RESUMEN
Reducing the volume of blood sampled from neonatal or paediatric patients is important to facilitate research in a group that is under-represented in clinical studies. Not all patients have a cannula available for blood sampling, meaning there are real advantages in obtaining a blood microsample by skin prick. In this study, the results obtained from both capillary microsamples (CMS) and a microfluidic (MF)-CMS by skin prick are compared to conventional plasma sampled from an arterial catheter in a clinical bridging study. Six critically ill patients receiving meropenem were included with the incurred sample reanalysis test meeting the acceptance criteria for both CMS (n = 24 samples) and MF-CMS (n = 20 samples). Bland-Altman plots comparing MF-CMS to conventional arterial blood sampling revealed a difference of - 12.7 ± 22.1% (mean ± standard deviation (SD), and comparing CMS to conventional arterial blood sampling a difference of - 3.4 ± 17.0%. At - 12.7%, the bias between MF-CMS and conventional sampling is greater than the bias found with CMS, although within the limit of acceptability for analytical accuracy (that being ± 15%). Samples collected by skin prick and using CMS produced meropenem concentrations that were comparable to those obtained from conventional arterial catheter sampling. CMS samples were found to be stable when stored in the capillary tube for 24 h at 5 °C or for 4 h at room temperature.
Asunto(s)
Recolección de Muestras de Sangre , Manejo de Especímenes , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/métodos , Niño , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Meropenem , PlasmaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the circulation lifespan of forks and teaspoons in an institutional tearoom. DESIGN: Longitudinal quality improvement study, based on prospective tracking of marked teaspoons and forks. SETTING: Staff tearoom in a public teaching and research hospital, Brisbane. PARTICIPANTS: Tearoom patrons blinded to the purposes of the study. INTERVENTION: Stainless steel forks and teaspoons (18 each) were marked with red spots and introduced alongside existing cutlery (81 items) in the tearoom. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Twice weekly count of marked forks and teaspoons for seven weeks; baseline and end of study count of all utensils on day 45. RESULTS: The loss of marked teaspoons (six of 18) was greater than that of forks (one of 18) by the conclusion of the study period (P = 0.038). The overall rate of utensil loss was 2.2 per 100 days for teaspoons and spoons, and -2.2 per 100 days for forks and knives. CONCLUSIONS: Teaspoon disappearance is a more substantial problem than fork migration in a multidisciplinary staff tearoom, and may reflect different kleptomaniacal or individual appropriation tendencies. If giving cutlery this Christmas, give teaspoons, not forks. The symbolism of fork rebirth or resurrection is appropriate for both Christmas and Easter, and forks are also mighty useful implements for eating cake!
Asunto(s)
Ingenio y Humor como Asunto , Utensilios de Comida y Culinaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacaciones y Feriados , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Personal de Hospital , Mejoramiento de la CalidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Early recognition and effective treatment of sepsis improves outcomes in critically ill patients. However, antibiotic exposures are frequently suboptimal in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. We describe the feasibility of the Bayesian dosing software Individually Designed Optimum Dosing Strategies (ID-ODS™), to reduce time to effective antibiotic exposure in children and adults with sepsis in ICU. METHODS: A multi-centre prospective, non-randomised interventional trial in three adult ICUs and one paediatric ICU. In a pre-intervention Phase 1, we measured the time to target antibiotic exposure in participants. In Phase 2, antibiotic dosing recommendations were made using ID-ODS™, and time to target antibiotic concentrations were compared to patients in Phase 1 (a pre-post-design). RESULTS: 175 antibiotic courses (Phase 1 = 123, Phase 2 = 52) were analysed from 156 participants. Across all patients, there was no difference in the time to achieve target exposures (8.7 h vs 14.3 h in Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively, p = 0.45). Sixty-one courses in 54 participants failed to achieve target exposures within 24 h of antibiotic commencement (n = 36 in Phase 1, n = 18 in Phase 2). In these participants, ID-ODS™ was associated with a reduction in time to target antibiotic exposure (96 vs 36.4 h in Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively, p < 0.01). These patients were less likely to exhibit subtherapeutic antibiotic exposures at 96 h (hazard ratio (HR) 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.05, p < 0.01). There was no difference observed in in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Dosing software may reduce the time to achieve target antibiotic exposures. It should be evaluated further in trials to establish its impact on clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Sepsis , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Teorema de Bayes , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Programas InformáticosRESUMEN
Background: Sepsis contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality globally. In Australia, 20,000 develop sepsis every year, resulting in 5,000 deaths, and more than AUD$846 million in expenditure. Prompt, appropriate antibiotic therapy is effective in improving outcomes in sepsis. Conventional culture-based methods to identify appropriate therapy have limited yield and take days to complete. Recently, nanopore technology has enabled rapid sequencing with real-time analysis of pathogen DNA. We set out to demonstrate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of pathogen sequencing direct from clinical samples, and estimate the impact of this approach on time to effective therapy when integrated with personalised software-guided antimicrobial dosing in children and adults on ICU with sepsis. Methods: The DIRECT study is a pilot prospective, non-randomized multicentre trial of an integrated diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm combining rapid direct pathogen sequencing and software-guided, personalised antibiotic dosing in children and adults with sepsis on ICU. Participants and interventions: DIRECT will collect microbiological and pharmacokinetic samples from approximately 200 children and adults with sepsis admitted to one of four ICUs in Brisbane. In Phase 1, we will evaluate Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION sequencing direct from blood in 50 blood culture-proven sepsis patients recruited from consecutive patients with suspected sepsis. In Phase 2, a further 50 consecutive patients with suspected sepsis will be recruited in whom MinION sequencing will be combined with Bayesian software-guided (ID-ODS) personalised antimicrobial dosing. Outcome measures: The primary outcome is time to effective antimicrobial therapy, defined as trough drug concentrations above the MIC of the pathogen. Secondary outcomes are diagnostic accuracy of MinION sequencing from whole blood, time to pathogen identification and susceptibility testing using sequencing direct from whole blood and from positive blood culture broth. Discussion: Rapid pathogen sequencing coupled with antimicrobial dosing software has great potential to overcome the limitations of conventional diagnostics which often result in prolonged inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. Reduced time to optimal antimicrobial therapy may reduce sepsis mortality and ICU length of stay. This pilot study will yield key feasibility data to inform further, urgently needed sepsis studies. Phase 2 of the trial protocol is registered with the ANZCTR (ACTRN12620001122943). Trial registration: Registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number ACTRN12620001122943.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Australia , Teorema de Bayes , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A bridging study is presented to investigate the applicability of measuring vancomycin concentrations obtained by finger-prick. A total of 25 paired plasma samples, collected from finger prick as capillary microsampling and arterial plasma samples collected from an indwelling cannula as conventional sampling, were obtained from critically ill patients receiving vancomycin. The maximum concentration (Cmax) and the minimum concentration (Cmin) measured were 66.2 mg/L and 29.7 mg/L for capillary microsampling and 78.9 mg/L, 25.6 mg/L for conventional sampling, respectively. The area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 6 h (AUC0-6h) ranged between 94.8 and 269 mg/L.h for capillary microsampling and from 106 and 303 mg/L.h for conventional sampling. The comparative study conducted was assessed using three different statistical approaches: Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok regression analyses and the USFDA criterion for the incurred sample reanalysis. The results of this analysis revealed no significant bias and a strong correlation between both sampling methods, with 95% of the calculated concentrations from the paired plasma samples laying within 20% of difference of the mean. This bridging study verifies that capillary microsampling may serve as an alternative to conventional sampling techniques to support clinical applications for measuring vancomycin concentrations in plasma.