Tipo I , Proteínas de la Membrana , Neoplasias , Transducción de Señal , Factores de Transcripción , Animales , Humanos , Ratones , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/metabolismo , Línea Celular Tumoral , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Exodesoxirribonucleasas/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Interferón Tipo I/metabolismo , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Mutación , Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias/genética , Proteínas Nucleares/metabolismo , Fosfoproteínas/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo , Masculino , Quimiocinas/genética , Quimiocinas/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Standard first-line chemotherapy for endometrial cancer is paclitaxel plus carboplatin. The benefit of adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy remains unclear. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase 3 trial, we assigned 816 patients with measurable disease (stage III or IVA) or stage IVB or recurrent endometrial cancer in a 1:1 ratio to receive pembrolizumab or placebo along with combination therapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin. The administration of pembrolizumab or placebo was planned in 6 cycles every 3 weeks, followed by up to 14 maintenance cycles every 6 weeks. The patients were stratified into two cohorts according to whether they had mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) disease. Previous adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted if the treatment-free interval was at least 12 months. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in the two cohorts. Interim analyses were scheduled to be triggered after the occurrence of at least 84 events of death or progression in the dMMR cohort and at least 196 events in the pMMR cohort. RESULTS: In the 12-month analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival in the dMMR cohort were 74% in the pembrolizumab group and 38% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 0.48; P<0.001), a 70% difference in relative risk. In the pMMR cohort, median progression-free survival was 13.1 months with pembrolizumab and 8.7 months with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.71; P<0.001). Adverse events were as expected for pembrolizumab and combination chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, the addition of pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than with chemotherapy alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; NRG-GY018 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03914612.).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Endometriales , Femenino , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN , Método Doble Ciego , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Endometrial cancer continues to be the only gynecologic malignancy with a rising incidence and mortality, with both regional and global implications. Combination carboplatin and paclitaxel has been the recognized chemotherapy backbone for the treatment of advanced-stage or recurrent disease, with modest clinical outcomes. Over the last year, significant advances were achieved in improving oncologic outcomes by capitalizing on the molecular characterization of this heterogenous disease. These advances include incorporation of immunotherapy, identification of effective hormonal approaches, the evolution of antibody drug conjugates, and utilization of alternate targeted therapies. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The molecular characterization of endometrial cancer has been critical in informing novel treatment strategies. Over the past year, significant gains have been made via the incorporation of immunotherapy, hormonal combinations as well as antibody drug conjugates.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Uterinas , Humanos , Femenino , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Neoplasias Uterinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Uterinas/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC) and tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) are characterized by late-stage presentation and high mortality. Current guidelines for prevention recommend risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in patients with hereditary mutations in cancer susceptibility genes. However, HGSC displays extensive genetic heterogeneity with alterations in 168 genes identified in TCGA study, but current germline testing panels are often limited to the handful of recurrently mutated genes, leaving families with rare hereditary gene mutations potentially at-risk. