Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 51(9): 3132-6, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23824776

RESUMEN

Five laboratory-acquired brucellosis (LAB) cases that occurred in the United States between 2008 and 2011 are presented. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reviewed the recommendations published in 2008 and the published literature to identify strategies to further prevent LAB. The improved prevention strategies are described.


Asunto(s)
Brucelosis/diagnóstico , Brucelosis/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Exposición Profesional , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
2.
East Mediterr Health J ; 19 Suppl 2: S19-23, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24673094

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to describe the risks and human health outcomes associated with attendance at the Moulay Abdellah Amghar moussem (a pre-planned mass gathering attracting more than 360 000 participants) for the purposes of public health prevention, planning, preparedness and response. We performed an environmental health risk assessment and retrospectively reviewed local health centre records before, during and after the event. In addition, standardized interviews with key stakeholders were performed to qualitatively evaluate local public health preparedness and response capacities. During the event, average daily health centre visits increased 5-fold. The sex ratio of health-care visits changed significantly from an average of 1.8:1 female:male visits per day to 1.2:1. The proportion of injuries varied from an average of 3.7% pre- and post-event to 14.8% (P < 0.01) during the event. A significant increase in digestive diseases was also observed during the event. Recommendations include increasing accessibility to free sanitation and hygiene facilities and improving health communications concerning hand washing and food and water safety.


Asunto(s)
Aniversarios y Eventos Especiales , Planificación en Salud , Medición de Riesgo , Viaje , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoría Médica , Marruecos , Salud Pública , Investigación Cualitativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Capacidad de Reacción , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Am J Transplant ; 10(9): 2161-7, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20883549

RESUMEN

Two patients developed renal mucormycosis following transplantation of kidneys from the same donor, a near-drowning victim in a motor vehicle crash. Genotypically, indistinguishable strains of Apophysomyces elegans were recovered from both recipients. We investigated the source of the infection including review of medical records, environmental sampling at possible locations of contamination and query for additional cases at other centers. Histopathology of the explanted kidneys revealed extensive vascular invasion by aseptate, fungal hyphae with relative sparing of the renal capsules suggesting a vascular route of contamination. Disseminated infection in the donor could not be definitively established. A. elegans was not recovered from the same lots of reagents used for organ recovery or environmental samples and no other organ transplant-related cases were identified. This investigation suggests either isolated contamination of the organs during recovery or undiagnosed disseminated donor infection following a near-drowning event. Although no changes to current organ recovery or transplant procedures are recommended, public health officials and transplant physicians should consider the possibility of mucormycosis transmitted via organs in the future, particularly for near-drowning events. Attention to aseptic technique during organ recovery and processing is re-emphasized.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Mucormicosis/mortalidad , Mucormicosis/transmisión , Ahogamiento Inminente/complicaciones , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/microbiología , Riñón/patología , Masculino , Inutilidad Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucorales/aislamiento & purificación , Mucormicosis/etiología , Mucormicosis/patología , Ahogamiento Inminente/etiología , Ahogamiento Inminente/terapia , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/efectos adversos , Trasplante Homólogo
4.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 72(4): 1047-52, 2000 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11010950

