Prostate Mapping for Cancer Diagnosis: The Madrid Protocol. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion and Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsies.

PURPOSE: We assessed the prostate cancer detection accuracy of transperineal prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy and micro-ultrasound during the same procedure. Micro-ultrasound is a new high-resolution imaging system that allows real-time targeted biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 194 consecutive patients underwent transperineal prostate biopsies using real-time targeted micro-ultrasound (ExactVu™) and ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (BiopSee®) in the same procedure, from February 2018 to September 2019. Biopsies were performed using a transperineal needle guide attached to the 29 MHz high-resolution micro-ultrasound transducer. RESULTS: The overall positive rate was 56% (108) for prostate cancer and 42% (81) for clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group greater than 1), and adding micro-ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging detected significantly more clinically significant prostate cancer than systematic biopsy (p <0.001). Micro-ultrasound found 12 of 108 (11%) prostate cancers that were missed by all other techniques and 11 (92%) were clinically significant prostate cancer. PI-RADS® and PRI-MUS™ (Prostate Risk Identification Using Micro-Ultrasound) were strong predictors of clinically significant prostate cancer in a logistic regression model (AUC 0.76). For prostate specific antigen greater than 4 ng/ml, PI-RADS greater than 3, there was an improvement in detection rate between PRI-MUS 4 and PRI-MUS 5 (52% Gleason Grade Group greater than 1 to 92% Gleason Grade Group greater than 1). No fever or clinical infection was observed and 17 (8.7%) patients presented with minor complications (Clavien Dindo I). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study using a transperineal approach for micro-ultrasound guided biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy. The results show a high accuracy for prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis, without infectious complications. The proposed method should be validated in large randomized clinical trials.

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy by Lateral Approach: Technique, Reproducibility and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy by lateral approach allows performing a prostatectomy through a buttonhole, with direct access to the seminal vesicle and fully sparing the anterior pubovesical complex. Our aim is to show the results of reproducing the technique of robotic radical prostatectomy by lateral approach, in terms of intraoperative, postoperative, oncological and functional parameters. METHODS: We analyzed 513 patients submitted to robotic radical prostatectomy by lateral approach from January 2015 to March 2021, operated on by two surgeons in our institution. The oncological and functional results of both surgeons were compared. RESULTS: When comparing both surgeons, the rate of positive surgical margins (PSM) was 32.87% and 37.9% and significant surgical margins (PSM > 2 mm) were 5.88% and 7.58% (p = 0.672) for surgeon 1 and surgeon 2, respectively. Immediate continence was 86% and 85% and sexual potency at one year 73% and 72%, with a similar rate of complications for surgeon 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy by the lateral approach technique with preservation of the anterior pubovesical complex is reproducible and offers good oncological and functional results.

En bloc MoLEP (MOSES HoLEP) with early apical dissection and preservation of the sphincter's mucosa. Surgical technique and technology developments that allow a new paradigm of endoscopic prostate enucleation. / MoLEP (MOSES HoLEP) en bloque con liberación apical precoz y preservación de la mucosa esfinteriana. Evolución de la técnica quirúrgica y la tecnológica que permiten un nuevo paradigma de enucleación endoscópica anatómica de próstata.

Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate was first described by Hiraoka in 1986, using a monopolar resectoscope. His contribution was largely ignored until Gilling and Fraundorfer published their three-lobe enucleation technique with the Holmium laser in 1998 ,that ended establishing itself as a reliable option for the treatment of HBP, backed by ample scientific evidence. Later on, enucleation performed with other lasers, as well as bipolar energy, have shown concordance in their clinical results. As a result, the term AEEP (anatomic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate) emerged to encompass all these techniques. During the last few years there have been significant advances in two areas: first, technology, with the development of pulse modulation for Holmium generators (MOSES) as well as high-speed morcellators. Second, the development of new surgical techniques that recognize the importance of the early release of the sphincter from the apex of the adenoma during the operation as well as the careful preservation of the external sphincter's mucosa, to avoid early stress incontinence. In this paper,we review the recent evolution of both technology and surgical technique. AEEP has been risen to a new level, reducing operative time significantly, usually under one hour, and radically reducing the incidence of early temporary stress incontinence, and maybe also facilitating the learning curve of AEEP.

La enucleación endoscópica de próstata fue descrita por primera vez por Hiraoka en 1986, usando un resector monopolar. Su aportación pasó desapercibida hasta que Gilling y Fraundorfer publicaron su técnica de enucleación en tres lóbulos con láser de Holmio en 1998, que se estableció como una opción de tratamiento de la obstrucción prostática benigna ampliamente respaldada por la evidencia científica. Posteriormentes e ha estudiado el uso de otros láseres así como de la energía bipolar para realizar enucleación  endoscópica y se ha observado una concordancia en los resultados de estas técnicas, independientemente de la fuente de energía utilizada, que ha conducido a englobarlas bajo el acrónimo EEAP (enucleación endoscópica anatómica de próstata). En los últimos años se han producido avances muy relevantes en dos ámbitos: Uno, el ámbito tecnológico, con el desarrollo de la tecnología de modulación del pulso del láser de Holmio (MOSES) y de los morceladores de alto rendimiento. Otro, el desarrollo de nuevas técnicas quirúrgicas, que reconocen la importancia de liberar precozmente el esfínter del ápex del adenoma en la intervención y de preservar escrupulosamente la mucosa del esfínter externo, para evitar la incontinencia urinaria precoz postoperatoria. En este artículo se revisa la evolución reciente de la tecnología y de la técnica quirúrgica que han elevado a la enucleación endoscópica de próstata a otro nivel, reduciendo significativamente el tiempo operatorio, normalmente inferior a una hora, disminuyendo radicalmente la incontinencia precoz postoperatoria y probablemente, facilitando el aprendizaje de la técnica.

[Standarization of PCNL reporting: Comparative methodology.] / Nuevo sistema de comparación de resultados tras nefrolitotomía percutánea de un modo más homogéneo.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a new renal lithiasis classification on the stone free rate. The new system would allow standarization of comparison between different series of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing NPCL between November 2011 and November 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The stones were classified as simple (pelvic and/or calyceal stones that required a single access and/or use of a rigid nephroscope), complex (required the use of more than one percutaneous access and/or flexible instruments and/or combined access) and extremely complex (complete staghorn stones or anatomical alterations), according to the Ibarluzea-Llanes classification. Other variables analyzed were age, sex, diabetes, hypertension or taking anticoagulants, stones composition, placement of postoperative nephrostomy and surgical time. We performed a univariate and multivariate analysis using the chi-square or Fisher test and logistic regression. RESULTS: Sixty-nine procedures were included in 57 patients with a mean age of 51 years (13-84) and a mean follow-up time of 30 months. The stone free rate was 86%, 75% and 55% for a simple, complex or extremely complex stone, both at three months and a year. Only the stone type was associated with a worse stone free rate (p 0.03) with RR of 2.5 for a 95% CI. CONCLUSIONS: The Ibarluzea-Llanes clasification could be used as a new system for standarization of PCNL outcomes reporting.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el impacto de una nueva clasificación de la litiasis renal sobre la tasa libre de litiasis, para su utilización como sistema que permita comparar distintas series de nefrolitotomía percutánea de un modo más homogéneo.MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se analizaron de forma retrospectiva pacientes sometidos a nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLPC) entre noviembre 2011 y noviembre 2016. Las litiasis se clasificaron en simples (litiasis pélvica y/o calicial que requirieron de un único acceso y/o utilización de un nefroscopio rígido), compleja (requirieron la utilización de más de un acceso percutáneo y/o instrumental flexible y/o acceso combinado) y extremadamente compleja (litiasis coraliforme completa o alteraciones anatómicas), de acuerdo con la clasificación de Ibarluzea-Llanes. También se analizaron las variables edad, sexo, antecedentes de diabetes, hipertensión o toma de anticoagulantes, composición de la litiasis, colocación de nefrostomía posquirúrgica y tiempo quirúrgico. Realizamos un análisis univariado y multivariado mediante el test de chi-cuadrado o de Fisher y regresión logística. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 69 procedimientos en 57 pacientes con una edad media de 51,3 años (13-84) y un tiempo medio de seguimiento de 32,57 meses (rango 71). La tasa libre de litiasis fue del 86%, 75% y 55% para una litiasis simple, compleja o extremadamente compleja, tanto a los tres meses como al año. Únicamente el tipo de litiasis se relacionó con una peor tasa libre de litiasis (p 0,03) con RR de 2,5. CONCLUSIONES: La clasificación del tipo de litiasis de Ibarluzea-Llanes resultó ser un buen modelo predictivo de tasa libre de litiasis tras nefrolitotomía percutánea.

Molep (moses Holep) en bloque con liberación apical precoz y preservación de la mucosa esfinteriana. Evolución de la técnica quirúrgica y la tecnológica que permiten un nuevo paradigma de enucleación endoscópica anatómica de próstata / In block Molep (moses Holep), including early apical dissection and sphincter mucous preservation. Surgical technique and technology development that allow a new paradigm of endoscopic prostate enucleation

La enucleación endoscópica de próstata fue descrita por primera vez por Hiraoka en 1986, usando un resector monopolar. Su aportación pasó desapercibida hasta que Gilling y Fraundorfer publicaron su técnica de enucleación en tres lóbulos con láser de Holmio en 1998, que se estableció como una opción de tratamiento de la obstrucción prostática benigna ampliamente respaldada por la evidencia científica. Posteriormente se ha estudiado el uso de otros láseres así como de la energía bipolar para realizar enucleación endoscópica y se ha observado una concordancia en los resultados de estas técnicas, independientemente de la fuente de energía utilizada, que ha conducido a englobarlas bajo el acrónimo EEAP (enucleación endoscópica anatómica de próstata). En los últimos años se han producido avances muy relevantes en dos ámbitos: Uno, el ámbito tecnológico, con el desarrollo de la tecnología de modulación del pulso del láser de Holmio (MOSES) y de los morceladores de alto rendimiento. Otro, el desarrollo de nuevas técnicas quirúrgicas, que reconocen la importancia de liberar precozmente el esfínter del ápex del adenoma en la intervención y de preservar escrupulosamente la mucosa del esfínter externo, para evitar la incontinencia urinaria precoz postoperatoria. En este artículo se revisa la evolución reciente de la tecnología y de la técnica quirúrgica que han elevado a la enucleación endoscópica de próstata a otro nivel, reduciendo significativamente el tiempo operatorio, normalmente inferior a una hora, disminuyendo radicalmente la incontinencia precoz postoperatoria y probablemente, facilitando el aprendizaje de la técnica

Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate was first described by Hiraoka in 1986, using a monopolar resectoscope. His contribution was largely ignored until Gilling and Fraundorfer published their three-lobe enucleation technique with the Holmium laser in 1998, that ended establishing itself as a reliable option for the treatment of HBP, backed by ample scientific evidence. Later on, enucleation performed with other lasers, as well as bipolar energy, have shown concordance in their clinical results. As a result, the term AEEP (anatomic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate) emerged to encompass all these techniques. During the last few years there have been significant advances in two areas: first, technology, with the development of pulse modulation for Holmium generators (MOSES) as well as high-speed morcellators. Second, the development of new surgical techniques that recognize the importance of the early release of the sphincter from the apex of the adenoma during the operation as well as the careful preservation of the external sphincter's mucosa, to avoid early stress incontinence. In this paper, we review the recent evolution of both technology and surgical technique. AEEP has been risen to a new level, reducing operative time significantly, usually under one hour, and radically reducing the incidence of early temporary stress incontinence, and maybe also facilitating the learning curve of AEEP

Nuevo sistema de comparación de resultados tras nefrolitotomía percutánea de un modo más homogéneo / Standarization of PCNL reporting: Comparative methodology

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el impacto de una nueva clasificación de la litiasis renal sobre la tasa libre de litiasis, para su utilización como sistema que permita comparar distintas series de nefrolitotomía percutánea de un modo más homogéneo. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se analizaron de forma retrospectiva pacientes sometidos a nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLPC) entre noviembre 2011 y noviembre 2016. Las litiasis se clasificaron en simples (litiasis pélvica y/o calicial que requirieron de un único acceso y/o utilización de un nefroscopio rígido), compleja (requirieron la utilización de más de un acceso percutáneo y/o instrumental flexible y/o acceso combinado) y extremadamente compleja (litiasis coraliforme completa o alteraciones anatómicas), de acuerdo con la clasificación de Ibarluzea-Llanes. También se analizaron las variables edad, sexo, antecedentes de diabetes, hipertensión o toma de anticoagulantes, composición de la litiasis, colocación de nefrostomía posquirúrgica y tiempo quirúrgico. Realizamos un análisis univariado y multivariado mediante el test de chi-cuadrado o de Fisher y regresión logística. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 69 procedimientos en 57 pacientes con una edad media de 51,3 años (13-84) y un tiempo medio de seguimiento de 32,57 meses (rango 71). La tasa libre de litiasis fue del 86%, 75% y 55% para una litiasis simple, compleja o extremadamente compleja, tanto a los tres meses como al año. Únicamente el tipo de litiasis se relacionó con una peor tasa libre de litiasis (p 0,03) con RR de 2,5. CONCLUSIONES: La clasificación del tipo de litiasis de Ibarluzea-Llanes resultó ser un buen modelo predictivo de tasa libre de litiasis tras nefrolitotomía percutánea

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a new renal lithiasis classification on the stone free rate. The new system would allow standarization of comparison between different series of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing NPCL between November 2011 and November 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The stones were classified as simple (pelvic and/or calyceal stones that required a single access and/or use of a rigid nephroscope), complex (required the use of more than one percutaneous Access and/or flexible instruments and/or combined access) and extremely complex (complete staghorn stones or anatomical alterations), according to the Ibarluzea-Llanes classification. Other variables analyzed were age, sex, diabetes, hypertension or taking anticoagulants, stones composition, placement of postoperative nephrostomy and surgical time. We performed a univariate and multivariate analysis using the chi-square or Fisher test and logistic regression. RESULTS: Sixty-nine procedures were included in 57 patients with a mean age of 51 years (13-84) and a mean follow-up time of 30 months. The stone free rate was 86%, 75% and 55% for a simple, complex or extremely complex stone, both at three months and a year. Only the stone type was associated with a worse stone free rate (p 0.03) with RR of 2.5 for a 95% CI. CONCLUSIONS: The Ibarluzea-Llanes clasification could be used as a new system for standarization of PCNL outcomes reporting