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there are rare germline mutations that may aid in early identification of more patients at-risk for ESC and/or HGSC by evaluating patients with concurrent ESC, HGSC or precursor lesions, and endometrial atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or low-grade endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (LGEEA). METHODS: We performed targeted next-generation sequencing using TSO 500, a 523 gene panel, on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor and matched benign non-tumor tissue blocks from 5 patients with concurrent ESC, HGSC or precursor lesions, and CAH or LGEEA. RESULTS: We identified germline pathogenic, likely pathogenic or uncertain significance variants in cancer susceptibility genes in 4 of 5 patients - affected genes included GLI1, PIK3R1, FOXP1, FANCD2, INPP4B and H3F3C. Notably, none of these genes were included in the commercially available germline testing panels initially used to evaluate the patients at the time of their diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive germline testing of patients with concurrent LGEEA or CAH and ESC, HGSC or precursor lesions may aid in early identification of relatives at-risk for cancer who may be candidates for RRSO with hysterectomy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Endometrioide , Neoplasias Endometriales , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/genética , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/genética , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Anciano , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/genética , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/patología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , AdultoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Molecular profiling is developing to inform treatment in endometrial cancer. Using real world evidence, we sought to evaluate frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor vs chemotherapy effectiveness in advanced endometrial cancer, stratified by Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) ≥10 mut/MB and microsatellite instability (MSI). METHODS: Patients with advanced endometrial cancer in the US-based de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine Clinico-Genomic Database were included. Data originated from patients treated between January 2011- March 2022 at 280 US clinics. Next-generation sequencing assays were performed via FoundationOne or FoundationOneCDx. Longitudinal clinical data were derived from electronic health records. Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment included pembrolizumab, dostarlimab, and nivolumab monotherapies. Time to next treatment, time to treatment discontinuation, and overall survival were assessed with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for known prognostic factors. We used the Likelihood ratio test to compare biomarker performance. RESULTS: A total of 343 patients received chemotherapy and 28 received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy as frontline treatment. Patients who received monotherapy were more likely to be stage III at diagnosis (immune checkpoint inhibitor: 54.6% vs chemotherapy: 15.0%; p<0.001) and more likely to test MSI-high via next-generation sequencing (immune checkpoint inhibitor: 53.6% vs chemotherapy: 19.2%; p<0.001). In MSI-high cancers, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor had a more favorable time to next treatment (aHR: 0.18, p=0.001) and overall survival (aHR 0.29, p=0.045). Additional analyses on 70 unique tumor specimens revealed mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) via immunohistochemistry and MSI-high via next-generation sequencing concordance (91%), with nominal improvement of MSI over dMMR to predict time to treatment discontinuation (p=0.030), time to next treatment (p=0.032), and overall survival (p=0.22). MSI status was concordant with tumor mutational burden ≥10 in 94.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors may have improved efficacy over chemotherapy in frontline treatment for advanced endometrial cancer defined by MSI-high using next-generation sequencing as a nominally better predictor of outcomes than dMMR with immunohistochemistry. This provides the biologic rationale of active phase III trials.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Endometriales , Femenino , Humanos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inestabilidad de MicrosatélitesRESUMEN
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, with a rising incidence and mortality. Traditionally, systemic treatment has included combination platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy. More recently, the identification of molecular subtypes has transformed the treatment paradigms for patients with endometrial cancer, especially in the immunotherapeutic arena. Given the recent advancements in immune oncology approaches, we review regimens approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as well as the interim results of ongoing phase 3 clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoterapia , PredicciónRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: The role of imaging has been increasing in pretherapy planning and response assessment in cervical cancer, particularly in high-resource settings that provide access to computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET). In 2018, imaging was incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for cervical cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging is advantageous over CT for evaluation of the primary cervical cancer size and extent, because of superior contrast resolution. Furthermore, quantitative methods, including diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, show promise in improving treatment response and prognosis evaluation. Molecular imaging with fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT and PET/MRI can be particularly helpful in the detection of nodal disease and distant metastases. Semiautomated delineation of 3-dimensional tumor regions of interest has facilitated the development of novel PET-derived biomarkers that include metabolic volume and radiomics textural analysis features for prediction of outcomes. However, posttreatment inflammatory changes can be a confounder and lymph node evaluation is challenging, even with the use of PET/CT. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising tool that may be able to overcome some of the drawbacks inherent with imaging, such as limited ability to detect microscopic metastases or to distinguish between postchemoradiotherapy changes and residual tumor. Preliminary evidence suggests that liquid biopsy may be able to identify cervical cancer treatment response and resistance earlier than traditional methods. Future work should prioritize how to best synergize imaging and liquid biopsy as an integrated approach for optimal cervical cancer management.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Biomarcadores , Femenino , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Biopsia Líquida , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Embarazo , Radiofármacos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patologíaRESUMEN
We report on a woman with aggressive estrogen receptor-positive, KRAS-mutated ovarian cancer who achieved a remarkable response to combination therapy with the MEK inhibitor (trametinib) and the aromatase inhibitor (letrozole), even though the disease had failed to respond to a combination of a PI3K inhibitor and different MEK inhibitor, as well as to trametinib and the estrogen modulator, tamoxifen, and to letrozole by itself. The mechanism of action for exceptional response was elucidated by in vitro experiments that demonstrated that the fact that tamoxifen can have an agonistic effect in addition to antagonist activity, whereas letrozole results only in estrogen depletion was crucial to the response achieved when letrozole was combined with an MEK inhibitor. Our current observations indicate that subtle variations in mechanisms of action of outwardly similar regimens may have a major impact on outcome and that such translational knowledge is critical for optimizing a precision medicine strategy. KEY POINTS: This report describes the remarkable response of a patient with KRAS-mutated, estrogen receptor-positive low-grade serous ovarian cancer treated with trametinib (MEK inhibitor) and letrozole (aromatase inhibitor), despite prior progression on similar agents including tamoxifen (estrogen modulator). In vitro investigation revealed that tamoxifen can have agonistic in addition to antagonistic effects, which could be the reason for the patient not responding to the combination of trametinib and tamoxifen. The current observations suggest that drugs with different mechanisms of action targeting the same receptor may have markedly different anticancer activity when used in combinations.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Nitrilos , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Receptores de Estrógenos/genética , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Tamoxifeno/farmacología , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico , Triazoles/farmacología , Triazoles/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe the transition from a mentee to mentor role in a cohort of academic gynecologic oncologists by studying the evolution of authorship placement in peer reviewed publications by current gynecologic oncology (GO) fellowship directors. METHODS: Current GO fellowship directors were identified from the ACGME website. A Pubmed search identified all publications by all listed fellowship directors. Number of publications, and order of authorship were counted by years since medical school graduation. Milestones representing likely career transition points were developed and tracked. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the individuals and associated institutions. Time to event curves were compared using the Kaplan Meier method. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 58 GO fellowship program directors. The median time since medical school graduation was 22â¯years. Eight unique milestones reflecting the relative frequencies of authorship placement were studied. The median time to accomplishing these milestones ranged from 6 to 18â¯years. The timing of milestone attainment suggests a stepwise progression of events and was associated with both individual and institutional factors. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of 58 fellowship directors, a roadmap to mentorship was identified, that includes several measurable milestones, and representative times to attain each. Further analyses identified a set of factors associated with the rate of progression. We hope these findings can inform the evolution of mentorship in gynecologic oncology. It is possible that initiatives focused on mentorship training might include milestone tracking to facilitate development.
Asunto(s)
Ginecología/educación , Oncología Médica/educación , Mentores , Academias e Institutos , Autoria , Estudios de Cohortes , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Becas , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the representation of women as principal investigators (PI) in phase 3, gynecologic oncology clinical trials. METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for all phase 3 clinical trials with start dates between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020 using the search terms: "ovarian cancer", "endometrial cancer", and "cervical cancer". Trial characteristics were abstracted from the website. Gender of the PI was assessed by name, image on institutional website or by querying the trial coordinator. Trials were considered to have women's representation if women were the sole PI or among multiple co-PIs. Chi-square tests and relative risks were used to compare proportions across groups. Linear regression was used to assess trends over time. RESULTS: 200 unique clinical trials were included in this analysis, of which women were represented as PI in 76 (38%). Women were more likely to be a PI of trials funded by multiple sites than a single entity (RR = 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25, 2.61, p = 0.01), registered outside of Asia than those in Asia (RR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.11, 2.88, p = 0.02), and trials with multiple co-PIs than with one PI (RR = 1.78 (95% CI 1.18, 2.67), p = 0.01). Overall, women's representation as a PI increased by 3% annually (by year of registration, R2 = 0.61, p = 0.01). This increase was most evident in trials registered in multiple continents and Europe (both 4% annually). CONCLUSIONS: Women's representation as PIs in clinical trials has increased in the last decade. Trials funded by multiple sources outside of Asia have the highest proportion of PIs who are women. These trends may represent ongoing leadership and mentorship opportunities for women gynecologic oncologists.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/organización & administración , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/terapia , Liderazgo , Oncología Médica/tendencias , Médicos Mujeres/tendencias , Asia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Geografía , Humanos , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the practice patterns and outcomes of patients with stage 3B endometrial cancer. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database for all surgically staged, stage 3 patients between 2012 and 2016. Patients who received any pre-operative therapy were excluded. Demographics, tumor factors, and adjuvant therapy for the stage 3 substages were compared. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with adjuvant therapy. Kaplan Meier curves were generated and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Model was used to adjust for prognostic factors. Findings with p < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of 7363 patients with stage 3 disease, 478 (6%) had stage 3B; 1732 (23%) had stage 3A, 3457 (48%) had stage 3C1, and 1696 (23%) had stage 3C2 disease. Post-surgical treatment consisted of: combined chemotherapy (CT) and radiation (RT) (49%), CT alone (28%), RT alone (9%), 14% received no postoperative therapy. Among all stage 3 substages, patients with stage 3B disease were the least likely to receive any CT, and the most likely to receive RT alone. After adjusting for known prognostic factors, patients with stage 3A (Hazard ratio (HR) of death = 0.64) and 3C1 (HR of death = 0.79) disease had significantly worse overall survival compared to stage 3B; survival was not demonstrably different from patients with stage 3C2 disease. Patients with stage 3B disease who received CT + RT had the best overall survival. CONCLUSION: Survival of patients with stage 3B disease is similar to that of patients with para-aortic node metastases and is inferior to all others with stage 3 endometrial cancer. Less frequent CT and a higher rate of post-operative RT alone, describes a distinct practice from that seen in other stage 3 patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/métodos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/estadística & datos numéricos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salpingooforectomía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe our single-institution oncologic outcomes of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: We compared clinicopathologic information and outcomes for all patients with advanced stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who received NACT and IDS with (Nâ¯=â¯20) or without (Nâ¯=â¯48) HIPEC at our institution from 2010 to 2019 RESULTS: Mean age (62â¯years with HIPEC and 60â¯years without HIPEC) and proportion of stage 4 disease (40% for both) did not differ between cohorts. HIPEC patients had higher rates of complete cytoreduction (95% vs 50%), longer mean duration of surgery (530 vs. 216â¯min), more grade 3 or 4 postoperative complications (65% vs. 4%), and longer mean length of hospital stay (8 vs. 5â¯days). HIPEC patients had significantly higher risk for platinum-refractory progression or platinum-resistance recurrence (50% vs 23%; RRâ¯=â¯2.18; 95% CI 1.11, 4.30, pâ¯=â¯0.024). Median progression free survival (11.5 vs. 12â¯months) and all-cause mortality (19.1 vs. 30.5â¯months) in the HIPEC and non-HIPEC cohorts, respectively, did not differ CONCLUSIONS: HIPEC was associated with increased risk for platinum refractory or resistant disease. Higher surgical complexity may contribute to higher complication rates without improving oncologic outcomes in our patients. Further investigations and long-term follow-up are needed to assess the utility of HIPEC in primary treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer.
Asunto(s)
Cisplatino/farmacología , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/terapia , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/métodos , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/tratamiento farmacológico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence, risk factors for, and clinical implications of unintentional weight loss on oncologic outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with concurrent chemotherapy and contemporary radiation techniques. METHODS: This a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of patients with LACC who received definitive chemoradiation (CRT) from 2010 to 2015. Clinicopathologic factors were abstracted by chart review and characterized using descriptive statistics. Factors associated with severe weight loss (≥10% from baseline) were determined by Chi-square test. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan Meier method and regression was performed using the Cox Proportional hazards model. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients comprised the cohort. The majority of patients were White, obese, and had squamous histology. Almost 80% of patients experienced at least some weight loss, with 14% of patients experiencing severe weight loss. Patients with FIGO 2009 stage 3 or 4 disease had a 3.4-fold increased risk of severe weight loss compared to those with earlier stage disease. Patients who had severe weight loss had a higher risk for death (HRâ¯=â¯2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77, 7.37, pâ¯=â¯0.036) and a trend toward high risk for recurrence (HRâ¯=â¯1.43, 95% CI 0.46, 3.32, pâ¯=â¯0.107) compared to patients without severe weight loss. CONCLUSION: Unintentional weight loss is a common symptom of patients with LACC receiving CRT that affects oncologic outcomes, yet it remains under-recognized. Increased awareness of weight loss and malnutrition may encourage interventions to improve this potentially modifiable risk factor for worse prognosis and quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Desnutrición/complicaciones , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/complicaciones , Pérdida de Peso/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The GOG Foundation, Inc. (GOG-F) is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization with the purpose of promoting excellence in the quality and integrity of clinical and basic scientific research in the field of gynecologic malignancies. GOG Partners (GOG-P) is a program of the GOG-F and is positioned alongside NRG Oncology under the GOG-F organizational umbrella. GOG-P operates outside of the federally funded NCI NRG Oncology, a key distinguishing feature. By functioning as a site management organization (SMO), GOG-P provides an additional platform for clinical trial development, mentorship opportunities, patient accrual, and site infrastructure support yielding an expanded gynecologic oncology clinical trials infrastructure in the US. GOG-P has a consistent track record of conducting high quality clinical trials that lead to bringing novel FDA approved treatments for gynecologic cancer. This manuscript summarizes the history and organizational structure of the GOG-P. In addition, we outline the other key supportive programs within the GOG-F that help support the GOG-P effort to perform transformative gynecologic cancer research.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/organización & administración , Industria Farmacéutica/organización & administración , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/terapia , Ginecología/organización & administración , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary care of placenta accreta spectrum cases improves pregnancy outcomes, but the specific components of such a multidisciplinary collaboration varies between institutions. As experience with placenta accreta spectrum increases, it is crucial to assess new surgical techniques and protocols to help improve maternal outcomes and to advocate for hospital resources. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess a novel multidisciplinary protocol for the treatment of placenta accreta spectrum that comprises cesarean delivery, multivessel uterine embolization, and hysterectomy in a single procedure within a hybrid operative suite. STUDY DESIGN: This was a matched prepost study of placenta accreta spectrum cases managed before (2010-2017) and after implementation of the Placenta Accreta Spectrum Treatment With Intraoperative Multivessel Embolization protocol (2018-2021) at a tertiary medical center. Historical cases were managed with internal iliac artery balloon placement in selected cases with the decision to inflate the balloons intraoperatively at the discretion of the primary surgeon. Intraoperative Embolization cases were compared with historical cases in a 1:2 ratio matched on the basis of placenta accreta spectrum severity and surgical urgency. The primary outcome was a requirement for transfusion with packed red blood cells. Secondary outcomes included estimated surgical blood loss, operative and postoperative complications, procedural time, length of stay, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 15 Placenta Accreta Spectrum Treatment With Intraoperative Multivessel Embolization cases and 30 matched historical cases were included in the analysis. There were no demographic differences noted between the groups. A median (interquartile range) of 0 units (0-2 units) of packed red blood cells were transfused in the Intraoperative Embolization group compared with 2 units (0-4.5 units) in the historical group (P=.045); 5 of 15 (33.3%) Intraoperative Embolization cases required blood transfusions compared with 19 of 30 (63.3%) cases in the historical group (P=.11). The estimated blood loss was significantly less in the Intraoperative Embolization group with a median (interquartile range) of 750 mL (450-1050 mL) compared with 1750 mL (1050-2500 mL) in the historical group (P=.003). There were no cases requiring massive transfusion (≥10 red blood cell units in 24 hours) in the Intraoperative Embolization group compared with 5 of 30 (16.7%) cases in the historical group (P=.15). There were no intraoperative deaths from hemorrhagic shock using the Intraoperative Embolization protocol, whereas this occurred in 2 of the historical cases. The mean duration of the interventional radiology procedure was longer in the Intraoperative Embolization group (67.8 vs 34.1 minutes; P=.002). Intensive care unit admission and postpartum length of stay were similar, and surgical and postoperative complications were not significantly different between the groups. The gestational age and neonatal birthweights were similar; however, the neonatal length of stay was longer in the Intraoperative Embolization group (median duration, 32 days vs 15 days; P=.02) with a trend toward low Apgar scores. Incidence of arterial umbilical cord blood pH <7.2 and respiratory distress syndrome and intubation rates were not statistically different between the groups. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary pathway including a single-surgery protocol with multivessel uterine embolization is associated with a decrease in blood transfusion requirements and estimated blood loss with no increase in operative complications. The Placenta Accreta Spectrum Treatment With Intraoperative Multivessel Embolization protocol provides a definitive surgical method that warrants consideration by other centers specializing in placenta accreta spectrum treatment.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea/métodos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Histerectomía/métodos , Arteria Ilíaca , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Placenta Accreta/terapia , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina/métodos , Hemorragia Uterina/prevención & control , Adulto , Puntaje de Apgar , Oclusión con Balón , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Combinada , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Estudio Históricamente Controlado , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tempo Operativo , Embarazo , Radiografía Intervencional , Choque Hemorrágico/epidemiología , Choque Hemorrágico/mortalidad , Hemorragia Uterina/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer has yet to be determined. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have demonstrated substantial improvement in progression-free survival as monotherapy maintenance treatment in the frontline setting versus active surveillance. Furthermore, preclinical and early clinical studies have shown that PARP inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors have synergistic antitumor activity and may provide an additional therapeutic option for patients in this population. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: In women with newly diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, we wish to assess the efficacy of frontline maintenance treatment with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib versus placebo following response to platinum-based chemotherapy (ATHENA-MONO), and to assess the combination of rucaparib plus nivolumab (a programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1)-blocking monoclonal antibody) versus rucaparib alone (ATHENA-COMBO). STUDY HYPOTHESIS: (1) Maintenance therapy with rucaparib monotherapy may extend progression-free survival following standard treatment for ovarian cancer in the frontline setting. (2) The combination of nivolumab plus rucaparib may extend progression-free survival following standard treatment for ovarian cancer in the frontline setting compared with rucaparib alone. TRIAL DESIGN: ATHENA is an international, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial consisting of two independent comparisons (ATHENA-MONO and ATHENA-COMBO) in patients with newly diagnosed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Patients are randomized 4:4:1:1 to the following: oral rucaparib+ intravenous nivolumab (arm A); oral rucaparib + intravenous placebo (arm B); oral placebo+ intravenous nivolumab (arm C); and oral placebo + intravenous placebo (arm D). The starting dose of rucaparib is 600 mg orally twice a day and nivolumab 480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks. ATHENA-MONO compares arm B with arm D to evaluate rucaparib monotherapy versus placebo, and ATHENA-COMBO evaluates arm A versus arm B to investigate the effects of rucaparib and nivolumab in combination versus rucaparib monotherapy. ATHENA-MONO and ATHENA-COMBO share a common treatment arm (arm B) but each comparison is independently powered. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients ≥18 years of age with newly diagnosed advanced, high-grade epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer who have achieved a response after completion of cytoreductive surgery and initial platinum-based chemotherapy are enrolled. No other prior treatment for ovarian cancer, other than the frontline platinum regimen, is permitted. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. SAMPLE SIZE: Approximately 1000 patients have been enrolled and randomized. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: The trial completed accrual in 2020. While dependent on event rates, primary results of ATHENA-MONO are anticipated in early 2022 and results of ATHENA-COMBO are anticipated to mature at a later date. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03522246).
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Nivolumab/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodosRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to examine the rate of and indications for readmission in patients with advanced staged ovarian cancer undergoing rectosigmoid resection and primary anastomosis, an important quality metric. A retrospective review was conducted of patients with primary ovarian cancer who underwent rectosigmoid resection as part of cytoreductive surgery between July 2003 and July 2014. Univariate analysis identified rates and predictors of readmission. Fifty patients were eligible for analysis. The unanticipated 30-day readmission rate was 18% (n = 9). Of those readmitted less than 30 days from date of discharge, 3 were readmitted more than once, making 14 total readmissions. A total of 21 indications for readmission were reported, with the most common being: infection (23.8%, n = 5); thromboembolic events (19%, n = 4); and severe malnutrition (14.3%, n = 3). The median time to readmission was 14 days (range, 2-26). There were no deaths within 30 days of surgery in this cohort.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known about the subject? Unanticipated 30-day readmission rates are reported to be between 12 and 20% among patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for the management of ovarian cancer. The relative contribution of rectosigmoid resection at the time of cytoreductive surgery to readmission is not well studied.What do the results of this study add? In the examined cohort, the unanticipated 30-day readmission rate following rectosigmoid resection with primary reanastomosis at the time of cytoreductive surgery is 18%, similar to the readmission rate for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery, in general. While the sample size is limited, the perioperative complications in this cohort appear similar to those of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Efforts to reduce unanticipated 30-day readmission following cytoreductive surgery is warranted. Future studies may benefit from multi-centre approaches and prospective data collection, while simultaneously assessing the impact of enhanced recovery programs. Ultimately, identification of risk factors, and programmatic initiatives to drive down readmission will be important across surgical platforms, and the opportunity exists in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Proctectomía/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Proctectomía/métodos , Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have shown have activity in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Previous studies documented activity in patients with germline (gBRCA) and tumor (tBRCA) BRCA mutations (BRCAm) for treatment in lieu of chemotherapy as well as in recurrent ovarian cancer as maintenance therapy. The recent data from four randomized phase 3 trials have established an important role for frontline PARPi maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer. While SOLO-1 only included BRCAm patients, PRIMA, VELIA, and PAOLA-1 enrolled broader patient populations. The magnitude of benefit of PARPi in these studies was consistently greatest in the BRCAm patients (germline or tumor). PARPi treatment also improved PFS in the HRD cohort but to a lesser degree than in patients with BRCAm. In secondary analyses, the overall impact of PARPi treatment in HR proficient patients, which comprise about 50% of ovarian cancers, was more limited than in the other subgroups. Data for overall survival, also a secondary endpoint, is currently immature for these four trials. Fatigue, hematologic, and GI toxicities are the most commonly noted adverse events with PARPi therapy. The recent FDA approvals of PARPi in the maintenance setting will enable clinicians to incorporate these into frontline armamentarium of ovarian cancer treatment.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia de Mantención/normas , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Aprobación de Drogas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas/normas , Ginecología/métodos , Ginecología/normas , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos , Oncología Médica/métodos , Oncología Médica/normas , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/normas , Mutación , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Characterize change in rates of minimally invasive (MIS) radical hysterectomy after presentation of the LACC trial. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis of data from Vizient® database for surgically treated patients with invasive cervical cancer from April 2017-March 2019. Covariates studied included patient demographic and obesity categories, dates of LACC trial presentation and publication, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: 2102 cervical cancer patients had surgery at 201 hospitals. Most were age 31-50 (51.2%), White (64.8%), and had public (49.2%) health insurance. Annual rates of MIS fell from 51.9% to 27.1% after the LACC trial presentation (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.47, 0.58; p < 0.0001). Adjusting for within hospital correlation, the odds of MIS dropped by 13% per month (OR = 0.872 per month, 95% CI 0.852, 0.891; p < 0.001), without further change in rates of MIS after the peer-review publication (OR = 1.033 per month, 95% CI 0.897, 1.189; p = 0.65). Rates of MIS declined across all demographics (RR = 0.32-0.65; p < 0.01), except in morbidly obese women (RR = 0.90; p = 0.60). Applying mixed effects model, rates of MIS fell by 3% per month in morbidly obese women versus 18% per month if body mass index<40 kg/m2. NCCN member hospitals and hospitals with gynecologic oncology fellowship training programs significantly reduced rates of MIS radical hysterectomy faster, but not earlier, than other hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of MIS radical hysterectomy fell dramatically and pervasively after the LACC trial presentation, despite ongoing substantive controversy. Practice pattern changes were not significant in morbidly obese women.