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Animal and in vitro studies have provided evidence of an anticarcinogenic effect of active ingredients in garlic. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to conduct meta-analyses of the epidemiologic literature on the association between garlic consumption and risk of stomach, colon, head and neck, lung, breast, and prostate cancers. DESIGN: Meta-analyses were conducted for all cancers mutually and separately for colorectal and stomach cancers in relation to consumption of exclusively raw garlic, cooked garlic, or both (RC garlic). Eighteen studies reported a relative risk estimate for RC garlic consumption and cancer risk. RESULTS: In the meta-analyses of colorectal and stomach cancer, the reference categories ranged from no consumption to consumption of 3.5 g/wk, whereas the highest categories ranged from any consumption to >28.8 g/wk. The average difference between the highest and lowest categories was 16 g/wk. The random-effects relative risk (RR) estimate of colorectal cancer and RC garlic consumption, excluding garlic supplements, was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.89). For stomach cancer, the random-effects RR estimate was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.92). The heterogeneity among studies for the latter outcome (P: = 0.0002) indicates the questionableness of the generalizability of this summary estimate. An indication of publication bias for all cancers combined is evident from a funnel plot of RC garlic consumption and cancer risk and from the results of the Begg and Mazumdar test (P: = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: High intake of RC garlic may be associated with a protective effect against stomach and colorectal cancers. Heterogeneity of effect estimates, differences in dose estimation, publication bias, and possible alternative hypotheses (eg, confounding by total vegetable consumption) preclude sole reliance on summary effect estimates.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Ajo/metabolismo , Plantas Medicinales , Neoplasias Gástricas/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Femenino , Ajo/fisiología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/prevención & control , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevención & control , MEDLINE , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , Sesgo de Publicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología
5.
J Nutr ; 131(3s): 1032S-40S, 2001 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11238811

RESUMEN

Animal and in vitro studies provide evidence of an anticarcinogenic effect of active ingredients in garlic. This review of the epidemiologic literature on garlic consumption addresses cancers of the stomach, colon, head and neck, lung, breast and prostate. Nineteen studies reported relative risk estimates for garlic consumption and cancer incidence. Site-specific case-control studies of stomach and colorectal cancer, in which multiple reports were available, suggest a protective effect of high intake of raw and/or cooked garlic. Cohort studies confirm this inverse association for colorectal cancer. Few cohort and case-control studies for other sites of cancer exist. Garlic supplements, as analyzed in four cohort studies and one case-control report, from two distinct populations, do not appear to be related to risk. Low study power, lack of variability in garlic consumption categorization within studies and poor adjustment for potential cofounders may limit the reliability of any conclusions regarding garlic supplements. However, an indication of publication bias was also found by visual inspection of a funnel plot and in a log-rank test (P = 0.004). Evidence from available studies nevertheless suggests a preventive effect of garlic consumption in stomach and colorectal cancers. The study limitations indicate the need for more definitive research and improved nutritional epidemiologic analyses of dietary data.


Asunto(s)
Anticarcinógenos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ajo/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Fitoterapia , Plantas Medicinales , Animales , Anticarcinógenos/metabolismo , Antineoplásicos/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Ajo/metabolismo , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/prevención & control , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevención & control , MEDLINE , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/prevención & control
6.
Nutr Cancer ; 40(2): 92-8, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11962261

RESUMEN

Several studies of dietary and serum antioxidant micronutrients (vitamins A, C, and E and beta-carotene) suggest that higher levels may be protective for ovarian cancer. None of these has examined supplements. We used a food frequency questionnaire and additional questions on supplements to study 168 histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer cases, 159 community controls, and 92 hospital-based controls. Antioxidant consumption from diet or supplements was calculated in milligrams or international units per day. In multivariate analyses using only community controls, the highest levels of intake of vitamins C and E from supplements were protective: odds ratio (OR) = 0.40 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.21-0.78] and OR = 0.33 (95% CI = 0.18-0.60), respectively. Consumption of antioxidants from diet was unrelated to risk. In analyses combining antioxidant intake from diet and supplements, vitamins C (> 363 mg/day) and E (> 75 mg/day) were associated with reduced risks: OR = 0.45 (95% CI = 0.22-0.91) and OR = 0.44 (95% CI = 0.21-0.94), respectively. Results were similar, with some attenuation toward the null, in analyses combining both control groups. The levels of vitamins C and E associated with the protective effect were well above the current US Recommended Dietary Allowances. These findings support the hypothesis that antioxidant vitamins C and E from supplements are related to a reduced risk of ovarian cancer.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Dieta , Suplementos Dietéticos , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Ácido Ascórbico/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Política Nutricional , Oportunidad Relativa , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vitamina E/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA